asterisk2a + traction   15

Pando: In the Valley, pre-seed is a meme. In New York, it’s a necessity
// cost of entry? // unable to make it happen? // Can't you write software from anywhere? // problem, heavily diluted early on approaching A/B, traditional shops don't like the cap table of pre-seed, angels, seed, accelerator & Micro VC's already owning ~+40% ... you come to a traditional A/B shop and not one of the existing investors is actually leading the round or committed in paper do double down? // // from a financial perspective/investment/math --- in the PRIVATE MARKET thrown under the bus by NIRP, QE, hunt for yield and FOMO (looking for their female unicorn or own Zuck) everyone can run 100 burger stands with unlimited/stellar returns in their spreadsheet model (bc cost of capital being 0 or negative). Despite the deflation of price of software & hosting (marginal cost, economics of abundance), Talent got bid up heavily (+200k/y in LA by Snapchat) in certain cities (SV, NY, London) // &! Steen Jakobsen - - min 16 avg guy does not have access to credit!
Seed  Round  Party  Round  Venture  Capital  Micro  VC  barriers  to  entry  cost  of  entry  London  Start-up  Scene  ecosystem  New  York  Scene  burn  rate  runway  traction  A  Round  seedfunding  funding  Angel  Investor  dilution  cap  table  lesson  advice  liquidation  preferences  hunt  for  yield  2015  distortion  FOMO  equity  bubble  credit  bubble  ZIRP  NIRP  QE  asset  allocation  Limited  Partners  monetary  policy  fiscal  policy  Wall  Street  asset  bubble  behavioral  finance  behavioral  economics  Silicon  Valley  Private  Market  Public  Market  reflate  reflation  cost  of  living  valuation  Unicorn  Decacorn  cost  of  leverage  financial  repression  financial  literacy  financial  financial  cycle  business  cycle  business  confidence  consumer  confidence  hubris  panic  irrational  exuberance  retail  banking  investment  banking  fractional  reserve  banking  banking  crisis 
september 2015 by asterisk2a
#TOA Interview with Fred Wilson & Brad Burnham of Union Square Ventures - YouTube
mi 32 - lack of adoption of SV model: no politics, execution, results driven, value creation, accepting Failure as outcome (culture of Stigma in EU and Germany) // min 36 - oh hi there world - buy into the company! a partner, strategic joint venture. shared economic interest, own platform by publishers! // miss-allocation of capital ! // hard things about hard things - Pivot, layoff vs running out of money not finding product/market fit & traction // early on its only hunch & gut based. // #TOA15: ¨Are the Germans Unable to Disrupt?¨ with Christoph Keese (Axel Springer SE) - - its abt value creation, value add, redesigning of value, chains, product, data. Big corps cant disrupt itself. especially not by committee. Legacy companies unlikely 2 survive bc of patterns 2 stick 2 the conventional & fail than fail with unconventional & look like a fool (risk aversion, Failure in the public eye). Book "Silicon Valley: Was aus dem mächtigsten Tal der Welt auf uns zukommt"
Europe  Start-Up  Scene  Berlin  Start-Up  Scene  Failure  incrementalism  incremental  value  creation  added  value  Core  Product  Proposition  intangible  value  Mittelstand  SME  SMB  Proposition  Venture  Capital  oh  hi  there  world  Fred  Wilson  London  Scene  Wall  Street  shareholder  value  profit  maximisation  book  ecosystem  distortion  asset  allocation  Germany  Europe  industrial  policy  Revolution  2.0  STEM  3D  printing  Software  Is  Eating  The  automation  automotive  Big  Data  Robotics  business  consumer  disrupting  markets  disruption  creative  destruction  Pivot  Product/Market  Fit  traction  self-awareness  MVP  Minimal  Viable  Product  Lean  Start-Up  timing  Internet  Privacy  Privacy 
august 2015 by asterisk2a
Online Lenders Facing Marketing War — The Information
Too many companies offering similar services in online lending is driving up the cost of customer acquisition. Some feel higher marketing costs could lead to a shakeout in the industry, particularly affecting smaller competitors.
FinTech  customer  acquisition  NPL  wonga  burn  rate  traction  word  of  mouth  Net  Promoter  Score  banking  runway  LTCV  marketing  advertising 
august 2015 by asterisk2a
Pando: Lessons from the startup graveyard
The startup grim reaper is time. Money buys you time; burn rate takes it away. // & avc - investing money into distribution before MVP/Product/Market Fit (traction, great net promoter score, word of mouth, social media sharing, email sharing, steady self-runner) is a waste. why pour gasoline on a non-existing fire, down the drain, never recoverable, no ROI!?!?
Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  burn  rate  runway  MVP  Product/Market  Fit  Minimal  Viable  Product  traction  user  churn  user  acquisition  customer  retention  customer  acquisition  Net  Promoter  Score  word  of  mouth  Social  Media  KPI  OKR 
august 2015 by asterisk2a
The Traction Book: 5 Steps To Traction & Business Growth
product distribution is part of start-up failure, find and focus 2-3 great distribution channels - test hypothesis what channels should work - evaluate (measure), why or why not, ... figure out what works, [keep moving. if you stop moving, you will fail]. double down on what works. test, test, test. spend time - 50/50 - marketing/product early on. find a great distribution strategy! traction. have goals determin your action. without a goal you cant score. focus on activities that move you forward towards the goal. // Justin Mares, Co-Author, Traction, Startup Grind Ottawa - &! Startup Metrics Toronto December 2014 - Justin Mares on User Onboarding -
book  Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  traction  growth  hacking  growth  hacker  viral  coefficient  Net  Promoter  Score  Product/Market  Fit  MVP  Core  Product  Value  Proposition  Value  Proposition  Minimal  Viable  Product  marketing  advertisement  affiliate  marketing  content  marketing  Lean  Start-Up  A/B  Testing  marketing  channel  distribution  strategy  conversion  user  acquisition  PR  public  relations  brand  awareness  user  engagement  user  generated  content  user  churn  customer  retention  customer  acquisition 
july 2015 by asterisk2a
#TOA14 Interview with Julie Meyer (CEO & Founder, Ariadne Capital) - YouTube
(1) why not to go to Palo Alto (2) money will find you if you are good enough/traction. // &! Enterprise Connect Presents: Raising Finance; Top Tips From Industry Experts (Highlights) - // &! Lecture 9 How to Raise Money Marc Andreessen, Ron Conway, Parker Conrad -
Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  traction  Focus  Product/Market  Fit  MVP  Minimal  Viable  Product  viral  coefficient  Net  Promoter  Score  network  effect  Venture  Capital  hunt  for  yield  Seed  Round  A  Round  Angel  Investor  London  Scene  Berlin  Start-Up  Scene  Networking 
july 2015 by asterisk2a
The frustrating, no-win "Goldilocks Zone" of seed deals
Don’t do party rounds. Raise as much as you possibly can so you don’t get crunched. Don’t raise money from just seed funds. Don’t raise money from just big name VCs unless you know you’ll breakthrough, and then absolutely do. And actually you never know that, so nevermind. Oh, and good luck rationalizing all of this advice, first timers. [...] TL;DR version: Large VC firms may do lots of seed deals but each partner will only do one to two Series A deals a year. So basic math tells you it’s a game of survivor. Most of the seed deals will not get a Series A from that firm. The concern is if you don’t quite make the cut, is the signal so bad to other VCs that you are worse off than if you never raised that, say, $200k from a big name VC to begin with? [ not every product consumer or b2b will not be a 500m/1bn dollar company, thus it's not worth it to raise risk capital and just grind it out!? at a sustainable pace, putting back in what you earned. ] &!
Seed  Round  Party  Round  Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  Angel  Investor  Micro  VC  Venture  Capital  Series  A  seedround  seedfunding  traction  business  model  Silicon  Valley  economies  of  scale  pageviews  Unicorn  valuation  speculative  bubbles  speculative  speculation 
july 2015 by asterisk2a
Gillmor Gang: Money for Nothing - Gillmor Gang | TechCrunch TV
min 42 // A Round is now a "post-traction" investment aka proven product & business model. A Round is an investment to scale it up, put it up a bunch of gears. // Keith Teare from ( people now doing pre-seed, seed, seed prime & bridge funding via existing investors; figuring out Product/Market fit, traction, funnel, etc. Now more than ever a hits driven business. // see also // Complexity of phenomenon - symptoms, causes and tangents; biases, selection bias, pattern matching, bidding up hot deals in the private market where the highest bidder will get the deal - irrationality of accepting those valuations and the founders Unicorn-status need, hunt for yield, trendy - the future, when doing 'hard things' becomes fashionable (ie Reality TV, TV Series & a shallow Channel 4's How To Be A Young Billionaire) then beware, negative yields for secure investments (bonds and corp debt), perceived 'conservative' value vs private bid up bubble potential.
Seed  Round  A  Round  traction  hunt  for  yield  ZIRP  NIRP  QE  unintended  consequences  Silicon  Valley  asset  bubble  asset  allocation  behavioral  finance  bond  bubble  bubbles  equity  bubble  demographic  bubble  secular  stagnation  complexity  growth  Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  pattern  matching  selection  bias  confirmation  bias  bias  Unicorn  Wall  Street  Private  Mutual  Fund  Hedge  Fund  Venture  Capital  savings  glut  productive  investment  business  model  Snapchat  WhatsApp  Instagram  Slack  Uber  productivity  output  gap  STEM  Share  Economy  Services  Industry  Niedriglohnsektor  incomplete  information  economic  history  marginal  cost  liquidity  trap  sovereign  debt  crisis  debt  bubble  zombie  banks  zombie  consumer  zombie  corporations  structural  imbalance  global  imbalances  faultlines  Product/Market  Fit  value  creation  1000  True  Fans  Core  Product  Proposition  differentiate  differentiation 
april 2015 by asterisk2a
What you label your funding round matters a lot less than how much you raise and what you accomplish | PandoDaily
It’s not inherently wrong to skip a Seed round altogether, or to raise a Seed so large that your next round effectively becomes a B round. But where the issue arises is in choosing such a path and not knowing you’re on it, and thus failing to deliver accordingly. Putting aside the occasional exceptions of outlier companies, proven repeat founders, and the like, there’s a predictable cadence to startup funding and the expectations that VCs set at each stage along the way. If you want to play the game, you have to know the rules.
Venture  Capital  Seed  Round  Series  A  Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  traction  growth 
april 2015 by asterisk2a
Why Jeff Clavier insists there’s no Series A Crunch | PandoDaily
It wasn’t that VCs were going to do fewer Series A deals than they have in the past. It was because there was a limit to how many more Series A deals the industry could do in a given year, since most VCs only do one to two deals per year. The explosion of incubators, angels, and seed funds meant there would be thousands more companies [ <100's with serious traction, seriously ] vying for those one or two yeses per partner per year. [...] [...] Clavier pushes his companies to raise ginormous seed rounds– way more than they think they want. He’ll routinely talk an entrepreneur who just wants to raise $750k into more than doubling that. Cynics could say this pushes an entrepreneur to give away more ownership at a higher early price and have less control, but the logic is that seeds are the only place where there’s a glut of money and you don’t have to prove a lot to get it. Load up while you can. That gives the company enough room that it can hit momentum .... &
Silicon  Valley  Venture  Capital  Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  Seed  Round  traction  execution  A  Round 
april 2015 by asterisk2a
(12) What are the early symptoms that a startup is going to fail? - Quora
6.) A desire for perfection. Perfection kills. The things that your early adopters care about? Those should be awesome. Everything else? Fuck it. A team that has a hard time being pragmatic will spend a lot of their time and money on shit that doesn't matter. And that will keep them from getting the product out early enough to get useful feedback. [...] 10.) Teams that know that they don't know much: generally awesome. Teams that think they know it all? Very dangerous.
Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  Lean  Start-Up  traction  Net  Promoter  Score  user  experience  user  churn  user  acquisition  viral  coefficient  Minimal  Viable  Product  Product/Market  Fit 
october 2014 by asterisk2a
Peter Thiel über Facebook, Deutschland und Asperger - SPIEGEL ONLINE
Konkurrenz ist schlecht. Monopole sind gut. Echter Fortschritt entsteht nicht dort, wo sich Menschen gegeneinander durchsetzen müssen. Sondern dort, wo Menschen sich dem Wettbewerb entziehen. Wo sie den Mut zu eigenen Ideen haben, die sich nicht leicht kopieren lassen. Sich gegen starke Konkurrenz durchzusetzen gelte gemeinhin als Zeichen der Stärke, so Thiel, "aber in Wahrheit ist Konkurrenz was für Verlierer. Wer Konkurrenz will, macht am besten ein Restaurant auf, da hat er reichlich davon." [...] "Viele erfolgreiche Silicon-Valley-Gründer scheinen an einer milden Form des Asperger-Syndroms zu leiden". Diese Krankheit könne es leichter machen, an technologischen oder unternehmerischen Ideen unbeirrt festzuhalten, selbst wenn andere sie schräg finden - weil man die Ablehnung gar nicht mitbekäme. Das Gegenteil sieht Thiel an der Harvard Business School: Dort wimmele es von kommunikationsstarken, aufgeschlossenen Typen, "die überhaupt keine Ideen haben".
Peter  Thiel  Competition  monopoly  oligopoly  oligopol  profit  maximisation  Asperger  aspergers  rejection  Start-Up  advice  Start-Up  lesson  traction  Berlin  Start-Up  Scene  Europe  Start-Up  Scene  London  Scene 
september 2014 by asterisk2a
Drowning in venture capital, mobile startups are waging unsustainable price wars | PandoDaily
upside of this up-cycle/up-business cycle? everyone with a little bit of chops and a MVP with little bit of traction can get capital. Downside? Everyone spends their capital. Would never happen in a down cycle. Down cycles are great, you've got more time to build a great team, product and brand. .... "[L]ook at ecommerce 2.0 companies like Fab and EcoMom who blew millions in capital acquiring customers at unsustainable rates, hoping for some magic lifetime customer value to justify the spending. (It didn’t.) “There’s a tension between growing fast enough and having a disastrous bottom line,” Jeff Clavier, Founder of SoftTech VC, says. Clavier was an early investor in Fab, among others playing this game. “If you don’t have growth you’re stuck, but if you have growth with economics not viable in the long term, [you’re making] a real bet that you’ll be funded nevertheless.” [...] companies aren’t developing a sustainable business model. [Freemium works better with Software Product.]
Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  Lean  Start-Up  VC  Venture  Capital  hunt  for  yield  growth  round  Uber  Lyft  sustainable  sustainability  customer  acquisition  customer  retention  2014  asset  bubble  bubble  Silicon  Valley  Palo  Alto  San  Francisco  business  model  business  plan  user  experience  user  expectations  Amazon  Zappos  free  freemium  SAAS  on-demand  mobile  services  Industry  mobile  first  Uber  for  X  Groupon  Berlin  Start-Up  Scene  Europe  Start-Up  Scene  London  Start-Up  Scene  me  too  price  war  commoditization  commodity  business  differentiation  differentiate  brand  brands  branding  indefensible  values  defensible  values  business  management  management  economics  frictionless  friction  rackspace  training  your  customer  growth  crutch  growth  hacker  traction  Value  Proposition  long-term  thinking  long-term  view 
july 2014 by asterisk2a
A Fireside Chat Jason Calacanis - YouTube
>> be short, sharp, compelling, have at least a mock-up if not better a MVP, or even better a product w traction. DONT ASK INVESTORS WHAT THE HAVE LEAST, TIME. ... and no dissing of unicorns (billion dollar exist, business),
Jason  Calacanis  Start-Up  lesson  Start-Up  advice  focused  focus  execution  communication  Unicorn  MVP  Minimal  Viable  Product  Hustle  billion  dollar  exit  Venture  Capital  VC  angelinvestors  angelinvestor  seedround  seedfunding  traction 
june 2014 by asterisk2a

related tags

2.0  3D  A  A/B  acquisition  added  advertisement  advertising  advice  affiliate  allocation  Alto  Amazon  Angel  angelinvestor  angelinvestors  Asperger  aspergers  asset  automation  automotive  awareness  banking  banks  barriers  behavioral  Berlin  bias  Big  billion  bond  book  brand  branding  brands  bubble  bubbles  burn  business  Calacanis  cap  Capital  channel  churn  coefficient  commoditization  commodity  communication  Competition  complexity  confidence  confirmation  consequences  consumer  content  conversion  Core  corporations  cost  creation  creative  credit  crisis  crutch  customer  cycle  Data  debt  Decacorn  defensible  demographic  destruction  differentiate  differentiation  dilution  disrupting  disruption  distortion  distribution  dollar  Eating  economic  economics  economies  Economy  ecosystem  effect  engagement  entry  equity  Europe  execution  exit  expectations  experience  exuberance  Failure  Fans  faultlines  finance  financial  FinTech  first  fiscal  Fit  focus  focused  FOMO  for  fractional  Francisco  Fred  free  freemium  friction  frictionless  Fund  funding  gap  generated  Germany  global  glut  Groupon  growth  hacker  hacking  Hedge  hi  history  hubris  hunt  Hustle  imbalance  imbalances  incomplete  incremental  incrementalism  indefensible  industrial  Industry  inflection  information  Instagram  intangible  Internet  investment  Investor  irrational  Is  Jason  Jobs  KPI  Lean  lesson  leverage  Limited  liquidation  liquidity  literacy  living  London  long-term  LTCV  Lyft  management  marginal  Market  marketing  markets  matching  maximisation  me  Media  Micro  Minimal  Mittelstand  mobile  model  monetary  monopoly  mouth  Mutual  MVP  Net  network  Networking  New  Niedriglohnsektor  NIRP  NPL  of  oh  OKR  oligopol  oligopoly  on-demand  output  pageviews  Palo  panic  Partners  Party  pattern  Peter  Pivot  plan  Point  policy  PR  preferences  price  printing  Privacy  Private  Product  Product/Market  productive  productivity  profit  Promoter  Proposition  public  QE  rackspace  rate  reflate  reflation  rejection  relations  repression  reserve  retail  retention  Revolution  Robotics  round  runway  SAAS  San  savings  scale  Scene  Score  secular  Seed  seedfunding  seedround  selection  self-awareness  Series  services  Share  shareholder  Silicon  Slack  SMB  SME  Snapchat  Social  Software  sovereign  speculation  speculative  stagnation  Start-Up  Start-up  STEM  Steve  strategy  Street  structural  sustainability  sustainable  table  tenacity  Testing  The  there  Thiel  thinking  timing  Tipping  to  too  traction  training  trap  True  Uber  Unicorn  unintended  user  Valley  valuation  value  values  VC  Venture  Viable  view  viral  Wall  war  WhatsApp  Wilson  wonga  word  world  X  yield  York  your  Zappos  ZIRP  zombie 

Copy this bookmark: