The Uber Bombshell About to Drop – Daniel With Music


66 bookmarks. First posted by briantrice march 2017.


If you’ve been following tech news over the last few weeks, you have probably seen several stories about Uber , all negative (bar this one about flying cars). I…
from instapaper
march 2017 by zachmargolis
The Case Against Uber
from twitter
march 2017 by amspatel
If you’ve been following tech news over the last few weeks, you have probably seen several stories about Uber , all negative (bar this one about flying cars). I…
from instapaper
march 2017 by scottsin
via Feedbin Starred Entries for joewiz@gmail.com
IFTTT  Feedbin  Starred  Entries  for  joewiz@gmail.com 
march 2017 by joewiz
Daniel Compton lays out the case against Uber having coordinated with Anthony Levandowski to steal Google subsidiary Waymo’s self-driving car technology:

From Waymo’s filings, it seems that they have Levandowski dead to rights on stealing their LiDAR designs. That alone should be enough to bring Uber’s self-driving car program to a halt and cause some big problems for Levandowski. California’s Trade Secrets law is weaker than other states, but if successful, Waymo will be able to seek an injunction, damages, and attorney’s fees. Because all law is securities law, the SEC may also be able to bring a case against Uber (similarly to their case against Theranos).

 ★ 
via:daringfireball 
march 2017 by rufous
The Case Against Uber

Daniel Compton lays out the case against Uber having coordinated with Anthony Levandowski to steal Google subsidiary Waymo’s self-driving car technology:

From Waymo’s filings, it seems that they have Levandowski dead to rights on stealing their LiDAR designs. That alone should be enough to bring Uber’s self-driving car program to a halt and cause some big problems for Levandowski. California’s Trade Secrets law is weaker than other states, but if successful, Waymo will be able to seek an injunction, damages, and attorney’s fees. Because all law is securities law, the SEC may also be able to bring a case against Uber (similarly to their case against Theranos).

 ★ 
ifttt  rss 
march 2017 by josephschmitt
The Uber Bombshell About to Drop
march 2017 by tinystride
Alphabet is implying that Mr Levandowski arranged with Uber to:

Steal LiDAR and other self-driving component designs from Waymo
Start Otto as a plausible corporate vehicle for developing the self-driving technology
Acquire Otto for $680 million
google  culture  law  legal  cars 
march 2017 by ntschutta
If you’ve been following tech news over the last few weeks, you have probably seen several stories about Uber, all negative (bar this one about flying cars). I suspect that what is coming next will prove to be a far bigger story than all of the other incidents so far. N.B. via Pocket
Pocket 
march 2017 by driptray
If you’ve been following tech news over the last few weeks, you have probably seen several stories about Uber , all negative (bar this one about flying cars). I…
from instapaper
march 2017 by peterjblack
via Pinboard (network items for earth2marsh)
IFTTT  Feedly 
march 2017 by earth2marsh
roz. In Pierre-Yves’ deposition, he claims that Levandowski “told him that he planned to ‘replicate’ Waymo’s technology at a new company he was forming.” (Droz…
from instapaper
march 2017 by powerpage
Daniel Compton:
<p>In the last few weeks Alphabet <a href="https://medium.com/waymo/a-note-on-our-lawsuit-against-otto-and-uber-86f4f98902a1#.vd51cmjdf">filed a lawsuit</a> against Uber. Alphabet and Waymo (Alphabet’s self-driving car company) allege that Anthony Levandowski, an ex-Waymo manager, stole confidential and proprietary information from Waymo, then used it in his own self-driving truck startup, Otto. Uber acquired Otto in August 2016, so the suit was filed against Uber, not Otto.

This alone is a fairly explosive claim, but the subtext of Alphabet’s filing is an even bigger bombshell. Reading between the lines, (in my opinion) Alphabet is implying that Mr Levandowski arranged with Uber to:

• Steal LiDAR and other self-driving component designs from Waymo
• Start Otto as a plausible corporate vehicle for developing the self-driving technology
• Acquire Otto for $680 million
• Below, I’ll present the timeline of events, my interpretation, and some speculation on a possible (bad) outcome for Uber. </p>


It's quite an interpretation. (Also, legal things tend not to go with bombshells. They're more like super-slow burners.) One suspect it isn't going to be that bad, but Uber could find itself a few years behind rivals if things go badly. Still, it has a ton of money which it can use to get through the hard times.
google  uber  alphabet  selfdrivingcar 
march 2017 by charlesarthur
via Pinboard (Popular items from Pinboard) https://pinboard.in/popular/
IFTTT  Feedly 
march 2017 by sbmandal
If you’ve been following tech news over the last few weeks, you have probably seen several stories about Uber , all negative (bar this one about flying cars). I…
from instapaper
march 2017 by lou31
This Uber/Waymo/Otto lawsuit is like watching a self-driving semitrailer jacknife across a highway.
from twitter
march 2017 by avi
This Uber/Waymo/Otto lawsuit is like watching a self-driving semitrailer jacknife across a highway.
from twitter_favs
march 2017 by lemonodor
This Uber/Waymo/Otto lawsuit is like watching a self-driving semitrailer jacknife across a highway.
from twitter_favs
march 2017 by antifuchs
RT : this is ... astounding would be the largest scandal in valley history (esp if you factor uber's valuation)
from twitter
march 2017 by sarcas
RT : Seems pretty obvious Uber’s interest in Otto was solely about stealing Google’s tech
from twitter
march 2017 by becked
Alphabet's IP theft allegations regarding Waymo, Otto and Anthony Levandowski are pretty hardcore
alphabet  google  uber  lawsuits  ip  waymo 
march 2017 by jm
Yet another shoe falls in the PR disaster that is Uber. This time WRT possible (likely?) stolen IP from Google:
from twitter_favs
march 2017 by peterood
Worüber sich Waymo und Uber streiten
from twitter
march 2017 by grzbielok
Alphabet is implying that Mr Levandowski arranged with Uber to:
1. Steal LiDAR and other self-driving component designs from Waymo
2. Start Otto as a plausible corporate vehicle for developing the self-driving technology
3. Acquire Otto for $680 million
startup  business  uber  self-driving 
march 2017 by mazin_z1
Pretty thorough analysis of the unfolding Waymo vs. Uber stolen IP dispute.
google  uber  silicon-valley 
march 2017 by alexbecker
Detailed speculation on the nature of Google's case about intellectual property theft
google  uber  waymo  alphabet  levandowski  via:metafilter 
march 2017 by nelson
RT : this is ... astounding would be the largest scandal in valley history (esp if you factor uber's valuation)
from twitter
march 2017 by saikofish
This article suggests that Otto’s only purpose was to give L. time to “independently” develop his LIDAR: Hoo boy!
from twitter
march 2017 by whyitsjeff
this is ... astounding would be the largest scandal in valley history (esp if you factor uber's valuation)
from twitter_favs
march 2017 by sneak
The Uber Bombshell About to Drop – Daniel With Music
from twitter
march 2017 by wschenk
The Uber Bombshell About to Drop...
from twitter_favs
march 2017 by jabbrwcky
Looks like Uber might have nicked their "self driving car" side from Google.
from twitter
march 2017 by ebel
Uber's horrendous month(s) continue. If Google's allegations are true, they're working off a ton of stolen designs http://bit.ly/2nmDBxT
Tweeted 
march 2017 by michaelmartin
More detail on Waymo's (Google's) case against Uber for allegedly stealing their self-driving technology.
from twitter
march 2017 by mikkelmarius
The Uber Bombshell About to Drop
from twitter_favs
march 2017 by briantrice