billclinton   946

« earlier    

What is Pizzagate and How Might it Change the Shape of America By Roy MacGregor
I’m not going to slowly build to a punchline here. This is not a story or any attempt at satirical humor, though the vast majority of our content is. There is a gargantuan illness in America and the world, and it’s not the ugly underbelly of the political elite. It is out in the open and staring us all directly in the face. The crimes committed by the Elite in this nation are far more severe and disgusting than many have even bothered to imagine, or could even conceive. A combination of dark web terminology, the emails procured and released by Wikileaks, the work of Anonymous, and unnamed sources within the New York Police Department provide evidence of a conspiracy to abduct children for purposes of kidnapping, trafficking, and molestation.

This is no small charge. Before you write it off as fanciful conspiracy nonsense, which is not only easy to do but better for your personal sanity, you owe it to yourself to hear the arguments out. Lives are at stake and innocent ones at that. As Nelson Mandela said, “Any society which does not care for its children is no nation at all.”

This would not be the first time in political history, even this decade, that a large pedophile ring involving powerful people has been discovered. An Australian piece on a mainstream media outlet just last year outed dozens of British and Australian politicians and high-society members as pedophiles. To this day, most of them are free to walk the streets. Kindly don’t take my word for it. Watch for yourself. This article will still be here when you get done. It only takes 30 minutes and it’s important going forward that you grasp the fact that we’re not talking hypothetically here.



First of all, it’s incredibly important to understand that this is not a new thing. People willing to harm children have always been with us.1 They have always had and acted on their desires. Only the most willfully ignorant could possibly deny it. It is no longer acceptable to turn a blind eye to the abuses and the fact that it’s happening at all levels of society. In the past half-century alone there have been dozens of high-profile cases that have gone absolutely nowhere, and a mere handful of low-level pedophiles have been punished.2 The only thing that has changed since these groups were outed is that they’ve gotten smarter about how they operate and gone farther underground. They first took to the Internet, but when law enforcement started tracking them they went to the dark web where the authorities have a much harder time finding them. People often call for the elimination of the dark web, but that is simply impossible. The dark web consists of every page on the Internet not indexed by search engines. That would include most of Facebook and a tremendous number of perfectly legitimate websites. All of them are ‘dark’ from the perspective of the average user. No account, no access.

The problem with the Internet is that anyone can style themselves an investigative journalist. People not trained in the art, myself included, tend to make common mistakes like including speculative information as fact or chasing red herrings in an effort to be thorough. This undermines the work the layperson does as well as the work trained investigative journalists do. We’re trying hard to avoid those pitfalls. Below is a non-exhaustive list of compelling evidence that the reader can verify at leisure.

A major source of information is Wikileaks, and specifically the Podesta Email Archive3 that has been released on a schedule from October 7th to November 9th, 2016. The useful messages cover the period from mid-October 2006 through Late February of 2016. Why should we trust Wikileaks as a source? Quite simply they have never released anything that was not authentic and verified. They are the only journalistic entity with a track record of 100% accuracy. They present information without comment in as close to its original form as possible, including all source information.4

The main objections to the Podesta emails have revolved around the fact that they’re seemingly in code. They don’t say anything overt at all. The question for anyone with that objection is, who wouldn’t speak in code when discussing nefarious activity? Parents speak in code around their children in an effort to hide the true meaning from their simpler minds and to great effect. The thing about this specific code is that it’s not particularly secret. The underground sex community has used it for decades.


this email (Email ID # 32795)
In emails, we see this code play out. For instance, in which some of the terms in the image to the right are seen. Link to that email.

In another email (John Podesta) we can decipher the terminology as excitement over having little girls as “company” instead of an ‘orgy’ involving ‘little boys’. He even gives us a second indication in the P.S. line that playing ‘dominos’ is better on top of ‘little girls’ than on top of ‘little boys’.

It seems as if Mr. Podesta has a difficult time cleaning up after himself. He is not nearly in the same league as his friend Anthony Weiner, but sloppy none the less. “A map that is pizza related,” as per the terminology chart, shows not only that Mr. Podesta was involved in unconscionable acts but the sender from The Sandler Foundation was aware of activities taking place. Now, some will suggest we are reading to much into this. but ask yourself, is it possible to spill a map related to pizza on your handkerchief?

This email shows children as young as seven being used as “entertainment” in a hot tub for old men. Based on the other emails we have read this one should put a big lump in your throat.

These emails show a blatant disregard for decency and give the reader some insight into the corruption of the elite. More emails can be found by searching the Wikileaks database and going down the rabbit hole.

As the information is trickling out we are seeing an ever-growing conspiracy that, according to anonymous sources within the N.Y.P.D, includes former Presidents, Congressmen, Federal Judges, and law enforcement officials. The information contained on the computer of Anthony Wiener seems more of a mutually assured destruction file than it does simple child porn. This being the same computer his wife Huma Abedin (Top aid to Hillary Clinton) used to send and receive emails to/from The State Department. You can just imagine the kind of blackmail this might have caused had Secretary Clinton won the presidency.


Orgy Island
Another party to this story is a longtime friend of the Clintons Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Epstein is a former financier at Bear Sterns before starting his own company J. Epstein and Co.

In 2008 Epstein was found guilty of attempted solicitation of sex from an underage girl and served 13 months.5 Yes, only 13 months in prison. Isn’t it great to have connections? Especially connections you have the ability to blackmail? According to various sources, Epstein owns his own island which is used to bring Elite adults together with children. This in not just an island used for elites from the United States, rather it is used for elites all over the globe. Bill Clinton has traveled with Mr. Epstein 26 times on Epstein’s private jet named “The Lolita Express” thus far and many of those “vacations” were taken without Secret Service protection.6 On several trips, President Clinton was joined by former Secretary Mrs. Clinton. Mr. Epstein seems like an odd friend for a former President and Secretary of State to have, no?

According to Virginia Roberts testimony in a Federal Court, she was used by Epstein as a sex slave from the age of 15.7 She was trafficked as an underage prostitute for wealthy clients including Attorney Allen Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew. Ms. Roberts also identified former President Clinton as being a guest in the Epstein Villa used for group sex with underage children, “I remember asking Jeffrey, ‘What’s Bill Clinton doing here?’ kind of thing and he laughed it off and said, ‘Well, he owes me a favor,’ ” Roberts was never explained to what that ‘favor’ was.

Oft-quoted Lord John Dalberg-Acton said, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” I wonder if perhaps he may have missed the mark. Could it be that powerful positions attract the most corruptible people? The evidence, and there is much more to be had, deserves a proper investigation by a proper investigative body. According to the anonymous informants in the NYPD, they’ve been stonewalled in their attempt to bring the information forward. We will continue to update information as it is released. The good decent people of the world deserve to know the truth and we will do everything in our power to bring that truth to you. Power should not grant immunity from morality.

Update 25 November 2016

Since it’s called Pizzagate it becomes important to make that term make sense. Since Bill Clinton and Jeffery Epstein have little to do with pizza overtly, where does the term come from? The whole thing can’t be based on the fact that pizza is a pedophile term. Where the ‘pizza’ in Pizzagate comes from is the inexorable ties to pizza parlors as fronts for human trafficking. Yeah, that sounds ludicrous. It has to be ludicrous. Pizza is a wonderful, albeit unhealthy, food, right? Yes. Everyone, especially a child, loves it.

Given its popularity, it’s not hard to imagine that trendy pizza shops would be frequented by politicians and powerful people especially in powerful cities like Washington, DC. But how is it possible that a pizza shop owner could be considered one of the most powerful people in Washington? I mean, it’s the most powerful city in the arguably most powerful country in the world, right? The list of powerful people should be limited to POTUS and influential lobbyists. How did this man, James Alefantis, become number 49 on … [more]
Pizzagate  BillClinton  JeffreyEpstein  LolitaExpress  ChildTrafficking  ChildSexualTrafficking 
7 hours ago by juandante
“When You Get That Wealthy, You Start to Buy Your Own Bullshit”: The Miseducation of Sheryl Sandberg | Vanity Fair
"Harvard Business School invented the “leadership” industry—and produced a generation of corporate monsters. No wonder Sandberg, one of the school’s most prominent graduates, lacks a functioning moral compass."



"The truth is, Harvard Business School, like much of the M.B.A. universe in which Sandberg was reared, has always cared less about moral leadership than career advancement and financial performance. The roots of the problem can be found in the School’s vaunted “Case Method,” a discussion-based pedagogy that asks students to put themselves in the role of corporate Übermensch. At the start of each class, one unlucky soul is put in the hot seat, presented with a “what would you do” scenario, and then subjected to the ruthless interrogation of their peers. Graded on a curve, the intramural competition can be intense—M.B.A.s are super-competitive, after all.

Let’s be clear about this: in business, as in life, there isn’t always one correct answer. So the teaching of a decision-making philosophy that is deliberate and systematic, but still open-minded, is hardly controversial on its face. But to help students overcome the fear of sounding stupid and being remorselessly critiqued, they are reminded, in case after case—and with emphasis—that there are no right answers. And that has had the unfortunate effect of opening up a chasm of moral equivalence in too many of their graduates.

And yet, there are obviously many situations where some answers are more right than others. Especially when it comes to moral issues like privacy, around which both Sandberg and Facebook have a history of demonstrating poor judgment. While H.B.S. is correct in its assertion that it produces people who can make decisions, the fact of the matter is that they have never emphasized how to make the right ones.

Consider investment banker Bowen McCoy’s “The Parable of the Sadhu,” published in Harvard Business Review in 1977, and again 20 years later. It addressed what seemed, at least to the H.B.S. crowd, to be an ethical dilemma. McCoy was on a trip to the Himalayas when his expedition encountered a sadhu, or holy man, near death from hypothermia and exposure. Their compassion extended only to clothing the man and leaving him in the sun, before continuing on to the summit. One of McCoy’s group saw a “breakdown between the individual ethic and the group ethic,” and was gripped by guilt that the climbers had not made absolutely sure that the sadhu made it down the mountain alive. McCoy’s response: “Here we are . . . at the apex of one of the most powerful experiences of our lives. . . . What right does an almost naked pilgrim who chooses the wrong trail have to disrupt our lives?”

McCoy later felt guilt over the incident, but his parable nevertheless illustrated the extent to which aspiring managers might justify putting personal accomplishment ahead of collateral damage—including the life of a dying man. The fact that H.B.S. enthusiastically incorporated said parable into its curriculum says far more about the fundamental mindset of the school than almost anything else that has come out of it. The “dilemma” was perfectly in line with the thinking at H.B.S. that an inability to clearly delineate the right choice in business isn’t the fault of the chooser but rather a fundamental characteristic of business, itself.

Here’s a slightly more recent example: remember Jeff Skilling? Like Sandberg, he graduated from H.B.S. and went to work at McKinsey. And like Sandberg, he left McKinsey for a C-suite gig—in his case, Enron—that took him to the stratosphere. Again like Sandberg, he basked in adulation over his ability to deliver shareholder returns. Skilling had done so, of course, by turning Enron into one of the greatest frauds the world has ever seen.

One of Skilling’s H.B.S. classmates, John LeBoutillier, who went on to be a U.S. congressman, later recalled a case discussion in which the students were debating what the C.E.O. should do if he discovered that his company was producing a product that could be potentially fatal to consumers. “I’d keep making and selling the product,” he recalled Skilling saying. “My job as a businessman is to be a profit center and to maximize return to the shareholders. It’s the government’s job to step in if a product is dangerous.” Several students nodded in agreement, recalled LeBoutillier. “Neither Jeff nor the others seemed to care about the potential effects of their cavalier attitude. . . . At H.B.S. . . . you were then, and still are, considered soft or a wuss if you dwell on morality or scruples.”

Why do so many M.B.A.s struggle to make the ethical decisions that seem so clear to the rest of us? Is it right to employ a scummy P.R. firm to deflect attention from our failures? Is it O.K. if we bury questions about user privacy and consent under a mountain of legalese? Can we get away with repeatedly choosing profits over principles and then promising that we will do better in the future?

If you think this kind of thing isn’t still going on at Harvard Business School—or wasn’t going on when Sandberg graduated in 1995—I refer you to Michel Anteby, who joined the faculty 10 years later, in 2005. At first enthusiastic, Anteby was soon flummoxed by the complete absence of normative viewpoints in classroom discussion. “I grew up in France where there were very articulated norms,” he told the BBC in 2015. “Higher norms and lower norms. Basically, you have convictions of what was right or wrong, and when I tried to articulate this in the classroom, I encountered . . . silence on the part of students. Because they weren’t used to these value judgments in the classroom.”

Eight years after his arrival, Anteby published Manufacturing Morals: The Values of Silence in Business School Education. The book was not published by Harvard but the University of Chicago Press. Calling the case system an “unscripted journey” for students, it was one of the first times an insider had joined the chorus of outsiders who have long criticized the case method as one that glamorizes the C.E.O.-as-hero, as well as the overuse of martial terminology in business curricula. (The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Mark Zuckerberg currently considers Facebook “at war.”)

“H.B.S. studies everybody under the sun,” Anteby told me in early 2015. “There is no reason we should be off limits.” Alas, they were. Not long after his book was published, Anteby came to believe that H.B.S. would not grant him tenure, and left the school soon after. “He is an unbelievably productive and smart guy,” one of his supporters, the University of Michigan’s Jerry Davis, told me later that year. “And they fired him. Probably because H.B.S. wasn’t the right place to have a conversation about itself. It would be like being at Versailles in 1789, offering up leadership secrets of Louis XIV. The really unfortunate part is that he wasn’t as harsh as he should have been, because he was up for tenure.”

The absence of voices like Anteby’s are evident to this day, and an ongoing indictment of the culture that turned Facebook from a Harvard sophomore’s dorm-room project into what passes for a Harvard Business School success story. Return one last time to the H.B.R. Web site, and you will find a case study that was published just a few months ago entitled “Facebook—Can Ethics Scale in the Digital Age?” Set aside the abuse of the English language in the question—M.B.A.s specialize in that kind of thing. The mere fact that it’s being asked serves as resounding proof that the moral equivalence problem is still with us today. The question is not whether or not a company of Facebook’s size and reach can stay ethical. The question is whether it will even try."
harvard  harvardbusinessschool  ethics  sherylsandberg  facebook  2018  business  careerism  morality  hbs  via:nicoleslaw  leadership  billclinton  mba  mbas  harvardbusinessrevie  hbr  duffmcdonald  competition  competitiveness  winning  decisionmaking  billgeorge  larrysummers  abrahamzaleznik  johnleboutillier  jeffskilling  bowenmccoy  michelanteby  norms  values  capitalism  neoliberalism 
november 2018 by robertogreco
‘The Clinton Affair’ Is a Necessary, Maddening Documentary - The Ringer
The Clinton Affair chips away at the idea, so popular among Democrats at the time, that outrage at Clinton was a regrettable by-product of the right wing seizing on a national puritanism. “We were the original ones who broke our silence,” Kathleen Willey says. “And we were absolutely hammered for it.”
TheClintonAffair  BillClinton 
november 2018 by cbearden
BREAKING: Journalist Found Dead in Hotel After Investigating Bill Clinton
Anonymous EXPOSED -
BREAKING: Journalist Found Dead in Hotel After Investigating Bill Clinton | Anonymous EXPOSED
JenMoore  Pizzagate  BillClinton  ClintonMurders 
august 2018 by juandante
Time’s Up, Bill
"it is truly only a powerful white man who could have lived the past 20 years — through the defeat of his wife and the social revolution it helped to galvanize — and think that none of this effort or upheaval applied to him, especially given that so much of it applies to him directly."
billclinton  sexualharassment 
june 2018 by sucktastic
Bill Clinton Feels His Own Pain
Working on behalf of women in general does not spare a person of accountability for his treatment of women in particular...His umbrage is the stuff not merely of male victimhood, but also of the greater good, of but it only happened once, of deeply ingrained assumptions about the way power works in this country. Sacrifices must be made. Practicalities must be assessed. “I had two women chiefs of staff when I was governor,” Bill Clinton reminds Craig Melvin, when Melvin asks about Lewinsky, and what he is suggesting is that women, as a group, might be better served if those who have been the victims of abuse would hold their tongues and know their place and do the thing women have long been expected to do: Take one for the team.
billclinton  metoo  sexualharassment  sexualassault 
june 2018 by sucktastic

« earlier    

related tags

#metoo  1%  10%  10thcircuit  1942  1960s  1980s  1983  1986  1988  1990  1991  1992  1993  1995  1996  1997  1998  2001  2005  2007  2009  2016  2017  2018  2020  538.com  9thcircuit  abortion  abrahamzaleznik  abuse  aca  alandershowitz  alaska  alexanderacosta  alexrobinson  anationatrisk  andreasschleicher  andrewcockburn  andrewold  anisshivani  anitahill  annanorth  antitrust  arnoldschwarzenegger  article  audreywatters  avatar  axelrod  axios  babyboomers  babydoc  bailout  bank  banking  bankruptcy  barackobama  bearstearns  beaubiden  beef  benjamindoxtdator  bernie  berniesanders  bill  billcolmer  billgeorge  bipartisanship  blm  bodies  body  boehner  book  books  bowenmccoy  bradplumer  brettkavanaugh  brownvboard  bryandawson  bryandawsonusa  buckvbell  bush  business  busing  california  campaign  campaigns  capitalism  care  careerism  cathydavidson  catyenders  cbc  cbo  centrist  chelseaclinton  childsexualtrafficking  childtrafficking  china  christianity  christians  christucker  citicalracetheory  civilrights  clarencethomas  class  clinton  clintonmurders  coldwar  colonialism  colorado  communication  competition  competitiveness  compromise  conservation  conservationists  containment  contradiction  cooperation  corollary  corporations  corporatism  corruption  corybooker  coup  court  courtneywild  credentialing  crime  crony  culture  cuomo  curriculum  cwrightmills  cybersecurity  dailyintell  davidaxelrod  decisionmaking  deficit  delaware  delusion  democracy  democratic  democraticparty  democrats  demographics  dericashileds  derivative  desegregation  desireewashington  detriot  detroit  devereuxjosephs  dictatorship  difference  discrimination  dnc  doj  dominicanepublic  donaldtrump  door  doughenwood  dredscott  drugwar  duffmcdonald  durbin  dws  dynasties  earthjustice  economic  economics  economy  edbrooke  editorial  edtech  education  election  election2016  election2018  election2020  elections  elilake  elitism  elizabethwarren  emails  end  enlightenment  entitlements  essay  ethics  eu  europe  evangelicalism  exclusion  facebook  fakenews  fbi  fdr  fear  feminism  finance  florida  foreignaffairs  foreignpolicy  forestservice  fox  foxnews  france  francisfukuyama  frank  franklingraham  fredkorematsu  freespeech  freetrade  funny  future  futurism  gawker  gay  gaymarriage  gender  generation  georgehwbush  georgelakoff  georgestephanopoulos  georgewbush  germany  gfc  gilliantett  gillibrand  girls  glasssteagall  globalization  google  gop  government  governmentshutdown  grammleachbliley  grassroots  hacker  haideralabadi  haiti  harpers  harvard  harvardbusinessrevie  harvardbusinessschool  harveyweinstein  hazemsalem  hbr  hbs  health  henrygiroux  henrykissinger  hezbollah  hhs  hillary  hillaryclinton  hiphop  history  honduras  hortensespillers  house  housing  hrc  huckabee  humaabedin  hunters  hypocrisy  ianjukes  idaho  identity  identitypolitics  ideology  immigration  imperialism  india  indystar  inequality  internet  iran  irannext  iraq  israel  jacksaul  jamescomey  janecoaston  janemayer  japanese  jasonchaffetz  jean-bertrandaristide  jeffreyepstein  jeffreysachs  jeffsessions  jeffskilling  jenlisajones  jenmoore  jillabramson  jimcarroll  jimmycarter  jobs  joebiden  johndewey  johndickerson  johnhickenlooper  johnleboutillier  johnmaynardkeynes  johnmccain  josephrecarey  juanitabroderick  juliebrown  kamalaharris  karenkorematsu  karlfisch  katiejohnson  kennethstarr  kenstarr  kerifacer  kevinspacey  korematsu  kqed  labor  landtawney  larrynassar  larrysummers  latecapitalism  lauraingraham  law  lawsuit  leadership  lebanon  left  legislation  leisure  lgbt  liberalism  liberia  lindadarling-hammond  lindataylor  lobby  logging  lolitaexpress  london  lorettalynch  losing  manuelzelaya  manufacturing  marginalization  marilynpatel  massachusetts  massage  matt  mba  mbas  media  metoo  miamiherald  michaelberman  michaeljstern  michaelsalwen  michaelstroll  michaelwolff  michelanteby  micheleobama  michigan  mikehuckabee  miketyson  missyelliott  money  monicalewinsky  morality  mostlikelytosuccess  multiculti  music  muslimban  nationalforests  nationalism  nato  nature  neilkinnock  neoliberal  neoliberalism  netflix  newdemocrats  newmexico  newspapers  newtgingrich  newyork  newyorker.com  nikolehannah-jones  ninaburleigh  norms  northkorea  nourialmaliki  npr  nro  nuclear  nuclearwinter  nyc  nyer  nyt  nytimes  oakland-ca  obama  oecd  okheelee  oligarchy  omb  opinion  orlandohernandez  outdoorlife  p2  palmbeach  panama  panetta  partisanship  party  paulkrugman  pedagogy  petespiliakos  pizzagate  plagiarism  plessyvferguson  plutocracy  podcast  podemo  podesta  police  policy  polifacts  politico  politics  polls  populism  posttruthpolitics  poverty  power  presidential  presjimmicarter  press  prison  privatization  productivity  prosecution  proxy  psmag  psychology  ptsd  publiclands  putin  race  racism  radiofreetom  reagan  recession09  regulation  religion  reparations  republican  republicans  resist  revolution  revolving  rich  richardriley  right  rkelly  rnc  roadlessrule  robbymook  robertbork  robotics  robots  rodneybrooks  rollcall  ronaldreagan  russia  ryanzinke  régisdebray  saidyahartman  salmanrushdie  samuelalito  sanders  scandal  scandals  schools  scottmcleod  scotus  seattletimes  security  senate  separation  sexism  sexualabuse  sexualassault  sexualharassment  sexualharrassment  sexuality  sherylsandberg  slate  slavery  society  sovietunion  speech  spending  sputnik  staffers  statistics  statusquo  stephenbannon  stephenmarkman  stromthurmond  success  super  superpac  superpacs  superrich  supremecourt  surveillance  syria  taibbi  tax  taxes  tech  technology  tedcruz  teddintersmith  tedkaufman  theatlantic  theclintonaffair  thedailybeast.com  theguardian  thehill  theodorejohnson  thomas  thomasfriedman  tomnichols  tomwaldo  tongass  tonywagner  towerbridge  trauma  trentlott  trickle-down  trolling  trump  tv  twitter  ukraine  us-pres  us  usa  usaid  usattorney  ussr  usvirginislands  utah  values  vanityfair.com  vanityfair  vietnameware  vox  vpalgore  wapo  war  washington  watergate  wealth  welfare  west  whitehouse  williamjenningsbryan  winning  women  woodrowwilsonn  work  workingclass  worldbank  worldeconomicforum  wyoming  xenophobia  zachcarter  zalmaykhalilzad 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: