Ben Thompson Is Wrong About the Deregulation of ISPs — Pixel Envy


37 bookmarks. First posted by jgordon november 2017.


Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart…
from instapaper
june 2018 by sethde
Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart debunking of that Portuguese cellular pricing infographic you’ve probably seen:
So to recount: one Portugal story is made up, and the other declared that a 10GB family plan with an extra 10GB for a collection of apps of your choosing for €25/month ($30/month) is a future to be feared; given that AT&T charges $65 for a single “Unlimited” plan that downscales video, bans tethering, and slows speeds after 22GB, one wonders if most Americans share that fear.
broadband  fcc  gov2.0  internet  net_neutrality  politics  title_ii  ISP 
december 2017 by rgl7194
via Pinboard (Popular items from Pinboard) https://pinboard.in/popular/
IFTTT  Feedly 
december 2017 by sbmandal
Ben Thompson Is Wrong About the Deregulation of ISPs via Instapaper http://ift.tt/2AeRXZT
IFTTT  Instapaper 
december 2017 by jonathan
Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart…
from instapaper
december 2017 by alexrudy
Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart debunking of that Portuguese cellular pricing infographic you’ve probably seen: So to recount: one Portugal story is made up, and the other declared that a 10GB family plan with […]
net_neutrality  telecom  fcc  internet  deregulation  isps  rebuttal 
december 2017 by jbkcc
Ben Thompson Is Wrong About the Deregulation of ISPs

Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart…
Articles 
december 2017 by Raymond1974
Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart…
from instapaper
december 2017 by dannystewart
"Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart debunking of that Portuguese cellular pricing infographic you’ve probably seen: So to recount: one Portugal story is made up, and the other declared that a 10GB family plan with […]"
business  isp  politics  government  us 
december 2017 by gavin
“There is clearly plenty of evidence that ISPs will not treat data the same if offered the opportunity to do otherwise.”

“Even if you believe that the American broadband market is sufficiently competitive — it isn’t — that ISPs can be trusted to not discriminate against some forms of traffic once given the freedom to — doubtful — and that existing regulatory structures will allow any problems to be fixed on a case-by-case basis, it still seems far more efficient to prevent it in the first place. There’s an opportunity to treat internet service as a fundamental utility; let’s keep it that way, whether that’s through Title II classification or an equivalent replacement.”
internet  history  government  regulation 
december 2017 by leereamsnyder
Ben Thompson writes a reasonable-sounding yet largely wrong defence of the proposal to reclassify ISPs under Title I instead of Title II, beginning with a smart…
from instapaper
december 2017 by scottsin
via Starred items from BazQux Reader http://ift.tt/1cAKc9M and IFTTT
Starred  items  from  BazQux  Reader 
december 2017 by stinkingpig
via Feedbin Starred Entries for joewiz@gmail.com
IFTTT  Feedbin  Starred  Entries  for  joewiz@gmail.com 
december 2017 by joewiz
Nick Heer wrote a terrific response to Ben Thompson on the FCC’s move to overturn Obama era net neutrality regulations:

Even if you believe that the American broadband market is sufficiently competitive — it isn’t — that ISPs can be trusted to not discriminate against some forms of traffic once given the freedom to — doubtful — and that existing regulatory structures will allow any problems to be fixed on a case-by-case basis, it still seems far more efficient to prevent it in the first place. There’s an opportunity to treat internet service as a fundamental utility; let’s keep it that way, whether that’s through Title II classification or an equivalent replacement.

 ★ 
via:daringfireball 
december 2017 by rufous
from Daring Fireball

Nick Heer wrote a terrific response to Ben Thompson on the FCC’s move to overturn Obama era net neutrality regulations:

Even if you believe that the American broadband market is sufficiently competitive — it isn’t — that ISPs can be trusted to not discriminate against some forms of traffic once given the freedom to — doubtful — and that existing regulatory structures will allow any problems to be fixed on a case-by-case basis, it still seems far more efficient to prevent it in the first place. There’s an opportunity to treat internet service as a fundamental utility; let’s keep it that way, whether that’s through Title II classification or an equivalent replacement.

 ★ 
ifttt  daringfireball 
december 2017 by josephschmitt
Ben Thompson Is Wrong About the Deregulation of ISPs -
from twitter
november 2017 by ampressman
◉ Ben Thompson Is Wrong About the Deregulation of ISPs – Feedbin Starred Entries for toph.allen@gmail.com
Feedbin 
november 2017 by toph
Thompson has bit of a cult following.
s 
november 2017 by jgordon