nhaliday + complement-substitute   22

Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2018
Rust, Python, Go in top most loved
F#/OCaml most high paying globally, Erlang/Scala/OCaml in the US (F# still in top 10)
ML specialists high-paid
editor usage: VSCode > VS > Sublime > Vim > Intellij >> Emacs
ranking  list  top-n  time-series  data  database  programming  engineering  pls  trends  stackex  poll  career  exploratory  network-structure  ubiquity  ocaml-sml  rust  golang  python  dotnet  money  jobs  compensation  erlang  scala  jvm  ai  ai-control  risk  futurism  ethical-algorithms  data-science  machine-learning  editors  devtools  tools  pro-rata  org:com  software  analysis  article  human-capital  let-me-see  expert-experience  complement-substitute 
december 2018 by nhaliday
Complexity no Bar to AI - Gwern.net
Critics of AI risk suggest diminishing returns to computing (formalized asymptotically) means AI will be weak; this argument relies on a large number of questionable premises and ignoring additional resources, constant factors, and nonlinear returns to small intelligence advantages, and is highly unlikely. (computer science, transhumanism, AI, R)
created: 1 June 2014; modified: 01 Feb 2018; status: finished; confidence: likely; importance: 10
ratty  gwern  analysis  faq  ai  risk  speedometer  intelligence  futurism  cs  computation  complexity  tcs  linear-algebra  nonlinearity  convexity-curvature  average-case  adversarial  article  time-complexity  singularity  iteration-recursion  magnitude  multiplicative  lower-bounds  no-go  performance  hardware  humanity  psychology  cog-psych  psychometrics  iq  distribution  moments  complement-substitute  hanson  ems  enhancement  parable  detail-architecture  universalism-particularism  neuro  ai-control  environment  climate-change  threat-modeling  security  theory-practice  hacker  academia  realness  crypto  rigorous-crypto  usa  government 
april 2018 by nhaliday
Overcoming Bias : A Tangled Task Future
So we may often retain systems that inherit the structure of the human brain, and the structures of the social teams and organizations by which humans have worked together. All of which is another way to say: descendants of humans may have a long future as workers. We may have another future besides being retirees or iron-fisted peons ruling over gods. Even in a competitive future with no friendly singleton to ensure preferential treatment, something recognizably like us may continue. And even win.
ratty  hanson  speculation  automation  labor  economics  ems  futurism  prediction  complex-systems  network-structure  intricacy  thinking  engineering  management  law  compensation  psychology  cog-psych  ideas  structure  gray-econ  competition  moloch  coordination  cooperate-defect  risk  ai  ai-control  singularity  number  humanity  complement-substitute  cybernetics  detail-architecture  legacy  threat-modeling  degrees-of-freedom  composition-decomposition  order-disorder  analogy  parsimony  institutions  software  coupling-cohesion 
june 2017 by nhaliday
Oh, they were looking for their Missing Piece – spottedtoad
Assuming that the value of an offspring’s trait are determined by averaging the value of both parents and then adding some random error due to mutation or developmental noise, the ideal mate for each individual in the population isn’t the one that is closest to the ideal value, but one that is “complementary”- ie, equally distant from the ideal value, but from the opposite side.
ratty  unaffiliated  sapiens  evolution  sex  thinking  essay  genetic-load  speculation  spearhead  selection  models  equilibrium  parable  europe  mediterranean  history  literature  cartoons  wonkish  iron-age  myth  the-classics  assortative-mating  tails  extrema  matching  homo-hetero  complement-substitute  life-history  increase-decrease  signum  ecology  EGT 
january 2017 by nhaliday
Overcoming Bias : Two Kinds Of Status
prestige and dominance

More here. I was skeptical at first, but now am convinced: humans see two kinds of status, and approve of prestige-status much more than domination-status. I’ll have much more to say about this in the coming days, but it is far from clear to me that prestige-status is as much better than domination-status as people seem to think. Efforts to achieve prestige-status also have serious negative side-effects.

Two Ways to the Top: Evidence That Dominance and Prestige Are Distinct Yet Viable Avenues to Social Rank and Influence: https://henrich.fas.harvard.edu/files/henrich/files/cheng_et_al_2013.pdf
Dominance (the use of force and intimidation to induce fear) and Prestige (the sharing of expertise or know-how to gain respect)


According to the model, Dominance initially arose in evolutionary history as a result of agonistic contests for material resources and mates that were common among nonhuman species, but continues to exist in contemporary human societies, largely in the form of psychological intimidation, coercion, and wielded control over costs and benefits (e.g., access to resources, mates, and well-being). In both humans and nonhumans, Dominance hierarchies are thought to emerge to help maintain patterns of submission directed from subordinates to Dominants, thereby minimizing agonistic battles and incurred costs.

In contrast, Prestige is likely unique to humans, because it is thought to have emerged from selection pressures to preferentially attend to and acquire cultural knowledge from highly skilled or successful others, a capacity considered to be less developed in other animals (Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Laland & Galef, 2009). In this view, social learning (i.e., copying others) evolved in humans as a low-cost fitness-maximizing, information-gathering mechanism (Boyd & Richerson, 1985). Once it became adaptive to copy skilled others, a preference for social models with better than average information would have emerged. This would promote competition for access to the highest quality models, and deference toward these models in exchange for copying and learning opportunities. Consequently, selection likely favored Prestige differentiation, with individuals possessing high-quality information or skills elevated to the top of the hierarchy. Meanwhile, other individuals may reach the highest ranks of their group’s hierarchy by wielding threat of force, regardless of the quality of their knowledge or skills. Thus, Dominance and Prestige can be thought of as coexisting avenues to attaining rank and influence within social groups, despite being underpinned by distinct motivations and behavioral patterns, and resulting in distinct patterns of imitation and deference from subordinates.

Importantly, both Dominance and Prestige are best conceptualized as cognitive and behavioral strategies (i.e., suites of subjective feelings, cognitions, motivations, and behavioral patterns that together produce certain outcomes) deployed in certain situations, and can be used (with more or less success) by any individual within a group. They are not types of individuals, or even, necessarily, traits within individuals. Instead, we assume that all situated dyadic relationships contain differential degrees of both Dominance and Prestige, such that each person is simultaneously Dominant and Prestigious to some extent, to some other individual. Thus, it is possible that a high degree of Dominance and a high degree of Prestige may be found within the same individual, and may depend on who is doing the judging. For example, by controlling students’ access to rewards and punishments, school teachers may exert Dominance in their relationships with some students, but simultaneously enjoy Prestige with others, if they are respected and deferred to for their competence and wisdom. Indeed, previous studies have shown that based on both self- and peer ratings, Dominance and Prestige are largely independent (mean r = -.03; Cheng et al., 2010).

Status Hypocrisy: https://www.overcomingbias.com/2017/01/status-hypocrisy.html
Today we tend to say that our leaders have prestige, while their leaders have dominance. That is, their leaders hold power via personal connections and the threat and practice of violence, bribes, sex, gossip, and conformity pressures. Our leaders, instead, mainly just have whatever abilities follow from our deepest respect and admiration regarding their wisdom and efforts on serious topics that matter for us all. Their leaders more seek power, while ours more have leadership thrust upon them. Because of this us/them split, we tend to try to use persuasion on us, but force on them, when seeking to to change behaviors.


Clearly, while there is some fact of the matter about how much a person gains their status via licit or illicit means, there is also a lot of impression management going on. We like to give others the impression that we personally mainly want prestige in ourselves and our associates, and that we only grant others status via the prestige they have earned. But let me suggest that, compared to this ideal, we actually want more dominance in ourselves and our associates than we like to admit, and we submit more often to dominance.

Cads, Dads, Doms: https://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/07/cads-dads-doms.html
"The proper dichotomy is not “virile vs. wimpy” as has been supposed, but “exciting vs. drab,” with the former having the two distinct sub-groups “macho man vs. pretty boy.” Another way to see that this is the right dichotomy is to look around the world: wherever girls really dig macho men, they also dig the peacocky musician type too, finding safe guys a bit boring. And conversely, where devoted dads do the best, it’s more difficult for macho men or in-town-for-a-day rockstars to make out like bandits. …

Whatever it is about high-pathogen-load areas that selects for greater polygynous behavior … will result in an increase in both gorilla-like and peacock-like males, since they’re two viable ways to pursue a polygynous mating strategy."

This fits with there being two kinds of status: dominance and prestige. Macho men, such as CEOs and athletes, have dominance, while musicians and artists have prestige. But women seek both short and long term mates. Since both kinds of status suggest good genes, both attract women seeking short term mates. This happens more when women are younger and richer, and when there is more disease. Foragers pretend they don’t respect dominance as much as they do, so prestigious men get more overt attention, while dominant men get more covert attention.

Women seeking long term mates also consider a man’s ability to supply resources, and may settle for poorer genes to get more resources. Dominant men tend to have more resources than prestigious men, so such men are more likely to fill both roles, being long term mates for some women and short term mates for others. Men who can offer only prestige must accept worse long term mates, while men who can offer only resources must accept few short term mates. Those low in prestige, resources, or dominance must accept no mates. A man who had prestige, dominance, and resources would get the best short and long term mates – what men are these?

Stories are biased toward dramatic events, and so are biased toward events with risky men; it is harder to tell a good story about the attraction of a resource-rich man. So stories naturally encourage short term mating. Shouldn’t this make long-term mates wary of strong mate attraction to dramatic stories?

Woman want three things: someone to fight for them (the Warrior), someone to provide for them (the Tycoon) and someone to excite their emotions or entertain them (the Wizard).

In this context,

Dad= Tycoon
Cad= Wizard

To repeat:

Dom (Cocky)+ Dad (Generous) + Cad (Exciting/Funny) = Laid

There is an old distinction between "proximate" and "ultimate" causes. Evolution is an ultimate cause, physiology (and psychology, here) is a proximate cause. The flower bends to follow the sun because it gathers more light that way, but the immediate mechanism of the bending involves hormones called auxins. I see a lot of speculation about, say, sexual cognitive dimorphism whose ultimate cause is evolutionary, but not so much speculation about the proximate cause - the "how" of the difference, rather than the "why". And here I think a visit to an older mode of explanation like Marsden's - one which is psychological rather than genetic - can sensitize us to the fact that the proximate causes of a behavioral tendency need not be a straightforward matter of being hardwired differently.

This leads to my second point, which is just that we should remember that human beings actually possess consciousness. This means not only that the proximate cause of a behavior may deeply involve subjectivity, self-awareness, and an existential situation. It also means that all of these propositions about what people do are susceptible to change once they have been spelled out and become part of the culture. It is rather like the stock market: once everyone knows (or believes) something, then that information provides no advantage, creating an incentive for novelty.

Finally, the consequences of new beliefs about the how and the why of human nature and human behavior. Right or wrong, theories already begin to have consequences once they are taken up and incorporated into subjectivity. We really need a new Foucault to take on this topic.

The Economics of Social Status: http://www.meltingasphalt.com/the-economics-of-social-status/
Prestige vs. dominance. Joseph Henrich (of WEIRD fame) distinguishes two types of status. Prestige is the kind of status we get from being an impressive human specimen (think Meryl Streep), and it's governed by our 'approach' instincts. Dominance, on the other hand, is … [more]
things  status  hanson  thinking  comparison  len:short  anthropology  farmers-and-foragers  phalanges  ratty  duty  power  humility  hypocrisy  hari-seldon  multi  sex  gender  signaling  🐝  tradeoffs  evopsych  insight  models  sexuality  gender-diff  chart  postrat  yvain  ssc  simler  critique  essay  debate  paying-rent  gedanken  empirical  operational  vague  info-dynamics  len:long  community  henrich  long-short-run  rhetoric  contrarianism  coordination  social-structure  hidden-motives  politics  2016-election  rationality  links  study  summary  list  hive-mind  speculation  coalitions  values  🤖  metabuch  envy  universalism-particularism  egalitarianism-hierarchy  s-factor  unintended-consequences  tribalism  group-selection  justice  inequality  competition  cultural-dynamics  peace-violence  ranking  machiavelli  authoritarianism  strategy  tactics  organizing  leadership  management  n-factor  duplication  thiel  volo-avolo  todo  technocracy  rent-seeking  incentives  econotariat  marginal-rev  civilization  rot  gibbon 
september 2016 by nhaliday
Why Information Grows – Paul Romer
thinking like a physicist:

The key element in thinking like a physicist is being willing to push simultaneously to extreme levels of abstraction and specificity. This sounds paradoxical until you see it in action. Then it seems obvious. Abstraction means that you strip away inessential detail. Specificity means that you take very seriously the things that remain.

Abstraction vs. Radical Specificity: https://paulromer.net/abstraction-vs-radical-specificity/
books  summary  review  economics  growth-econ  interdisciplinary  hmm  physics  thinking  feynman  tradeoffs  paul-romer  econotariat  🎩  🎓  scholar  aphorism  lens  signal-noise  cartoons  skeleton  s:**  giants  electromag  mutation  genetics  genomics  bits  nibble  stories  models  metameta  metabuch  problem-solving  composition-decomposition  structure  abstraction  zooming  examples  knowledge  human-capital  behavioral-econ  network-structure  info-econ  communication  learning  information-theory  applications  volo-avolo  map-territory  externalities  duplication  spreading  property-rights  lattice  multi  government  polisci  policy  counterfactual  insight  paradox  parallax  reduction  empirical  detail-architecture  methodology  crux  visual-understanding  theory-practice  matching  analytical-holistic  branches  complement-substitute  local-global  internet  technology  cost-benefit  investing  micro  signaling  limits  public-goodish  interpretation  elegance  meta:reading  intellectual-property  writing 
september 2016 by nhaliday

related tags

2016-election  abstraction  academia  accelerationism  acm  acmtariat  adversarial  agriculture  ai  ai-control  alignment  allodium  altruism  amazon  analogy  analysis  analytical-holistic  anglosphere  anthropic  anthropology  antidemos  aphorism  api  apollonian-dionysian  apple  applications  arbitrage  aristos  arms  art  article  asia  assortative-mating  atmosphere  atoms  attention  authoritarianism  automation  autor  average-case  barons  behavioral-econ  behavioral-gen  being-becoming  benevolence  big-peeps  big-picture  bio  biodet  bioinformatics  biotech  bits  blockchain  books  bostrom  branches  brands  browser  build-packaging  business  business-models  california  cancer  canon  capital  capitalism  career  cartoons  causation  chart  checking  china  civil-liberty  civilization  class  class-warfare  clever-rats  client-server  climate-change  coalitions  coarse-fine  coding-theory  cog-psych  cold-war  collaboration  communication  community  comparison  compensation  competition  complement-substitute  complex-systems  complexity  composition-decomposition  computation  computer-vision  concrete  contracts  contradiction  contrarianism  convexity-curvature  cooperate-defect  coordination  corporation  correlation  corruption  cost-benefit  cost-disease  counterfactual  coupling-cohesion  courage  course  cracker-econ  creative  crime  CRISPR  critique  crooked  crux  crypto  cryptocurrency  cs  cultural-dynamics  cybernetics  cycles  cynicism-idealism  dark-arts  darwinian  data  data-science  database  death  debate  debt  decentralized  decision-making  decision-theory  deep-learning  deep-materialism  deepgoog  defense  definite-planning  definition  degrees-of-freedom  democracy  demographics  dennett  descriptive  desktop  detail-architecture  deterrence  devtools  dimensionality  direct-indirect  direction  dirty-hands  discussion  disease  distribution  dotnet  drama  drugs  duplication  duty  early-modern  ecology  econ-productivity  economics  econotariat  ecosystem  eden  eden-heaven  editors  education  EEA  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  EGT  einstein  electromag  elegance  elite  emergent  emotion  empirical  ems  ends-means  energy-resources  engineering  enhancement  entertainment  entrepreneurialism  environment  envy  equilibrium  erlang  essay  essence-existence  estimate  ethical-algorithms  ethics  europe  evolution  evopsych  examples  existence  expansionism  expert-experience  explanans  exploratory  explore-exploit  externalities  extra-introversion  extrema  facebook  faq  farmers-and-foragers  fashun  FDA  fermi  fertility  feudal  feynman  fiction  finance  flexibility  flux-stasis  focus  formal-values  frameworks  frisson  frontend  frontier  functional  futurism  gallic  games  gedanken  gender  gender-diff  genetic-load  genetics  genomics  geoengineering  geography  germanic  giants  gibbon  gnon  gnosis-logos  god-man-beast-victim  golang  google  government  gradient-descent  gray-econ  group-selection  growth-econ  gwern  hacker  hanson  happy-sad  hard-tech  hardware  hari-seldon  harvard  henrich  heterodox  heuristic  hidden-motives  high-dimension  high-variance  higher-ed  history  hive-mind  hmm  homo-hetero  honor  horror  hsu  human-capital  human-ml  humanity  humility  hypocrisy  ideas  impetus  impro  incentives  increase-decrease  individualism-collectivism  inequality  info-dynamics  info-econ  information-theory  innovation  insight  institutions  intel  intellectual-property  intelligence  interdisciplinary  interests  internet  interpretation  intervention  intricacy  intuition  investing  iq  iron-age  iteration-recursion  janus  japan  javascript  jobs  journos-pundits  judgement  justice  jvm  knowledge  krugman  labor  land  latin-america  lattice  law  leadership  learning  lecture-notes  left-wing  legacy  legibility  len:long  len:short  lens  let-me-see  letters  leviathan  libraries  life-history  limits  linear-algebra  links  list  literature  local-global  long-short-run  long-term  longevity  love-hate  lovecraft  lower-bounds  machiavelli  machine-learning  macro  magnitude  malaise  malthus  management  manifolds  map-territory  maps  marginal  marginal-rev  market-power  markets  martial  matching  math  math.CA  meaningness  measure  measurement  media  medicine  mediterranean  meta:reading  meta:war  metabuch  metameta  methodology  micro  microsoft  military  mobile  model-class  models  moloch  moments  monetary-fiscal  money  morality  mostly-modern  multi  multiplicative  musk  mutation  mystic  myth  n-factor  narrative  nationalism-globalism  nature  network-structure  networking  neuro  neuro-nitgrit  new-religion  news  nibble  nietzschean  nihil  no-go  noahpinion  noble-lie  nonlinearity  northeast  nuclear  number  nutrition  nyc  ocaml-sml  occident  offense-defense  old-anglo  open-closed  operational  optimate  optimism  optimization  order-disorder  org:anglo  org:biz  org:bleg  org:bv  org:com  org:foreign  org:junk  org:lite  org:local  org:mag  org:med  org:sci  organizing  orient  outcome-risk  outliers  parable  paradox  parallax  parasites-microbiome  parsimony  patience  paul-romer  paying-rent  peace-violence  people  performance  personality  pessimism  phalanges  pharma  philosophy  physics  planning  play  plots  pls  poast  polanyi-marx  polarization  policy  polisci  politics  poll  popsci  population  postrat  power  power-law  pre-ww2  prediction  primitivism  princeton  priors-posteriors  privacy  pro-rata  probability  problem-solving  programming  properties  property-rights  protocol-metadata  psych-architecture  psychology  psychometrics  public-goodish  python  q-n-a  quantitative-qualitative  quantum  questions  quotes  random  randy-ayndy  ranking  rationality  ratty  realness  reason  recruiting  red-queen  reddit  redistribution  reduction  reference  reflection  regularizer  regulation  reinforcement  relativity  religion  rent-seeking  responsibility  retention  review  revolution  rhetoric  rhythm  rigorous-crypto  risk  ritual  robotics  roots  rot  rust  s-factor  s:**  s:***  saas  safety  sapiens  scala  scale  scholar  science  scifi-fantasy  scitariat  search  securities  security  selection  sentiment  sex  sexuality  shakespeare  shift  signal-noise  signaling  signum  similarity  simler  simulation  singularity  sinosphere  skeleton  skunkworks  slides  social  social-choice  social-norms  social-psych  social-structure  sociality  society  socs-and-mops  software  space  spearhead  speculation  speed  speedometer  sports  spreading  ssc  stackex  stagnation  stanford  startups  state  statesmen  stats  status  stereotypes  stochastic-processes  stock-flow  stories  strategy  street-fighting  structure  study  stylized-facts  success  summary  survey  sv  synchrony  systems  tactics  tails  taxes  tcs  tech  technocracy  technology  telos-atelos  temperance  the-bones  the-classics  the-devil  the-founding  the-great-west-whale  the-self  the-watchers  the-west  theory-of-mind  theory-practice  theos  thick-thin  thiel  things  thinking  threat-modeling  time  time-complexity  time-preference  time-series  todo  tools  top-n  track-record  trade  tradeoffs  tradition  transportation  trends  tribalism  troll  trust  truth  turing  twitter  types  ubiquity  unaffiliated  uncertainty  unintended-consequences  universalism-particularism  unsupervised  urban-rural  us-them  usa  utopia-dystopia  vague  values  venture  visual-understanding  visualization  vitality  volo-avolo  war  wealth  web  welfare-state  whiggish-hegelian  whole-partial-many  wiki  winner-take-all  wisdom  within-without  wonkish  world  world-war  writing  X-not-about-Y  xenobio  yvain  zeitgeist  zero-positive-sum  zooming  🎓  🎩  🐝  🤖 

Copy this bookmark: