migrants   1116

« earlier    

Integrate, migrants are told. But can they ever be good enough for the likes of Blair? | Aditya Chakrabortty | Opinion | The Guardian
The question is how far Britain is willing to change its ideas of Britishness to accommodate all the millions of people who have so much to give it. But to do that, the pundits must stop treating the white working class as if it is one fused-together identity, ignoring the reality that in many parts of our cities the working class is not white at all, from the security guards who mind the offices to the cleaners who come after dark.

The politicians should stop nodding at racists and their “legitimate grievances”. Stop seeing people from ethnic minorities for what they are, and finally see them for who they are.
BlairTony  immigration  migrants  integration  racism  blame  UK  dctagged  dc:creator=ChakraborttyAditya 
27 days ago by petej
Militia leader arrested
Some good news; terrorist leader menacing migrants is arrested
terrorism  immigration  migrants  politics  fascism  guns 
4 weeks ago by nelson
Revealed: How Leave.EU faked migrant footage – Channel 4 News
An investigation by Channel 4 News also reveals how Arron Banks' pro-Brexit group appears to have staged photos of migrants attacking women in London
fake  propaganda  rightwing  uk  migrants  brexit  millitary 
4 weeks ago by harcesz
Twitter
Thrilled to announce the launch of the Toolkit! Welcoming is an act of joy+solidarity against…
migrants  WelcomeALL  from twitter_favs
9 weeks ago by sdp
‘With or Without You’: Naturalising Migrants and the Never-Ending Tragedy of Liberalism | Salvage
"To be homeless is to be nameless. He. The existence of a migrant worker.

John Berger

*

The One Day Without Us campaign was launched in the UK in October 2016 ‘in reaction to the rising tide of post-Brexit street- level racism and xenophobia’ and, according to its website, ‘the divisive and stridently anti-migrant rhetoric emanating from too many politicians that has accompanied it.’ It held its target protest day on Monday 20 February 2017. ‘At a time when the political discussion about migration too often depicts a false narrative of “us versus them”, and when migrants are too often excluded from a debate that is supposedly about them, we wanted to provide an opportunity for migrants and British nationals to come together and celebrate the vital role that migrants play within their own communities.’ The campaign thus aimed to showcase a variety of pro-migrant sentiment and action across the UK. At my workplace, students and staff were encouraged to write on Post-its pinned to a map of the world their messages of support and solidarity, and what migrants meant to them. In other workplaces, one particularly striking message passing on social media emerged from a series of pictures of people contrasting what their work cohort looked like with and without migrants.

Emphasising how many migrants constitute our workforce and everyday life is a helpful way to create a contrast between the rhetoric of anti-immigration politics and the reality of migrant integration. Yet numbers are also threatening to some when imagined through The Sun-fuelled metaphors of hordes, swarms, and floods of monsters, coming here, taking our jobs. In its more extreme forms, the vocabulary of anti-immigration rhetoric shifts between the registers of environmental disaster to war and crusade. Against this, the One Day Without Us actions send out a powerful message of solidarity by numerically performing the sudden disappearance of the migrants amongst us to conjure up a bond that feels increasingly unbound."



"Specifically, it seems logical to this ideology that where and to whom one is born should determine what resources and conditions one should survive in – justified legally by the respective principles of ius solis and ius sanguinis for determining nationality rights. The anti-immigrant rhetoric in most European countries today reinforces and restricts these principles. However, in other contexts such as North America, as Jessica Evans reminds us, indigenous peoples are ‘internal outsiders with a prior claim to both jus solis and jus sanguinis’ and yet ‘access to the state and to the right for a state of their own’ remains denied to them. In both contexts, however, xenophobic and exclusionary rhetoric finds refuge in the cataclysmic sense of emergency where everybody is meant to accept that the world is dying, resources are limited and cannot be shared, and, crucially, (European) Christian culture is threatened. Thus, people should stay where they are and deal with the lot they were given, whether this means war, famine, persecution, discrimination, colonial theft and trauma, unemployment, lack of healthcare, and more. What this implies is the erosion of the principle of solidarity. Although this principle, when coupled to Western liberal ideals, has often led to the worst of liberal interventionism’s civilising missions, it remains a cornerstone of basic human decency and co- existence, and of socialist politics. It therefore must be protected from European liberalism’s securitisation, retrenchment and paranoia.

Thus, the ‘with and without us’ message signals the challenge of this tragic yet never-ending liberalism, which, like the narrator character in the U2 song ‘With or Without You’, threatens to die but remains loudly and infuriatingly alive and dominant. Liberalism is currently deemed at risk by the advance of the far right; as critics of liberalism, should we not be rejoicing? No, because what is really at risk is not liberalism, but the principle of solidarity that some liberalism contains. Instead of dying, liberalism is merely becoming more and more securitised and economically ‘rational’. The principle of solidarity is trapped in the farcical tragedy of liberalism’s never-ending schizophrenic dance-off to two different songs; trying to cleave to its ideal of harmonious economic migration and human- rights discourse on one hand, and its need for retaining and cajoling the interests of state and capital through cheap labour and border controls on the other.

In ‘With or Without You’, Bono is wailing, taunting us with despair and the threat of death because the subject of his love brings him both joy and pain. He personifies today’s dominant ideology, asking migrants to stay and save liberalism’s soul, while complaining of how they threaten it, justifying the need to exploit them, detain them or kick them back into the equivalent of outer- space. Economic liberalism maintains and reproduces a moral discourse of righteousness and an institutional façade of human rights. Nevertheless, it must be rejected in toto because it necessarily also furthers a policy agenda of fear and social hierarchy that fills up the pockets of employers and fuels the growing migration security agenda and industry. Sonja Buckel captures this relation well when explaining that ‘managing migration’ means that ‘neoliberal open-border politics has been interwoven with a left- liberal humanitarian and human rights strategy, while also needing to make concessions to the conservative project’. Thus, she writes, ‘what is currently happening with the immigration crisis is not a crisis of neoliberalism. Instead, “managing migration” remains effective’.

The left can of course be co-opted into this management of migration, and this calls for vigilance towards instances when we see these categories and subjectivities being invoked and performed. To teach migration from a more critical perspective is to acknowledge and disturb our role as ‘educators’ or conductors of these categories and subjectivities. This means, firstly, to teach the origins of migration as a process tied to the commodification and value theory of labour, where workers are necessarily ‘moving- workers’ but have been alienated to only identify as national citizens or ‘bordered-workers’; and secondly, to rethink on a basic level how we are all necessarily migrants under capitalism.[2]"



"Specifically, it seems logical to this ideology that where and to whom one is born should determine what resources and conditions one should survive in – justified legally by the respective principles of ius solis and ius sanguinis for determining nationality rights. The anti-immigrant rhetoric in most European countries today reinforces and restricts these principles. However, in other contexts such as North America, as Jessica Evans reminds us, indigenous peoples are ‘internal outsiders with a prior claim to both jus solis and jus sanguinis’ and yet ‘access to the state and to the right for a state of their own’ remains denied to them. In both contexts, however, xenophobic and exclusionary rhetoric finds refuge in the cataclysmic sense of emergency where everybody is meant to accept that the world is dying, resources are limited and cannot be shared, and, crucially, (European) Christian culture is threatened. Thus, people should stay where they are and deal with the lot they were given, whether this means war, famine, persecution, discrimination, colonial theft and trauma, unemployment, lack of healthcare, and more. What this implies is the erosion of the principle of solidarity. Although this principle, when coupled to Western liberal ideals, has often led to the worst of liberal interventionism’s civilising missions, it remains a cornerstone of basic human decency and co- existence, and of socialist politics. It therefore must be protected from European liberalism’s securitisation, retrenchment and paranoia.

Thus, the ‘with and without us’ message signals the challenge of this tragic yet never-ending liberalism, which, like the narrator character in the U2 song ‘With or Without You’, threatens to die but remains loudly and infuriatingly alive and dominant. Liberalism is currently deemed at risk by the advance of the far right; as critics of liberalism, should we not be rejoicing? No, because what is really at risk is not liberalism, but the principle of solidarity that some liberalism contains. Instead of dying, liberalism is merely becoming more and more securitised and economically ‘rational’. The principle of solidarity is trapped in the farcical tragedy of liberalism’s never-ending schizophrenic dance-off to two different songs; trying to cleave to its ideal of harmonious economic migration and human- rights discourse on one hand, and its need for retaining and cajoling the interests of state and capital through cheap labour and border controls on the other.

In ‘With or Without You’, Bono is wailing, taunting us with despair and the threat of death because the subject of his love brings him both joy and pain. He personifies today’s dominant ideology, asking migrants to stay and save liberalism’s soul, while complaining of how they threaten it, justifying the need to exploit them, detain them or kick them back into the equivalent of outer- space. Economic liberalism maintains and reproduces a moral discourse of righteousness and an institutional façade of human rights. Nevertheless, it must be rejected in toto because it necessarily also furthers a policy agenda of fear and social hierarchy that fills up the pockets of employers and fuels the growing migration security agenda and industry. Sonja Buckel captures this relation well when explaining that ‘managing migration’ means that ‘neoliberal open-border politics has been interwoven with a left- liberal humanitarian and human rights strategy, while also needing to make concessions to the … [more]
capitalism  migration  border  borders  citizenship  2017  maïapal  nationalism  race  racism  immigration  canon  liberalism  frédériclordon  johnberger  onedaywithoutus  neoliberalism  sandromezzadra  policy  politics  economics  identity  division  marxism  subjectivity  mobility  containment  society  migrants  immigrants  jessicaevans  indigenous  indigeneity  outsiders  accumulation  materialism  consumerism  jeffreywilliamson  sonjabuckel  security  industry  humanrights  humanitarianism  ideology  labor  work  territory  territorialism  colonization  west  xenophobia  naturalization  sovereignty  globalization  globalism  slavery  servitude  war  environment  climatechange  climate  globalwarming  colinmooers  supremacy  backwardness  davidharvey  jasonmoore  dereksayer  structure  agency  whitesupremacy  criticalpedagogy 
10 weeks ago by robertogreco
Kids sexually abused at the border
Because of course they were, it's an entirely predictable outcome of the Republican policy of stealing children from their parents
rape  children  immigrants  politics  humanrights  migrants 
11 weeks ago by nelson
Twitter
RT : There are 7.5 million living in the region. Based on our latest data collected at 3…
WestAndCentralAfrica  migrants  from twitter_favs
12 weeks ago by ljegou

« earlier    

related tags

'fake  2017  2018  a  abuse  accumulation  afd  africa  agency  agriculture  aid  amazon  ambiguity  america  american  an  and  announces  anti-semitism  antisemitism  apply  are  arizona  arrive  as  asylum.  asylum  at  attempt  austerity  authoritarianism  away  backwardness  ban  bayonne  because  between  blairtony  blame  blasts  blocks  boats  bolsover  border  borderpatrol  borderpolicy  borders  boston  bowersrobert  breaking.  brexit  briancon  budget  calais  canon  capitalism  caravans  ceccardisusanna  central  centralamerica  charity  children  china  china_rising  churchofengland  citizenship  ciudadjuarez  climate  climatechange  colinmooers  colonization  community  community_engagement  compassion  conditions  congress  conspiracytheories  consumerism  containment  corbynjeremy  corruption  course.use  crisis  crisis:  criticalpedagogy  cross  crossing  culture  culturewar  custody  dam  davidharvey  dc:creator=chakraborttyaditya  dc:creator=gessenmasha  dc:creator=goodfellowmaya  dc:creator=hirschafua  dc:creator=williamszoe  dc:creator=wren-lewissimon  dctagged  deal  debt  dehumanisation  deindustrialisation  deportation  dereksayer  detention  diego  dimaioluigi  distrust  division  donald_trump  drowning  drugs  easier  economics  economy  election  elpaso  employment  englishchannel  enter  entrepreneur  entry  environment  eu  europe  europeanparliament  eviction  exclusion  exploitation  fake  faragenigel  farming  farright  fascism  fdi  field  fine  fires  for  form  foundation  france  freedom  freedomofmovement  from  frontier_markets  frontieres  frustration  frédériclordon  funding  fys  gaddafi  gangs  gap  gas  generalelection  generationidentitaire  geog107  german  germany  globalism  globalization  globalwarming  golf  government  greece  groups  guatemala  guns  harassment  has  hatred  help  hias  honduras  hope  hostileenvironment  hostility  housing  how  hu  humanitarian  humanitarianism  humanrights  hundreds  hungary  hypocrisy  ice  identity  ideology  illegally  immigrants  immigration  in  indigeneity  indigenous  industrial_zones  industry  influence  information  integration  intolerance  investors  iran  is  islamophobia  italy  it’s  jasonmoore  javidsajid  jeffreywilliamson  jessicaevans  jews  jobs  johnberger  judge  kent  labor  labour  labourparty  lambeth  large  lawandjusticeparty  leave  legal  leganord  lessons  liberalism  liberals  libya  lincolnshire  listen  london  lovesocialismhatebrexit  m5s  macron  made  malta  manufacturers  many  martintim  marxism  materialism  mayor  maïapal  med  mediterranean  mexican  mexico  migrant  migrantcaravans  migration  miles  military  millitary  mobility  months  montimario  more  moscovicipierre  murder  muslim  mustread  nationalism  nations  nativism  naturalization  neoliberalism  newjersey  news'  news  newsletter  ngos  nigeria  not  now  nytimes  obama  of  offering  on  onedaywithoutus  orbanviktor  organisation  outsiders  own  palantir  patrol  pay  peoplesvote  phil  pittsburgh  pol  poland  policy  politics  populism  port  president  privatisation  propaganda  propose  publicservices  quicker  race  racism  rape  reach  recruitment  referendum  refugees  remain  renzimatteo  republicans  rescuing  ride  rights  rightwing  robertson:  roma  running  safety  salaries  salvinimatteo  san  sandromezzadra  says  sea?  security  servitude  shirebrook  shooting  shortage  shutdown  skills  skinnerdennis  slavery  smugglers  soccer  society  some  sonjabuckel  sovereignty  spain  sportsdirect  springs  stagnation  starmerkeir  stranded  structure  subjectivity  supremacy  suspends  synagogue  syria  team  tear-gassing  tear  territorialism  territory  terrorism  the  their  this  thousands  threshold  tijuana  to  torture  toward  trump's  trump  trumpdonald  tunisia  tuscany  u.s.  uk  united_states  us-border  us-mexico  us  usa  violence  vorbild  wages  wait  wall  war  weekend  welcomeall  west  westandcentralafrica  wetherspoons  whitepaper  whitesupremacy  who  wikipedia  wikipediapage  work  xenophobia  ‘natural’ 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: