science   402539

« earlier    

Two Stars Collided And Solved Half of Astronomy's Problems. Now What? - Slashdot
"It's hard to overstate the enormous leap forward that astronomy took on August 17, 2017," reports an article shared by schwit1:
On that day, astronomers bore witness to the titanic collision of two neutron stars, the densest things in the universe besides black holes. In the collision's wake, astronomers answered multiple major questions that have dominated their field for a generation. They solved the origin of gamma-ray bursts, mysterious jets of hardcore radiation that could potentially roast Earth. They glimpsed the forging of heavy metals, like gold and platinum. They measured the rate at which the expansion of the universe is accelerating. They caught light at the same time as gravitational waves, confirmation that waves move at the speed of light. And there was more, and there is much more yet to come from this discovery... "Now it's a question of, do we have the right instrumentation for doing all the follow-up work?" said Edo Berger, an astronomer at Harvard who studies explosive cosmic events. "Do we have the right telescopes? What's going to happen when we have not just one event, but one a month, or one a week -- how do we deal with that flood...?"
slashdot  stars  Astronomy  science  Gravity 
21 hours ago by gardencat
Calculating the optimum temperature for serving hot beverages. - PubMed - NCBI
“A linear (with respect to temperature) figure of merit merged the two effects to identify an optimal drinking temperature of approximately 136 degrees F (57.8 degrees C). The analysis points to a reduction in the presently recommended serving temperature of coffee to achieve the combined result of reducing the scald burn hazard and improving customer satisfaction.”
science  nih  coffee  tea  hot  temperature  2017 
yesterday by handcoding
Some Cochrane risk of bias items are not important in osteoarthritis trials: A meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews
Twenty reviews including 126 OA trials with a high degree of heterogeneity was included (τˆ2=0.1247). Among RoB domains only patient blinding had an impact on the results (reducing heterogeneity according to τˆ2 <7%). Inadequate blinding of patients yielded larger effects (SMDDifference = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.29, P=0.035). The most important study characteristic was trial size (heterogeneity reduced by 25%), with small trials reporting larger effects (SMDDifference = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.42, P<0.001).
Science  RiskOfBias 
yesterday by pwhaley
Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
When considering the index (primary or first reported) meta-analysis of each SR, just over half (62/110 [56%]) used the random-effects model, but few (5/62 [8%]) interpreted the meta-analytic effect correctly (as the average of the intervention effects across all studies). A statistical test for funnel plot asymmetry was reported in 17/110 (15%) SRs, however, in only 4/17 (24%) did the test include the recommended number of at least 10 studies of varying size. Subgroup analyses accompanied 42/110 (38%) index meta-analyses, but findings were not interpreted with respect to a test for interaction in 29/42 (69%) cases, and the issue of potential confounding in the subgroup analyses was not raised in any SR.
Science  StatsMethods 
yesterday by pwhaley
Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics
Our interpretation of the results is limited by imprecise estimates. There is some indication that between-trial heterogeneity could be partially explained by reported design characteristics, and hence adjustment for bias could potentially improve accuracy of meta-analysis results.
Science  RiskOfBias 
yesterday by pwhaley
Differences between protocols for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews
How to game a protocol? Although we fully acknowledge the potential benefits of protocols for SRs, it is important to point out that there is a clear difference between protocols for SRs when compared to protocols for RCTs.
Science  SRStandards  Protocol 
yesterday by pwhaley

« earlier    

related tags

--prehistory  2017  3d  433  academia  advice  ai  alternate-history  anatomy  animation  anthropology  apologetics  archives  art  articles  artificial  arts  astronomy  audio  author  automation  bat  bigdata  biology  blogs  book  books  brexit  career  cbd  chemistry  client  coffee  cold  comic  communication  computer-vision  creepy  crime  crowd  culture  data  database  debate  depression  dna  dplyr  e-learning  ebook  economist  eds  education  elements  enevoldsen  environment  ethics  evolution  exercise  experiment  explained  explanation  eyes  fact  facts  flu  food  for_jesse  for_twins  genetics  genome  genomics  geology  german  germany  google  gravity  health  healthcare  history  home  homedecor  hot  human  humans  humor  ideology  illusion  illusions  influencing  info  information  innovation  insects  inteligence  interesting  interview  invention  jay  journalism  keith  kids  laboratory  leader  learning  libraries  library  like  lying  machine  magazine  mapping  math  media  medical  medicine  memory  muscle  nasa  nature  network  neural  nih  oevr  open.access  open  opticalillusions  optimism  package  pandas  papers  parenting  people  periodic  persuasion  philosophy  phone  physics  planets  plex  podcasts  politics  popular  population  postpartum  pregnancy  prison  productivity  programming  protocol  pseudoscience  psychology  python  r  racism  read-later  reading  reddit  replication  research  ring  riskofbias  schr  sciencefiction  scientific  selection  serner  shopping  simulation  skeleton  skypuppy  slashdot  sleep  socialmedia  sociology  solar  sourced  space  srstandards  stars  statistics  stats  statsmethods  stefanimhoff-de  stem  storyresearch  table  tea  tech  technology  temperature  trump  truth  twitter  us  usa  vaccine  vaccines  video  visualization  wallart  wapo  water  weight_loss  wellness  wired  work  world  worldview  xai  yearinreview  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: