commoncore   899

« earlier    

Common Core for Teachers
Common Core overview for Teachers
6 weeks ago by amann
Florida School Ditches Common Core - Soars To Number One
A school in Florida that dumped the Common Core program in favor of traditional teaching methods has soared to the number one position in the State’s top schools list, according to government statistics.
education  commonCore 
december 2017 by Jswindle
Radical Eyes for Equity: Why Journalists Shouldn’t Write about Education | National Education Policy Center
"Over the past couple of days, I have watched almost universal praise for Dana Goldstein’s Why Kids Can’t Write*. Since those sharing this article have tended to be people and organizations that I respect, my own response has been tempered—even though I recognize in the overview of teaching writing the same problems with edujournalism I have been confronting for many years.

Other than Jim Horn’s challenge that Goldstein takes the “blame the teachers” route, many in the writing and teaching writing community have posted and shared this article without challenge, and several have added that Goldstein does a more than adequate job covering the landscape of teaching writing.

The irony here is that this article on the failures to teach students to write is a model for both typical mainstream journalism and everything wrong with mainstream journalism: the breezy recounting of a complex field within which the journalist has no real experience or expertise and the “both sides” coverage of complex issues that treats “sides” as somehow equally credible.

The key problems in this piece can be unpacked in a few claims made by Goldstein.

Early, Goldstein asserts (without any link to evidence):
Focusing on the fundamentals of grammar is one approach to teaching writing. But it’s by no means the dominant one. Many educators are concerned less with sentence-level mechanics than with helping students draw inspiration from their own lives and from literature.

What is profoundly garbled here is a conflating of what the field of teaching writing shows through research and what teachers actually do in their classrooms.

The reality of 2017 and how students are taught writing is best reflected in a comment by former NCTE president Lou LaBrant from 1947:
A brief consideration will indicate reasons for the considerable gap between the research currently available and the utilization of that research in school programs and methods. (p. 87)

Isolated grammar instruction has been shown to have almost no transfer into student writing, and George Hillocks (among others) detailed that traditional grammar exercises could even make student writing worse.

However, I invite Goldstein and others to visit classrooms and, better yet, simply read through the Connected Community’s Teaching and Learning Forum (NCTE) where weekly English teachers voice their continued commitment to “[f]ocusing on the fundamentals of grammar.”

I want to come back to this point with another example below, but next, Goldstein wanders into the fatal flaw of edujournalism with this splash of evidence:
Three-quarters of both 12th and 8th graders lack proficiency in writing, according to the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress. And 40 percent of those who took the ACT writing exam in the high school class of 2016 lacked the reading and writing skills necessary to successfully complete a college-level English composition class, according to the company’s data.

Poor writing is nothing new, nor is concern about it. More than half of first-year students at Harvard failed an entrance exam in writing — in 1874. But the Common Core State Standards, now in use in more than two-thirds of the states, were supposed to change all this. By requiring students to learn three types of essay writing — argumentative, informational and narrative — the Core staked a claim for writing as central to the American curriculum. It represented a sea change after the era of No Child Left Behind, the 2002 federal law that largely overlooked writing in favor of reading comprehension assessed by standardized multiple-choice tests.

The relentless and uncritical faith in what standardized tests tell us is one of the great problems with edujournalism across all discussions of education, but with writing, this is particularly problematic since standardized testing of writing is universally horrible, lacking validity and itself providing the context for why the teaching of writing is in fact inadequate.

Again, Hillocks has carefully analyzed that one of the most negative influences on teaching students to write has been the high-stakes testing movement. Teachers and their students have become slaves to state-level and national tests of writing that make writing to prompts and conforming to anchor papers as well as rubrics supersede any authentic writing goals that were endorsed by important movements such as the National Writing Project (a key focus of Goldstein’s article).

As I noted earlier, the irony is that a professional journalist’s piece in the NYT fails to provide the sort of credible evidence that many would expect as essential to student writing."

"But, again, what is incredibly important about causality in Applebee and Langer’s analysis, and what is totally subsumed by Goldstein’s focus on teachers, is that the standards and high-stakes testing movement killed the path to authentic writing instruction begun by the National Writing Project in the late 1970s and early 1980s (I outline that phenomenon in a chapter on de-grading the writing classroom).

Teachers and their students are being held accountable for writing standards and high-stakes tests—and everything we know about teaching writing well be damned.

On balance, then, Goldstein fails to expose accurately why students can’t write by glossing over the field of teaching writing without the care and expertise that topic deserves and by depending on weak evidence at the exclusion of a wealth of evidence that powerfully addresses the exact problem she seeks to examine.

Writing and teaching writing are highly complex fields, but we have a great deal of research, we do know how to teach writing well, and the field of composition, like all vibrant fields, remains a living thing driving by debate and investigation.

If we need a simple statement, then, on why students can’t write, let me offer something to consider: Students can’t write well because teachers are blocked from teaching well, and thus, the wall that must be torn down so both can excel is the standards and high-stakes testing movement.

* Goldstein’s title alludes to one of the worst but also enduring works ever on literacy, Why Johnny Can’t Read. This book spurred the school-bashing movement and engrained some of the most negative attitudes about literacy still remaining in the U.S. See Revisiting Content and Direct Instruction."
education  journalism  writing  2017  reporting  danagoldstein  katewalsh  testing  standardizedtesting  reform  schoolreform  learning  teaching  howweteach  literacy  media  standardization  commoncore  data  assessment  pedagogy  lolabrant  1947  georgehillocks  ncte  nationalwritingproject  instruction  grammar  arthurapplebee  judithlanger  1970s  1980s  rudolfflesch  policy  plthomas  paulthomas  highstakestesting 
august 2017 by robertogreco
I know the conservatives hate but I thought ya'll should know that is covered in 9th Grade…
CommonCore  Plagiarism  from twitter_favs
january 2017 by KateSherrill
WakeUpAmerica  CommonCore  from twitter
january 2017 by nausley
ReturnEducation2States  CommonCore  from twitter
january 2017 by nausley

« earlier    

related tags

1859  1947  1970s  1980s  2015  2016  2017  3rdgrade  4gk  aboutthechild  accountability  achievementgap  algebra  altschool  amazon  amplify  apps  arthurapplebee  article  assessment  automation  berriensprings  bigbrother  billgates  blendedlearning  bones  book  brainpop  brooklyn  bureaucracy  ccss  charterschools  children  closereading  coding  common-core  common  computers  connect  core  curriculum  danagoldstein  dap  data  datamining  datastore  deathtax  democracy  dianelevin  dianeravitch  earlyliteracy  ebooks  edchat  edtech  education  ela  elachat  eparegs  esasij  explained  explainer  family  feedly  fiveparagraphessays  free  freespeech  gatesfoundation  gender  georgehillocks  georgehwbush  googlect  government  gradecam  grammar  gtamtv  guncontrol  hacks  higheredtrends  highstakestesting  history  homeschooling  howwelearn  howweteach  howwewrite  ibdeditorials  ifttt  inequality  influence  innovation  instapaper  instruction  ipad  irandeal  johndewey  journalism  judithlanger  k-12trends  k12  katewalsh  kindergarten  labor  laed  lalege  learning  lesson  literacy  literature  lolabrant  madelyn  mastery  masteryconnect  math  mathanxiety  mathedu  mathematics  matrices  matrix  maxventilla  media  middleschoolmath  money  mtpol  naep  nancycarlsson-paige  nannystate  nationalwritingproject  nced  nclb  ncte  netcademy  ngss  nicholastampio  nyc  oats  obamacare  oldschool  one  onlinebooks  opportunitygap  organization  origination  paloalto  parcc  parenting  parents  paulthomas  pedagogy  pennant  petergray  petergreene  pinterestlike  pjnet  plagiarism  plan  planbook  planner  plans  plthomas  policy  politics  poverty  practice  programming  progressive  progressiveeducation  public  publischools  reading  realid  reform  reporting  returneducation2states  rttt  rudolfflesch  sakura  sanfrancisco  sat  schooling  schoolreform  schools  science  scottish  segregation  sfsh  siliconvalley  standardization  standardizedtesting  standards  statistics  stem  stopesea  students  surveillance  teaching  teachingwriting  teachtoone  technology  templates  tenframe  test  testing  theatlantic  toread  tosachat  unions  us  utah  uted  utpol  veritas  via.susan  video  vox  wakeupamerica  writing  yis 

Copy this bookmark: