workingclass   462

« earlier    

Twitter
You want to see change in D.C.? Contribute to a who will represent the and not…
workingclass  Veteran  from twitter_favs
17 days ago by andriak
Get Real | Tarence Ray
"What liberals like Paul Krugman still don’t understand about rural America"



"This question of why the rural working class often votes against its interests has been bugging liberals for a few decades now, and you can’t really blame them. Democrats still held a lot of sway in rural America for the first half of the twentieth century, but then things started to change. Neoliberal economics tore rural regions apart. Both jobs and people left in short order. Now these regions swing predominantly conservative, and liberals are left scratching their heads.

Today, rural America is largely viewed as politically and culturally “a world apart,” when in reality the picture is bleaker: conservatives simply maintain a stronger grasp on power in rural areas than liberals do. Liberals think that the majority of people in rural areas see this as a desirable state of affairs. Many of us don’t. It’s just that our voices have been erased by the overwhelming might of power and industry.

Krugman would do better to skip the psychoanalysis and examine the way power is actually constituted in rural America: to look at why and how ideology is formed, who does the forming, and what material interests are served by it. But he knows his audience, and he knows that they don’t really want to know the answers to those questions because that would mean they would have to actually believe in and fight for something. And they’re not going to do that. They’d rather be at brunch.

*****

As good Marxists, let’s state up front that the primary function of rural areas within the larger national economy is as a supply source of raw materials: food, oil, natural gas, coal, timber, and other resources. To keep these goods flowing out of rural areas —and profit flowing into capitalists’ pockets—freethinking dissent within the extractive regions must be squashed at all costs. Compare this with urban areas, where a greater productive capacity and larger middle classes can absorb and dilute a great deal of dissent. In rural areas, those impulses have to be stamped out before they can really take off; nothing less than the unchallenged flow of profit and resources is at stake. Conservatives understand this, and it’s why one of their foremost political strategies in rural areas is that of social control.

If you live in a rural community, extractive or not, you are likely confronted every day with an onslaught of images, dogmas, and various cultural reinforcements regarding your role within the national social structure. Perhaps the primary location for this “indoctrination” is the local school system. In many rural communities, it is well understood that while state power may be concentrated in the county courthouse, social power—the power to shape the ideological contours of the community, and therefore how it votes, prays, works, and obeys—is concentrated in the local school board."



"The only thing capable of breaking the conservative stranglehold on rural communities—and of breaking the power of their foot soldiers in the local school boards, chambers of commerce, and churches—is a nationwide political movement based in the actual interests of the working class: the service industry employees and care workers, the teachers and tenants. That’s because the right wing has their own institutions, programs, and forms of ideological preservation in rural areas. They have invested heavily in them for the last thirty years, and they will not stop until rural America is a useless ecological graveyard. Conservatives see their beliefs gradually losing support, and they have entered death cult mode. They want to squeeze as much profit and as many resources out of rural areas as possible, until we, too, have gone to the graveyard.

The result is a rapidly deteriorating economic landscape that stumps writers like Krugman. When he writes about the economic forces contributing to rural America’s decline “that nobody knows how to reverse,” the “nobody” he’s referring to is himself. Krugman’s liberalism, with its focus on slow incrementalism and social tinkering, has become incompatible with rural economies that are beholden to the whims of increasingly embattled industry. In the days when America’s economy was booming after World War II, when regulations meant to safeguard the financial interests of ordinary people didn’t necessarily threaten the immense wealth that was being produced throughout society, it was feasible that pro-business ideas could coexist with liberal doctrines like human rights and social welfare policies. But in the era of post-industrial capitalism, as wages decline, jobs are relocated, and the social safety net shrinks, it’s become impossible to square that contradiction.

So the best Krugman can offer is a kind of liberal realism: progressive values are simply incompatible with the minds of backwards yokels living out in the provinces, and we need to get real about that. This allows Krugman to erase all forms of rural radicalism: he doesn’t see us as powerless, silenced by the authoritarian regime of conservative social control, because he doesn’t see power at all.

But we know that rural radicalism exists, and we know that the rural working class can exert a great deal of leverage on entrenched power structures. The statewide teacher strikes in predominantly rural West Virginia serve as the best recent example. Our power is growing. It may take some time and experimentation, but conservatives will not reign unchallenged in rural America for eternity. We’ve never stopped fighting back."
rural  us  paulkrugman  politics  economics  2019  power  taranceray  liberals  neoliberalism  capitalism  democrats  republicans  ideology  incrementalism  elitism  society  socialwelfare  welfare  radicalism  humanrights  work  labor  workingclass  class  teachers  tenants  coal  westvirginia  newmexico  oil  gas 
22 days ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

2018  2019  3013  aam10  abuse  academia  activism  age  america  anarchism  anthropocene  anti-semitism  aristocracy  art  aspiration  authenticity  authentocracy  author:garyyoung  banksarron  bbc  beauty  belief  benefits  benntony  black  blacks  blairism  bluelabour  books  brexit  bristol  bullshitjobs  capitalism  care  caring  centralamerica  charity  class  climatechange  coal  commonsense  community  compensation  competition  conference  conservatism  consumption  corbynism  corbynjeremy  corruption  councilestates  councilhouse  coventry  creation  creativity  cuba  davidgraeber  dc:creator=emberypaul  dc:creator=masonpaul  dc:creator=mcduffphil  dc:creator=ramsayadam  dc:creator=sandbrookdominic  dc:creator=williamszoe  dctagged  delusion  demand  democracy  democrats  deportation  disability  discipline  discrimination  disparity  diversity  divideandrule  division  dollyparton  dorothyallison  economics  economy  education  elderly  election  elitism  employers  employment  england  englishcivilwar  englishness  eu  eugenics  europeanunion  exceptionalism  exchangevalue  family  farright  feminism  film  finance  food  fortpj  freedom  freedomofmovement  gas  gender  generalelection  georgeshaw  germany  gigeconomy  giletsjaunes  glasmanmaurice  goodhartdavid  governesses  guardian  harrison  havana  have-watched  heartland  highered  highereducation  highwageamerica  history  hollywood  hospitals  housing  howwewrite  humanrights  identity  ideology  illegal  immigration  inclusion  incrementalism  inequality  inspiration  intellectualism  intellectuals  interdisciplinary  internationalism  interview  ireland  jobs  johnboughton  kiel  konttinin  kropotkin  labor  labourparty  language  learning  leave  leeds  legal  levellers  lexit  liberalism  liberals  liverpool  localism  long-baileyrebecca  lottery  lynseyhanley  maintenance  maintstreamleft  management  manchester  manufacturing  margaret  margaretmitchell  marketaluskacova  marx  marxism  matthewstewart  mcdonnelljohn  media  mexico  michaelacole  middleclass  migration  mikedavis  military  misery  money  mothers  mutiny  nannies  nationalidentity  nationalism  navy  neoliberalism  newlabour  newmexico  nobility  nonprofit  nonprofits  nostalgia  novara  nursing  nyc  ocasio-cortezalexandra  occupywallstreet  ofs  ohio  oil  opportunity  os  parenting  parliament  patriotism  paulkrugman  pay  pennsylvania  pennyslvania  peoplesvote  performativity  perryclaire  petermitchell  photography  play  plp  policy  politics  polling  post-industrialism  poverty  power  pragmatism  precarity  privilege  processed  production  productivity  proletariat  questiontime  race  raceclass  racism  radicalism  raynerangela  rebelmedia  referendum  reform  religion  remain  reproduction  republicans  research  resentment  review  revolt  revolution  richardbillingham  rights  rural  salaries  salford  samanthabee  sanctions  sexism  shirleybaker  singlemarket  skills  skinnerdennis  smithowen  socialclass  socialsciences  socialwelfare  society  softbrexit  spontaneity  starmerkeir  supply  survival  tactics  taranceray  teachers  teaching  tenants  theleft  thomasturnbull  time  tishmurtha  tradeunions  triciaporter  troyvettese  trump  truth  tuc  ubi  uk  unions  universalbasicincome  us  usa  usevalue  value  values  very-good  veteran  video  wage  wagelabor  wages  war  wealth  welfare  westvirginia  whites  whiteworkingclass  wisconsin  women  work-life-balance  work  working  worldwari  writing  xenophobia  youngtoby  youth  zerohours 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: