lawsuit   4111

« earlier    

Who Should Own Photos of Slaves? The Descendants, not Harvard, a Lawsuit Says
The two slaves, a father and daughter, were stripped to the waist and positioned for frontal and side views. Then, like subjects in contemporary mug shots, their pictures were taken, as part of a racist study arguing that black people were an inferior race.

Little did they know that 169 years later, they would be at the center of a dispute over who should own the fruits of American slavery.

On Wednesday, Tamara Lanier, 54, filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts saying that she is a direct descendant of the pair, who were identified by their first names, Renty and Delia, and that the valuable photographs — commissioned by a professor at Harvard and now stored in a museum on campus — are hers.

The images, Ms. Lanier said, are records of her personal family history, not cultural artifacts to be kept by an institution.

“These were our bedtime stories,” Ms. Lanier’s older daughter, Shonrael, said.

The case renews focus on the role that the country’s oldest universities played in slavery, and also comes amid a growing debate over whether the descendants of the enslaved are entitled to reparations — and what those reparations might look like.

“It is unprecedented in terms of legal theory and reclaiming property that was wrongfully taken,” Benjamin Crump, one of Ms. Lanier’s lawyers, said. “Renty’s descendants may be the first descendants of slave ancestors to be able to get their property rights.”

Jonathan Swain, a spokesman for Harvard, did not immediately respond to a request to comment on the lawsuit.
legal  history  slavery  humanrights  civilrights  culture  lawsuit  copyright 
3 days ago by jtyost2
Lawsuit as unvaccinated teen banned by US school in outbreak - BBC News
An unvaccinated Kentucky teenager is suing after his Catholic school excluded him amid a chickenpox outbreak that has sickened at least 32 pupils.

Jerome Kunkel, 18, has not contracted the virus, but he has been banned by Our Lady of the Sacred Heart/Assumption Academy in Walton.

His lawsuit argues the vaccine is "immoral, illegal and sinful" and his rights have been violated.

The Northern Kentucky Health Department banned unvaccinated pupils on 14 March.

The notification said that due to the outbreak of chickenpox, students who have not been vaccinated or are already immune to the infection must stay home "until 21 days after the onset of rash for the last ill student or staff member".
vaccine  health  stupid  lawsuit  legal  religion  freedomofreligion  kentucky  usa 
4 days ago by jtyost2
West Virginia Sues Bishop and Diocese Over Sex Abuse, Citing Consumer Protection
The West Virginia attorney general filed a lawsuit against a retired top bishop and the state’s only Catholic diocese on Tuesday, saying that they “knowingly employed pedophiles.”

The civil suit also alleges that the diocese of Wheeling-Charleston and Bishop Michael J. Bransfield, who was recently restricted from ministry, “failed to conduct adequate background checks” for employees of Catholic camps and schools, and that they did not disclose “the inherent danger to parents who purchased its services for their children.”

The lawsuit claims that the diocese and the bishop violated the state’s Consumer Credit and Protection Act, an unusual approach in pursuing the Catholic Church over sexual abuse and misconduct. Criminal prosecutions of individual abuse cases have often been hampered by statutes of limitation, but the West Virginia lawsuit is a civil action, and is directed at the church’s handling of the problem. At least 16 attorneys general have started investigations into the Catholic Church since last summer.
WestVirginia  legal  religion  catholic  scandal  SexAbuse  lawsuit  safety  from instapaper
4 days ago by jtyost2
Doing More to Protect Against Discrimination in Housing, Employment and Credit Advertising | Facebook Newsroom
Our policies already prohibit advertisers from using our tools to discriminate. We’ve removed thousands of categories from targeting related to protected classes such as race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and religion. But we can do better.

We believe that the changes we’re announcing today as part of our settlements with the NFHA, ACLU, CWA and other groups will better protect people on Facebook:

Anyone who wants to run housing, employment or credit ads will no longer be allowed to target by age, gender or zip code.
Advertisers offering housing, employment and credit opportunities will have a much smaller set of targeting categories to use in their campaigns overall. Multicultural affinity targeting will continue to be unavailable for these ads. Additionally, any detailed targeting option describing or appearing to relate to protected classes will also be unavailable.
We’re building a tool so you can search for and view all current housing ads in the US targeted to different places across the country, regardless of whether the ads are shown to you.
legal  lawsuit  facebook  business  advertising  discrimination  housing  employment  economics  civilrights  humanrights  from instapaper
4 days ago by jtyost2
Facebook agrees to overhaul targeted advertising system for job, housing and loan ads after discrimination complaints
Facebook on Tuesday agreed to overhaul its lucrative targeted advertising system to settle accusations that landlords, lenders and employers use the platform to…
facebook  advertising  business  legal  housing  employment  discrimination  lawsuit  civilrights  humanrights  from instapaper
4 days ago by jtyost2
A Jury Will Decide if a GA School District Banned Yoga to Appease Christians
In 2006, Bonnie Cole, a practicing Christian, became the Assistant Principal at Bullard Elementary School in Cobb County, Georgia. In 2014, she and other teachers began introducing children to yoga exercises that involved breathing and stretching and meditation in order to help kids reduce their stress and relax.

It seemed to work. The school reported a 33% decrease in disruptive behavior and policy violations following the introduction of those yoga sessions.
religion  politics  education  legal  lawsuit  freedomofreligion 
5 days ago by jtyost2
US court: Sandy Hook victims' families can sue Remington - BBC News
A Connecticut court has ruled that families of schoolchildren killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook mass shooting can sue American gun-maker Remington.

In a 5-4 vote, the US state's Supreme Court said the lawsuit could proceed on the basis of state consumer protection laws.

The gun was used by Adam Lanza, who killed 27 people, including 20 elementary school students.

The ruling is a rare legal defeat for an arms firm in a mass shooting case.

The lawsuit, by relatives of nine victims and one survivor, points to the "militaristic" marketing of Remington's AR-15 rifle.
Connecticut  legal  lawsuit  business  SandyHook  guncontrol 
7 days ago by jtyost2
Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman sued for $500bn in college cheating scam - BBC News
A US mother has filed a $500bn (£375bn) lawsuit against the people charged in a university admissions scandal, claiming her son was unfairly denied placement.

Jennifer Kay Toy cited the "despicable actions" of the alleged conspirators as the reason her child was not admitted to some universities he had applied to.

A separate class action suit brought by current students has been filed against the universities named by US officials.

The students say a "warped and rigged" admission scandal cost them money.

Actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin are among the 33 parents charged with conspiring to bribe, cheat on tests and fake credentials to get their students into elite universities.

On Thursday, Ms Loughlin was officially dropped from the Hallmark Channel, a television network she has worked with since at least 2010.
lawsuit  college  education  stupid  legal  FelicityHuffman  LoriLoughlin 
7 days ago by jtyost2
Ex-VW Chief Knew of Diesel Scheme Years Earlier Than He Admitted, S.E.C. Says
The top securities agency in the United States has accused Volkswagen of undertaking a “massive fraud” and lying to investors, the latest in an ongoing diesel emissions scandal that has beleaguered the German carmaker.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said late Thursday that it was suing Volkswagen and Martin Winterkorn, its former chief executive, in a case related to a decade-long scheme undertaken by one of the world’s biggest carmakers to fudge its diesel emissions testing.

The agency is seeking to bar Mr. Winterkorn from being an executive director of any publicly listed company in the United States. It is also seeking to recover what it called “ill-gotten gains” from Volkswagen. Federal prosecutors criminally charged Mr. Winterkorn in 2018 with conspiring to hide the emissions cheating, elevating the scandal at the automaker to the very top of its management.
Volkswagen  sec  legal  lawsuit  business  ethics  pollution  automotive  fraud 
8 days ago by jtyost2
Congress Has a Breaking Point. This Week, Trump Might Have Found It.
The rejection of Mr. Trump’s national emergency declaration could also give ammunition to a half-dozen legal cases challenging the president’s exercise of that power under the 1976 National Emergencies Act, said Jack L. Goldsmith, a Harvard law professor who led the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel under President George W. Bush.

“Some judges may count that as evidence of congressional intent,” Mr. Goldsmith said, though he added that he disagrees with that view.

Dror Ladin, a staff lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, said Congress’s action would help convince federal judges that the president was acting illegally to fund his wall.

“This vote reinforces that the president has no right to that money,” Mr. Ladin said.

But as a political matter, Mr. Trump could use the congressional votes to his advantage on the 2020 campaign trail, portraying himself once again as the outsider candidate battling an unpopular Congress and the establishment in Washington.

Congress has for decades been what Ross K. Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University, calls a “constitutional weakling” — excessively deferential to the president. But there have been moments in history where the legislative branch seeks to assert its power and relevance, particularly with respect to the military and foreign engagement.

That happened in the 1970s with the passage of the War Powers Act, which gave Congress the ability to compel the removal of military forces absent a formal declaration of war. Congress exerted its authority in 1991 and again in 2002, when it authorized the president to use military force in the run-up to both wars in Iraq.

In 2005, amid a public uproar over the torture of detainees, Congress tightened antitorture laws to ban the infliction of “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” on prisoners — including those held overseas by the C.I.A. — over the objections of President Bush.

Now the fight over wall funding may incite yet another round of congressional muscle-flexing. A number of Republicans are pushing legislation to claw back the powers that Congress gave the president in the National Emergencies Act, which Mr. Trump invoked to declare an emergency along the southwestern border.

“The Senate’s waking up a little bit to our responsibilities,” said Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee.
congress  politics  usa  immigration  legal  military  government  democracy  DonaldTrump  republicans  democrats  lawsuit  from instapaper
8 days ago by jtyost2
Senate Rejects Trump’s Border Emergency Declaration, Setting Up First Veto
The Senate on Thursday easily voted to overturn President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the southwestern border, delivering a bipartisan rebuke to what lawmakers in both parties deemed executive overreach by a president determined to build his border wall over Congress’s objections.

The 59-41 vote on the House-passed measures set up the first veto of Mr. Trump’s presidency. It was not overwhelming enough to override Mr. Trump’s promised veto, but Congress has now voted to block a presidential emergency declaration for the first time — and on one of the core promises that animated Mr. Trump’s political rise, the vow to build a wall between the United States and Mexico.

In an attempt to limit defections ahead of the vote, Mr. Trump had sought to frame the vote publicly as not only a declaration of support for his border security policies but a sign of personal loyalty.

“It’s pure and simple: it’s a vote for border security, it’s a vote for no crime,” Mr. Trump told reporters ahead of the vote, which he declared on Twitter to be “a vote for Nancy Pelosi, Crime and the Open Border Democrats!”

But he could not overcome concerns among Republican senators about the legality of redirecting $3.6 billion from military construction projects toward the border wall even after Congress explicitly rejected the funding request.

“I believe the use of emergency powers in this circumstance violates the Constitution,” said Senator Jerry Moran, Republican of Kansas, in a statement written on lined paper. “This continues our country down the path of all powerful executive — something those who wrote the Constitution were fearful of.”

Ultimately, about a dozen Republicans joined Senate Democrats in supporting the House-passed resolution of disapproval: Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Susan Collins of Maine, Mike Lee of Utah, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rob Portman of Ohio, Mitt Romney of Utah, Marco Rubio of Florida, Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, and Mr. Moran.

The vote marks an explicit rebuke of Mr. Trump’s effort to end-run the constitutional power of the purse given to Congress, and although supporters will not be able to overcome a veto, the action could bolster a number of lawsuits contesting the emergency declaration as a flagrant violation of the Constitution’s separation of powers.
legal  government  politics  senate  congress  HouseOfRepresentatives  republicans  democrats  DonaldTrump  immigration  lawsuit  from instapaper
9 days ago by jtyost2
Sandy Hook Massacre: Remington and Other Gun Companies Lose Major Ruling Over Liability
The Connecticut Supreme Court dealt a major blow to the firearms industry on Thursday, clearing the way for a lawsuit to move forward against the companies that manufactured and sold the semiautomatic rifle used by the gunman in the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The ruling allows the lawsuit brought by victims’ relatives to go to trial, which could force gun companies to turn over internal communications that they have fiercely fought to keep private and provide a revealing — and possibly damaging — glimpse into how the industry operates.

The decision represents a significant development in the long-running battle between gun control advocates and the gun lobby.

The ruling validates the novel strategy lawyers for the victims’ families used as they sought to find a route around the vast protections in federal law that guard gun companies from litigation when their products are used to commit a crime.

The victims’ relatives had faced long odds as they argued that the gun companies bore some responsibility for the horrific attack.

The lawsuit argued that the AR-15-style Bushmaster used in the 2012 attack had been marketed as a weapon of war, invoking the violence of combat and using slogans like “Consider your man card reissued.”

Such messages reflected, according to the lawsuit, a deliberate effort to appeal to troubled young men like Adam Lanza, the 20-year-old who charged into the elementary school and killed 26 people, including 20 first graders, in a spray of gunfire. The attack traumatized the nation and made Newtown, Conn., the small town where it happened, a rallying point in the broader debate over gun violence.

The high stakes posed by the case stirred a vigorous response from both sides that only intensified after recurring episodes of deadly mass violence that followed the Newtown attack.

Among those who lobbied in support of the lawsuit were gun violence prevention groups, emergency doctors who treated patients wounded by assault rifle fire and a statewide association of school superintendents.

Many gun-rights groups also raised their concerns, including the National Rifle Association, which contended in its brief that allowing the case to move ahead stood to “eviscerate” the gun companies’ legal protections.
guncontrol  legal  lawsuit  politics  nra  Connecticut  from instapaper
9 days ago by jtyost2

« earlier    

related tags

$1.5  $1  $179  $2.8  $30k  $600k  #metoo  &  '420'  'bones'  'fenty'  'fortnite'  'leaving  'love  'the  'uncanceling'  "all  "walk  16  1999  19eyz  2005  2019  30%  30  30_percent  50  6ix9ine  a  abortion  about  access  accused  accusers  action  activism  administration  admissions  advertising  affordablehousing  after  against  age  aide  alandershowitz  alexanderacosta  alfonso  allegations  alleging  amber  amendment  and  annanorth  another  antitrust  apple  appstore  are  asbestos  assault  associatedpress  at&t’s  atlanta  atlanticmonthly  authoritarianism  automotive  awarded  aws  axios  azealia  babypowder  badass  bankruptcy  banks  bearstearns  belgrade  bennabok  billclinton  billy  birth-injury  blacklivesmatter  bobkraft  bombing  boss  boy  breach  brushes  business  camp  campaign  canada  carlton  cartography  catholic  cbcnews  cellnetwork  censusbureau  cent  championship  champs  chapman  charlottesville  chemical  chemicals  children  china  christianity  christucker  citizenship  civilrights  class-action  class  clf  climate_change  climatechange  colin  colinkaepernick  college  collusion  communitygarden  concert  concordmonitor  congress  connecticut  consent  constitution  consumer_rights  contentious  copyright  core  corruption  court  courtneywild  crime  criminalization  culture  dance  dapl  de  deal  deceptive  declaration  demands  democracy  democrats  denies  deportation  depositions  depp  deptofcommerce  detail  dhruvmehrotra  didn't  dieselgate  dipperz  disaster  discrimination  dismiss  dismissed  dismisses  dispute  dnc-russia  donald  donald_trump  donaldtrump  drop  dropped  drops  dwight  economics  edgarraykillen  education  elizabethstreetgarden  elon  embassy  emergency  emi:  employees  employment  environment  epic  eric  erp  ethics  ex-restaurant  face  facebook  facial  failed  fake  fat  father  fbi  felicityhuffman  festival  file  filed  files  first  florida  football  for  former  founder  fox  fraud  freedom  freedomofreligion  freedomofspeech  french  from  fyre  game  games  gawker  gender  geolocation  get  gets  girls  give  gizmodo  google's  google  government  grimes  groups  guncontrol  hardware  harveyweinstein  havilland’s  having  hbo  he  health  healthcare  heard  her  high-tech  him  hip  his  history  hit  hoa  holders  holocaust  homecoming  hop'  houseofrepresentatives  housing  how  howard  huawei  humanrights  ibm  ice  if  ikea  immigration  impersonator  implementation  in  inapp  industry  indystar  inmate  insurance  integrators  intimidation.tactics  intuit  investors  iphone  is  it"  it  italy  jacobs  jamesstern  janecoaston  jeffreyepstein  jeffschoep  jehovahswitness  jemelehill  jenlisajones  jerryjones  jobs  joe  joey  johnny  josephrecarey  juliebrown  kaepernick  kansas  kanye  kashmirhill  katiejohnson  kelly  kennethstarr  kentucky  kevinspacey  kingkong  kissing  kkk  know  labor  larrynassar  lasvegassands  law  leaked  legal  licensing  life  listing  litigation  loriloughlin  losing  ma  made  mapping  marc  mari's  martinolivier  massage  maxmind  mcfarland  media  medical-negligence  medicine  meek  merlin  merrimackstation  miamiherald  michaelcohen  michaelstroll  michaelwolff  michigan  migrant  militarization  military  mill  million  minaj  missing  missouri  money  montana  music  musk  national_emergency  nationalgeospatialintelligenceagency  nationalsocialistmovement  nazis  ncix  need  nevada  neverland'  new  newjersey  newmexico  news  nfc  nfl  nhpr  nicki  nintendo  nirvana's  nolita  not  nra  nyc  of  off  office  olivia  on  one  opinion  oracle  ordered  out  over  oxycontin  pablo'  paid  palmbeach  paulkruger  pay  paydayloan  people  percent  pipeline  police  politics  pollution  porn  possible  power  press  pretoria  pretoriaboyshigh  prison  privacy  private  producer  profit  prosecution  prostitution  protection  protest  protests  publicly  purchase  purduepharma  purge'  q1  quavo  r.  reach  recognition  refugee  reid  religion  removes  remy  replayed  reportedly  republicans  response  reveal  revenge  revenue  ribeiro  rihanna  ripoff  rkelly  rogergoodell  safety  saints  salary  samsung  sandyhook  sap  scandal  school  season  sec  security  seeking  selfdriving  senate  service  settle  settlement  sexabuse  sextrafficking  sexual  sexualabuse  sexwork  shame  she  sheldonadelson  shooting  shrugging  shutdown  sierraclub  slavery  smartphones  soccer  social  software  song  soulja  souljagame  southafrica  sparks  spies  splc  sports  spotify  sprint  stanford  star  states  stephenross  strangers  students  stupid  stylist’s  subpoena  supreme  supremecourt  surveillance  system  t.i.  takeoff  talcum  talk  teairra  tech  technology  tesla  the  theatlantic  thomasmather  threatened  throw  ticket  tidal  to  tobacco  tracy  trademark  trafficking  trump  trump’s  tweet  u.s.  uber  unionleader  unions  united_states  unitetheright  university  up"  uphold  urge  us  usa  usgs  usvirginislands  vaccine  victim  volkswagen  vox  vs  wake  wall  wants  washpost  watchtower  way  wealth  west  westvirginia  what  why  with  without  women’s  would  you  ‘feud’  “5g” 

Copy this bookmark: