JFIResearch + policy   73

Overcoming Bias
At TED 2017 I heard many talks where speakers point out a way that our world is not ideal. For example, speakers talked about how tech firms compete to entice users to just pay attention to them, how cities seem to be spread out more than is ideal, and how inner city grocery stores have less fresh food. But speakers never attributed problems to a particular standard kind of market failure, much less suggest a particular institutional solution because it matched the kind of market failure it was to address. While speakers tend to imply government regulation and redistribution as solutions, they never consider the many ways that regulation and redistribution can go wrong and be costly.

It is as if TED audiences, who hear talks on a great specialized many areas of science and tech, were completely unaware of key long-established and strongly-relevant areas of scholarship. If TED audiences were instead well informed about institution design, market failures, and regulatory costs, then a speaker who pointed out a problem would be expected to place it within our standard classifications of ways that things can go wrong. They’d be expected to pick the standard kind of institutional solution to each kind of problem, or explain why their particular problem needs an unusual solution. And they’d be expected to address the standard ways that such a solution could be costly or go wrong. Perhaps even adjust their solution to deal with case-specific costs and failure modes.
metaresearch  thinktanks  policy 
june 2017 by JFIResearch

related tags

academia  administrative_data  advocacy  ai  antitrust  artificial_intelligence  banking  basic_income  behavioral_economics  bias  carbontax  cash_transfers  chetty  climate  climate_change  congress  data  data_analysis  development  digital_ethics  economics  economic_development  economic_effects  economic_history  education  educational_effects  elections  energy  environment  ethics_of_algorithms  ethnic_cleansing  finance  fiscal_policy  geoengineering  gerrymandering  government  guaranteed_income  healthcare  health_insurance  higher_education  history  housing  imf  immigration  income_share_agreement  inequality  influence  innovation  investing  labor  law  loan  loans  machine_learning  macroeconomics  metaresearch  metresearch  metrics  microstructure_of_democracy  never_linked  opportunity_zones  pilot  place_based_policy  polarization  police  policing  policy  politics  poverty  public_assistance  race  report  research  rural_america  rural_education  r_and_d  safety_net  sidhya  snap  socialfabric  social_fabric  social_science  spain  statistics  student_debt  student_loans  surveys  taxes  technology  thinktanks  ubi  univeral_basic_income  universal_basic_income  urban_design  voting  wealth  welfare  will 

Copy this bookmark: