fake-news   522

« earlier    

That Time NPR Did Not Consider All Things | Dame Magazine
But who cares, right? It’s just one story out of thousands! Why drag this one? Because it’s illustrative of something all consumers of mainstream news these days need to be on the lookout for: What isn’t there, and why.

"contextualizing controversy"

What’s more likely is that journalists are human, and humans make mistakes, and they fail to ask the right questions, or they fear asking the wrong ones, and so they err on the side of caution, which does a disservice to readers but at least it means the writer has a job tomorrow.
There are a few different kinds of objectivity efforts in mainstream journalism that produce skewed, rather than impartial, work by privileging certain sources, warping the importance of others, or ignoring the existence of some altogether:

1/ There’s the “gotta hear both sides” approach, which fills out a story about a controversial subject with opposing views, no matter how crackpot.

2/ There’s the “he said, she claimed” approach, which presumes that official narratives are to be believed over the lived experiences of critics.

3/ The “silent source” fallacy: It asks readers to fill in the blanks, if they can, rather than fully reporting the extent to which a subject or policy is in dispute.

---
Apropos of nothing, in a context-free world where nothing has anything to do with anything else, readers are expected to find it interesting that CPC clients use Medicaid. In actuality, it’s particularly interesting that CPC clients use Medicaid precisely because conservative, Republican-aligned CPCs broadly oppose government programs like Medicaid.
abortion  healthcare  abortion-access  npr  dame-magazine  fake-news  andrea-grimes  sarah-mccammon  crisis-pregnancy-centers  journalism 
23 hours ago by yolandaenoch
‘Transparency’ Is the Mother of Fake News
At first glance the bias in favor of unlimited speech and information seems perfectly reasonable and even unassailable. What arguments could be brought against it? An answer to that question has been offered in recent years by a small, but growing, number of critics.

In a 2009 essay in The New Republic titled “Against Transparency,” the law professor Lawrence Lessig (known as an apostle of openness), asked, as I just have, “How could anyone be against transparency?” Lessig responds to his own question by quoting a trio of authors who in their book “Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency” observe that by itself information doesn’t do anything; its effects depend on the motives of those who make use of it, and raw information (that is, data) cannot distinguish between benign and malign appropriations of itself. Misunderstanding and manipulation are always more than possible, and there is no way to assure that “new information is used to further public objectives.”

Another way to put this is to say that information, data and the unbounded flow of more and more speech can be politicized — it can, that is, be woven into a narrative that constricts rather than expands the area of free, rational choice. When that happens — and it will happen often — transparency and the unbounded flow of speech become instruments in the production of the very inequalities (economic, political, educational) that the gospel of openness promises to remove. And the more this gospel is preached and believed, the more that the answer to everything is assumed to be data uncorrupted by interests and motives, the easier it will be for interest and motives to operate under transparency’s cover.

[...]

The insistence on the primacy of narratives and interpretations does not involve a deriding of facts but an alternative story of their emergence. Postmodernism sets itself against the notion of facts just lying there discrete and independent, and waiting to be described. Instead it argues that fact is the achievement of argument and debate, not a pre-existing entity by whose measure argument can be assessed. Arguments come first; when they are successful, facts follow — at least for a while, until a new round of arguments replaces them with a new set of facts.

This is far from the picture of Nietzschean nihilism that Hanson and others paint. Friction, not free invention, is the heart of the process: You commit yourself to the standards of evidence long in place in the conversation you enter, and then you maneuver as best you can within the guidelines of those standards. Thus, for example, a judge who issues a decision cannot simply decide which side he favors and then generate an opinion; he must first pass through and negotiate the authorized routes for getting there. Sometimes the effort at negotiation will fail and he will say that despite his interpretive desires, “This opinion just won’t write.”

Any opinion will write if there are no routes to be negotiated or no standards to hew to, if nothing but your own interpretive desire prevents you from assembling or reassembling bits of unmoored data lying around in the world into a story that serves your purposes. It is not postmodernism that licenses this irresponsibility; it is the doctrine that freedom of information and transparency are all we need.
NYT  fake-news  transparency  free-speech  politics  oppression  potmodernism  2018 
16 days ago by zzkt
TheJournal.ie FactCheck is first Irish outlet to officially tackle misinformation on Facebook
TheJournal.ie FactCheck project has signed on to carry out third-party fact-checking on Facebook. This will involved testing the veracity of articles posted on the platform and attaching a rating and contextual information to contested items.


Awesome. nice one TJ
the-journal  fact-checking  facebook  fake-news  facts  journalism 
29 days ago by jm
Drew Cloud Is a Well-Known Expert on Student Loans. One Problem: He’s Not Real. - The Chronicle of Higher Education
His website, the Student Loan Report, is widely cited by news media for its surveys on loan debt, and Cloud is quoted at length. But both he and his organization are facades.
student-loans  fake-news 
29 days ago by dougleigh
We Should Put Fact-Checking Tools In the Core Browser | Hapgood
Early in the history of the browser various features were introduced that helped with navigation: bookmarks, bookmark organization, browsable history, omnibar search, URL autocomplete (which ended  up eroding bookmark use). Icons showing when a connection was secure. Malicious site blocking. But as the web developed, the main focus of the browser wars ended up being less the browser as a navigation device and more the browser as an application platform. The interaction designs and renderings browsers support still advance year over year but the browser as a piece of user-focused software stalled decades ago. Mobile use, with it’s thin, crippled UI, just compounded that trend. Extensions were proposed as a solution for extensibility, but the nature of them just served to further impoverish core development.
mike-caulfield  browser  web-browsers  fake-news  media-literacy 
4 weeks ago by jbrennan
You Won’t Believe What Obama Says In This Video! 😉 - YouTube
"We're entering an era in which our enemies can make anyone say anything at any point in time."
fake-news  video  Manipulation 
5 weeks ago by thot
Post-Authenticity and the Ironic Truths of Meme Culture
What I’ve sought to argue in this essay, then, is that we are indeed living in an a strange, surface-centric moment in popular, digital culture right now — where the original ‘essence of things’ has indeed become somewhat unfashionable (or just less entertaining). Social and media technologies, optimised for the diffusion of highly emotive, reaction-generating content, encourage a rapid trade in attention-grabbing ideas, over slower-burning systematic, contextualised thinking.

Yet, even as ‘authenticity’ as a claim and as an aesthetic feels outdated, deeper forms of ‘realness’ in our communications still persist. People are still seeking to communicate their deepest personal truths: their values, hopes and fears with each other. Through sharing media, we’re still creating community.

Nonetheless, the kind of truth in play is changing form: emotional and moral truths are in ascendance over straightforwardly factual claims. Truth becomes plural, and thereby highly contested: global warming, 9/11, or Obama’s birthplace are all treated as matters of cultural allegiance over ‘fact’ as traditionally understood. “By my reckoning, the solidly reality-based are a minority, maybe a third of us but almost certainly fewer than half,” Kurt Andersen posits. Electorates in the US and Europe are polarising along value-driven lines — order and authority vs. openness and change. Building the coalitions of support needed to tackle the grand challenges we face this century will require a profound upgrade to our political and cultural leaders’ empathic and reconciliation skills.
culture  memes  generations  branding  demographics  irony  teens  danah-boyd  politics  fake-news 
5 weeks ago by jbrennan

« earlier    

related tags

2018  2nd-amendment  abortion-access  abortion  addiction  advertising  ai  algorithm  algorithms  alt-right  alternative  andrea-grimes  artificial-intelligence  beeleyite  berners-lee  bitcoin  black-mirror  book  bot  bots  branding  brexit  browser  bubble  business  cambridge  capitalism  censorship  centrism  chatbot  checkthedata  clinton-foundation  collapse  commentary  communication  conservatism  conspiracy-theories  conspiracy  content  contrarian  corruption  crisis-pregnancy-centers  crisis  critical-theory  culture  daemon  daily-mail-uk  dame-magazine  danah-boyd  data  deception  democracy  demographics  diffusion  digiconomist  digitalisierung  domination  donald-trump  dystopia  elections  elon-musk  epistemology  exhibition  facebook  fact-checking  facts  fake  fake=unfavorable  fakenews  feudalism  fiction  filter  free-speech  freedom  furries  future  gafa  generations  gesellschaft  google  guide  gun-culture  haiti  healthcare  history  hoaxes  human  humanities  imaginaries  imagination  indictment  individual  information-age  information-science  information  infowars  internet-culture  internet  irony  italy  jemelle-hill  jill-lepore  journalism  joy-reid  joyann-reid  knowledge  kremlin  kritisches-denken  laura-m-holson  literature  lizzy-smith  lj  machine-learning  maciej-cegłowski  manipulation  media-literacy  media-studies  media  medienbildung  medienkompetenz  medium  memes  mike-caulfield  misinformation  mit  monopoly  motivated-cognition  mueller  médias  neutrality  news  npr  nyt  nytimes  objectivity  omgwtf  online  oppression  paradigm-shift  pdf  persuasion  philip-k-dick  pinterest  plateformes  politics  politik  post-truth  potmodernism  profiles  propaganda  pundits  quatar  radio  readings  reagan-bad  reality  reflexion  regulations  research  resistance  responsibility  review  rumor  russia-media-hacking  russia  russian  sarah-mccammon  science-fiction  science  scientific-accuracy  scientific-communication  scroll  semk-digitalisierung  sf  snopes  social-media  social-network  social-networks  social-psychology  socialmedia  sociology  spies  stephanie-hamill  sts  student-loans  studies  surveillance  systems  teens  tesla  the-internet  the-journal  the-new-york-times  theory  tiger-tv  transparency  trump-journalism  trump  trumpism  truth  tumblr  twitter-moments  twitter  uk  usa  video  videobearbeitung  viral  virtue  web-browsers  web  wikimedia  wikipedia  www  yiffing  you-tube  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: