honduras   3808

« earlier    

Greg Grandin reviews ‘Allende’s Chile and the Inter-American Cold War’ by Tanya Harmer · LRB 19 July 2012
"Harmer dispatches two myths favoured by those who blame the coup on Allende himself. The first is that his commitment to democracy was opportunistic and would soon have been abandoned. ‘One might even,’ Falcoff writes, ‘credit the Nixon administration with preventing the consolidation of Allende’s “totalitarian project”’. The second is that even if Allende wasn’t a fraud he was a fool, unleashing forces he could not control – for example, the left wing of Popular Unity, and the Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria, which was further to the left of Allende’s coalition and drew inspiration from the Cuban Revolution, Cuba conceived here as a proxy for Moscow.

Harmer shows that Allende was a pacifist, a democrat and a socialist by conviction not convenience. He had an ‘unbending commitment to constitutional government’ and refused in the face of an ‘externally funded’ opposition ‘to take a different non-democratic or violent road’. He invoked history to insist that democracy and socialism were compatible, yet he knew that Chile’s experience was exceptional. During the two decades before his election, military coups had overthrown governments in 12 countries: Cuba in 1952; Guatemala and Paraguay in 1954; Argentina and Peru in 1962; Ecuador, the Dominican Republic, Honduras and again Guatemala in 1963; Brazil and Bolivia in 1964; and Argentina once more in 1966. Many of these coups were encouraged and sanctioned by Washington and involved subverting exactly the kind of civil-society pluralism – of the press, political parties and unions – that Allende promoted. So he was sympathetic to the Cuban Revolution and respected Castro, especially after he survived the CIA’s Bay of Pigs exploit in 1961. And when Allende won the presidency, he relied on Cuban advisers for personal security and intelligence operations.

But Cuba’s turn to one-party authoritarianism only deepened Allende’s faith in the durability of Chilean democracy. Socialism could be won, he insisted, through procedures and institutions – the ballot, the legislature, the courts and the media – that historically had been dominated by those classes most opposed to it. Castro warned him that the military wouldn’t abide by the constitution. Until at least early 1973 Allende believed otherwise. His revolution would not be confronted with the choice that had been forced on Castro: suspend democracy or perish. But by mid-1973, events were escaping Allende’s command. On 11 September he took his own life, probably with a gun Castro gave him as a gift. The left in the years after the coup developed its own critique of Allende: that, as the crisis hurtled toward its conclusion, he proved indecisive, failing to arm his supporters and train resistance militias, failing to shut down congress and failing to defend the revolution the way Castro defended his. Harmer presents these as conscious decisions, stemming from Allende’s insistence that neither one-party rule nor civil war was an acceptable alternative to defeat.

A photograph of Allende taken during his last hours shows him leaving the presidential palace, pistol in hand and helmet on head, flanked by bodyguards and looking up at the sky, watching for the bombs. The image is powerful yet deceptive, giving the impression that Allende had been at the palace when the coup started, and was beginning to organise resistance to it. But Allende wasn’t trapped in his office. He’d gone there earlier that morning, despite being advised not to, when he heard that his generals had rebelled. The Cubans were ready to arm and train a Chilean resistance and, Harmer writes, ‘to fight and die alongside Allende and Chilean left-wing forces in a prolonged struggle to defend the country’s revolutionary process’. But Allende ordered them not to put their plans into operation, and they listened: ‘The Chilean president,’ Harmer says, ‘was therefore far more in control of Cuba’s involvement in his country than previously thought.’ He also rejected the idea of retreating to the outskirts of Santiago and leading an armed resistance: in Harmer’s assessment, he committed suicide rather than give up his commitment to non-violent revolution.

Many, in Chile and elsewhere, refused to believe that Allende had killed himself. The story had to be that he was executed, like Zapata, Sandino, Guevara and others who died at the hands of traitors. Che fought to the end and had no illusions about the bourgeoisie and its democratic credentials. Allende’s legacy is more ambiguous, especially for today’s revived Latin American left, which despite its remarkable electoral success in recent decades still struggles to tame the market forces set free after the Chilean coup. In 2009 in Honduras, for instance, and last month in Paraguay, democratically elected presidents were unseated by ‘constitutional coups’. In both countries, their opponents dressed up what were classic putsches in the garb of democratic proceduralism, taking advantage of vague impeachment mechanisms to restore the status quo ante.

For Brazil’s Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT), founded in 1980 by militant trade unionists including the future president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the coup in Chile reinforced the need to work with centrist parties to restore constitutional rule. Social issues weren’t completely sidelined, but attaining stability took precedence over class struggle; for the first time in Latin American history, a major left-wing party found itself fighting for political democracy as a value in itself, not as part of a broader campaign for social rights. ‘I thought a lot about what happened with Allende in Chile,’ Lula once said, referring to the polarisation that followed the 1970 election, when the Popular Unity coalition won with only a bit more than a third of the vote. That’s why he agreed to set the bar high for a PT win. During the Constituent Assembly debates leading up to the promulgation of Brazil’s 1988 post-dictatorship constitution, Lula insisted that if no one candidate received a majority in the first round of a presidential election, a run-off had to be held between the top two contenders, which would both give the winner more legitimacy and force him or her to reach out beyond the party base. Like Allende, Lula stood for president three times before winning at his fourth attempt. Unlike Allende, though, each time Lula ran and lost and ran again, he gave up a little bit more of the PT’s founding principles, so that the party went from pledging to overturn neoliberalism to promising to administer it more effectively.

In Venezuela, Hugo Chávez drew a different lesson from the defeat of the Popular Unity government. Soon after he was elected president in 1998, before coming out as a confrontationalist, indeed before he even identified himself as a socialist, Chávez began to compare himself to Allende. Wealthy Venezuelans were mobilising against even the mildest economic reforms, as their Chilean predecessors had done, taking to the streets, banging their pots and pans, attacking the government through their family-owned TV stations and newspapers, beating a path to the US embassy to complain, and taking money from Washington to fund their anti-government activities. In response, Chávez began to talk about 1973. ‘Like Allende, we are pacifists,’ he said of his supporters, including those in the military. ‘And like Allende, we are democrats. Unlike Allende, we are armed.’ The situation got worse and worse, culminating in the coup of April 2002 which, though unsuccessful, looked very like the coup against Allende. Chávez found himself trapped in the national palace speaking to Castro on the phone, telling him he was ready to die for the cause. Ever the pragmatist, Castro urged him to live to fight another day: ‘Don’t do what Allende did!’"
greggrandin  salvadorallende  history  marxism  socialism  democracy  2012  tanyaharmer  venezuela  economics  inequality  class  pacifism  cuba  fidelcastro  brazil  brasil  lula  luladasilva  latinamerica  us  richardnixon  intervention  revolution  government  argentina  honduras  guatemala  paraguay  perú  bolivia  hugochávez  pinochet  chile  henrykissinger  tanyharmer  coldwar  markfalcoff  dilmarousseff  authoritarianism  dictatorship 
3 days ago by robertogreco
Dismay after Trump moves to cut aid to Central America
US opposition politicians and aid agencies have questioned a decision by President Donald Trump to cut off aid to three Central American states.

Mr Trump ordered the suspension of aid payments to El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras to push their governments to stop migration into the US.

Critics say the decision will hurt programmes that already aim to persuade people to stay at home.

Congress may seek to stop the aid being redirected elsewhere.
congress  DonaldTrump  politics  budget  foreignaid  ElSalvador  Guatemala  Honduras  immigration  economics 
20 days ago by jtyost2
Trump seeks to cut foreign aid to 3 Central American nations
Taking drastic action over illegal immigration, President Donald Trump moved Saturday to cut direct aid to El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, whose citizens are fleeing north and overwhelming U.S. resources at the southern border.

The State Department notified Congress that it would look to suspend 2017 and 2018 payments to the trio of nations, which have been home to some of the migrant caravans that have marched through Mexico to the U.S. border.

Amplified by conservative media, Trump has turned the caravans into the symbol of what he says are the dangers of illegal immigration — a central theme of his midterm campaigning last fall. With the special counsel’s Russia probe seemingly behind him, Trump has revived his warnings of the caravans’ presence.

Trump also has returned to a previous threat he never carried out — closing the border with Mexico. He brought up that possibility on Friday and revisited it in tweets Saturday, blaming Democrats and Mexico for problems at the border and beyond despite warnings that a closed border could create economic havoc on both sides.

“It would be so easy to fix our weak and very stupid Democrat inspired immigration laws,” Trump tweeted Saturday. “In less than one hour, and then a vote, the problem would be solved. But the Dems don’t care about the crime, they don’t want any victory for Trump and the Republicans, even if good for USA!′

A group of House Democrats visiting El Salvador denounced the administration’s decision to cut aid to the region.

“As we visit El Salvador evaluating the importance of U.S. assistance to Central America to address the root causes of family and child migration, we are extremely disappointed to learn that President Trump intends to cut off aid to the region,” said the statement from five lawmakers, including Rep. Eliot Engel of New York, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “The President’s approach is entirely counterproductive.”

The Trump administration has threatened before to scale back or cut off U.S. assistance to Central America. Congress has not approved most of those proposed cuts, however, and a report this year by the Congressional Research Service said any change in that funding would depend on what Congress does.
DonaldTrump  government  foreignaid  diplomacy  immigration  crime  legal  congress  budget  Guatemala  Honduras  ElSalvador 
21 days ago by jtyost2
Canada cancels homeopathic foreign aid to Honduras - BBC News
The Canadian government will no longer fund homeopathic therapies in Honduras.

The move comes after an outcry about public funds going to support alternative therapies that have not been proven effective.

Terre Sans Frontières (TSF) had been given C$200,000 ($149,000, £114,000) over five years to provide homeopathy in the Central American country.

Around the world, alternative medicine charities modelled after Doctors Without Borders are still going strong.

The Quebec-based charity had been funded through Global Affairs' Volunteer Cooperation Program, which helps send skilled volunteers to developing countries.
Canada  Honduras  health  healthcare  science  medicine  foreignaid 
6 weeks ago by jtyost2

« earlier    

related tags

10-year  1980  2011  2012  2017  abuse  abusos  activist's  agua  aldana/thelma  america  americas  ancientamericas  and  anthonyromero  argentina  arizona  art  asesinos  assassination  assholes  asylum  authoritarianism  badmen  bayofpigs  berta_caceres  billclinton  bolivia  border  borderpatrol  borders  braceros  brasil  brazil  budget  california  canada  capitalism  caribbean  cartelesdedrogas  central  central_america  centralamerica  change  chile  cia  ciudadjuarez  civil/liberties  civilrights  civilwar  class  climate  clinton  cocaina  coffee  coffee:diseases  coldwar  colombia  colonialism  colorado  comicios  communism  congress  conspiracy  contras  corporations  corporatism  corruption  cotton  coup  court  covering  crime  cuba  cáceres/berta  dams  death  defamation  deforestation  democracy  democrats  deportation  derechos/humanos  devastating  dictadura  dictatorship  dictatorships  dilmarousseff  diplomacy  disease  documentary  dominicanrepublic  donaldtrump  drones  drug_war  drugs  ecología/honduras  economics  eisenhower  el-salvador  el  election  elpaso  elsalvador  embassy  emigracion  empire  environmental  español  ethniccleansing  evaluation  event  exchange  exploitation  fairtrade  familyseparation  familyvalues  fidelcastro  film  florida  food  for  foreign  foreign_policy  foreignaid  foreignpolicy  fosta  frank/dana  fraude  freelance  fuerzasarmadas  fulgenciobatista  fyffes  gangs  georgehwbush  geraldorivera  global/warming  global  golpe  gop  government  greggrandin  guatemala  harrytruman  health  healthcare  hectortrujillo  helps  henrykissinger  hernández/juanorlando  hillary_clinton  hillaryrclinton  history  hugochávez  idiots  immigrants  immigration  impact  imperialism  impunidad  in  indigenas  inequality  inteligencia  intervention  iran-contraaffair  jacoboárbenz  jerusalem  jessejackson  jimmycarter  joaquínbalaguer  journalist's  juangonzález  junotdíaz  justicia/sistema/de  land  language  laptops  latin_america  latinamerica  latinos  law  law_enforcement  lead  legal  lobo/porfirio  lorenzomeyer  luisenrique  lula  luladasilva  manifestaciones/populares  manuelzelaya  maps  marielboatlift  markfalcoff  martínespada  marxism  maríahinojosa  maya  media  medicine  mesoamerica  mexican-americanwar  mexico  miami  migrants  migration  militares  military/bases  military  military_aid  mncs  money/laundering  monument  move  murder  nacionesunidas  nafta  nasralla/salvador  natives  netanyahu  nevada  newmexico  newyorkmagazine  newyorktimes  nicaragua  nyc  oas  obama  obo  oncontact  oppression  oralhistory  organization_of_american_states  orlandohernández/juan  otf  overseas  ownership  pacifism  paraguay  participation  paulramirezjonas  perú  pinochet  pobreza  police  policiacos  policy  politics  prensa/libre  presos  prison  puertorico  race  racism  rafaeltrujillo  rct  redscare  refugees  reporter  republicans  research  resistance  revolution  richardnixon  rights  rigobertamenchú  roatan  ronaldreagan  rust  salvador  salvadorallende  sandinistas  science  sentence  shop  sindicatos  smuggling  socialism  spanish-americanwar  spanish  sports  sugar  tackling  tanyaharmer  tanyharmer  tegucigalpa  texas  textbooks  the  theconversation  threatened  ties  tootme  torturas  tourisme  trabajadoresenelcampo  trade  travel  trial  troubled  trump/donaldjohn  trump-presidency  trump  trumpdonald  u.s.  united_states  unitedfruitcompany  upholds  us  usa  usforeignpolicy/honduras  vacances  venezuela  violence  violencia  war/on/drugs  war  warm  warming  way  with  wmjclinton  ww2  wwii  youth  óscarromero 

Copy this bookmark: