The Cost Of JavaScript In 2018 – Addy Osmani – Medium


172 bookmarks. First posted by jjmartucci august 2018.


A lot of the advice in here make the web in 2018 sound like an tiny embedded system. You get a 170 kB budget.
javascript  performance 
4 days ago by jefframnani
“Byte-for-byte, JavaScript is still the most expensive resource we send to mobile phones, because it can delay interactivity in large ways.”
javascript  performance  webdev  webdesign 
7 weeks ago by beep
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded…
javascript  from instapaper
september 2018 by wesbaker
Byte-for-byte, JavaScript is still the most expensive resource we send to mobile phones, because it can delay interactivity in large ways.
javascript  performance  mobile 
august 2018 by spaceninja
The Cost of JavaScript in 2018 https://ift.tt/2LNYuly
august 2018 by johnloy
The Cost Of JavaScript In 2018 – Addy Osmani – Medium
from twitter_favs
august 2018 by dnene
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?
Archive 
august 2018 by fraz87
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded…
IFTTT  Instapaper 
august 2018 by LaptopHeaven
*If client-side JavaScript isn’t benefiting the user-experience, ask yourself if it’s really necessary.* Maybe server-side-rendered HTML would actually be faster. Consider limiting the use of client-side frameworks to pages that absolutely require them. Server-rendering and client-rendering are a disaster if done poorly.
javascript  performace  web  webdevelopment  bestpractices 
august 2018 by andrewsardone
The cost of JavaScript : cc
from twitter_favs
august 2018 by briantrice
Addy Osmani schreibt sehr ausfürlich über Javascript und welche Möglichkeiten es gibt, eine Seite oder Anwendung schneller zu bauen.

Byte-for-byte, JavaScript is still the most expensive resource we send to mobile phones, because it can delay interactivity in large ways.
javascript  performance 
august 2018 by schneyra
olve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?
Javascript 
august 2018 by stewymac07
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll…
august 2018 by thenerdscribe
The cost of JavaScript In 2018: — a strong wake up call to all developers by .…
from twitter_favs
august 2018 by stephenjang
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens?
performance  js 
august 2018 by siggiarni
Building interactive sites can involve sending JavaScript to your users. Often, too much of it. Have you been on a mobile page that looked like it had loaded only to tap on a link or tried to scroll and nothing happens? via Pocket
read  pocket 
august 2018 by tricca
If client-side JavaScript isn’t benefiting the user-experience, ask yourself if it’s really necessary. Maybe server-side-rendered HTML would actually be faster. Consider limiting the use of client-side frameworks to pages that absolutely require them. Server-rendering and client-rendering are a disaster if done poorly.
javascript  performance  wpo 
august 2018 by WimLeers