Jupyter, Mathematica, and the Future of the Research Paper – Paul Romer

36 bookmarks. First posted by rafguns april 2018.

I remember dabbling with Mathematica circa 2010 and experiencing almost exactly the same issues. The rest of the text is very insightful re: open source. It's good to know people like Romer are advocating for Python in organisations like the World Bank.

open-source
data:science
python
may 2018 by phnk

Jupyter, Mathematica, and the Future of the Research Paper – Paul Romer via Instapaper https://ift.tt/2JLlNHS

IFTTT
Instapaper
april 2018 by richardcherron

Jupyter, Mathematica, and the Future of the Research Paper The Atlantic has a great article on new ways to share research results. Its three parts make three points: Each is spot on. I had to learn the hard way why so many kept their distance from Mathematica. Now, I’m much more productive with Jupyter. Added April 19, 2018 at 04:50PM

Pocket
april 2018 by np

The Atlantic has a great article on new ways to share research results. Its three parts make three points: Each is spot on. I had to learn the hard way why so many kept their distance from Mathematica. Now, I’m much more productive with Jupyter.

Archive
instapaper
tenpla
april 2018 by WFreeland

april 2018
by mthoma

I stopped using Mathematica and gave up on notebooks, so it was only recently that I discovered how easy it is to use the Jupyter notebook to as a front end for Python libraries. It offers the best REPL I’ve ever used. It does a better job of delivering what Theodore Gray had in mind when he designed the Mathematica notebook. It lets me get quick feedback, via text or graphics, about what happens when I select a line of code and run it.

python
data-science
april 2018 by elrob

The Atlantic has a great article on new ways to share research results. Its three parts make three points: A graphical user interface (GUI) can facilitate…

from instapaper
april 2018 by loganrhyne

The article asks why Jupyter succeed where Mathematica failed. The obvious contrast is between the proprietary world of Wolfram and the open-source model of the software ecosystem that Jupyter mobilizes.

research
publication
Jupyter
april 2018 by wlanderson

Jupyter, Mathematica, and the Future of the Research Paper

coding
Python
from twitter
april 2018 by cierniak

Jupyter rewards transparency; Mathematica rationalizes secrecy. Jupyter encourages individual integrity; Mathematica lets individuals hide behind corporate evasion. Jupyter exemplifies the social systems that emerged from the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, systems that make it possible for people to cooperate by committing to objective truth; Mathematica exemplifies the horde of new Vandals whose pursuit of private gain threatens a far greater pubic loss–the collapse of social systems that took centuries to build.

research
Python
opensource
april 2018 by janpeuker

RT @paulmromer: Thoughts about open source (Jupyter) vs proprietary software (Mathematica) prompted by the Somers article:

from twitter
april 2018 by benny

RT @newsycombinator: Jupyter, Mathematica, and the Future of the Research Paper

from twitter
april 2018 by heapdump

april 2018
by pl99

Thoughts about open source (Jupyter) vs proprietary software (Mathematica) prompted by the Somers article:

from twitter_favs
april 2018 by rafguns

Thoughts about open source (Jupyter) vs proprietary software (Mathematica) prompted by the Somers article:

from twitter_favs
april 2018 by gglanzani

Thoughts about open source (Jupyter) vs proprietary software (Mathematica) prompted by the Somers article:

from twitter_favs
april 2018 by gwpl

tags

archive bookmarks_bar coding data-science data:science education foss ide ifttt imported_from_firefox instapaper interesting jupyter mathematica mathematics open-source opensource philosophy pocket programming publication py python reproducibility research s scholarlycommunication science software_and_services stem tenpla writing