petej + librarians   75

Vocational Awe and Librarianship: The Lies We Tell Ourselves – In the Library with the Lead Pipe
The problem with vocational awe is the efficacy of one’s work is directly tied to their amount of passion (or lack thereof), rather than fulfillment of core job duties. If the language around being a good librarian is directly tied to struggle, sacrifice, and obedience, then the more one struggles for their work, the “holier” that work (and institution) becomes. Thus, it will become less likely that people will feel empowered, or even able, to fight for a healthier workspace. A healthy workplace is one where working around the clock is not seen as a requirement, and where one is sufficiently compensated for the work done, not a workplace where “the worker [is] taken for granted as a cog in the machinery.”34

Libraries are just buildings. It is the people who do the work. And we need to treat these people well. You can’t eat on passion. You can’t pay rent on passion. Passion, devotion, and awe are not sustainable sources of income. The story of Saint Lawrence may be a noble one, but martyrdom is not a long-lasting career. And if all librarians follow in his footsteps, then librarianship will cease to exist. You might save a life when wandering outside for lunch, but you deserve the emotional support you’ll no doubt need as a result of that traumatic event. You may impress your supervisor by working late, but will that supervisor come to expect that you continually neglect your own family’s needs in the service of library patrons? The library’s purpose may be to serve, but is that purpose so holy when it fails to serve those who work within its walls every day? We need to continue asking these questions, demanding answers, and stop using vocational awe as the only way to be a librarian.
libraries  librarians  work  labour  vocation  pride  passion  exploitation 
january 2018 by petej
How librarians enable neoliberalism and inequality, and what we can do to resist it | Infoism
"In order to be consistent with our professional values and to work to create the conditions for an alternative to the dominant ideology that asserts information as a commodity, we must surely become “transformative librarians”? Rather than adopting the language and strategies of the dominant class, we should be challenging or rejecting it. The language of the market has become the dominant discourse within our profession, our libraries and higher education in general. We are too accommodating of neoliberal ideologies that are at odds with our ethical values. Remaining “neutral” is no longer an option. “Neutrality” makes us both accommodating intellectuals and enablers of the dominant ideology. Why should we enable an ideology that is in conflict with our values?

Neoliberalism is a corrosive, destructive ideology. It leads to an unequal society that transforms, without consent, citizens into consumers. Adopting the language of this dominant ideology legitimises and normalises it, ensuring a steady flow into the establishment of graduates “steeped in the norms of the dominant culture that ultimately controls the means of production” [Bales and Engle, PDF]. Rather than passively and uncritically accepting the use of terminology that is alien to our professional values, we should challenge its use and instead of accepting the language of the dominant ideology, we should offer students forms of alternative discourse that reject and challenge it. The prevalence of what Buschman terms as “business buzzwords” legitimise this dominant discourse and therefore cannot be considered neutral, but purely political. It is up to us to refuse to act as passive agents that reinforce the power of the dominant classes and to reject the legitimisation of language that act as tools of inequality. When neutrality reinforces a dominant ideology that runs counter to our values, we are no longer neutral. There is a choice before us: we either act as enablers or we act as transformative agents."
politics  neoliberalism  ideology  apparatus  libraries  information  commodification  marketisation  consumerism  ethics  language  librarians  dctagged  dc:creator=ClarkIan 
july 2014 by petej
What’s happening at Harvard? « Feral Librarian
Rather than serving to keep staff informed, they served primarily to created significant anxiety.
libraries  librarians  HarvardUniversity  cuts 
january 2012 by petej

related tags

academia  access  activism  ALA  ala2009  anti-capitalism  apartheid  apparatus  apprenticeships  authority  BeallJeffrey  BL  blogging  boycott  branding  BritishLibrary  capitalism  careers  catalogues  censorship  change  CILIP  clothes  codeOfConduct  collective  comedy  commodification  communication  communities  conference  conferences  confidence  consumerism  control  copyright  criticalTheory  culture  cuts  data  dc:creator=ClarkIan  dc:creator=HirstTony  dc:creator=PowellAndy  dc:creator=RuddockBethan  dc:creator=WalkPaul  dctagged  decentralisation  defamation  digitalHumanities  digitalLiteracy  diversity  DPLA  dress  dressCodes  DublinCore  education  EdwinMellenPress  elitism  employment  ethics  event  exploitation  freedomOfSpeech  future  gender  harassment  HarvardUniversity  HaydenCarla  higherEducation  Huddersfield  humour  identity  ideology  ili2011  individualism  information  informationLiteracy  informationTechnology  infrastructure  Internet  intersectionality  journalism  journals  KPMG  labour  language  legal  leisure  libel  librarians  librarianship  libraries  library  LibraryOfCongress  licences  licenses  licensing  linkedData  London  marketisation  metadata  misinformation  neoliberalism  news  NewYork  noise  noPlatform  ObamaBarack  occupyWallStreet  openAccess  overwork  ows  passion  pay  peerGroups  performance  performativity  pickets  piracy  politics  power  presentation  pride  privilege  professionalSocieties  publisher  publishers  publishing  quiet  race  racism  radicalism  radicallibs  radlib15  RDF  regulation  research  RLC  safeSpaces  scholarlyCommunication  search  sexism  skills  slides  SlideShare  slogans  SnowdenEdward  socialMedia  socialNetworking  software  speakers  standards  strikes  students  study  SwartzAaron  t-shirts  teamharpy  technology  television  textMining  tools  training  travel  Trello  trends  TrumpDonald  Twitter  UK  universities  USA  usability  VandeSompelHerbert  video  vocation  wages  Web  WebbRobert  weblogging  whistleblowers  whistleblowing  women  work  workLifeBalance  workshop  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: