asterisk2a + commoditization + company   4

Apple Music: Neuer Streamingdienst verschlägt der Konkurrenz die Sprache - SPIEGEL ONLINE
Es kommt wie erwartet, und doch ist die Branche in Aufruhr: Bei der Entwicklerkonferenz WWDC hat Apple seinen neuen Streamingdienst Apple Music angekündigt. Umfang und Art des Angebots dürften der Konkurrenz das Leben schwer machen. [...] Apple muss damit nicht reich werden Allerdings sind die Ausgangspunkte sehr unterschiedlich. Bei einem Umsatz von 1,3 Milliarden Dollar machte Spotify im vergangenen Jahr 197 Millionen Euro Verlust. Mit dem Geldverdienen klappt es also nicht einmal beim Marktführer so richtig. Und trotzdem wird das schwedische Unternehmen mit acht Milliarden Dollar bewertet. Für Apple aber ist es viel einfacher: Der kalifornische Konzern muss mit seinem Angebot gar kein Geld verdienen. Der iTunes Store und der App Store dienen in erster Linie dazu, Kunden an Apples Plattformen zu binden und damit den Verkauf der viel profitableren Apple-Hardware anzukurbeln. Genauso ist es auch mit Apple Music.
Apple  Music  Apple  Spotify  Tidal  Pandora  Rdio  Deezer  Platdorm  Silo  aspirational  product  Branding  Brand  iTunes  Apple  App  Store  ecosystem  marginal  cost  margin  cash  cow  business  model  multi-product  company  freemium  subscription  model  commodity  business  commoditization  Software  Is  Eating  The  World  Google  Play  Amazon  Netflix  differentiate  differentiation 
june 2015 by asterisk2a
NYT - EU and Google
“With more than a decade of hindsight, the theories supporting the case against Microsoft have all but fallen apart, and the pursuit of the company that makes Windows may suggest a reason for skepticism about this fight against Google: The tech marketplace is fluid and unpredictable. The giants that look most unbeatable today could falter in ways that may once have seemed unthinkable — and without a lot of help from the government.” [...] Google makes most of its money from search ads, but the market for such direct advertising may be tapped out. The next great wave of digital advertising — a market far bigger than search spots — will come from ad budgets now reserved for TV commercials, and many observers bet that Facebook, not Google, is in the best position to get that business. &! bit.ly/1aCgTK7 &! Growth stalls eventually 4all companies >> bit.ly/1DpxFXl &! youtu.be/SdJz93aIvA0?t=20m talk abt Google Search business practices and their way to "add value." And Lobbying activities.
Microsoft  IBM  Google  Apple  HP  Facebook  creative  destruction  Silicon  Valley  Skype  IRC  ICQ  AOL  Yahoo!  Y!  Fortune  500  Wall  Street  oligopoly  oligopol  monopoly  antitrust  FTC  EU  Nokia  Snapchat  Tumblr  Twitter  craigslist  Google  Search  AdSense  Programmatic  Advertising  native  advertisement  targeting  advertisement  re-targeting  advertisement  content  marketing  Huffington  Post  BuzzFeed  YouTube  economic  history  business  cycle  commodity  business  commoditization  Amazon  PayPal  eBay  growth  economic  growth  microeconomics  saturation  market  size  multi-product  company  shareholder  value  profit  maximisation  crony  capitalism  exploitation  short-term  thinking  short-term  view  revolving  door  Washington  presidency  barackobama  lobbyist  Lobbying  lobby 
april 2015 by asterisk2a
As Samsung Falters, An Opening For Startups | TechCrunch
[Samsung] is so identified with the government and the progress of Korea that the country is occasionally referred to locally as the Republic of Samsung. So when Samsung repeatedly presented bad news to investors this past year, particularly its results last quarter that showed a drop of 15% of its operating profit — the first drop in three years — there has been something of a slowly boiling panic underway in the country. From talks with people who work at the company, stress levels are off the charts, intensified by the pressure to return previously-paid performance bonuses. My colleague John Biggs has already talked about Samsung’s race to the bottom, but that was before these most recent results. With consumers unwilling to pay top dollar for Samsung’s best smartphones and Chinese manufacturers readying a dizzying array of competitive and inexpensive products, Samsung faces what might be considered an almost overpowering inevitability crisis about its downfall.
Samsung  South  Korea  China  BRIC  flat  world  globalization  globalisation  Nokia  Motorola  competitive  advantage  competitiveness  competitive  Competition  comparative  advantage  multi-product  company  conglomerate  differentiation  differentiate  Japan  technological  progress  Apple  aspirational  product  Product/Market  Fit  change  Mobile  Creative  Mobile  Creatives  economic  history  Sony  destruction  Moore's  Law  commoditization  commodity  business  margin  creativity  disrupting  markets  disruption  economics  Developing  Frontier  KakaoTalk  Daum  Venture  Capital  Seoul  Start-Up  Scene  culture  society 
august 2014 by asterisk2a
Sharp Drops After Saying Material Doubt on Survival - Bloomberg
SHARP and PANASONIC likely next candidates to fail (bankruptcy, reorganisation, splitting of assets). Their demise is partly to contribute not being able to stay in touch of technology trends. It is a dead end street to compete simply by price where ur products are just a commodity.

Same with Motorola and their cell phone business.
Same with Nokia and their cell phone business.
Same with RIM and their cell phone business.
Same w Kodak and photo business.

- But what makes it even worse for SHARP and PANASONIC is that they a Japanese companies, with Japanese Corp. ORG structures. Also see OLYMPUS.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2010/07/japanese_corporate_culture
http://www.cityam.com/forum/the-japanese-disease-how-its-corporate-culture-turns-disasters-catastrophes
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-problem-with-japanese-corporate-culture-lives-on-2012-9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_management_culture
Apple  Kodak  management  corporate  governance  corporate  culture  Olympus  Eastman  Kodak  Eastman  Kodak  Company  Research  In  Motion  RIM  Google  Motorola  Amazon  commoditization  lostgeneration  lostdecade  Japan  Panasonic  Corporation  Sharp  Corporation  Nokia  technology  innovation 
november 2012 by asterisk2a

related tags

AdSense  advantage  advertisement  Advertising  Amazon  antitrust  AOL  App  Apple  aspirational  barackobama  Brand  Branding  BRIC  business  BuzzFeed  Capital  capitalism  cash  change  China  commoditization  commodity  company  comparative  Competition  competitive  competitiveness  conglomerate  content  corporate  Corporation  cost  cow  craigslist  creative  Creatives  creativity  crony  culture  cycle  Daum  Deezer  destruction  Developing  differentiate  differentiation  disrupting  disruption  door  Eastman  Eating  eBay  economic  economics  ecosystem  EU  exploitation  Facebook  Fit  flat  Fortune  freemium  Frontier  FTC  globalisation  globalization  Google  governance  growth  history  HP  Huffington  IBM  ICQ  In  innovation  IRC  Is  iTunes  Japan  KakaoTalk  Kodak  Korea  Law  lobby  Lobbying  lobbyist  lostdecade  lostgeneration  management  margin  marginal  market  marketing  markets  maximisation  microeconomics  Microsoft  Mobile  model  monopoly  Moore's  Motion  Motorola  multi-product  Music  native  Netflix  Nokia  oligopol  oligopoly  Olympus  Panasonic  Pandora  PayPal  Platdorm  Play  Post  presidency  product  Product/Market  profit  Programmatic  progress  Rdio  re-targeting  Research  revolving  RIM  Samsung  saturation  Scene  Search  Seoul  shareholder  Sharp  short-term  Silicon  Silo  size  Skype  Snapchat  society  Software  Sony  South  Spotify  Start-Up  Store  Street  subscription  targeting  technological  technology  The  thinking  Tidal  Tumblr  Twitter  Valley  value  Venture  view  Wall  Washington  world  Y!  Yahoo!  YouTube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: