biometrics   1849

« earlier    

Facial recognition is accurate - if you're a white guy
Study of facial recognition software conducted by Jyo Buolamwini at the MIT Media Lab finds that the darker the skin of the subject the more errors arise - up to 35% for darker-skinned women. At Georgetown Law School, researchers estimate that 117 million American adults are in face recognition networks used by law enforcement. African-Americans are disproportionately represented in mugshot databases.
biometrics  facial  recognition  race  fairness 
7 days ago by net.wars
Prevent Biometrics - Concussion Intelligence
revent’s patented technology was developed at Cleveland Clinic by top neurosurgeons and engineers over a period of 6 years with grants from the National Institute of Health and others, and is the only head impact monitor who’s accuracy has been validated in an IRB approved study published in the top peer reviewed Stapp Journal.
health  biometrics  concussion  wearable  sports  medical 
17 days ago by cyberchucktx
Biometrics in the News: MasterCard Plans for Transaction Implementation in 2019
Biometrics are on the forefront of the finance industry, as MasterCard announces their plans to implement these measures for in-store transactions starting in 2019.
biometrics  access-control  security 
18 days ago by Adventure_Web
Is India's Aadhaar system really "hack-proof"? Assessing a publicly observable security posture • Troy Hunt
<p>UIDAI is the Unique IDentification Authority of India and they run the Aadhaar project. Their statement echoes comments made around this latest incident that espouse the complete security of the system: "The Aadhaar data, including biometric information, is fully safe and secure".

Here's the issue I (and many others) have with these statements and I want to make it crystal clear:
Security is not a boolean proposition. It's not "secure" versus "insecure", "safe" versus "unsafe", rather it is a spectrum of controls that all contribute to an overall security posture. There is no "fully", there is no "completely"; every system - every single one - has weak points and a sufficiently well-equipped and determined adversary will find them.

It's the hubris of the UIDAI's statements which is the most worrying and it neglects so many of the highly sophisticated precedents that have come before the current situation. Precedents like Stuxnet, created by the US and Israeli governments to damage the Iranian nuclear program by targeting air-gapped centrifuges via 4 previously unknown "zero-day" flaws. That's almost a cliched example to pull out these days, the point is simply that where there is sufficient will and resources, any information system can be compromised.

But let's get back to that original tweet and the question therein: "Can you prove otherwise?" I certainly wouldn't want to be the person probing away at Aadhaar in an unauthorised fashion in order to prove otherwise (although make no mistake, many people are), but per the title of this post, there are many publicly observable things I can easily draw attention to. To be crystal clear, none of this is "hacking", it will merely involve looking at how the system responds to legitimate requests and observing the gap between what it does at present and what it ideally should do.</p>

Lengthy post. It's not certain that Aadhaar can be hacked, but one tends to think that where there's a will - and 1.2bn user records - there's a way.
aadhaar  biometrics  hacking 
5 weeks ago by charlesarthur

« earlier    

related tags

341webmgmt  351  3d_printing  644  aadhaar  aadhar  academe  access-control  activismo  advertising  agriculture  ai  airlines  airports  algorithms  alibaba  analysis  analytics  anderlecht  apfs  apparel  apple  art  artificial-intelligence  artificialintelligence  audio  auth  authentication  big_data  bigbrother  bkav  bone  borders  brexit  by:alibreland  cbp  china  cia  civilliberties  classification  comp3911  concussion  congress  cool  cybersecurity  daca  daon  data  database  databases  dc:creator=friedlandjonathan  dctagged  deeplearning  digitalidentity  dna  domestic_surveillence  dystopia  eff  eu  face++  face-recognition  face  face_id  facebook  facedetection  faceid  facerecognition  facial  facialrecognition  fail  failure  failures  fairness  fake  farming  fb  finger  fingerprint  freedomofmovement  from:theguardian  fuck-everything  future  futureoftransportation  genetics  government  hack  hacker  hacking  hands  health  healthhouse  heart  hjd  homeoffice  horrorstories  id-cards  idcards  identification  identifiers  identity  images  immigration  india  informationsecurity  infosec  iphone  ireland  joybuolamwini  jrkkvaganza  kfc  lambnorman  law  leaks  learning  liberty  machine-learning  machine  machinelearning  materials  medical  mobile  mobiles  modelling  morpho  multifactor-authentication  naomiwu  natsec  neuro  news  nsa  panopticon  password  passwords  pdf  photographs  physical_security  police  policing  politics  predictivepolicing  privacy  profiling  psc  quantified_self  race  racism  realsexycyborg  recognition  regression  retailing  retention  rfw  sarahjamielewis  scary  sciencefiction  security  sensors  skater  slashdot  smile_to_pay  snowden  social_score  spoofing  spooks  sports  surveillance  synthesis  technology  teenvogue  textbook  threat_model  three-factor-authentication  totwitter  touchid  transportation-security-administration  transportation  travel  tweet  uk  uniqueidentification  usa  via-irc  voice  voicedetection  voiceverification  waronterror  wearable  wearables  webofnoweb  windows  wireless 

Copy this bookmark: