abortion   12906

« earlier    

Biblical Abortion: A Christian’s View
Tamar: Killing an Undesirable Pregnancy
Genesis 38

Hosea: Progeny of the Rebellious Shall Not be Born
Hosea 9:14
Hosea 13:16
Isaiah 7:20 and 10:5
2 Kings 8:12 and 15:16

Sotah: Abortion-Inducing Potion due to Husband’s Jealousy
Numbers 5

Causing a Miscarriage: Mere Property Loss
Exodus 21:22-25
abortion  christianity  scripture 
yesterday by campylobacter
Turnaway Study | ANSIRH
The Turnaway Study is ANSIRH’s prospective longitudinal study examining the effects of unintended pregnancy on women’s lives. The major aim of the study is to describe the mental health, physical health, and socioeconomic consequences of receiving an abortion compared to carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term.
study  white_Paper  research  abortion  reproductive_Health  health_Policy  healthcare  autonamy  women's_Health 
2 days ago by crittlet
How pro-choice politicians should answer questions about third-trimester abortions.
“Do you believe that a woman should be able to terminate a pregnancy up until the moment of birth?”
abortion 
3 days ago by casfindad
Noam Chomsky takes ten minutes to explain everything you need to know about the Republican Party in 2019 / Boing Boing
"Amy Goodman from Democracy Now interviewed linguist and political philosopher Noam Chomsky and asked him to explain Donald Trump; in a mere 10 minutes, Chomsky explains where Trump came from, what he says about the GOP, and what the best response to Russiagate is.

Chomsky lays out the history of the GOP from Nixon's Southern Strategy, when the party figured out that the way to large numbers of working people to vote for policies that made a tiny minority of rich people richer was to quietly support racism, which would fuse together a coalition of racists and the super-rich. By Reagan's time, the coalition was beefed up with throngs of religious fanatics, brought in by adopting brutal anti-abortion policies. Then the GOP recruited paranoid musketfuckers by adopting doctrinal opposition to any form of gun control. Constituency by constituency, the GOP became a big tent for deranged, paranoid, bigoted and misogynist elements, all reliably showing up to vote for policies that would send billions into the pockets of a tiny rump of wealthy people who represented the party's establishment.

That's why every time the GOP base fields a candidate, it's some self-parodying character out of a SNL sketch: Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, etc. Every time, the GOP establishment had to sabotage the campaigns of the base's pick, until they couldn't -- Trump is just the candidate-from-the-base that the establishment couldn't suppress.

You can think of the Republican Party as a machine that does two things: enacting patriarchy and white supremacy (Trump) while delivering billions to oligarchs (McConnell, Paul Ryan, etc).

Then Chomsky moves onto Russiagate: Russian interference may have shifted the election outcome by a few critical points to get Trump elected, but it will be impossible to quantify the full extent and nature of interference and the issue will always be controversial, with room for doubt. But campaign contributions from the super-rich? They are undeniable and have a massive effect on US elections, vastly more than Russian interference ever will (as do election interventions of US allies: think of when Netanyahu went to Congress to attack Obama policies before a joint Congressional session right before a key election): "The real issues are different things. They’re things like climate change, like global warming, like the Nuclear Posture Review, deregulation. These are real issues. But the Democrats aren’t going after those."
Well, why did that happen? It happened because the Republicans face a difficult problem. They have a primary constituency, a real constituency: extreme wealth and corporate power. That’s who they have to serve. That’s their constituency. You can’t get votes that way, so you have to do something else to get votes. What do you do to get votes? This was begun by Richard Nixon with the Southern strategy: try to pick up racists in the South. The mid-1970s, Paul Weyrich, one of the Republican strategists, hit on a brilliant idea. Northern Catholics voted Democratic, tended to vote Democratic, a lot of them working-class. The Republicans could pick up that vote by pretending—crucially, “pretending”—to be opposed to abortion. By the same pretense, they could pick up the evangelical vote. Those are big votes—evangelicals, northern Catholics. Notice the word “pretense.” It’s crucial. You go back to the 1960s, every leading Republican figure was strongly, what we call now, pro-choice. The Republican Party position was—that’s Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, all the leadership—their position was: Abortion is not the government’s business; it’s private business—government has nothing to say about it. They turned almost on a dime in order to try to pick up a voting base on what are called cultural issues. Same with gun rights. Gun rights become a matter of holy writ because you can pick up part of the population that way. In fact, what they’ve done is put together a coalition of voters based on issues that are basically, you know, tolerable to the establishment, but they don’t like it. OK? And they’ve got to hold that, those two constituencies, together. The real constituency of wealth and corporate power, they’re taken care of by the actual legislation.

So, if you look at the legislation under Trump, it’s just lavish gifts to the wealth and the corporate sector—the tax bill, the deregulation, you know, every case in point. That’s kind of the job of Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan, those guys. They serve the real constituency. Meanwhile, Trump has to maintain the voting constituency, with one outrageous position after another that appeals to some sector of the voting base. And he’s doing it very skillfully. As just as a political manipulation, it’s skillful. Work for the rich and the powerful, shaft everybody else, but get their votes—that’s not an easy trick. And he’s carrying it off."

[Full interview: https://truthout.org/video/chomsky-on-the-perils-of-depending-on-mueller-report-to-defeat-trump/
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/4/18/chomsky_by_focusing_on_russia_democrats
https://www.democracynow.org/shows/2019/4/18?autostart=true

"NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, Trump is—you know, I think there are a number of illusions about Trump. If you take a look at the Trump phenomenon, it’s not very surprising. Think back for the last 10 or 15 years over Republican Party primaries, and remember what happened during the primaries. Each primary, when some candidate rose from the base, they were so outlandish that the Republican establishment tried to crush them and succeeded in doing it—Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum. Anyone who was coming out of the base was totally unacceptable to the establishment. The change in 2016 is they couldn’t crush him.

But the interesting question is: Why was this happening? Why, in election after election, was the voting base producing a candidate utterly intolerable to the establishment? And the answer to that is—if you think about that, the answer is not very hard to discover. During the—since the 1970s, during this neoliberal period, both of the political parties have shifted to the right. The Democrats, by the 1970s, had pretty much abandoned the working class. I mean, the last gasp of more or less progressive Democratic Party legislative proposals was the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act in 1978, which Carter watered down so that it had no teeth, just became voluntary. But the Democrats had pretty much abandoned the working class. They became pretty much what used to be called moderate Republicans. Meanwhile, the Republicans shifted so far to the right that they went completely off the spectrum. Two of the leading political analysts of the American Enterprise Institute, Thomas Mann, Norman Ornstein, about five or 10 years ago, described the Republican Party as what they called a “radical insurgency” that has abandoned parliamentary politics.

Well, why did that happen? It happened because the Republicans face a difficult problem. They have a primary constituency, a real constituency: extreme wealth and corporate power. That’s who they have to serve. That’s their constituency. You can’t get votes that way, so you have to do something else to get votes. What do you do to get votes? This was begun by Richard Nixon with the Southern strategy: try to pick up racists in the South. The mid-1970s, Paul Weyrich, one of the Republican strategists, hit on a brilliant idea. Northern Catholics voted Democratic, tended to vote Democratic, a lot of them working-class. The Republicans could pick up that vote by pretending—crucially, “pretending”—to be opposed to abortion. By the same pretense, they could pick up the evangelical vote. Those are big votes—evangelicals, northern Catholics. Notice the word “pretense.” It’s crucial. You go back to the 1960s, every leading Republican figure was strongly, what we call now, pro-choice. The Republican Party position was—that’s Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, all the leadership—their position was: Abortion is not the government’s business; it’s private business—government has nothing to say about it. They turned almost on a dime in order to try to pick up a voting base on what are called cultural issues. Same with gun rights. Gun rights become a matter of holy writ because you can pick up part of the population that way. In fact, what they’ve done is put together a coalition of voters based on issues that are basically, you know, tolerable to the establishment, but they don’t like it. OK? And they’ve got to hold that, those two constituencies, together. The real constituency of wealth and corporate power, they’re taken care of by the actual legislation.

So, if you look at the legislation under Trump, it’s just lavish gifts to the wealth and the corporate sector—the tax bill, the deregulation, you know, every case in point. That’s kind of the job of Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan, those guys. They serve the real constituency. Meanwhile, Trump has to maintain the voting constituency, with one outrageous position after another that appeals to some sector of the voting base. And he’s doing it very skillfully. As just as a political manipulation, it’s skillful. Work for the rich and the powerful, shaft everybody else, but get their votes—that’s not an easy trick. And he’s carrying it off.

And, I should say, the Democrats are helping him. They are. Take the focus on Russiagate. What’s that all about? I mean, it was pretty obvious at the beginning that you’re not going to find anything very serious about Russian interference in elections. I mean, for one thing, it’s undetectable. I mean, in the 2016 election, the Senate and the House went the same way as the executive, but nobody claims there was Russian interference there. In fact, you know, Russian interference in the election, if it existed, was very slight, much less, say, than interference by, say, Israel. Israel… [more]
amygoodman  noamchomsky  corydoctorow  donaldtrump  republicans  us  politics  extremism  billionaires  inequality  campaignfinance  money  power  policy  mitchmcconnell  paulryan  abortion  nra  guns  evangelicals  richardnixon  ronaldreagan  georgehwbush  govenment  corporatism  corruption  russiagate  legislation  wealth  oligarchy  plutocracy  paulweyrich  southernstrategy  racism  race  gop  guncontrol  bigotry  misogyny  establishment  michelebachman  hermancain  ricksantoram  patriarchy  whitesupremacy  netanyahu  barackobama  congress  climatechange  canon  democrats  democracy  insurgency  radicalism  right  labor  corporations  catholics  2019  israel  elections  influence 
3 days ago by robertogreco
Why Community Is Dangerous
“I say that in a hundred years, if Christians are identified as people who do not kill their children or the elderly, we will have done well.”
Abortion  Culture  Euthanasia 
4 days ago by crbassett
@claireculwell: My response to @NC_Governor who vetoed the Born Alive Act this morning. Abortion survivors do exist and we shouldn’t have to fight for our lives after we survive an abortion.
@claireculwell: My response to @NC_Governor who vetoed the Born Alive Act this morning. Abortion survivors do exist and we shouldn’t have to fight for our lives after we survive an abortion.
Abortion  BornAliveAct 
5 days ago by cbearden
Regarding Life at the Beginning
To continue to think in terms of an analogy that depicts the newone as a material aggressor is to envision ordinary, even if unwanted, pregnancy as if it were also an invasion — as if the newone were trespassing where it had no business rather than being in the place from which all of us have naturally emerged.
Abortion 
5 days ago by crbassett
401(k)s, abortion, youth football: 15 things we do now that will be considered unthinkable in 50 years - Vox
[via: https://kottke.org/19/04/what-do-we-do-now-that-will-be-unthinkable-in-50-years ]

"Youth tackle football
Bosses
Eating meat
Conspicuous consumption
The drug war
The way we die
Banning sex work
401(k)s
Ending the draft
Facebook and Google
Abortion
Self-driving cars
Our obsession with rationality
Abandoning public education
The idea of a “wrong side of history”



"Some 50 years ago, in 1964, 42 percent of Americans smoked cigarettes. Smoking in bars and offices was normal and cigarettes were given to soldiers as part of military rations. Half of American physicians smoked. Ads for cigarettes bombarded the American public. That year, the surgeon general released a report outlining the health risks of smoking. Two years later, only 40 percent of Americans said that they believed smoking was a major cause of cancer.

Today, we know that smoking is bad for our health. We’ve banned smoking in most indoor public spaces. We stopped allowing tobacco companies to advertise and forced them to put warning labels on cigarette boxes. By 2001, 71 percent of the country said they recognized smoking was a major cause of cancer, and by 2017, the rate of smokers dropped to 14 percent. The habit is now looked at as a relic of the past, something we’ve come to accept as unquestionably harmful.

When we think about what common habits, social norms, or laws that are widely considered unthinkable in today’s world, a variety of past atrocities come to mind. We could point to bloodletting, Jim Crow-era segregation, and drinking and driving as being on the “wrong side” of history.

But what modern practices will we one day think of as barbaric? It’s a framework invoked frequently in political or scientific beliefs: Actor Harrison Ford recently said leaders who deny climate change are on the “wrong side of history.” President Barack Obama said Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine was on the “wrong side of history.” Filmmaker Spike Lee said that President Donald Trump himself is on the “wrong side of history.”

So what, by 2070 — some 50 years in the future — will join this group? We asked 15 thinkers, writers, and advocates to take their best guess.

Bioethicist Peter Singer says people will stop the habit of conspicuous consumption. “The ostentatious display of wealth, in a world that still has many people in need, is not in good taste. Within 50 years, we’ll wonder how people did not see that,” he writes.

Historian Jennifer Mittelstadt predicts that our volunteer army will be widely considered a mistake: “Fifty years from now Americans will observe with shock the damage to both foreign policy and domestic institutions wrought by our acceptance of an increasingly privatized, socially isolated, and politically powerful US military.”

For philosopher Jacob T. Levy, the very idea of there being a “wrong side of history” is wrong itself.

Other answers range from kids playing tackle football to expecting workers to invest in 401(k)s."
us  future  obsolescence  barbarity  draft  cars  self-drivingcars  retirement  saving  drugwar  football  americanfootball  conspicuousconsumption  capitalism  consumption  rationality  scientism  publiceducations  publicschools  schools  schooling  education  facebook  google  abortion  war  military  sexwork  death  dying  meat  food  howwelive  predictions  history  petersinger  kristatippett  jaboblevy  jennifermittelstadt  haiderwarraich  kathleenfrydl  meredithbroussard  chrisnowinski  adiaharveywingfield  bhaskarsunkara  horizontality  hierarchy  inequality  jacobhacker  economics  society  transportation 
7 days ago by robertogreco
Townhall -- Newest Feminist Lie: A Botched Abortion Survivor Is Not An Actual Baby
'...When Hawkins asked again why the child who survives a botched abortion is not a child, the student doubled down. -- “Because they’re performing an abortion,” the student argued. “So, before that, they’ve already determined that it’s not a baby. I know you’re telling me that science has determined one thing, but…” -- ... Hawkins also described a third-trimester abortion to the student, explaining that during the procedure, the abortionist injects the nearly full-term, unborn baby with digoxin to induce cardiac arrest so that the baby is delivered dead. -- “So this baby comes out of utero,” Hawkins said, “and the digoxin hasn’t been successful in inducing cardiac arrest, and this baby is alive … so, do you think it’s a baby?” -- “No,” insisted the student. -- Hawkins continued to press, asking the pro-choice student to explain how exactly an abortionist “can determine it’s not a baby.” -- The pro-choice student stood her ground, but failed to explain how an infant born alive after a botched abortion is not, in fact, a baby.'
abortion  feticide  infanticide  psychopathy  pathocracy 
9 days ago by adamcrowe

« earlier    

related tags

2019  activism  adiaharveywingfield  alabama  americanfootball  amygoodman  anti  ao3  argentina  article  assholes  author:spunky0ne/starfire0ne  autonamy  banned  bans  barackobama  barbarity  beat  behalf  bhaskarsunkara  bigotry  billionaires  birthcontrol  bleach  bold  bornaliveact  byakuya/renji  byakuya/sousuke  campaignfinance  canon  capitalism  cars  catholics  childbirth  children  chrisnowinski  christianity  climatechange  clinic  comics  congress  conservative-judges  conspicuousconsumption  conspiracy  consumption  contraception  contraceptions  corporations  corporatism  corruption  corydoctorow  court  coverage  cpac  crime  crisisofparaphrase  cruzted  culture  cystic_fibrosis  dc:creator=eggersdave  dctagged  death  debate  democracy  democrats  desiringgod  discriminatory  dojustly  donaldtrump  draft  drugwar  dying  dystopia  economics  editorial  education  elections  elpaso  ending  establishment  ethics  euthanasia  evangelicals  ewp  extremism  facebook  facts  fanfic  feminism  feticide  fetus  ff.net  florida  food  football  foreignaid  future  gender  georgehwbush  google  gop-crap  gop-falshoods  gop  govenment  government  grants  green-new-deal  guncontrol  guns  h/c  haiderwarraich  healtchare  health  health_policy  healthcare  heart  hermancain  hierarchy  history  horizontality  horrible  howwelive  hypergamy  ice  idiots  immigration  in_vitro  inequality  infanticide  influence  insurgency  israel  it's2019everybody  ivankatrump  jaboblevy  jacobhacker  jameswhite  jen-gunter  jennifermittelstadt  jezebel  just  kathleenfrydl  kentucky  kid  kristatippett  kuchiki_rukia  labor  late-term-abortion  late-term  law  legal  legislation  lgbtq  libertarian  liberty  life  man's  marriage  meat  medicine  members  men  meredithbroussard  mexico  michaelwear  michelebachman  military  milkshakeduck  mindfuckery  miscarriage  misogyny  mississippi  mitchmcconnell  moleg  money  mosen  mpreg  multi-chapter  music  nathanpyle  nathanwpyle  nc  netanyahu  nevada  newyork  noamchomsky  non-con  northkorea  nra  nsfw  nytimes  o'rourkebeto  obsolescence  ocs  of  ohio  oligarchy  on  oppression  pathocracy  patriarchy  paulryan  paulweyrich  pelosinancy  petersinger  petition  pewresearchcenter  plannedparenthood  plutocracy  policy  political_attitudes  politics  polls  power  predictions  pregnancy  premature-birth  prison  prochoice  progressives  prolife  psychopathy  publicdiscourse  publiceducations  publicopinion  publicschools  race  racism  radicalism  rally  rape  rationality  refugees  religion  religionfail  reproductive_health  reproductive_rights  republicans  research  retirement  richardnixon  ricksantoram  right  ronaldreagan  russiagate  saving  schooling  schools  scientism  scotus  scripture  self-drivingcars  sex  sexism  sexuality  sexwork  shihouin_yoruichi  shutdown  slate  socialism  society  southernstrategy  statistics  step  study  stupid  sue  take  taxation  texas  theology  to  towards  transportation  trump-falsehoods  trumpdonald  twitter  tx-gop-bad  tx-gop-good  ugh  united_states  unohana_retsu  urahara_kisuke  us  usa  video  violence  voting-rights  voting  wall  war  wealth  wendybacon  white_paper  whitesupremacy  women's_health  women  yaoi  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: