petej + monopoly   137

Zuckerberg’s new privacy essay shows why Facebook needs to be broken up - MIT Technology Review
By narrowly construing privacy to be almost exclusively about end-to-end encryption that would prevent a would-be eavesdropper from intercepting communications, he manages to avoid having to think about Facebook’s weaknesses and missteps. Privacy is not just about keeping secrets. It’s also about how flows of information shape us as individuals and as a society. What we say to whom and why is a function of context. Social networks change that context, and in so doing they change the nature of privacy, in ways that are both good and bad.
Facebook  socialMedia  ZuckerbergMark  communication  privacy  business  businessModels  advertising  encryption  secrecy  context  misinformation  attention  walledGarden  monopoly  control 
10 weeks ago by petej
John Lanchester reviews ‘The Attention Merchants’ by Tim Wu, ‘Chaos Monkeys’ by Antonio García Martínez and ‘Move Fast and Break Things’ by Jonathan Taplin · LRB 17 August 2017
"What this means is that even more than it is in the advertising business, Facebook is in the surveillance business. Facebook, in fact, is the biggest surveillance-based enterprise in the history of mankind. It knows far, far more about you than the most intrusive government has ever known about its citizens. It’s amazing that people haven’t really understood this about the company. I’ve spent time thinking about Facebook, and the thing I keep coming back to is that its users don’t realise what it is the company does. What Facebook does is watch you, and then use what it knows about you and your behaviour to sell ads. I’m not sure there has ever been a more complete disconnect between what a company says it does – ‘connect’, ‘build communities’ – and the commercial reality. Note that the company’s knowledge about its users isn’t used merely to target ads but to shape the flow of news to them. Since there is so much content posted on the site, the algorithms used to filter and direct that content are the thing that determines what you see: people think their news feed is largely to do with their friends and interests, and it sort of is, with the crucial proviso that it is their friends and interests as mediated by the commercial interests of Facebook. Your eyes are directed towards the place where they are most valuable for Facebook."

"Here in the rich world, the focus is more on monetisation, and it’s in this area that I have to admit something which is probably already apparent. I am scared of Facebook. The company’s ambition, its ruthlessness, and its lack of a moral compass scare me. It goes back to that moment of its creation, Zuckerberg at his keyboard after a few drinks creating a website to compare people’s appearance, not for any real reason other than that he was able to do it. That’s the crucial thing about Facebook, the main thing which isn’t understood about its motivation: it does things because it can. Zuckerberg knows how to do something, and other people don’t, so he does it. Motivation of that type doesn’t work in the Hollywood version of life, so Aaron Sorkin had to give Zuck a motive to do with social aspiration and rejection. But that’s wrong, completely wrong. He isn’t motivated by that kind of garden-variety psychology. He does this because he can, and justifications about ‘connection’ and ‘community’ are ex post facto rationalisations. The drive is simpler and more basic. That’s why the impulse to growth has been so fundamental to the company, which is in many respects more like a virus than it is like a business. Grow and multiply and monetise. Why? There is no why. Because.

Automation and artificial intelligence are going to have a big impact in all kinds of worlds. These technologies are new and real and they are coming soon. Facebook is deeply interested in these trends. We don’t know where this is going, we don’t know what the social costs and consequences will be, we don’t know what will be the next area of life to be hollowed out, the next business model to be destroyed, the next company to go the way of Polaroid or the next business to go the way of journalism or the next set of tools and techniques to become available to the people who used Facebook to manipulate the elections of 2016. We just don’t know what’s next, but we know it’s likely to be consequential, and that a big part will be played by the world’s biggest social network. On the evidence of Facebook’s actions so far, it’s impossible to face this prospect without unease."
Facebook  socialMedia  ZuckerbergMark  attention  business  psychology  ThielPeter  mimeticDesire  GiraudRene  filterBubble  identity  fakeNews  misinformation  Russia  TrumpDonald  advertising  surveillance  surveillanceCapitalism  businessModels  targeting  personalData  monetisation  tracking  Experian  creditCards  algorithms  auctions  Google  monopoly  duopoly  manipulation  emotion  happiness  mentalHealth  dctagged  dc:creator=LanchesterJohn  LRB 
august 2017 by petej
Up the Amazon with the BS Machine | Book View Cafe Blog
Every book purchase made from Amazon is a vote for a culture without content and without contentment.
Amazon  books  retail  business  businessModels  monopoly 
june 2015 by petej
The Banality of ‘Don’t Be Evil’ by Julian Assange -
"The authors offer an expertly banalized version of tomorrow’s world: the gadgetry of decades hence is predicted to be much like what we have right now — only cooler. “Progress” is driven by the inexorable spread of American consumer technology over the surface of the earth. Already, every day, another million or so Google-run mobile devices are activated. Google will interpose itself, and hence the United States government, between the communications of every human being not in China (naughty China). Commodities just become more marvelous; young, urban professionals sleep, work and shop with greater ease and comfort; democracy is insidiously subverted by technologies of surveillance, and control is enthusiastically rebranded as “participation”; and our present world order of systematized domination, intimidation and oppression continues, unmentioned, unafflicted or only faintly perturbed."
Google  technology  technoUtopianism  consumerism  neoliberalism  business  monopoly  control  privacy  dctagged  dc:creator=AssangeJulian 
june 2013 by petej
Bryan Appleyard » Blog Archive » Has Google Gone Gaga?
"The Singularity, Ayn Rand, the elitism, the moral pretensions and the dreams of island states are all sending the same message – that Silicon Valley is a small, highly intelligent, obsessive, hubristic and deluded community. Its values are not ours. We should, of course, embrace its ingenuity and the gadgets it showers upon us, but we should be wary of the ‘terms and conditions’ attached. These include not just the inane legalisms that come with the software, but also the ideology, the rhetoric, the world-dominating fantasies and, of course, the tax avoidance."
Google  SchmidtEric  technoUtopianism  monopoly  business  taxAvoidance  democracy  liberalism 
june 2013 by petej
Are We Just Google’s Lab Rats? | OUseful.Info, the blog...
"With Feedburner, Google bought up a service that acted as a proxy, taking public syndication feeds, instrumenting them with analytics, and then encouraging the people taking up the syndicated content to subscribe to the Feedburner feed. Where RSS and Atom were designed to support syndication between independent parties, Feedburner – and then Google – insinuated itself between those parties. By replacing self-controlled feeds as the subscription endpoint with Google controlled endpoints, publishers gave up control of their syndication infrastructure. With Google losing interest in open syndication feeds as it pursues its own closed content network agenda, we are faced with a situation whereby Google can potentially trash a widespread syndication infrastructure that would have remained resilient if Google hadn’t insinuated itself into it. Or if we hadn’t been so stupid as to simplistically accept it’s overtures.

Hmmm… thinks… do we need a Google users’ motto? Don’t be stupid perhaps…?!"
Google  RSS  GoogleReader  Feedburner  monopoly  walledGarden  standards  control  business  influence  dctagged  dc:creator=HirstTony 
may 2013 by petej
Facebook Home launches to eat Google's lunch
"But the most interesting possibility for Facebook is that, by stopping short of developing their own version of Android, they've created something which can be installed with ease on nearly any Android phone. It provides the company with far deeper hooks into a user's life than just installing an app would, without a significantly higher hurdle to leap.

And, of course, where Facebook goes, advertising follows. At the launch, Mark Zuckerberg confirmed that "there are no ads in this yet, [but] I'm sure that one day there will be". It fits with the Facebook ethos that sees ads as just another type of content, which users should see with equal prominence in their news feed to the status – but when that "feature" is rolled out, expect some grumbles.

But an oblique entry into a crowded field doesn't make Facebook any less of a threat to the companies currently in the lead – and that goes double for Google, which really should be quaking in its boots at this move. The search giant's entire reason for making Android is to use it to harvest data and sell ads to mobile users. Home is clearly an attempt to eat Google's lunch in that regards, without taking on the expense burden of actually having to develop and maintain an operating system."
Facebook  FacebookHome  Android  mobile  control  monopoly  Google  business  competition  walledGarden 
april 2013 by petej
What makes Twitter Twitter? - alt.adrianshort
"Twitter used to be where people talked. Now it’s where money talks."
Twitter  monopoly  business  businessModels  restrictions  control 
june 2012 by petej
« earlier      
per page:    204080120160

related tags

21stCenturyFox  acquisition  AdExchange  advertising  Africa  agriculture  AI  algorithms  Alphabet  alternatives  Amazon  AmazonPrime  AMP  Android  AOL  AOSP  API  Apple  apps  appstore  archives  artificialIntelligence  ATM  attention  auctions  AWS  BBC  BiffenJohn  blacklisting  BoingBoing  books  BradleyKaren  BrinSergey  Bristol  broadcasting  BSkyB  bullshit  bullying  business  businessModels  CableVince  CameronDavid  Cannes  capitalism  CarphoneWarehouse  cataloguing  censorship  centralisation  China  Chrome  cinema  clients  closedness  cloudComputing  coalition  comments  commerce  communication  communities  competition  conditions  consistency  consumerism  context  control  copyright  corruption  creditCards  culture  Currys  data  dc:contributor=ZuckerbergMark  dc:creator=AssangeJulian  dc:creator=boyddanah  dc:creator=BrayTim  dc:creator=CathcartBrian  dc:creator=ColburnRafe  dc:creator=DashAnil  dc:creator=DoctorowCory  dc:creator=EllisMike  dc:creator=EveMartin  dc:creator=GibsonWilliam  dc:creator=HarrisJohn  dc:creator=HirstTony  dc:creator=HydeMarina  dc:creator=LanchesterJohn  dc:creator=NeylonCameron  dc:creator=O'ReillyTim  dc:creator=PestonRobert  dc:creator=PollockRufus  dc:creator=ScobieRobertt  dc:creator=ScobleRobert  dc:creator=TennisonJeni  dc:creator=WalshNorman  dc:creator=WatsonTom  dc:creator=WeinbergerDavid  dc:creator=WinerDave  DCMS  dctagged  democracy  dependency  design  developers  digitalIdentity  distribution  Dixons  Doubleclick  Dragonfly  DRM  duopoly  DVDs  ebooks  EC  economics  ecosystem  electronics  Elsevier  email  emotion  employment  encryption  energy  ethics  EU  EuropeanCommission  EuropeanParliament  expansion  Experian  Facebook  FacebookHome  FacebookZero  fakeNews  Feedburner  film  filterBubble  filtering  fine  FirstGroup  food  franchise  Freebase  FriendFeed  GibsonWilliam  GiraudRene  globalisation  GMail  Google  Google+  GoogleAnalytics  GoogleChrome  GoogleGlass  GoogleNews  GooglePlay  GooglePlus  GoogleReader  governance  government  growth  Guardian  Hachette  happiness  health  history  HTML  humour  HungryBeast  HuntJeremy  hype  hyperlinks  IBM  ICQ  identity  IMDB  inappPayments  influence  information  infrastructure  Internet  interoperability  interview  iPad  iPhone  Jisc  JobsSteve  journalism  journals  Kindle  labour  legal  LeMonde  LiberalDemocratParty  liberalism  libraries  linking  lobbying  London  London2012  lovefilm  LRB  manipulation  marketing  markets  Mashable  media  mentalHealth  merger  MetaWeb  microblogging  microdata  Microhoo  micropayments  Microsoft  mimeticDesire  misinformation  mobile  mobilePhones  monetisation  monitoring  monopolies  monopoly  Murdoch  MurdochRupert  music  neoliberalism  Netflix  news  NewsCorp  NewsCorporation  newspapers  NewYorkTimes  O2  OCLC  Ofcom  olympics  Olympics2012  OpenId  openness  OpenSource  ownership  PageLarry  PageRank  PCWorld  personalData  planning  politics  power  press  privacy  promotion  psychology  publicServices  publishers  publishing  rail  ranking  RDFa  ReadWriteWeb  realtime  regulation  research  restrictions  retail  robots  RSS  Russia  SchmidtEric  science  search  searchEngineOptimisation  secrecy  security  semanticWeb  SEO  shopping  SiliconValley  silos  Siri  Sky  SkyNews  SkyRiver  SMB  socialMedia  socialNetworking  socialSoftware  spam  speechRecognition  sponsorship  sport  standards  Stanford  StokesCroft  streaming  subscription  supermarkets  surveillance  surveillanceCapitalism  takeover  targeting  taxAvoidance  techcrunch  technology  technoUtopianism  Telegraph  television  terminology  Tesco  Thatcher  ThatcherMargaret  TheRegister  TheTimes  ThielPeter  ToryParty  tos  TPM  tracking  train  transport  travel  trolling  TrumpDonald  trust  Tweetdeck  Twitter  TwitterCards  UI  UK  URI  utility  video  VirginTrains  virtualAssistant  voiceRecognition  walledGarden  warehouse  wearables  Web  web2.0  WholeFoods  work  Yahoo  YouTube  ZuckerbergMark 

Copy this bookmark: