asterisk2a + robotics + meritocracy   5

Does The Myth of Meritocracy show us how to alleviate inequality?
No debate about social mobility is complete without reference to the supposedly halcyon days of the 1950s and 1960s. The class fluidity of those decades, however, was not the result of professions becoming more meritocratic. It was caused by an unprecedented rise in the number of middle-class jobs: there was more room at the top. [...] Bloodworth writes that 21st-century society is characterised by a dwindling of professional jobs and more people slipping downwards: there is “more room at the bottom”. [...] Globalisation has created what the economist Robert H Frank calls “winner-takes-all” markets
downward  mobility  social  mobility  income  mobility  inequality  Paul  Mason  book  post-capitalism  James  Bloodworth  Gini  coefficient  income  distribution  structural  unemployment  long-term  unemployment  skill  gap  skills  gap  skill  mismatch  skill-biased  technological  change  AI  artificial  intelligence  globalisation  globalization  rising  middleclass  squeezed  middle  class  BRIC  Manufacturing  economic  history  sociology  Brexit  Identitypolitics  Identitätspolitik  career  ladder  education  bubble  education  cost  autonomous  car  autonomous  cars  self-driving  cars  augmented  intelligence  Robotics  Robots  automation  neoclassical  economics  Chicago  School  trickle-down  economics  trickle-down  effect  1%  10%  20%  working  poor  Precariat  credit  card  credit  card  debt  consumerism  consumerist  austerity  bank  bailout  capitalism  in  crisis  neoliberal  neoliberalism  crony  capitalism  tax  evasion  tax  avoidance  Baby  Boomers  babyboomers  Elizabeth  Warren  Joseph  Stiglitz  poverty  trap  poverty  child  poverty  rentier  rent-seeking  winner  take  all  monopoly  monopsony  conglomerate  multinational  Toff  Privileged  Establishment  No  Representation  Politicians  career  politician  Centrist  meritocracy  meritocratic  plutocracy  oligarchy  capitalism 
july 2016 by asterisk2a
The Growth Trap
[ growing for growth sake! vs growing in a world/area that is not conducive to grow ] When Twitter went public in 2013, its stock soared and its value jumped to $25 billion. Its founders and early investors got rich. But since then, the company has been considered a failure, despite the fact that it boasts 320 million active users, because it's not growing fast enough. Douglas Rushkoff, author of "Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus: How Growth Became the Enemy of Prosperity," talks to Steve Paikin about why he sees the push for more growth as dangerous. // true capitalists (shareholder, crony, greedy) w/o self-regulation or governance extract all the value there is to extract and then leave, dispersing it to the few who already have [...] WE MUST REWRITE THE RULES OF THE GROWTH GAME ITSELF! [...] you want to optimise the economy based on velocity of money (circulation of money), not share price and value extraction [...]
Venture  Capital  Unicorn  shareholder  capitalism  Greed  shareholder  value  profit  maximisation  profit  maximization  Wall  Street  Wall  Street  activists  Yahoo!  Google  Inc.  Alphabet  Inc.  Microsoft  IBM  Intel  Oracle  capitalism  exploitation  Super  Rich  short-termism  short-term  thinking  1%  plutocracy  oligarchy  M&A  economic  growth  growth  round  Mutual  Fund  macroeconomic  policy  secular  stagnation  Private  Equity  MBO  Pivot  IPO  dividends  prosperity  Start-Ups  Start-up  s&p500  pension  scheme  pension  finite  resources  resource  depletion  economic  history  creative  destruction  share  buyback  Apple  capitalism  in  crisis  capitalist  Uber  monopoly  oligopol  oligopoly  antitrust  corruption  western  world  squeezed  middle  class  emerging  middle  class  BRIC  business  cycle  company  book  cost  center  overhead  costcutting  operating  performance  operating  margin  globalisation  globalization  Universal  Basic  Income  artificial  intelligence  AI  augmented  intelligence  Robotics  automation  structural  unemployment  materialism  consumerism  status  anxiety  disenfranchise  disenfranchised  youth  unemployment  post-capitalism  Mobile  Banlieue  deprivation  poverty  trap  poverty  meritocracy  meritocratic  Gini  value  coefficie 
april 2016 by asterisk2a
TWiST - E622 by TWiStartups
when displaced through technology "labour will find eventually more productive uses." // creative cognitive non-repetitive work is safe // more bounty // have to have social safety net! general welfare "complex issue" to tax the 1% for that ... // 40:50 Pakistan, Drone Warfare, one hand does x other hand does y ... see PBS Frontline on Iraq war. Also Fahrenheit 9/11. Cablegate. harbouring taliban, al-quaida, refuge and supplying them.
automation  Robotics  AI  artificial  intelligence  augmented  intelligence  self-driving  cars  autonomous  car  Mobile  Creatives  Mobile  Creative  creativity  standard  of  living  economic  history  book  Gini  coefficient  meritocracy  meritocratic  American  Dream  inequality  income  distribution  squeezed  middle  class  wage  stagnation  secular  stagnation  income  redistribution  welfare  state  social  safety  net  food  poverty  poverty  trap  child  poverty  poverty  free  market  trickle-down  economics  neoliberalism  neoliberal  fairness  tax  evasion  tax  avoidance  Generationengerechtigkeit  neoconservatism  neoconservatives  Career  Politicians  No  Representation  plutocracy  oligarchy  Super  Rich  1% 
february 2016 by asterisk2a
Will Advances in Technology Create a Jobless Future? | MIT Technology Review
Who Will Own the Robots? - We’re in the midst of a jobs crisis, and rapid advances in AI and other technologies may be one culprit. How can we get better at sharing the wealth that technology creates? // BY MARTIN FORD - The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them BY JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ &! Inequality: What Can Be Done? BY ANTHONY B. ATKINSON &! The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies BY ERIK BRYNJOLFSSON AND ANDREW MCAFEE // &! Paul Krugman - “A lot of what’s happening [in income inequality] is not just the gods of technology telling us what must happen but is in fact [due to] social constructs that could be different.” - gov policy, corporate policy (ie 4-day work week and 6-hour days because productivity and profit margin do allow for that, and more brings diminished returns etc etc but will that go down well with Wall Street?)
Universal  Basic  Income  tax  evasion  tax  avoidance  crony  capitalism  shared  economic  interest  AI  Software  Is  Eating  The  World  marketplace  efficiencies  mobile  homescreen  mobile  phone  commodity  business  commoditization  Service  Sector  Jobs  Niedriglohnsektor  Future  of  Work  Creatives  Creative  skill-biased  technological  change  skills  gap  skill  mismatch  education  policy  Makers  4-day  week  6-hour  day  productivity  output  gap  secular  stagnation  squeezed  middle  class  working  poor  precarious  1099  Economy  Gig  Economy  self-employment  Zero  Hour  Contract  Contractor  on-demand  convenience  outsourcing  job  creation  job  market  labour  economics  labour  market  neoliberalism  neoliberal  Wall  Street  profit  maximisation  shareholder  value  capitalism  inequality  capital  gains  1%  Super  Rich  meritocracy  meritocratic  tax  code  tax  tax  free  welfare  state  tax  credit  Public  Services  Social  Services  austerity  dogma  manufactured  consent  propaganda  populism  lobbyist  lobby  Lobbying  PR  spin  doctor  Robotics  3D  printing  Manufacturing  STEM  industrial  policy  automation  self-driving  cars  autonomous  car  marginal  cost  economics  of  abundance  safety  net  Gini  inequality  technological  technological  labour  capital 
august 2015 by asterisk2a
We Are All Venture Capitalists Now | TechCrunch
In Mediocristan, you work fixed hours for a fixed wage. In Extremistan, success is enormously lucrative, but failure is far more common … and, for artists, condemns you to a life of grinding poverty and/or working outside of your chosen field. Of course tech startups also live in Extremistan. So too does venture capital itself, a meta-tournament of picking winners, in which enough money is (hopefully) made from the few big hits to outweigh the inevitable failures– –and so too will we all, soon enough. I’ve argued before that, because software is eating the world, “technology is slowly dragging us all, economically, away from Mediocristan and into Extremistan.” The power of software is such that it gives ever-smaller numbers of people ever-greater leverage. Meanwhile, much of yesterday’s rote Mediocristan work can and will be automated tomorrow. As a result, our economies are moving (slowly, in fits and starts) to a power-law Extremistan future. [ Seth Godin "be remarkable" ]
Venture  Capital  Software  Is  Eating  The  World  Future  of  Work  Mobile  Creatives  Mobile  Creative  Robotics  automation  squeezed  middle  class  working  poor  precarious  Precariat  3D  printing  algorithm  marketplace  marketplace  efficiencies  Share  Economy  shareholder  value  Wall  Street  profit  maximisation  Services  Industry  Niedriglohnsektor  service  service  Sector  Jobs  on-demand  convenience  Gini  coefficient  social  mobility  income  mobility  Universal  Basic  meritocracy  meritocratic  American  Dream  self-employment  contractor  Zero  Hour  Contract  Zeitarbeit  STEM  Germany  Western  World  secular  stagnation  globalisation  globalization  flat  borderless  freelancing  freelance  competitive  competitiveness  competition  education  policy  Career  Politicians  protectionism  Makers  policy  folly  policy  error  No  Representation  volatility  complexity  uncertainty  Super  Rich  1%  Extremistan  tournament  ivyleague  Privileged  Establishment  welfare  welfare  state  social  safety  net  USA  UK  productivity  output  gap  GFC  Silicon  Valley  Angel  Investor  Seth  Godin  sethgodin  differentiate  differentiation  entrepreneurial  entrepreneurship  entrepr 
april 2015 by asterisk2a

related tags

1%  3D  4-day  6-hour  10%  20%  Abstieg  abundance  activists  AI  algorithm  all  Alphabet  American  Angel  antitrust  anxiety  Apple  artificial  augmented  austerity  automation  autonomous  avoidance  Baby  babyboomers  bailout  bank  Banlieue  Basic  Bloodworth  book  Boomers  borderless  Brexit  BRIC  bubble  business  buyback  capital  capitalism  capitalist  car  card  career  cars  center  Centrist  change  Chicago  child  class  code  coefficient  commoditization  commodity  company  competition  competitive  competitiveness  complexity  conglomerate  consent  consumerism  consumerist  Contract  contractor  convenience  corporate  corruption  cost  costcutting  creation  creative  Creatives  creativity  credit  crisis  crony  cycle  day  debt  depletion  deprivation  destruction  differentiate  differentiation  disenfranchise  disenfranchised  distribution  dividends  doctor  dogma  Douglas  downward  Dream  Eating  economic  economics  Economy  education  effect  efficiencies  Elizabeth  emerging  entrepreneur  entrepreneurial  entrepreneurship  Equity  error  Establishment  evasion  exploitation  Extremistan  fairness  finite  flat  folly  food  free  freelance  freelancing  Fund  Future  gains  gap  generational  Generationengerechtigkeit  Germany  GFC  Gig  Gini  globalisation  globalization  Godin  Google  governance  Greed  growth  history  homescreen  Hour  human  IBM  Identitypolitics  Identitätspolitik  in  Inc.  income  industrial  Industry  inequality  Intel  intelligence  interest  Investor  IPO  Is  ivyleague  James  job  Jobs  Joseph  labour  ladder  living  lobby  Lobbying  lobbyist  long-term  M&A  macroeconomic  Makers  manual  manufactured  Manufacturing  margin  marginal  market  marketplace  Mason  materialism  maximisation  maximization  MBO  meritocracy  meritocratic  Microsoft  middle  middleclass  mismatch  mobile  mobility  monopoly  monopsony  multinational  Mutual  neoclassical  neoconservatism  neoconservatives  neoliberal  neoliberalism  net  Niedriglohnsektor  No  of  oligarchy  oligopol  oligopoly  on-demand  operating  Oracle  output  outsourcing  overhead  participation  Paul  pension  performance  phone  Pivot  plutocracy  policy  politician  Politicians  poor  populism  post-capitalism  poverty  PR  Precariat  precarious  printing  Private  Privileged  productivity  profit  progress  propaganda  prosperity  protectionism  Public  rate  recovery  redistribution  regulation  regulators  rent-seeking  rentier  Representation  resource  resources  Rich  rising  Robotics  Robots  round  Rushkoff  s&p500  safety  scheme  School  Sector  secular  self-driving  self-employment  self-regulation  service  Services  Seth  sethgodin  share  shared  shareholder  short-term  short-termism  Silicon  skill  skill-biased  skills  social  society  sociology  Software  Sozialer  spin  squeezed  stagnation  standard  Start-up  Start-Ups  state  status  STEM  Stiglitz  Street  structural  Super  sustainability  sustainable  take  tax  technological  The  thinking  Toff  tournament  trap  trickle-down  Uber  UK  uncertainty  unemployment  Unicorn  Universal  USA  Valley  value  Venture  volatility  wage  Wall  Warren  week  welfare  Wertegesellschaft  western  winner  Work  working  world  Yahoo!  youth  Zeitarbeit  Zero 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: