assessment   10670

« earlier    

International expansion assessment for businesses |
ASSESSMENT IS NOT ONLINE - Our International Growth Potential service will help you: assess your potential for international expansion based on 3 key areas ( below), identify your expansion strengths and capabilities, clearly understand the complexities and risks involved, identify gaps so that you can select potential complementary partners, discover the best opportunities for growth, get a summary action plan with recommendations.
ESB6  global  internationalentrepreneurship  assessment  free 
15 hours ago by jeromekatz
Intellectual property strategy assessment |
Get started by planning a comprehensive intellectual property (IP) strategy to support the integration of IP into your business plan. This strategy will help maximize the value of your IP and protect your competitive advantage.

Use this free assessment, developed by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) in partnership with BDC, to help guide the development of your IP strategy.

The following assessment includes four questions and will take you five minutes to complete. Simply choose one response that best suits your business needs for each question. Once you have completed the assessment, your results will be displayed online. You will also have the option to receive a report containing your results, plus recommended readings and information.
ESB6  ch17  IP  intellectualproperty  assessment  survey  free  Online 
18 hours ago by jeromekatz
Free commercial real estate assessment – Buy or lease |
Are you looking at commercial real estate to accommodate your new or growing company? While deciding whether to buy or lease a property is primarily a financial decision, there are other factors to consider when choosing the best option for you and your business.

Take BDC’s free assessment to help guide this important decision.

The following assessment includes 12 statements and will take you less than ten minutes to complete. Simply choose Yes or No for each statement.  Once you have completed the assessment, your results will be displayed online. You will also have the option to receive a report containing your results, plus recommended readings and information.
ESB6  ch15  realestate  survey  assessment  Online  free 
18 hours ago by jeromekatz
Progressive Labels for Regressive Practices: How Key Terms in Education Have Been Co-opted - Alfie Kohn

"So here's the cycle:

1. Educators create valid term for needed reform.
2. Corporate/political forces co-opt term to sell bullshit to schools.
3. Regressive educators equate needed reform with bullshit "reform."
4. Needed reform is defeated & forgotten.


1. Educators advocate for differentiated/personalized learning as humane, relationship-based alternative to standardization.
2. Corporations co-opt term to sell algorithm-based-ed-tech bullshit.
3. Popular bloggers equate 'personalized learning' with edtech bullshit.
4. Public impression is created that 'personalized learning' is a negative, corporate-driven, bullshit concept.
5. Standardization prevails."

[my reply]

"“a dark commentary on how capitalism absorbs its critiques”" (quoting ) ]

"“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

— Lewis Caroll, Through the Looking Glass

“Whole language” (WL), a collaborative, meaning-based approach to helping children learn to read and write, emerged a few decades ago as a grassroots movement. Until it was brought down by furious attacks from social conservatives, academic behaviorists, and others, many teachers were intrigued by this alternative to the phonics fetish and basal boom that defined the field. More than just an instructional technique, WL amounted to a declaration of independence from packaged reading programs. So how did the publishers of those programs respond? Some “absorbed the surface [features] of WL and sold them back to teachers.” Others just claimed that whatever was already in their commercial materials — bite-size chunks of literature and prefabricated lesson plans — was whole language.[1]

Until you can beat them, pretend to join them: WL is literally a textbook illustration of that strategy. But it’s hardly the only one. For example, experts talk about the importance of having kids do science rather than just learning about it, so many companies now sell kits for easy experimenting. It’s branded as “discovery learning,” except that much of the discovery has been done ahead of time.

A teacher-educator friend of mine, a leading student of constructivism, was once treated to dinner by a textbook publisher who sought his counsel about how kids can play an active role in the classroom and create meaning around scientific ideas. The publisher listened avidly, taking careful notes, which my friend found enormously gratifying until he suddenly realized that the publisher’s objective was just to appropriate key phrases that could be used in the company’s marketing materials and as chapter headings in its existing textbook.

Or consider cooperative learning. Having students spend much of their classroom time in pairs or small groups is a radical notion: Learning becomes a process of exchanging and reflecting on ideas with peers and planning projects together. When we learn with and from one another, schooling is about us, not just about me. But no sooner had the idea begun to catch on (in the 1980s) than it was diluted, reduced to a gimmick for enlivening a comfortably traditional curriculum. Teachers were told, in effect, that they didn’t have to question their underlying model of learning; students would memorize facts and practice skills more efficiently if they did it in groups. Some writers even recommended using grades, certificates, and elaborate point systems to reinforce students for cooperating appropriately.[2]

In short, the practice of “co-opting” potentially transformative movements in education[3] is nothing new. Neither, however, is it just a historical artifact. A number of labels that originally signified progressive ideas continue to be (mis)appropriated, their radical potential drained away, with the result that they’re now invoked by supporters of “bunch o’ facts” teaching or a corporate-styled, standards-and-testing model of school reform.[4]

A sample:

* Engaging doesn’t denote a specific pedagogical approach; it’s used as a general honorific, signifying a curriculum that the students themselves experience as worthwhile. But these days the word is often applied to tasks that may not be particularly interesting to most kids and that they had no role in choosing. In fact, the value of the tasks may simply be ignored, so we hear about student “engagement,” which seems to mean nothing more than prompt or sustained compliance. Such children have internalized the adults’ agenda and are (extrinsically) motivated to complete the assignment, whatever it is. If the point is to get them to stay “on task,” we’re spared having to think about what the task is — or who gets to decide — even as we talk earnestly about the value of having engaged students.[5]

* Developmental originally meant taking our cue from what children of a given age are capable of doing. But for some time now, the word has come to imply something rather different: letting children move at their own pace . . . up an adult-constructed ladder. Kids may have nothing to say about what, whether, or why — only about when. (This is similar to the idea of “mastery learning” — a phrase that hasn’t really been co-opted because it was never particularly progressive to begin with. Oddly, though, it’s still brandished proudly by people who seem to think it represents a forward-thinking approach to education.[6])

* Differentiated, individualized, or personalized learning all emerge from what would seem a perfectly reasonable premise: Kids have very different needs and interests, so we should think twice about making all of them do the same thing, let alone do it in the same way. But there’s a big difference between working with each student to create projects that reflect his or her preferences and strengths, on the one hand, and merely adjusting the difficulty level of skills-based exercises based on students’ test scores, on the other. The latter version has become more popular in recent years, driven in part by troubling programs such as “mass customized learning”[7] and by technology companies that peddle “individualized digital learning” products. (I have more to say about the differences between authentic personal learning and what might be called Personalized Learning, Inc. in this blog post.)

* Formative assessment was supposed to be the good kind — gauging students’ success while they’re still learning rather than evaluating them for the purpose of rating or ranking when it’s too late to make changes. But the concept “has been taken over — hijacked — by commercial test publishers and is used instead to refer to formal testing systems,” says assessment expert Lorrie Shepard.[8] Basically, an endless succession of crappy “benchmark” standardized tests — intended to refine preparation for the high-stakes tests that follow — are euphemistically described as “formative assessment.” Too often, in other words, the goal is just to see how well students will do on another test, not to provide feedback that will help them think deeply about questions that intrigue them. (The same is true of the phrase “assessment for learning,” which sounds nice but means little until we’ve asked “Learning what?”) The odds of an intellectually valuable outcome are slim to begin with if we’re relying on a test rather than on authentic forms of assessment.[9]

* A reminder to focus on the learning, not just the teaching seems refreshing and enlightened. After all, our actions as educators don’t matter nearly as much as how kids experience those actions. The best teachers (and parents) continually try to see what they do through the eyes of those to whom it’s done. But at some point I had the queasy realization that lots of consultants and administrators who insist that learning is more important than teaching actually have adopted a behaviorist version of learning, with an emphasis on discrete skills measured by test scores.

You see the pattern here. We need to ask what kids are being given to do, and to what end, and within what broader model of learning, and as decided by whom. If we allow ourselves to be distracted from those questions, then even labels with a proud progressive history can be co-opted to the point that they no longer provide reassurance about the practice to which the label refers."
alfiekohn  2015  progressive  education  schools  schooling  schooliness  lesicarroll  humptydumpty  wholelanguage  cooption  language  words  buzzwords  pedagogy  differentiation  teaching  business  capitalism  formativeassessment  assessment  learning  howweetach  howwelearn  development  engagement  grassroots 
4 days ago by robertogreco
T-Mobile Open Source
PacBot is a platform for continuous security and compliance assessment, reporting and automation. It assesses our infrastructure against security best practices and T-Mobile internal security and governance policies. We use it to ensure adherence across all of our AWS accounts. PacBot also has ‘auto fixes’ to automatically respond to critical security policy violations.

Policy violations identified by PacBot are presented to asset owners via simple dashboards. These dashboards that make it easy to remediate the issues found. With PacBot we have eliminated the manual drudgery of compliance assessment letting us invest more time mitigating risks and addressing the gaps found.
continuous  security  compliance  assessment  cloud  infosec  policy 
11 days ago by wck
For better multiple-choice tests, avoid tricky questions, study finds: Simple tips make multiple choice a more powerful learning tool -- ScienceDaily
""Although people often think about multiple-choice tests as tools for assessment, they can also be used to facilitate learning,' said Andrew Butler, a cognitive psychologist in Arts & Sciences who studies the brain processes behind learning and recall. 'The act of retrieving information strengthens memory for that information, leading to better long-term retention, and changes the representation of the information, creating deeper understanding.'
"tips for constructing multiple-choice questions that are effective at both assessing current knowledge and strengthening ongoing learning.

"Among key findings, educators should never include trick questions or offer "all of the above" or "none of the above" options among the list of possible answers.
testing  assessment  learning  recall  cognition 
18 days ago by katherinestevens

« earlier    

related tags

2015  2018  341webmgmt  351  accessibility  addiction  admission  adulting  affect  agilelearning  air  akilahrichards  alfiekohn  alternative  analytics  anthonygalloway  apis  asphalt  asses  attachment  attainment  audit  auditing  aws  basic  bestpractices  bias  blog  body-language  boquetes  bulgaria  business  buzzwords  california  capitalism  career  carreteras  ch15  ch17  ch4  character  check  children  chna  class  classroom-management  clicker  climate_change  cloud  cognition  collaboration  colleges  communities  community  community_benefit  community_health  comparison  compliance  computer-basedassessment  computer-science  connectivism  constructivism  continuous  cooption  crater  crateres  curiosity  curriculum  curriculum_planning  cv  data  database  dataservices  depression  deschooling  development  devops  differentiation  digital  disease  dispositions  document  documentation  droughts  dynamic  education  elite  elitism  embed  emergency  engagement  environment  environment_and_behavior  epidemiology  esb6  estonia  ethics  ethnicity  exam  exams  eye-opening-thing  feasibility  federal_gov  fires  flows  formative  formativeassessment  frederickhess  free  freeschools  gamedesign  games  gaming  gaze  gds  gifted  global  google  governance  government  grades  grading  grassroots  gratitude  grit  groupwork  happiness  hardening  health  heat  high_school  higher_education  highered  highereducation  hollo  hollos  howelearn  howweetach  howwelearn  howweread  howweteach  hoyo  hoyos  humptydumpty  hyperisland  iat  ifttt  infolit  infosec  infrastructure  innovation  insight  insightvm  instruction  intellectualproperty  internationalentrepreneurship  intervention  ip  irs  irs_501r  jamaica  joehoyle  johnphillips  juliacordero  k12  kahoot  knowledge_building  language  lcproject  leader  learning  learningoutcomesassessment  legal_education  lesicarroll  libraries  maintenance  mapbox  marketing  mattmiller  mc  mde  measure  measurement  measuring  media  medicine  mit  module  monitor  monitoring  mood  naep  nclb  nellyo  networks  nps  nssi  nyc  oer  ollo  ollos  online  onlinetesting  openstudioproject  overwork  oyo  oyos  paediatrics  parenting  pd  pdf  pedagogy  personalize  perspective  philosophy  phone  planning  podcast  policy  politics  poll  polling  populism  powerpoint  praise  preparedness:  presentation  privacy  process  products  profdev  professional  progressive  psychology  psychometrics  publicschools  qr  qrcodes  quality  questionnaire  quiz  race  racism  rapid7  reading  realestate  recall  reform  relationships  remc  research  resources  risk  rits  road  roadbotics  roads  rttt  safe  schooliness  schooling  schools  script  scrum  security  segregation  self-directed  self-directedlearning  selfawareness  selfharm  selfinjury  sfsh  sharing  singlepointrubric  smartphone  software  speech  standardization  standardizedtesting  strengths  studentdebt  survey  surveying  systems  systemsthinking  tcsnmy  teaching  technology  ted  templates  test  testing  tests  time  tools  trafficlight  tutorials  tx  uk  universities  unpaidinternships  unschooling  usability  values  video  visual  washington  water  wholelanguage  wildfires  words  work  workaddiction  writing  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: