stevejobs   11803

« earlier    

Steve Jobs and Apple’s Last Previous Earnings Warning

Jobs’s arrogance got him into trouble at times, but at other times it was his saving grace. One of the finest moments in Apple’s history, at least from a messaging standpoint, was the company’s response to the iPhone 4 antennagate controversy. That press conference was a masterstroke. But underlying its success were two things: (1) the story truly was vastly overblown — the iPhone 4 antenna did have a weakness but it was a terrific product overall; (2) Jobs knew this and took a “I can’t believe I have to waste my time with this bullshit, but OK, I’ll explain it to you” attitude into dealing with it.

I think Cook’s genuine and inherent humility holds Apple back on days like today. Apple needed less “I’m sorry, let me explain” and more “Fuck you, this is bullshit, let me explain”. What people took away from Cook’s letter and TV appearance today is that the iPhone laid a turd last quarter. Properly delivered, the takeaway should have been that China is crazy but the iPhone is still kicking the shit out of the entire rest of the handset industry and is only pulling further ahead.
apple  business  communication  history  iphone  SteveJobs  daringfireball 
12 days ago by jefframnani
That time Steve Jobs hired a career juggler to teach programming to developers - Cake
Here’s the thing: I would rather listen to Randy about hiring and culture than any of them. See for yourself in one of his few public appearances, below. Here’s the summary:

1. You want to find people with mastery, true depth.
2. The problem is, that isn’t enough. You need people who had failed and recovered. The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.
3. Breadth, meaning curiosity about things beyond what you’re deep in.
4. Collaboration. Not a synonym for cooperation, but the ability to magnify others.
steve  jobs  stevejobs  story  pixar  apple  next  career  job  hr  hiring  culture 
18 days ago by bekishore
Opinion | What Straight-A Students Get Wrong - The New York Times
"A decade ago, at the end of my first semester teaching at Wharton, a student stopped by for office hours. He sat down and burst into tears. My mind started cycling through a list of events that could make a college junior cry: His girlfriend had dumped him; he had been accused of plagiarism. “I just got my first A-minus,” he said, his voice shaking.

Year after year, I watch in dismay as students obsess over getting straight A’s. Some sacrifice their health; a few have even tried to sue their school after falling short. All have joined the cult of perfectionism out of a conviction that top marks are a ticket to elite graduate schools and lucrative job offers.

I was one of them. I started college with the goal of graduating with a 4.0. It would be a reflection of my brainpower and willpower, revealing that I had the right stuff to succeed. But I was wrong.

The evidence is clear: Academic excellence is not a strong predictor of career excellence. Across industries, research shows that the correlation between grades and job performance is modest in the first year after college and trivial within a handful of years. For example, at Google, once employees are two or three years out of college, their grades have no bearing on their performance. (Of course, it must be said that if you got D’s, you probably didn’t end up at Google.)

Academic grades rarely assess qualities like creativity, leadership and teamwork skills, or social, emotional and political intelligence. Yes, straight-A students master cramming information and regurgitating it on exams. But career success is rarely about finding the right solution to a problem — it’s more about finding the right problem to solve.

In a classic 1962 study, a team of psychologists tracked down America’s most creative architects and compared them with their technically skilled but less original peers. One of the factors that distinguished the creative architects was a record of spiky grades. “In college our creative architects earned about a B average,” Donald MacKinnon wrote. “In work and courses which caught their interest they could turn in an A performance, but in courses that failed to strike their imagination, they were quite willing to do no work at all.” They paid attention to their curiosity and prioritized activities that they found intrinsically motivating — which ultimately served them well in their careers.

Getting straight A’s requires conformity. Having an influential career demands originality. In a study of students who graduated at the top of their class, the education researcher Karen Arnold found that although they usually had successful careers, they rarely reached the upper echelons. “Valedictorians aren’t likely to be the future’s visionaries,” Dr. Arnold explained. “They typically settle into the system instead of shaking it up.”

This might explain why Steve Jobs finished high school with a 2.65 G.P.A., J.K. Rowling graduated from the University of Exeter with roughly a C average, and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. got only one A in his four years at Morehouse.

If your goal is to graduate without a blemish on your transcript, you end up taking easier classes and staying within your comfort zone. If you’re willing to tolerate the occasional B, you can learn to program in Python while struggling to decipher “Finnegans Wake.” You gain experience coping with failures and setbacks, which builds resilience.

Straight-A students also miss out socially. More time studying in the library means less time to start lifelong friendships, join new clubs or volunteer. I know from experience. I didn’t meet my 4.0 goal; I graduated with a 3.78. (This is the first time I’ve shared my G.P.A. since applying to graduate school 16 years ago. Really, no one cares.) Looking back, I don’t wish my grades had been higher. If I could do it over again, I’d study less. The hours I wasted memorizing the inner workings of the eye would have been better spent trying out improv comedy and having more midnight conversations about the meaning of life.

So universities: Make it easier for students to take some intellectual risks. Graduate schools can be clear that they don’t care about the difference between a 3.7 and a 3.9. Colleges could just report letter grades without pluses and minuses, so that any G.P.A. above a 3.7 appears on transcripts as an A. It might also help to stop the madness of grade inflation, which creates an academic arms race that encourages too many students to strive for meaningless perfection. And why not let students wait until the end of the semester to declare a class pass-fail, instead of forcing them to decide in the first month?

Employers: Make it clear you value skills over straight A’s. Some recruiters are already on board: In a 2003 study of over 500 job postings, nearly 15 percent of recruiters actively selected against students with high G.P.A.s (perhaps questioning their priorities and life skills), while more than 40 percent put no weight on grades in initial screening.

Straight-A students: Recognize that underachieving in school can prepare you to overachieve in life. So maybe it’s time to apply your grit to a new goal — getting at least one B before you graduate."
education  grades  grading  colleges  universities  academia  2018  adamgrant  psychology  gpa  assessment  criticalthinking  anxiety  stress  learning  howwelearn  motivation  gradschool  jkrowling  stevejobs  martinlutherkingjr  perfectionism  srg  edg 
26 days ago by robertogreco
A VISIONARY: Comics Pros on STAN LEE and His Legacy | 13th Dimension, Comics, Creators, Culture
WHAT IS STAN LEE’S GREATEST LEGACY?
Kelley Jones (Artist, Batman; Magneto)
Stan Lee’s legacy is that of trust.
He showed that in 1961.
He simply trusted himself and those around him to make great comics. Better comics when no one asked. A new form of comics when no one knew it was needed.
He trusted us, the readers, even more.
He trusted us that we’d understand that different was good, exciting, and we’d want more.


Paul Levitz (Former publisher, Distinguished Competition)
Getting the best work out of some of the most talented men to ever work in comics, and unequaled work out of some of comics’ yeomen.  From that, the rest follows; without it, nothing.
stanlee  stevejobs  spunti  personaggi 
8 weeks ago by nicoladagostino
Twitter
Editorial: is only robbing you if you thought was too
SteveJobs  from twitter_favs
9 weeks ago by soundsgood

« earlier    

related tags

1976  2007  2018-08-10  2018  5.industry.persons.stevejobs.lisa  60minutes  academia  adamgrant  addiction  advertising  alankay  amazon  america  analysis  andygrove  andyherzfeld  anxiety  aol  apple-store  apple  applecommunity  applepark  applestore  apps  appstore  arm  article  assessment  at&t  attention  august  balance  bed  beos  billburr  biography  book  books  budismo  business  by:jonathansnook  cancer  career  charity  children  chrisespinosa  chrismacaskil  chrismacaskill  cloud  colleges  comeback  communication  companies  computer  computers  cpu  creativedirection  creativity  criticalthinking  cro  culture  cyborg  daringfireball  death  democracy  design  disruption  doom  economics  edg  education  elite  elonmusk  empreendedorismo  entertainment  ethical  ethics  evolution  experience  facebook  fonts  forbes  foxconn  funny  games  gateway  generalmagic  genius  google  googlereader  gpa  grades  grading  gradschool  growth  guykawasaki  hackernews  hardware  healthcare  hightech  hiring  history  howwelearn  hr  human  humanism  humanities  infiniteloop  influence  information  innovation  innovators  inovacao  inspiração  instapaper  intel  interface  interview  iphone  jkrowling  job  jobs  john-carmack  johncarmack  jonathanive  jonrubenstein  jonyive  journalism  june  kids  laurenepowelljobs  law  learning  lisa  logo  longreads  lynnfox  mac  macintosh  mainstream  management  marketing  martinlutherkingjr  memory  microsoft  mobile  model  monopoly  motivation  next  nyt  operatingsystem  oralhistory  pancreas  papodehomem  parent  parenting  parents  perfectionism  personaggi  philanthropy  pixar  politics  power  predictions  productivity  prototyping  psychology  quality  quote  reform  reputation  research  responsibility  retail  retro  robertscoble  rss  scale  sda  shanesnow  shapelayers  shearinglayers  siliconvalley  simplicity  sketchapp  smalltalk  soa  software  spunti  srg  stanlee  steve-jobs  steve  stores  stories  story  storytelling  strategy  streaming  stress  success  summer  susankare  tech  technology  telecard  tesla  theranos  timcook  tonyfaddell  trends  tv  universities  up-to-us  urbanlegend  ussteel  ux  vanityfair  video  vision  webdesign  why  wifi  wow  xerox  youtube  zen 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: