humans   3323

« earlier    

Travail de Juliette Morel sur l'Atlas numérique du Limousin
SAGEO2018  HumaNS  from twitter_favs
9 days ago by ljegou
Marxism 101: How Capitalism is Killing Itself with Dr. Richard Wolff - YouTube
"Despite a concerted effort by the U.S. Empire to snuff out the ideology, a 2016 poll found young Americans have a much more favorable view of socialism than capitalism.

Though he died 133 years ago, the analysis put forward by one of the world’s most influential thinkers, Karl Marx, remains extremely relevant today. The Empire’s recent rigged presidential election has been disrupted by the support of an avowed socialist, Bernie Sanders, by millions of voters.

To find out why Marx’s popularity has stood the test of time, Abby Martin interviews renowned Marxist economist Richard Wolff, Professor Emeritus of Economics at UMass - Amherst, and visiting professor at the New School in New York.

Prof. Wolff gives an introduction suited for both beginners and seasoned Marxists, with comprehensive explanations of key tenets of Marxism including dialectical and historical materialism, surplus value, crises of overproduction, capitalism's internal contradictions, and more."
richardwolff  karlmarx  academia  academics  capitalism  accounting  us  inequality  communism  socialism  marxism  berniesanders  labor  idealism  materialism  radicalism  philosophy  dialecticalmaterialism  humans  systems  change  friedrichengels  slavery  automation  credit  finance  studentdebt  poverty  unions  organization  systemschange  china  russia  ussr  growth  2016  power  democracy  collectives  collectivism  meansofproduction  society  climatechange  environment  sustainability  rosaluxemburg  militaryindustrialcomplex  pollution  ethics  morality  immorality  ows  occupywallstreet  politics  corruption 
10 days ago by robertogreco
Reducing your carbon footprint still matters.
"Recent articles in Vox, the Guardian, and the Outline have warned that individuals “going green” in daily life won’t make enough of a difference to be worth the effort. In fact, they argue, such efforts could actually make matters worse, as focusing on individual actions might distract people from pressuring corporations and government officials to lower greenhouse gas emissions and enact the broader policy change we need to meet our climate goals. These articles and others like them (including in Slate) tend to conclude that the only truly meaningful action people can take to influence our climate future is to vote.

Voting is crucial, but this perspective misses a large point of individual actions. We don’t recommend taking personal actions like limiting plane rides, eating less meat, or investing in solar energy because all of these small tweaks will build up to enough carbon savings (though it could help). We do so because people taking action in their personal lives is actually one of the best ways to get to a society that implements the policy-level change that is truly needed. Research on social behavior suggests lifestyle change can build momentum for systemic change. Humans are social animals, and we use social cues to recognize emergencies. People don’t spring into action just because they see smoke; they spring into action because they see others rushing in with water. The same principle applies to personal actions on climate change.

Psychologists Bibb Latane and John Darley tested this exact scenario in a now-classic study. Participants filled out a survey in a quiet room, which suddenly began to fill with smoke (from a vent set up by the experimenters). When alone, participants left the room and reported the apparent fire. But in the presence of others who ignored the smoke, participants carried on as though nothing were wrong."

"There are plenty of things to do about climate change beyond voting. Take a train or bus instead of a plane, even if inconvenient—in fact, especially when inconvenient. Take a digital meeting instead of an in-person one, even if you give up expensed travel. Go to a protest, invest in noncarbon energy, buy solar panels, eat at meatless restaurants, canvass for climate-conscious candidates. Do whichever of these you can, as conspicuously as you can. With each step, you communicate an emergency that needs all hands on deck. Individual action—across supermarkets, skies, roads, homes, workplaces, and ballot boxes—sounds an alarm that might just wake us from our collective slumber and build a foundation for the necessary political change."
leorhackel  greggsparkman  climatechange  2018  politics  social  humans  globalwarming  bibblatane  johndarley  psychology  action  activism  environment  sustainability 
12 days ago by robertogreco
How To Sleep Better Tonight
Sleep is such an integral part of our lives. We as humans cannot perform to the best of our abilities day-in and day-out without getting enough sleep.
electronic-devices  sleep  humans 
17 days ago by Adventure_Web
Dr Sarah Taber on Twitter: "Red Delicious was A+ in its original incarnation. Then folks kept grafting from bud sports (=sometimes a tree throws a branch that's a little different, it's normal) w darker & darker fruit. Selected for color instead of qualit
"Red Delicious was A+ in its original incarnation. Then folks kept grafting from bud sports (=sometimes a tree throws a branch that's a little different, it's normal) w darker & darker fruit. Selected for color instead of quality. 100+ yrs later we now have purple foamballs.

[quoting: "If I had a time machine I would 100% make sure that the person who named the Red Delicious apple was brought to justice"]

(2/) Weirdly this makes some evolutionary sense. When confronted w a variety of otherwise identical fruit (say, bins of apples at the store), humans go for the darkest red ones.

In nature, that's how you eat the ripe ones & leave bb fruit to mature.

(3/) So. All other things being equal, if you have multiple apple varieties at the store, the darkest red ones tend to sell the fastest. It's not hard to see how that wound up being the priority for deciding which Red Delicious variants to graft.

(4/) Tl;dr a lot of the stuff that the food movement blames on "bad agriculture" or w/e is ... really just the result of a lot of micro-scale human decisions that made sense on their own. Then they snowball into something weird.

(5/) Also when I worked in fruit breeding the weirdest thing would happen. Us in the breeding program would wind up with our favorite cultivars. We liked the ones with a lot of flavor: strong, balanced acidity & sweetness with a lot of aroma.

(6/) There was this one blueberry that had this amazing rich flavor. Thick, jammy with a little bit of blackberry to it. mmmmmm

(7/) But when we actually did the flavor testing? Let civilians eat our new berry crosses?

They LOOOVED the most watery, insipid, shitty berries. Kept giving them top marks, and our favorite big-flavor berries always wound up in the middle.

(8/) IIRC the top-testing blueberry from that program during my time there was Meadowlark. Bless its heart, it's a great bush- but the fruit is a bland-ass water bean. Its max flavor level is a faint whiff of violets.

(9/) Anyway, it seems like every other thinkpiece about ~food these days~ has obligatory remarks on how The Scientists Are Breeding Crops For Durability Instead of Flavor.

lmao fuck that, we keep TRYING to breed for flavor & getting sabotaged by y'all on the taste panels

(10/) Again, there's some really complex human systems stuff going on in our produce markets. Like asking why so many ppl seem to prefer bland fruit. We'd really be able to help ourselves out if we actually ... looked at that?

(11/) But it wraps the story up in a neat little bow to blame ~science~ so sure let's do that instead.

-cut to scientists hissing Gollum-style over the 3 good berry plants from their field trials that never made it to market because The People Have Spoken- 🤣

(12/) Hrmmm replies have turned into a "let's hate on the plebes who don't appreciate fruit like ~we~ do" sesh.

The entire point of this thread was, there's a HUGE spectrum of flavors out there most of us don't ever encounter & we don't know what we don't know.

(13/) Statistically speaking, MOST OF US in the ol' u s of a are secretly one of those majority of people who like shitty bland fruit, AND WE'LL NEVER KNOW IT."
fruit  science  agriculture  2018  sarahtaber  apples  blueberries  grafting  flavor  food  selection  humans  berries  blackberries 
18 days ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

"going  2012  2016  2018  2read  96%  a  academia  academics  accounting  action  activism  age  agesegregation  agesegregaton  agriculture  ai  altright  anatomy  ancestry  and  animalintelligence  animals  anthropocene  apes  apocalypse  apples  archaeology  archive  are  arizona  arlingtonists  art  articles  artificialintelligence  at  atheism  automation  autonomous  be  behavior  berniesanders  berries  bibblatane  biology  blackberries  blueberries  bombs?  bonobos  bpa  brains  brooding  buddhism  business  calculator  california's  california’s  canadian  capitalism  carbon  carolblack  cars  centralization  change  children  childrenarethefuture  chimpanzees  china  chinook  christianity  civilization  climate  climatechange  coaching  cognition  collectives  collectivism  communication  communism  compulsory  computers  connection  conservation  control  corporations  corporatism  corruption  cover  credit  crisis  crispr  crowdsourcing  culture  cut  cyber  data  datasets  defense  democracy  deschooling  design  devastated  development  diabetes  dialecticalmaterialism  diet  dignity  disruptors  dna  does  dogs  dream  duh  duo  earth  ecology  economics  ecstasy  edc  education  electro  electronic-devices  endocrine  environment  eowilson  ethics  every  evolution  experiment  extinction  farms  fb  feminism  final  finance  first  flavor  food  footprint  for  found  friedrichengels  fruit  future  futurism  gan  gender  generosity  genetics  georgetownists  gilesfraser  globalwarming  gop  grafting  greggsparkman  grimmeathook  growth  guardian  habit  happiness  hardly  hawking’s  health  history  hormones  how  howwelearn  humanity  humannature  humansofdata  idealism  idiots  immorality  immunity  in  inequality  infrastructure  insulin  interaction  interspecies  into  islam  it.  jobs  johndarley  journalism  judaism  just  karlmarx  kill  labor  late"  layeraleph  lcproject  leadership  learning  leorhackel  less  like  line  lists  literacy  lot  lovecraft  lulz  machines  made  mail  make  management  mars?  marxism  marymidgley  matcher  materialism  may  meansofproduction  media  meetoo  militaryindustrialcomplex  models  monkeys  moral  morality  more  multiplier  music  nazis  need  new  newsletter  non-usa  now  nutrition  occupywallstreet  octopuses  of  offer  office  openstudioproject  orangutans  organization  organs  orphaned  out  ows  papers  people  philosophy  photography  physiotherapy  plastic  podcast  policy  politics  pollution  pop  post  poverty  power  pre-existing  predict  prehistory  premiere:  primates  psychology  publicschools  racism  radicalism  rationality  recommendedreading  reductionism  regular  relationships  religion  replace  research  richarddawkins  richardwolff  rippetoe  robot  robots  rosaluxemburg  running  russia  sageo2018  salmon.  sarahtaber  save  school  schooling  schools  science  scientism  screen  selection  self-driving  selfishness  settlement  sex  sfsh  share  skininthegame  slavery  sleep  social  socialism  socialsoftware  society  sociobiology  software  standardization  static  statistics/probability  step  stephen  studentdebt  study  super-rich  superhumans  sustainability  systems  systemschange  tcsnmy  teach  tech  technology  texting  the  them  theselfishgene  they  think  thinking  threat  tips  to  tools  trucks  trump  type2  typeii  unions  unschooling  upside  us  usa  ussr  video  violence  vs.  want  water  weightlifting  where  whirlpool  whitesupremacy  whoa  wildfire  wildfires  will  window  work  worse    “forest  “natural”    🇨🇳  🇷🇺 

Copy this bookmark: