benchmark   14474

« earlier    

Hardware Unboxed analyzes Intel's commissioned core i9-9900k benchmarks • HardOCP
:
<p>Hardware Unboxed did a short analysis of a few of the benchmarks as their team felt that the i7-8700K benchmarks and the AMD Ryzen 2700X numbers were incorrect. They found that Principled Technologies had allegedly gimped the AMD CPUs by using different coolers, incorrect ram timings, and possibly even disabled some of the cores on the AMD Ryzen 2700X. To put this into perspective, on the Ashes of the Singularity benchmark that Hardware Unboxed ran, the AMD Ryzen 2700X was 18% faster and the i7-8700K was 4% slower, than the commissioned testing that Intel has published. They even showed how over a suite of games that the i7-8700K was only 9% faster than the AMD Ryzen 2700X in previous pure gaming benchmarks conducted by Hardware Unboxed. Yet in Intel's commissioned benchmark results, the AMD Ryzen 2700X was far, far, behind the Intel i7-8700K in performance metrics. This is why we never trust a manufacturer's benchmarks. Always wait for the review before buying hardware.</p>

So Intel is "choosing" who benchmarks its processors for broader publication so that they will come out ahead of AMD. It feels weird to be living in a time when Intel cares again about AMD being competitive.

That said, unless you're building a PC from scratch, you don't have much choice about your processor, do you? (Thanks Stormyparis for the link.)
Intel  benchmark  cheating 
8 days ago by charlesarthur
Which GPU(s) to Get for Deep Learning
You want a cheap high performance GPU for deep learning? In this blog post I will guide through the choices, so you can find the GPU which is best for you.
gpu  deep-learning  hardware  benchmark  performance 
11 days ago by pmigdal
Vonng/ac: Aho-Corasick Automaton with Double Array Trie (Multi-pattern substitute in go)
Aho-Corasick Automaton with Double Array Trie (Multi-pattern substitute in go) - Vonng/ac
benchmark 
11 days ago by jinwik
The iPhone XS & XS Max review: unveiling the silicon secrets • Anandtech
Andrei Frumusanu:
<p>Apple promised a significant performance improvement in iOS12, thanks to the way their new scheduler is accounting for the loads from individual tasks. The operating system’s kernel scheduler tracks execution time of threads, and aggregates this into an utilisation metric which is then used by for example the DVFS mechanism. The algorithm which decides on how this load is accounted over time is generally simple a software decision – and it can be tweaked and engineered to whatever a vendor sees fit.

Because iOS’s kernel is closed source, we’re can’t really see what the changes are, however we can measure their effects. A relatively simple way to do this is to track frequency over time in a workload from idle, to full performance. I did this on a set of iPhones ranging from the 6 to the X (and XS), before and after the iOS12 system update.

<img src="https://images.anandtech.com/doci/13392/Ramp-A8.png" width="100%" />

Starting off with the iPhone 6 with the A8 chipset, I had some odd results on iOS11 as the scaling behaviour from idle to full performance was quite unusual. I repeated this a few times yet it still came up with the same results. The A8’s CPU’s idled at 400MHz, and remained here for 110ms until it jumped to 600MHz and then again 10ms later went on to the full 1400MHz of the cores.

iOS12 showcased a more step-wise behaviour, scaling up earlier and also reaching full performance after 90ms.

<img src="https://images.anandtech.com/doci/13392/Ramp-A9.png" width="100%" />

The iPhone 6S had a significantly different scaling behaviour on iOS11, and the A9 chip’s DVFS was insanely slow. Here it took a total of 435ms for the CPU to reach its maximum frequency. With the iOS12 update, this time has been massively slashed down to 80ms, giving a great boost to performance in shorter interactive workloads.</p>

Most of this multi-page review is just benchmark gobbledygook to me, but this page and those graphics really stand out because it shows iOS 12 getting performance improvements of as much as 50% on old hardware, through tweaks to the core OS.
benchmark  iphone  xs 
12 days ago by charlesarthur

« earlier    

related tags

12  2018  2700u  a409  ab  akka  amd  android  ann  annoy  api  appserver  article  audio  aug18  benchmarking  benchmarks  bios  bray  browser  build  c++  c  capital  channel  cheating  clojure  cloud  codecs  collection  comparison  compatibility  compilers  computer  cpu  cuda  customer  dataset  datastructure  debug  deep-learning  deep  deeplearning  devel  development  diagnostic  disk  dns  documentation  dyld  e-commerce  ecto  elf  elisp  elixir  emacs  example  execution  expansion  fai  fail  faq  fileformats  floss  fp  framework  framwork  functional  funding  futuremark  gc  gcov  general  geosparql  geospatial  github  globenetselection  glue  go  golang  gpio  gprof  gpu  grpc  guide  hacker  hardware  hardwaresupport  hdd  http  ibm  idle  intel  interconnect  internet  intrinsics  intuitive  ios  iphone  iris  issue  its  java  javascript  jmh  js  json  jvm  lang:en  laptop  learn  learning  lenovo  linker  links  linux  load  lua  machine  metrics  ml  network  networking  news  nim  nlp  node  noinput  nvidia  opencl  optimization  partnership  pc  pcmark  perf  performace  performance  perl  physics  plex  plugins  postgresql  profile  profiling  program  programming  protocol  pwa  python  rails  raspberry-pi  realworld  reasonable  reddit  reference  reflection  reproducible_research  research  review  reviews  rnn  rockbox  rpc  rtx  ruby  ryzen  saas  scala  serialization  serverless  shakes  simd  speech  ssd  synthesis  sysop  system  tensorflow  test  testing  text-to-speech  themes  thinkpad  tim  timbray  time-series  time  tips  todo  tool  tools  turing  type:tool  unixkcd  up  user  utility  ux  vanilla  virtual-server  visual  web  webcomponents  webdesign  webdev  wikientry  workaround  wrk  xs  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: