Charles Murray is once again peddling junk science about race and IQ - Vox


26 bookmarks. First posted by matthewog may 2017.


Charles Murray, the conservative scholar who co-authored The Bell Curve with the late Richard Herrnstein, was recently denied a platform at Middlebury…
from instapaper
june 2017 by icathing
Our bottom line is that there is a responsible, scientifically informed alternative to Murrayism: a non-essentialist view of intelligence, a non-deterministic view of behavior genetics, and a view of group differences that avoids oversimplified biology.
race  iq  socialscience  heritability 
june 2017 by deprecated
Murray with Sam Harris on Racial IQ
june 2017 by psybertron
Charles Murray is once again peddling junk science about race and IQ
from twitter
may 2017 by kejadlen
"Our bottom line is that there is a responsible, scientifically informed alternative to Murrayism: a non-essentialist view of intelligence, a non-deterministic view of behavior genetics, and a view of group differences that avoids oversimplified biology."
race  intelligence  protest  science  biology  genetics  longread  article  inspiration 
may 2017 by msszczep
Photo taken from , which is worth your time.
from twitter
may 2017 by ewout
Professors at UVA, UT Austin, and Michigan debunk Charles Murray on race and IQ:
may 2017 by tptacek
Middlebury College students turn their backs to author Charles Murray during a lecture in March. The talk had to be moved, and a professor hosting Murray was…
from instapaper
may 2017 by scottsin
In Harris’s view, all of this is simply beyond dispute. Murray’s claims about race and intelligence, however, do not stand up to serious critical or empirical examination. But the main point of this brief piece is not merely to rebut Murray’s conclusions per se — although we will do some of that — but rather to consider the faulty path by which he casually proceeds from a few basic premises to the inflammatory conclusion that IQ differences between groups are likely to be at least partly based on inborn genetic differences. These conclusions, Harris and Murray insist, are disputed only by head-in-the-sand elitists afraid of the policy implications.


(In the interview, Murray says he has modified none of his views since the publication of the book, in 1994; if anything, he says, the evidence for his claims has grown stronger. In fact, the field of intelligence has moved far beyond what Murray has been saying for the past 23 years.)
iq  charles_murray  sam_harris  intelligence  genetics  racism 
may 2017 by perich
Excellent look at the science that got skipped over and ignored in Sam Harris's interview with Charles Murray: https://t.co/My30x1FRB4
IFTTT  Diigo  fav_tweet 
may 2017 by occam98
Middlebury College students turn their backs to author Charles Murray during a lecture in March. The talk had to be moved, and a professor hosting Murray was…
from instapaper
may 2017 by rolphrecto
the fear in this article is delicious, you can tell that they know that their game is finished
from twitter_favs
may 2017 by ejl
Murray casually concludes that group differences in IQ are genetically based. But what of the actual evidence on the question? Murray makes a rhetorical move that is commonly deployed by people supporting his point of view: They stake out the claim that at least some of the difference between racial groups is genetic, and challenge us to defend the claim that none, absolutely zero, of it is. They know that science is not designed for proving absolute negatives, but we will go this far: There is currently no reason at all to think that any significant portion of the IQ differences among socially defined racial groups is genetic in origin.

Here, too briefly, are some facts to ponder — facts that Murray was not challenged to consider by Harris, who holds a PhD in neuroscience, although they are known to most experts in the field of intelligence.
charlesmurray  race  racism  iq  intelligence  socialscience  cognition  takedowns  samharris 
may 2017 by sampenrose
100g on the inheritability of race
Teaching 
may 2017 by scritic
Of course is helping racists promote discredited pseudoscience.
from twitter
may 2017 by jrosenau
turns out Sam Harris–who warned in '06 France would be 50% Muslim by 2031 (its currently 8%)–peddles racist nonsense https://t.co/cJNbN64uNI
– Adam H. Johnson (adamjohnsonNYC) http://twitter.com/adamjohnsonNYC/status/865218366084173827
via:packrati.us 
may 2017 by kelo
turns out Sam Harris–who warned in '06 France would be 50% Muslim by 2031 (its currently 8%)–peddles racist nonsense
from twitter_favs
may 2017 by bokane
Excellent look at the science that got skipped over and ignored in Sam Harris's interview with Charles Murray:
from twitter_favs
may 2017 by lurrel
RT : Sam Harris is an intellectual fraud who peddles racist pseudoscience
from twitter
may 2017 by gregbrown
Sam Harris is an intellectual fraud who peddles racist pseudoscience
from twitter_favs
may 2017 by matthewog