fandom   86083

« earlier    

Better a Witty Fool Than a Foolish Wit - I feel like a lot of tumblr culture, especially...
I feel like a lot of tumblr culture, especially the particularly ineffective brand of Tumblr Social Justice™, has somewhere along the line lost track of the difference between something having the potential to be bad, and being innately bad. 
fandom  tumblr 
yesterday by pseudonymic
(13) Rod Roscoe - Repeat after me: "Perfection should never be the...
Repeat after me: "Perfection should never be the standard for welcoming or supporting an ally."
People will make mistakes. At least give them a chance to make amends out of respect for all the good they've done. Do not erase their good works from your memory, or else you're showing that you never cared about them in the first place... only appearances.
rights  SocialJustice(tm)  feminism  fandom 
4 days ago by kadymae
#MeToo and the New Era of Internet Celebrity | JSTOR Daily
For those of us who recognize that that false accusations are relatively rare, and who are therefore committed to the principle of believing accusations by default, it can still feel like a painful choice. Partly that’s because many of us also believe deeply in the principle of “innocent until proven guilty,” and there’s an inherent tension between believing accusers and presuming innocence.

But what we experience in these moments is more than just a collision of principles. It’s also a collision of emotions. We may want to be on the side of victims, but many of us also feel deep allegiance and loyalty to our favorite performers and public figures. And the internet is at the heart of that dynamic.

To begin with, the internet has become central to the celebrity machine. Scholarship on celebrity has taken note of what Joshua Gamson describes as the “bottom-up, do-it-yourself celebrity production process.” As Gamson notes,

The Internet drastically widens the pool of potential celebrities by lowering the entry barriers—a computer and a bit of moxie, and you’ve got a shot—and bypassing the tightly controlled publicity system and the tightly controlling middle people of Hollywood. In this arena, the fans are extremely active in the creation of celebrity: “viral” celebrity grows primarily through links forwarded from one person to another, reaction videos and blog postings, tagging, and so on.

But the celebrity-generating power of the internet is not limited to manufacturing celebrities from scratch. In her article on the actress Felicia Day, Elizabeth Ellcessor looks at the way the internet now helps to create the “star text” of celebrity:

Whereas the star system of classic Hollywood involved the careful cultivation of star texts by a studio in order to build reliable audiences for a performer’s work, we might look at the star text of connection as a new kind of star system. No longer is the metaphor that of a production line; today, it is more apt to speak of an ecosystem. Expansive, varied, and intimately connected, the workings of a star text of connection are formed through complicated interactions of media platforms, texts, audiences, and industries, facilitated by digital and social media.

It’s thanks to the internet, in other words, that minor celebrities can become big stars. That’s certainly the case with George Takei, an actor who was mainly remembered for his supporting role on Star Trek until his Facebook posts catapulted him to a fresh form of fame. But you could also say that Jeffrey Tambor and Kevin Spacey owe a big part of their celebrity to the internet, since both of whom have become much better known in recent years thanks to their star turns on hugely successful, internet-native TV series: Amazon’s Transparent (Tambor) and Netflix’s House of Cards (Spacey). Louis CK, too, has been widely described as a masterful user of online media, using direct distribution to release his own comedy performances online.

In creating and amplifying celebrity, however, the internet also transforms the relationship between stars and the public. Compared to traditional celebrity, Ellcessor writes, “Internet celebrity is founded even more firmly on illusions of intimacy….Internet-based fame depends on the authenticity of a star’s self-representation and on the notion of intimacy, experienced through the possibility of interaction rather than through simple familiarity.”

We may still be star-struck, but stars feel newly accessible: we receive their “candid” snapshots, their “spontaneous” thoughts, their “live” encounters. (Sorry, but it is impossible to talk about any of this without air quotes.) Ellcessor notes that this illusion of authenticity is intrinsic to the way social media works including “the illusions of “liveness” and interactivity presented online, the quotidian rhythms of interaction, the (possible) lack of media gatekeepers such as publicists, editors, and paparazzi in creating online self-presentations, and the availability of media tools. “…Illusions of liveness and interactivity in online media are crucial to experiencing online celebrity as uncontrolled, ongoing, immediate, and ‘real.’”

With this intimacy, however, comes vulnerability. In his article on celebrity as a form of capital, Driessens describes the visibility that comes with celebrity as a “Janus face,” noting that the “extreme example of the potentially disempowering effects of visibility is (political) scandal…for instance when morally transgressing practices that were kept invisible are revealed.” By making celebrities constantly and ubiquitously visible, the internet increases the likelihood that the skeletons in a celebrity’s closet will be brought to light. In part, that’s the simple result of ensuring that anyone with an internet connection can now share their own celebrity encounters, positive or negative, with the entire world.

But the reverberations of recent celebrity accusations don’t stem merely from the way the internet has manufactured and amplified celebrity, while also making it more intimate and vulnerable. The internet has also intensified our own level of emotional investment in the celebrities we follow, for reasons the are closely related to the way the internet makes celebrities feel more immediate and authentic. As Gamson notes in his description of the PR and media strategy of positioning celebrities as “ordinary people,” this common narrative strategy—”‘come see what they’re really like’—invites identification with celebrities.”

Because the internet and social media make celebrities feel more so much closer—so much more like us—their failure start to feel like our failures. We may not experience this identification consciously, but it’s still there at an emotional level. When you hear that the star of a bunch of your favorite movies has been accused of sexual assault, it’s sad and disappointing. When that star is someone you also follow on Twitter or Instagram, or have directly paid for an online performance, or have quoted on your own Facebook wall—well, it feels much more personal. This is a member of your virtual posse (even if it’s been a one-way relationship), and he’s let you down.

Precisely because this all happens in the deep cover of our lizard brains, it can lead to dangerous or counter-productive impulses—like the urge to defend a beloved celebrity without any real knowledge of the accuser or the accusations. Even if we stay silent, we may feel sad, anxious, or disloyal, simply for leaving “our” celebrity out there, undefended.

There’s no easy way out of this predicament, unless you’re prepared to do something radical, like cancelling your People subscription and unfollowing all your favorite stars. Even then, there’s no getting away from the fact that in our media-saturated culture, we often see and hear more from our favorite celebrities than from our own friends and family members.

But we can remind ourselves that exposure is not the same thing as familiarity. We can reject media and celebrity narratives that present stars as ordinary people we can identify with, and focus instead on the hundreds of clues and signals about all the ways their existence differs massively from our own. And then we can hope: hope that one way in which we are alike is in our horror at sexual harassment and exploitation, in all its forms.
celebrity  fandom  metoo 
15 days ago by thegrandnarrative

« earlier    

related tags

!forlater  *fanfiction  *ff-reccs  *marvel_reccs  *merlin_reccs  2005  2009  2017  abuse  actors  admins  agency-and-control  agency  alternative  alternities  amoktime  animals:otters  anime  archive  archives  art  article  atonement  audience  audiences  author:vina.jie-min.prasad  avantgarde  avengers  beyonc├⌐  blog_post  blogger:fangirlish  bookmark  books  bronson_pinchot  browserextentions  business  capitalism  celebrities  celebrity  change  clothes  comic  comicbook  comix  consumerism  criticism  cultural-cringe  culture  cuteanimals  cybercrime  delicious  diabetes  discussion  diversity  dresses  dwarves  economics  equality  essays  fail  fan-studies  fan  fanculture  fandometrics  fandomwank  fanfic  feminism  fic  film  flickr  fred_astaire  from  funny  future  games  gaming  geek  geekery  gen  grief  hamilton  healthcare  henryjenkins  history  hoax  hp  humbug  internet  invention  iphone  jackdaniel  k/s  k-pop-fandom  k-pop  kirk/spock  kpop  kyriarchy  labour  language  lexicon  lists  literature  lolcats  longreads  lucifer  maciejceglowski  malware  markets  mcdonalds  media  memoir  merlin  meta  metoo  misc_fandoms  moss  movie  movies  music  my  neoliberalism  neuchwanstein  nf  nonfic  nostalgia  once_upon_a_time  original  otaku  otters  outlander  outsider.perspective  overview  parody  people  pharmaceuticals  pinboard  pop  possibility  potential  poverty  princess_bride  privacy  psych  publicity  punk  quantum_leap  radanvarsimafia  reference  religion  resources  review  rickandmorty  rights  robots  sam/jack  sci-fi  scifi  sent  series  sex  ship-wars  shopping  slang  slash  socialjustice(tm)  socialmedia  sports-fandom  sports-teams  sports_night  st  st:tos  star_wars  stargate  stargatesg-1  supernatural  sweatshirts  tabloids  tagging  tech  television  the.martian  theatre  thor  thought-provoking  tips  toxicity  transcontextualism  transcription  transformation  tricks  tumblr  tutorial/how-to  tv  tv_discussion  twilight  usa  utopia  video  videogames  view.2017  volunteer  wagner  wank  wealthinequality  wiki  writing  x-files  yahoo  zines 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: