50 bookmarks. First posted by aebraddy may 2018.
It is a new input in an argument—did plagues doom the Roman empire?—so careworn that even the 18th-century historian Edward Gibbon, who wrote 4,000 pages on Rome’s decline, wearied of debating it. And like the rest of the study, it will change how classicists like Seth Bernard go back to the primary sources.pestenoire from instapaper
may 2018 by fmgagnon
But for all those years, the source material for the arguments have remained largely the same. Archeologists can locate new sites and excavate for coins, plates, or jewelry; scholars can read and reread Roman writers like Cicero, Sallust, and Catullus, who all documented Caesar. These have been the techniques for learning about Rome for centuries, and they are indispensable. But lately, they have been joined by something new.
On Monday, scientists announced the discovery of an entirely new resource that has the potential to remake some of those centuries-old arguments over Roman politics and history. A team of archeologists, historians, and climate scientists have constructed a history of Rome’s lead pollution, which allows them to approximate Mediterranean economic activity from 1,100 b.c. to 800 a.d. They found it hiding thousands of miles from the Roman Forum: deep in the Greenland Ice Sheet, the enormous, miles-thick plate of ice that entombs the North Atlantic island.
In short, they have reconstructed year-by-year economic data documenting the rise and fall of the Roman Republic and Empire. The first news of the record was published Monday afternoon in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
may 2018 by lemeb
tags%history %science 2018 ancientworld ancient_history antiquity archaeology arctic artic chemistry climate climate_change empire for_griffin geology greenland history humanhistory ifttt interdisciplinary news newsletter pestenoire pocket pollution proxies reading.am research roman romans rome science scienceadvancement scienceignorance twitter