sex   39805

« earlier    

Red Sex, Blue Sex - The New Yorker
For too long, the conventional wisdom has been that social conservatives are the upholders of family values, whereas liberals are the proponents of a polymorphous selfishness. This isn’t true, and, every once in a while, liberals might point that out.
culture  sex  usa  religion  pregnancy 
yesterday by pozorvlak
When it comes to sexual desirability, balls are often treated as an afterthought | Mike Barry
We can re-imagine testicles as more than an unavoidable component of reproduction or a crude descriptor for bravery
sex  culture 
yesterday by sfriedenberg
Infidelity Lurks in Your Genes - NYTimes.com
AMERICANS disapprove of marital infidelity. Ninety-one percent of them find it morally wrong, more than the number that reject polygamy, human cloning or suicide, according to a 2013 Gallup poll.

Yet the number of Americans who actually cheat on their partners is rather substantial: Over the past two decades, the rate of infidelity has been pretty constant at around 21 percent for married men, and between 10 to 15 percent for married women, according to the General Social Survey at the University of Chicago’s independent research organization, NORC.

We are accustomed to thinking of sexual infidelity as a symptom of an unhappy relationship, a moral flaw or a sign of deteriorating social values. When I was trained as a psychiatrist we were told to look for various emotional and developmental factors — like a history of unstable relationships or a philandering parent — to explain infidelity.

But during my career, many of the questions we asked patients were found to be insufficient because for so much behavior, it turns out that genes, gene expression and hormones matter a lot.

Now that even appears to be the case for infidelity.

We have long known that men have a genetic, evolutionary impulse to cheat, because that increases the odds of having more of their offspring in the world.

But now there is intriguing new research showing that some women, too, are biologically inclined to wander, although not for clear evolutionary benefits. Women who carry certain variants of the vasopressin receptor gene are much more likely to engage in “extra pair bonding,” the scientific euphemism for sexual infidelity.

Brendan P. Zietsch, a psychologist at the University of Queensland, Australia, has tried to determine whether some people are just more inclined toward infidelity. In a study of nearly 7,400 Finnish twins and their siblings who had all been in a relationship for at least one year, Dr. Zietsch looked at the link between promiscuity and specific variants of vasopressin and oxytocin receptor genes. Vasopressin is a hormone that has powerful effects on social behaviors like trust, empathy and sexual bonding in humans and other animals. So it makes sense that mutations in the vasopressin receptor gene — which can alter its function — could affect human sexual behavior.


Richard A. Friedman
Mental health, addiction, human behavior and neuroscience.
The Feel-Good Gene MAR 6
A Natural Fix for A.D.H.D. OCT 31
Why Teenagers Act Crazy JUN 28
Why Can’t Doctors Identify Killers? MAY 27
Shrinking Hours
See More »

He found that 9.8 percent of men and 6.4 percent of women reported that they had two or more sexual partners in the previous year. His study, published last year in Evolution and Human Behavior, found a significant association between five different variants of the vasopressin gene and infidelity in women only and no relationship between the oxytocin genes and sexual behavior for either sex. That was impressive: Forty percent of the variation in promiscuous behavior in women could be attributed to genes. That is surprising since, as Dr. Zietsch points out, there are so many other factors that are necessary for promiscuous encounters, like circumstance and the availability of a willing and able partner. Although this is the largest and best study on this, it’s not clear why there was no relationship between the vasopressin gene and promiscuous behavior in men.

Photo

Credit Marion Fayolle
Other studies confirm that oxytocin and vasopressin are linked to partner bonding, which bears on the question of promiscuity since emotional bonding is, in a sense, the inverse of promiscuity. Hasse Walum at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm found that in women, but not in men, there is a significant association between one variant of the oxytocin receptor gene and marital discord and lack of affection for one’s partner. In contrast, there was a significant correlation in men between a specific variant of the vasopressin receptor gene and lower marital quality reported by their spouses.

Now, before you run out and get your prospective partner genotyped for his or her vasopressin and oxytocin receptor genes, two caveats: Correlation is not the same as causation; there are undoubtedly many unmeasured factors that contribute to infidelity. And rarely does a simple genetic variant determine behavior.

Still, there is a good reason to take these findings seriously: Data in animals confirm that these two hormones are significant players when it comes to sexual behavior. An intriguing clue came from the pioneering work of Dr. Thomas R. Insel, now the director of the National Institute of Mental Health, who studied the effects of vasopressin and oxytocin in a little rodent called the vole. It turns out that there are two closely related species of voles: montane voles, which are sexually promiscuous, and prairie voles, which are sexually monogamous and raise their extended families in burrows.

After sex, prairie voles quickly develop a selective and enduring preference for their mate, while mating for montane voles is more of a one-night stand.

What Dr. Insel described is that the strikingly different sexual behavior of these two species of voles reflects the action of vasopressin in their brains. The vasopressin receptors in the montane and prairie voles are in completely different brain regions so that when these receptors are stimulated by vasopressin, there are very different behavioral effects.

When vasopressin is injected directly into the brain of the monogamous male prairie vole, it triggers pair bonding; in contrast, blocking the vasopressin receptors inhibits monogamy, but does nothing to stop sexual activity. In other words, vasopressin promotes social bonding, and blocking the activity of this hormone encourages social promiscuity.

In the monogamous prairie voles, the vasopressin receptors are close to the brain’s reward center, but in the philandering montane voles, these same receptors are mostly found in the amygdala, a brain region that is critical to processing anxiety and fear.

So mating for the prairie voles activates the pleasurable reward pathway, which reinforces mating and promotes attachment and thus monogamy. For the promiscuous montane voles, sex has little effect on attachment; any vole will do.

It is even possible experimentally to take a home-wrecking montane vole and make him behave like a family-oriented prairie vole. Using a virus as a delivery vehicle to transmit the vasopressin receptor gene, it’s easy to artificially boost the number of vasopressin receptors in the brain’s reward center, and make a male vole behave monogamously. The story for female voles is similar except that it is oxytocin, not vasopressin, that triggers monogamous behavior.

We don’t yet know from human studies whether the vasopressin receptor genes that are linked with infidelity actually make the brain less responsive to these hormones, but given the animal data, it is plausible.

Continue reading the main story
RECENT COMMENTS

Enri 4 hours ago
Attributing social behavior to genetic determinants is not a well informed move. Historically, the idea of cheating or betrayal only arises...
Cheryl 5 hours ago
Lots of over the top reactions to what the Dr. didn't say. He didn't advocate for infidelity, he isn't excusing betrayal of a partner - he...
Josh Hill 5 hours ago
I can think of several potential evolutionary reasons why some women would be promiscuous. For one thing, it provides an opportunity to bind...
SEE ALL COMMENTS WRITE A COMMENT
EXPERIMENTS in which oxytocin and vasopressin are directly administered to humans show these hormones have effects that go beyond sex; they appear to increase trust and social bonding. In one study, for example, healthy subjects were randomly given either intranasal oxytocin or a placebo and then played a trust game. In this game, the two subjects either act as an investor or a trustee. The investor first has the chance of choosing a costly trusting action by giving money to the trustee. Then the trustee can either honor the trust by returning a portion of the money or violate it by not sharing the money. Those who play under the influence of oxytocin continue to trust and make generous monetary offers in response to betrayal, while subjects getting a placebo become less trusting and stingier after getting burned. Oxytocin appears to make us more socially trusting — even in situations where it may not be in our best interest to do so.

In one study of men, giving vasopressin enhanced the subjects’ memory for both happy and angry faces compared with a placebo, which implies that vasopressin could boost social affiliation and aggressive behavior since it increased social and emotional learning.

These findings also suggest potential therapeutic uses for oxytocin and vasopressin for people who have either a deficit or an excess of trust and social bonding. Autism is an example of a deficit, and indeed there is preliminary evidence that oxytocin may have some beneficial prosocial effects in this disorder. In contrast, Williams syndrome is a rare genetic illness in which kids are pathologically trusting and indiscriminately befriend complete strangers. The disorder is associated with baseline oxytocin levels that are on average three times above normal, so a drug that blocks oxytocin may curb their excessive trust.

If you have an Orwellian bent, you’ve probably already imagined the mischief you might do with these two hormones. You could surreptitiously make a potential investor more trusting or encourage a monogamous impulse in a partner who you suspect is cheating. All you need is aerosolized oxytocin or vasopressin, perhaps in a spiked air freshener or perfume. Kidding, of course, but you get the idea.

Sexual monogamy is distinctly unusual in nature: Humans are among the 3 to 5 percent of mammalian species that practice monogamy, along with the swift fox and beaver — but even … [more]
marriage  relationship  dating  sex  neuroscience  psychology 
yesterday by enochko
The Top Jobs In 10 Years Might Not Be What You Expect | Fast Company | Business + Innovation
WE TALKED TO THREE FUTURISTS TO FIND OUT WHAT THE HOT JOBS OF 2025 COULD BE, AND THEIR ANSWERS MAY SURPRISE YOU.
Jobs  Future  sex  3DPrinting  Brain  robotics  aging  FastCompany  2015  Work 
yesterday by mstmorris
"We Learned Together": An Afternoon With The Women Of New Orleans' Trans Veterans Support Group - BuzzFeed News
Though transgender people are still barred from openly serving in the military, a small but increasingly visible population of veterans are...
military  sex 
yesterday by mgw
Artificial Sexuality: a roundtable discussion on screwing robots
"Artificial Sexuality: a roundtable discussion on screwing robots" in flow "Technology" (Sex, Technology, Robots, Artificial intelligence, Sex toys, A.i., Ex machina, Chobits, Sex education, Sexuality, Fembots, Dorothy howard, Ian kerner, Kate weinberg, Gareth stoneman) — Hopes&Fears. Hopes&Fears
technology  sex  ai  future 
2 days ago by bradbarrish

« earlier    

related tags

*e  *m  2015  3dprinting  ;★★★  ;♥♥  a/b/o  a:james-palmer  advice  aging  ai  alcohol  amber  america  an  ao3  art  at  awkward  bedsharing  before  being  bioethics  biology  blanchett  boschetar  brain  bravenewworld  bride  brides  bruce  business  buzzfeed.com  can  cate  cell  change  charity  children  china  cinderella  coming  comment  cone  consent  continentalphilosophy  corruption  courtney  courtneystodden  cover-art  cream  crime  culture  cute  d:2015.02.04  dating  de  debut  defends  din  dirtiest  discussion  diy  donate  donating  done  earnings  education  evolutionarypsychology  fastcompany  feminism  film  first  food  footage  for  free!  funny  future  gay  gender  gushing  h/c  haikyuu  has  have  health  heard  her  here  hilarity  hinata/kageyama  history  hold  hollywoods  homophobia  how  huh  ice  ifttt  illustration  im  in  india  interview  is  jealousy  jenner  jezebel  jobs  jonathan  journalism  just  kids  knotting  knowledge  law  leaked  legal  lgbtq  life  love  mad  madmen  makoto/haruka  males  marriage  massage  matchmaking  matter  media  men  meyers  military  million  movies  name  nerds  nerecunoscut  neuroscience  news  nickelback  no  object  obscenity  of  offered  on  online  only  or  osho  p:chinafile  phones  plans  politicalphilosophy  politics  porn  pornography  pregnancy  prejudice  prison  profits  propaganda  properly  prostitution  psycho  psychology  racism  really  relationship  relationships  released  religion  report  research  rhys  robotics  sale  salon  says  scene  school  science  season  sells  sexism  sexuality  she  show  shows  sick!fic  sight  simbol  so  society  solo  soon  sparks  spoilers  sprinkles  star  stars  stodden  stoddens  sundae  sytch  tammy  tape  technology  teen  tells  text  the  time  tips  to  totally  trans  trends  tv  twitter  uk  us  usa  use  video  videos  w.b::2-5k  w.c::5-10k  w.f::40k-more  w:4000  war  was  winner  women  work  wtf  wwe  yes  yet 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: