advertising   141286

« earlier    

RXBar runs anti-ad with quirky campaign featuring Ice-T | CMO Strategy - Ad Age
- the brutal honesty is likely to get old fast, but shows how breaking the rules works
inspiration  advertising 
yesterday by renaissancechambara
Blis Launches Blockchain Platform to Add Transparency to Digital Advertising
The platform is in response to these increased industry challenges around transparency and verification of data, including location and demographic data, and will run on the IBM Blockchain Platform.
Geographical data enables digital advertisers to create more targeted ads by identifying specific demographics and better understand consumer behaviour. With this new platform, the source of the geographical data is written to the blockchain, providing advertisers and data providers with greater confidence in the provenance of the data, by giving them access to a transparent blockchain that is immutable and verified.
“Unilever are committed to partnering with organizations which create better digital infrastructure. This new capability is an important step towards transparency and clarity in data provenance and compliance across our global activity,” said Luis Di Como, Executive VP, Global Media, Unilever Group.
advertising  blockchain  location  partnerships 
yesterday by dancall
The Flourishing Business of Fake YouTube Views - The New York Times
Piles of interesting here. For a start, the latest Horowitz brat, Russia Today, and Fox all use the same botherd. A classic example of D^2's principle that if you respond to attempted fraud just as an administrative issue, fraudsters will experiment and learn how to steal from you reliably. Finally, algo kitsch.
advertising  fraud  clickfraud  bots  youtube  security  to_blog 
yesterday by yorksranter
Idomoo Personalized Videos |
Idomoo’s Personalized Marketing Videos enable you to easily engage with your customers on a truly personal level, driving loyalty and revenue growth.
personalized  video  advertising  create  build 
yesterday by kpieper876
David Ogilvy 10 Tips on Writing
In 1982, the original “Mad Man” David Ogilvy, sent the following internal memo to all employees of his advertising agency, Ogilvy & Mather, titled “How to Write.”
advice  advertising  writing 
yesterday by oliverw
The flourishing business of fake YouTube views • The New York Times
Michael Keller:
<p>“I can deliver an unlimited amount of views to a video,” Mr. Vassilev said in an interview. “They’ve tried to stop it for so many years, but they can’t stop it. There’s always a way around.”

After Google, more people search on YouTube than on any other site. It is the most popular platform among teenagers, according to a 2018 study by the Pew Research Center, beating out giants like Facebook and Instagram. With billions of views a day, the video site helps spur global cultural sensations, spawn careers, sell brands and promote political agendas.

Just as other social media companies have been plagued by impostor accounts and artificial influence campaigns, YouTube has struggled with fake views for years.

The fake-view ecosystem of which Mr. Vassilev is a part can undermine YouTube’s credibility by manipulating the digital currency that signals value to users. While YouTube says fake views represent just a tiny fraction of the total, they still have a significant effect by misleading consumers and advertisers. Drawing on dozens of interviews, sales records, and trial purchases of fraudulent views, The New York Times examined how the marketplace worked and tested YouTube’s ability to detect manipulation.

Inflating views violates YouTube’s terms of service. But Google searches for "buying views" turn up hundreds of sites offering “fast” and “easy” ways to increase a video’s count by 500, 5,000 or even five million. The sites, offering views for just pennies each, also appear in Google search ads.</p>


This is what happens when you optimise for "engagement". Compare to Wikipedia...
youtube  fake  advertising 
yesterday by charlesarthur
Why Wikipedia works • NY Mag
Brian Feldman:
<p>On YouTube, I might make one video about the Stoneman shooting, and you might make another with a totally opposite idea of truth; they’d then duke it out in “the marketplace of ideas” (the YouTube search results). On Wikipedia, there’s only one article about the Stoneman shooting, and it’s created by a group of people discussing and debating the best way to present information in a singular way, suggesting and sometimes voting on changes to a point where enough people are satisfied.

Importantly, that discussion is both entirely transparent, and at the same time “behind the scenes.” The “Talk” pages on which editorial decisions are made are prominently linked to on every entry. Anyone can read, access, and participate — but not many people do. This means both that the story of how an article came to be is made clear to a reader (unlike, say, algorithmic decisions made by Facebook), but also that there is less incentive for a given editor to call attention to themselves in the hopes of becoming a celebrity (unlike, say, the YouTube-star economy).

Wikipedia articles also have stringent requirements for what information can be included. The three main tenets are that (1) information on the site be presented in a neutral point of view, (2) be verified by an outside source, and (3) not be based on original research. Each of these can be quibbled with (what does “neutral” mean?), and plenty of questionable statements slip through — but, luckily, you probably know that they’re questionable because of the infamous “[citation needed]” superscript that peppers the website.

Actual misinformation, meanwhile, is dealt with directly. Consider how the editors treat conspiracy theories. “Fringe theories may be mentioned, but only with the weight accorded to them in the reliable sources being cited,” Wikimedia tweeted in an explanatory thread earlier this week. In contrast, platform companies have spent much of the last year talking about maintaining their role as a platform for “all viewpoints,” and through design and presentation, they flatten everything users post to carry the same weight. </p>


Succinct, and accurate. What if YouTube was forced to limit itself to a single, checked, accurate video per topic? Sure, it's like asking musicians to only write one song. Yet there's that suspicion that there's a better way to organise it even so.
advertising  analysis  youtube  google  wikipedia 
yesterday by charlesarthur

« earlier    

related tags

2018  321  acceptableusepolicy  ad  adblock  adblocker  ads  advertisements  advice  adwords  affiliate  agencies  agency  ai  algorithms  amazon  analysis  analytics  android  apollo  app  approval  apps  architecture  ares  art  aspiration  at&t  authenticity  automation  basf  bbh  bias  bitcoin  blockchain  book  books  bots  bracket  brand_kfc  branding  brands  brexit  build  business  businessmodels  california  campaign  career  cars  censorship  claudia-h-deutsch  clickfraud  collectingnewmedia  collectiondevelopment  concepts  connected  consumerism  copyright  copywriting  create  creative  creativity  crosspromotion  currencies  dance  data  datadecisions  datasette  dc:creator=horningrob  dctagged  decalogue  democracy  design  diagrams  digitalidentity  disinformation  dns  drawing  e-commerce  economics  election  emotion  ethics  events  evidence  exclusion  facebook  fake  fakenews  feminism  finance  fintech  fonts  food  fortune_500  fraud  fun  fundraising  funny  future  genius  getrichslowly  google  gps  graphicdesign  growth  hacking  headline  health  hermes  history  howto  html5  humor  ia  identity  ifttt  im  incentives  inclusion  influence  information  inspiration  instagram  insurance  interface  internet  internetresearchagency  ios  iosdevbreak  ipad-pro  ipadpro  iphone  johnhegarty  large_companies  law  lightning  linkedin  list  listening  location  loyalty  mainstream  manufacturing  maps  market_research  marketing  measurement  media  membership  meme  mic  million  money  moneyforcontent  music  native  network  news-event  news  newsletter  newslettered  newspapers  notice  ohforfuckssake  online  ott  paid  partnerships  pay  people  performance  personalbranding  personalized  phd  philosophy  pixels  planning  planning_funko  podcast  podcasts  poems  policy  politics  popculture  posters  predictions  preservation  preview  pricing  privacy  producer  producing  products  programmatic  programming  psychology  publishing  raspberrypi  recognition  research  resource  retail  roku  rules  russia  scam  science  security  selling  seo  services  shopping  shrinkingbundle  simplicity  sketching  smartphones  snapchat  social-networks  social  socialmedia  socialnetwork  solutions  startup  statistics  stats  stories  strategy  studio  summary  surveillance  system  targeting  testing  the-new-york-times  timewarner  to_blog  tool  tools  totwitter  training  trends  truth  tv  twitter  typography  ui  uk  usa  usergenerated  validator  video  videomarketing  viral  voice  warc  web  webdesign  webdev  weft  wiedenkennedy  wikipedia  work  writing  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: