The Cost Of JavaScript In 2018 – Addy Osmani – Medium


155 bookmarks. First posted by jjmartucci 11 weeks ago.


Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded…
javascript  from instapaper
6 weeks ago by wesbaker
Byte-for-byte, JavaScript is still the most expensive resource we send to mobile phones, because it can delay interactivity in large ways.
javascript  performance  mobile 
7 weeks ago by spaceninja
The Cost of JavaScript in 2018 https://ift.tt/2LNYuly
7 weeks ago by johnloy
The Cost Of JavaScript In 2018 – Addy Osmani – Medium
from twitter_favs
8 weeks ago by dnene
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?
Archive 
9 weeks ago by fraz87
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded…
IFTTT  Instapaper 
9 weeks ago by LaptopHeaven
*If client-side JavaScript isn’t benefiting the user-experience, ask yourself if it’s really necessary.* Maybe server-side-rendered HTML would actually be faster. Consider limiting the use of client-side frameworks to pages that absolutely require them. Server-rendering and client-rendering are a disaster if done poorly.
javascript  performace  web  webdevelopment  bestpractices 
9 weeks ago by andrewsardone
The cost of JavaScript : cc
from twitter_favs
9 weeks ago by briantrice
Addy Osmani schreibt sehr ausfürlich über Javascript und welche Möglichkeiten es gibt, eine Seite oder Anwendung schneller zu bauen.

Byte-for-byte, JavaScript is still the most expensive resource we send to mobile phones, because it can delay interactivity in large ways.
javascript  performance 
9 weeks ago by schneyra
olve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?
Javascript 
10 weeks ago by stewymac07
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll…
10 weeks ago by thenerdscribe
The cost of JavaScript In 2018: — a strong wake up call to all developers by .…
from twitter_favs
10 weeks ago by stephenjang
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?
performance  js 
10 weeks ago by siggiarni
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens? via Pocket
read  pocket 
10 weeks ago by tricca
If client-side JavaScript isn’t benefiting the user-experience, ask yourself if it’s really necessary. Maybe server-side-rendered HTML would actually be faster. Consider limiting the use of client-side frameworks to pages that absolutely require them. Server-rendering and client-rendering are a disaster if done poorly.
javascript  performance  wpo 
10 weeks ago by WimLeers
Отличная статья о проблемах использования JS в современном вебе
programming  design  2018  js 
10 weeks ago by gevorg
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?

Byte-for-byte, JavaScript is still the most expensive resource we send to mobile phones, because it can delay interactivity in large ways.
javascript  performance 
10 weeks ago by kejadlen