petej + sovereignty   103

Why Labour is dangerously foolish to turn against freedom of movement
There are certainly reasons to criticise the institution of EU free movement. For one, it is only a partial freedom, restricted by class, ethnicity, and geography. For another, it is an extremely exclusive one, leaving thousands of migrants to perish on the Mediterranean each year.

But it is dangerously foolish to believe that the Labour Party can destroy EU free movement in order to build something better in its place. As we are about to discover, the costs of ending free movement — to the millions of EU citizens that have made homes, families, and lives in Britain — are painfully high. Allowing this to pass will be a permanent stain on the Labour Party’s record.

Instead, EU free movement should be a springboard to a more global system of open migration. Labour should be leading the way to defend EU free movement and extend it beyond Europe’s borders, shattering the fortress that Brussels has constructed around the continent.
UK  EU  freedomOfMovement  immigration  CorbynJeremy  migration  wages  pay  culture  nostalgia  sovereignty  nation-state  politics  LabourParty 
february 2019 by petej
mainly macro: Brexit. Of course everyone hates a compromise, but like much else its the best option, isn't it?
According to IPSOS Mori, only a few percent of people thought the EU was an important issue in 2010. In 2015 it only occasionally reached double figures. This strongly suggests that people voted Leave not because they wanted to leave the EU for its own sake, but for what they believed would be a consequence of leaving in some other dimension. This is the key to understanding why a compromise does not work.

Most Brexit voters will not be moderately happy with a deal that makes them worse off: they will not be happy at all. Most Brexit voters will not be moderately happy with a deal that gives the UK less say in the rules the UK has to obey than when in the EU: they will not be happy at all. A true compromise is something that gives each side something, but the incredible thing about Brexit is that what most Leavers want from Brexit is not possible, yet most politicians and much of the media refuse to tell them that.

The curse of Brexit is that anyone enacting it will be unpopular, not because most Leave voters do not get all they want but because they do not get anything they want. In fact, like the snake oil analogy, they will probably be worse off or have less say. Brexit was always a fantasy, and anyone who makes Brexit concrete will fail to deliver that fantasy. As most politicians have not had the courage to call Brexit out as the fantasy it is, voters are likely to blame the politicians who fail to produce their fantasy rather than blaming themselves.
UK  EU  Brexit  Leave  delusion  economy  publicServices  sovereignty  compromise  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=Wren-LewisSimon 
january 2019 by petej
Ivan Rogers’ Brexit bombshell, digested | Martha Gill | Opinion | The Guardian
There is a contradiction at the heart of the argument made by many of those advocating no deal. They say both that WTO terms are good enough for the UK to trade on, and that Britain’s prosperity depends on it striking multiple trade deals abroad.

Rogers puts it like this: “You cannot simultaneously argue that it is perfectly fine to leave a deep free trade agreement with easily our largest export and import market for the next generation, and trade on WTO terms because that is how we and others trade with everyone else – and argue that it is imperative we get out of the EU in order that we can strike preferential trade deals with large parts of the rest of the world, because the existing terms on which we trade with the rest of the world are intolerable.”
UK  EU  Brexit  negotiations  politics  delusion  sovereignty  agency  power  Article50  transition  EU27  withdrawalAgreement  singleMarket  LancasterHouse  freedomOfMovement  WTO  noDeal  trade  freeTradeAgreement  services  transparency  secrecy  dishonesty  RogersIvan  speech  Liverpool 
december 2018 by petej
Brexit means leaving the single market and the customs union. Here’s why | Barry Gardiner | Opinion | The Guardian
Most trade agreements arise from a desire to liberalise trade – making it easier to sell goods and services into one another’s markets. Brexit will not. Brexit arose from key political, rather than trade, objectives: to have control over our borders, to have sovereignty over our laws, not to submit to the European court of justice (ECJ), and not to pay money into the European budget. When negotiations start it will be the first time countries seek a trade agreement with the clear understanding that they are increasing barriers between them.
UK  EU  Brexit  LabourParty  sovereignty  freedomOfMovement  ECJ  singleMarket  customsUnion  trade  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=GardinerBarry 
july 2017 by petej
European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Speech by Michel Barnier at the European Economic and Social Committee
I have heard some people in the UK argue that one can leave the single market and keep all of its benefits – that is not possible.
I have heard some people in the UK argue that one can leave the single market and build a customs union to achieve "frictionless trade" – that is not possible.
UK  EU  Brexit  singleMarket  customsUnion  freedomOfMovement  sovereignty  ECJ  BarnierMichel  negotiations  politics 
july 2017 by petej
British officials drop 'cake and eat it' approach to Brexit negotiations | Politics | The Guardian
“We have a problem in that really there are only two viable options,” one official told the Guardian. “One is a high-access, low-control arrangement which looks a bit like the EEA. The other is a low-access, high-control arrangement where you eventually end up looking like Ceta – a more classic free trade agreement, if you are lucky.
UK  EU  Brexit  economy  trade  sovereignty  customsUnion  EEA  freeTrade  FTA  freedomOfMovement  negotiations 
july 2017 by petej
Scotland eyes independence: can nationalism deliver a progressive utopia?
Beyond simple economic calculation, who could look on England’s bubbling stew of imperial nostalgia, anti-migrant paranoia and omnidirectional resentment and not retch? Who would not wish to wash their hands of the U.S.’ snivelling global lieutenant, its unfailing ally in every atrocity, and its sedately corrupt institutions – or its monuments to mediocrity, deference and graft, the Windsor family?

What a fitting testament it would be to a nation long drunk on self-importance and the legacy of global plunder that the party most committed to its tawdry self-regard should finally steer it to its ruin.
Scotland  independence  SNP  UK  EU  Brexit  MayTheresa  LabourParty  nationalism  radicalism  TheLeft  sovereignty  dctagged  dc:creator=ButlerJames 
march 2017 by petej
EU referendum: ‘This is now a battle for an idea of Britain’ | Will Hutton | Opinion | The Guardian
Brexit would not herald a new dawn. As John Major has argued, we export six times as much to the EU as to Brazil, Russia, China and India added together. We export five times as much to the EU as to all the other 52 members of the Commonwealth added together. We sell more services to tiny Luxembourg than to India. The “experts”, derided by Leave, when they warn of recession and years of lost opportunity as Britain tries to redirect its trade, are only stating the obvious.

The millions of working-class voters thinking of voting Brexit, beware. Immigrants, who boost our economy, are not the cause of our ills. The lack of cheap social housing, the underinvestment in public services, the non-building of roads, the inability of weakened trade unions to defend wages and the wider failure to develop vigorous local economies are not the EU’s fault. What is wrong is minted in Britain and must be put right here.

Moreover, the values that will make our lives better are mutuality and generosity – not telling others to go home and turning our backs on the noble if derided EU. To leave is to indulge the worst side of our natures, to believe fantasies about what constitutes democracy and to chase an economic chimera. To remain is a double win – to be part of something good and get richer in the process. Think before you vote.
UK  EU  referendum  Brexit  Europe  globalisation  sovereignty  cooperation  publicServices  housing  immigration  post-industrialism  Britishness  trade  dctagged  dc:creator=HuttonWill  deindustrialisation 
june 2016 by petej
« earlier      
per page:    204080120160

related tags

53Group  accountability  advertising  AEiP  age  agency  agreement  Airbnb  ANEL  anger  anti-imperialism  anti-intellectualism  arrogance  Article50  Ashcroft  Assembly  assets  audio  austerity  authoritarianism  authority  backstop  bailout  banking  banks  BannonStephen  BarnierMichel  BattenGerard  benefits  betrayal  bigData  BinLadenOsama  Blairism  BlairTony  blame  BlueLabour  BoltonHenry  borders  Brexit  Britishness  BrownGordon  budget  business  CableVince  CameronDavid  CampbellMenzies  Canada  CAP  capitalism  cars  CarswellDouglas  CFP  China  citizensAssembly  citizenship  CJEU  class  CleggNick  climateChange  coalition  colonialism  communism  competition  compromise  conflict  conservatism  constitution  control  cooperation  Corbynism  CorbynJeremy  crisis  culture  CummingsDominic  currency  customsUnion  data  dataMining  DavisDavid  dc:contributor=BastaniAaron  dc:contributor=DaviesWill  dc:contributor=GalsworthyMike  dc:contributor=GiddensAnthony  dc:contributor=VaroufakisYanis  dc:contributor=WalkerMichael  dc:contrinutor=HardtMichael  dc:creator=AdonisAndrew  dc:creator=BalibarEtienne  dc:creator=BarnettAnthony  dc:creator=BastaniAaron  dc:creator=BehrRafael  dc:creator=BernalPaul  dc:creator=BrownGordon  dc:creator=ButlerJames  dc:creator=CoppolaFrances  dc:creator=D'AnconaMatthew  dc:creator=DouganMichael  dc:creator=DuntIan  dc:creator=Evans-PritchardAmbrose  dc:creator=FreedlandJonathan  dc:creator=GardinerBarry  dc:creator=GourevitchAlex  dc:creator=GoveMichael  dc:creator=HuttonWill  dc:creator=JenkinsSimon  dc:creator=JonesOwen  dc:creator=KanePat  dc:creator=MasonPaul  dc:creator=MillerGina  dc:creator=MorozovEvgeny  dc:creator=NegriAntonio  dc:creator=OrrDeborah  dc:creator=PittsFH  dc:creator=RamsayAdam  dc:creator=RogersIvan  dc:creator=SelfWill  dc:creator=ThompsonPaul  dc:creator=ToynbeePolly  dc:creator=TrillingDaniel  dc:creator=VaroufakisYanis  dc:creator=Wren-LewisSimon  dc:creator=YoungeGary  dctagged  debate  debt  decentralisation  decolonisation  deficit  deindustrialisation  delusion  democracy  democratisation  deregulation  detention  DiEM  DiEM25  digitalBauhaus  diplomacy  discipline  discussion  dishonesty  dissolution  EC  ECB  ECHR  ECJ  economics  economy  editorial  education  EEA  EFTA  ElliottMatthew  emergencyBrake  emotion  Empire  England  Englishness  ESM  ethnicity  EU  EU27  Euro  Eurogroup  Europe  EuropeanUnion  Euroscepticism  Eurozone  exclusion  extension  failure  FalklandsWar  FarageNigel  fascism  federalism  feminism  finance  financialisation  fiscalCompact  FoxJeremy  FoxLiam  FPTP  France  freedomOfMovement  freeTrade  freeTradeAgreement  FTA  FTPA  GDP  ge2017  generalElection  Germany  Gibraltar  GiddensAnthony  giletsJaunes  globalisation  Google  GourevitchAlex  GoveMichael  government  Greece  greekrevolution  grexit  GrieveDominic  growth  Guardian  HaleyNikki  HannanDan  HannanDaniel  hardBrexit  HardtMichael  healthcare  HighCourt  HiltonSteve  history  Hobbes  HomeOffice  homeOwnership  housing  HowardMichael  hubris  humanRights  Hungary  idcards  identity  identityCards  IMF  immigration  imperialism  independence  IndependentGreeks  inequality  informationTechnology  infrastructure  integration  interdependence  interdependency  internationalism  Internet  interview  investment  Iran  Ireland  isolationism  Italy  Jacobin  jingoism  jobs  JohnsonBoris  JunckerJean-Claude  LabourParty  LamontNorman  LancasterHouse  landlords  language  leadership  Leave  LeftPlatform  legal  LegaNord  legislation  Lexit  LiberalDemocratParty  liberalism  libertarianism  LisbonTreaty  Liverpool  livingStandards  LRB  LucasCaroline  M5S  MaastrichtTreaty  MacronEmmanuel  manufacturing  markets  MarneyJo  Marx  MasonPaul  MattarellaSergio  max-fac  MayTheresa  media  MerkelAngela  migrants  migration  MillerGina  multiculturalism  multitude  nation-state  nationalIdentity  nationalisation  nationalism  negotiations  Negri  NegriAntonio  neoliberalism  NewLabour  newspapers  NHS  Nissan  noDeal  NorthernIreland  Norway  NorwayPlus  nostalgia  Novara  nuclearPower  OBL  Oldham  OsborneGeorge  ownership  Pakistan  Parliament  patriotism  pay  pensions  PeoplesVote  personalData  philosophy  PhilosophyTube  pluralism  Podemos  Poland  policing  policy  politics  populism  Portugal  post-capitalism  post-industrialism  post-work  poverty  power  prices  privacy  privatisation  productivity  proportionalRepresentation  protectionism  protest  publicServices  PutinVladimir  racism  radicalism  radio  recession  Rees-MoggJacob  referendum  reform  refugees  regulation  Remain  renewal  residency  resignation  RogersIvan  rules  Russia  SalviniMatteo  sanctions  scale  schools  Scotland  secrecy  security  self-interest  separatism  services  sharingEconomy  SiliconValley  singleMarket  SNP  socialAttitudes  socialDemocracy  socialGroup  socialJustice  socialMedia  socialMobility  softBrexit  SoubryAnna  sovereignty  Spain  speech  Spinoza  standards  state  stateAid  strategy  Sunderland  surveillance  survey  Syntagma  Syriza  tabloids  tactics  talk  tariffs  tax  technocracy  technology  tenancies  Thatcherism  TheLeft  TheSun  thisisacoup  ThomasJohn  threats  ToryParty  trade  transition  transitions  transparency  travel  troika  TrumpDonald  trust  TsiprasAlexis  TTIP  Turkey  TuskDonald  Twitter  UK  UKIP  UN  uncertainty  USA  vanguardism  VaroufakisYanis  victimhood  video  Vimeo  violence  visas  wages  war  welfare  WhitePaper  withdrawalAgreement  WorldWarII  WTO  xenophobia  YouTube 

Copy this bookmark: