The Philosophy of the Oddball | The New Republic
This is the best explanation of what Cavell is trying to achieve, and naturally, it's by Richard Rorty:

Austin hoped to reimpress us with the truth of the old saw that philosophers kick up dust and then complain that they cannot see. But Austin did not press the further questions that fascinate Cavell: What compels them to kick up all that dust? Why do they want to talk so funny? Why are they not content to be, and speak, Ordinary? Why do they refuse to acknowledge the ordinary, human world? These questions amount to: Why do philosophers go in for skepticism? Why do they ask whether the table is really there, whether you might turn out to be a robot, whether you see what I see when we simultaneously remark the deep vermilion in the rose?

If one is not satisfied with the answer “It’s all they know how to do: they were taught to ask these questions in graduate school,” one will have to find some deeper significance in philosophical, Descartes-like skepticism (as opposed to practical, Montaigne-like skepticism). Finding such significance has been Cavell’s lifework, the central project of all his books.
Purity and Data - EPIC
alternative ways of thinking about data. 100j
Emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Leaders: Richard Socher, Salesforce
Profile of Richard Socher. The best line is this:

Socher goes on to explain what he sees as the 3 requirements for any successful AI endeavor: Data, algorithms, and workflow integration. Salesforce has the data, MetaMind and other machine learning teams at Salesforce develop the algorithms, but the workflow integration could be the most important ingredient and one that goes to the heart of Socher’s ambition, the practical implications of his research, its impact on the world.
moocs  artificial_intelligence 
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Coursera | Web Policy
jonathan mayer's exposure of Coursera's privacy holes
Platforms, publishers, and the uneasy alliance at the heart of journalism - Columbia Journalism Review
Thompson’s remarks are symptomatic of themes that recurred in our research. As platforms gather speed in squashing fake news, developing artificial intelligence applications, and hiring moderators or curators to restore some kind of order to their own businesses, they are opening a new front for conflict with not just existing press organizations but with governments, businesses, and activist groups both in the US and across the world.

The underlying business issues for journalism and the long-term decline of advertising support have not gone away, but they have ceased to be the only issue for editorial organizations and journalists. The “partnerships” we heard so much about in our research, and the very surprising access and closeness between some news organizations and platform companies, have an added dimension that goes far beyond economic consequences for publishers—and into fundamental questions about the type of market structure and protections needed for the operation of a free press.

Teaching  platformization 
5 days ago
Sex, drugs, and rhetoric: The case of flibanserin for ‘female sexual dysfunction’ - Judy Z Segal, 2018
100g; interesting case of how patients are mobilized in approval or disapproval of drugs
7 days ago
Personal Informatics for Sport
impact of self-tracking on sports; 100j
7 days ago
Why the Forced Error Does Not Get Its Due in Tennis - The New York Times
189; coming up with categories;

possible project: history of unforced errors and have they changed players' strategy?
11 days ago
A Flawed Elections Conspiracy Theory - POLITICO Magazine
100j. He says google doesn't do this. But it could be doing it unintentionally.
12 days ago
The case for quarantining extremist ideas | Joan Donovan and Dana Boyd | Opinion | The Guardian
The emphasis of strategic silence must be placed on the strategic over the silencing. Every story requires a choice and the recent turn toward providing equal coverage to dangerous, antisocial opinions requires acknowledging the suffering that such reporting causes. Even attempts to cover extremism critically can result in the media disseminating the methods that hate groups aim to spread, such as when Virginia’s Westmoreland News reproduced in full a local KKK recruitment flier on its front page. Media outlets who cannot argue that their reporting benefits the goal of a just and ethical society must opt for silence.

Newsrooms must understand that even with the best of intentions, they can find themselves being used by extremists. By contrast, they must also understand they have the power to defy the goals of hate groups by optimizing for core American values of equality, respect and civil discourse. All Americans have the right to speak their minds, but not every person deserves to have their opinions amplified, particularly when their goals are to sow violence, hatred and chaos.
15 days ago
The Darkness Before the Right - The Awl
great description of alt right and noreaction
18 days ago
« earlier      
2u abtesting academy accreditation advertising affect agile airbnb algorithms amazon america amplify analytics anonymous ant anthropology apple apps architecture artificial_intelligence asu automation badging baidu berkeley bigdata bitcoin blackboard blogging bollywood books boundary_work business business_model california canon capital capitalism career cars china cities cmoocsvsxmoocs cmu code coding cognition coldwar college community_college companies computational_social_science computer_science computing consulting controversies copyright corporation cost coursebuilder coursera credentialing crowdsourcing crowdwork cryptocurrency cs_education culture cybernetics data data_science dating davidson debates debt deeplearning demographics derivatives design design-decisions desire2learn development digital_learning digitalsts economic_growth economics ed education edx electionsproject email employment engineers engineervsinstructor entrepreneurship europe expertise expertisevsaggregation facebook fcc fiction finance fitness flipped_classroom forums funding futurism gender generalinterest gerrymandering google grading hackathon hackers hardware harvard hawkeye hci health higher higher_ed hindicinema history ibm india inequality information information_technology infrastructure innovation intel internet investments ip iraq isis islam java jira jobs journalism jurisdiction_contest keypoints khanacademy knewton labor language latour law lawenforcement learning_analytics learning_research licensing linguistics linkedin literature lms lyft machine_learning machinelearning management marijuana marketing markets marxism media medicalanthropology medicine meditation michigan microsoft misinformation mit mitx money moocs moodle motivatedreasoning motivation movies music myspace neoliberalism netflix netneutrality norms novels nsa nuclear nudging obama objectivity okcupid openedx opensource optimization ora pbs pearson pedagogy peer_grading performativity personal personalization philanthropy philosophy piketty platformization platformiztion polarization policy political_economy political_science political_theory politicaltheory politics pot prediction privacy productivity productivity-tips psychology public_discourse public_sphere publishing python quantifiedself quora reading regulation religion replicationcrisis research revenue robotics rorty scale scam school science sciencestudies sciencevspolitics security sharing_economy silicon_valley siliconvalley sjsu socialmedia socialpsychology socialscience socialtheory sociology software software_engineering softwarestudies softwarevscontent spam spoc spotify standardization stanford statistics stem_education stephenhawking sts studio supremecourt surveillance taxes teaching technical-help technological_progress technology technologyvspolitics television tennis texas tinder tips toblog tolisten tools toread towatch trading translation tripadvisor truecrime trump turing twitter uber udacity unread video visualization wallstreet watson web web2.0 webanalytics websearch whatsapp women workers workplace xblock xblocks youtube

Copy this bookmark: