petej + impact   131

How Brexit Will End | The New Yorker
Brexit is an uncanny political process because it is an inversion of the way that things were supposed to go. The world was becoming only more connected; money and people flowed. Europe was leading the experiment. And then a population said no. In 2016, Remainers tended to make economic arguments for staying in the E.U., while Leavers spoke about sovereignty and the health of the nation. In truth, it was a matter of instinct for both sides: were you prepared to go on sharing your agency with international forces of unimaginable scale, or did you believe that an old country could somehow reassert itself and claw out its own domain? The question was more philosophical than real. Being a member of the E.U. cost less than two per cent of Britain’s national budget. Most of us did not care. But, once the question was asked, it became fundamental, and the prelude to every future question. Choosing Brexit meant that we would diverge. We would diverge from Europe, and we would diverge from one another.
UK  EU  Brexit  referendum  politics  JohnsonBoris  withdrawalAgreement  dishonesty  evasion  CummingsDominic  VoteLeave  propaganda  language  discourse  WorldWarII  noDeal  OperationYellowhammer  PeoplesVote  deregulation  standards  economy  impact  publicSpending  ERG  BakerSteve  Rees-MoggJacob  England  nationalism  GaukeDavid  GrieveDominic  BurtAlistair  NorthernIreland  Ireland  GoodFridayAgreement  borders  backstop  MayTheresa  negotiations  DUP  VaradkarLeo  Liverpool  customs  regulatoryAlignment  WAB  HouseOfCommons  dctagged  dc:creator=KnightSam 
22 days ago by petej
Brexit: No-deal impact assessment published - BBC News
It said the worst-hit areas economically in a no-deal scenario would be Wales (-8.1%), Scotland (-8.0%), Northern Ireland (-9.1%) and the north east (-10.5%).
UK  EU  Brexit  noDeal  impact  SoubryAnna  customs  food  prices  business  Dover  delay  economy  NorthernIreland  North-East 
february 2019 by petej
The part of Brexit everyone’s been avoiding is finally here: immigration | Gaby Hinsliff | Opinion | The Guardian
Brexit was never really about immigration.

Or so liberal leavers fall over themselves to claim, at least. They can’t bear the idea of being associated with a racist backlash and so they insist it was really all about sovereignty; that all those inflammatory posters of dark-skinned migrants queuing at European borders and the cynical scaremongering about Turkey didn’t really have any bearing on the result, and that all they really wanted was just a fairer and more open system in which people could come to Britain more easily from Commonwealth countries.

Even Nigel Farage sounded as if butter wouldn’t melt in his mouth on the radio this morning, insisting all he ever wanted was control of our borders and equal opportunities for Indians to come here just as Romanians once did.
UK  EU  Brexit  migration  freedomOfMovement  xenophobia  Leave  impact  pay  wages  employers  skills  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=HinsliffGaby 
september 2018 by petej
David Davis is bluffing on Brexit. And now it’s clear for all to see | Rafael Behr | Opinion | The Guardian
Through all the bluster, swagger, faux joviality, arrogance and complacency of the committee’s star witness one sharp truth shines through. A decision was made last summer to define Brexit as a requirement to leave the single market and the customs union – an action that would quite obviously have enormous consequences for the UK’s economy – and the secretary of state notionally responsible for enacting that decision at no point set about the task of rigorously investigating what those consequences might be.

But a deeper subtext to the Davis argument (one he might not even consciously know) is that it would be a mistake to let the EU know what the UK’s judgment of Brexit’s impact on the domestic economy would be because the impact is so harsh. In other words, if the commission knew that the UK is actually afraid to go through with some of the harder Brexit plans promoted by Theresa May, the talks become a dictation of the terms of surrender. That is indeed the way things have played out so far. The great fear of exposing the government’s hand flows from the relative weakness of the cards it holds.

The bluffer fears being called. Of course, the EU side has understood the relative strengths and weaknesses of the UK position for longer and far better than May or Davis. The prime minister and her secretary of state have been kidding themselves. To sustain the delusion, they have tried to avoid scrutiny in parliament and, by extension, deceive the British public. Is the whole of the government’s Brexit strategy built on lies and obfuscation? Well that depends on what your meaning of the word “is” is.
DavisDavid  UK  EU  Brexit  impact  assessment  analysis  reports  disclosure  dishonesty  secrecy  dctagged  dc:creator=BehrRafael 
december 2017 by petej
Open access will remain a half-revolution – interview with richard Poynder
"In the end, the key question is whether the research community has the commitment, the stamina, the organisational chops and/or the resources to reclaim scholarly communication. While I would love to end on a positive note, I am personally doubtful that it has. The fact is that, OA advocates aside, there does not appear to be much appetite in the research community for giving up publishing in prestigious journals, and abandoning the notorious Impact Factor. More importantly, university managers and funders do not want to see anything that radical occur. We live in an age of bureaucratic scrutiny, and scrutineers crave simple and standard ways of practising their dark arts. That is exactly what the IF and legacy journals provide. If I am right, OA will surely remain a half-revolution, for now at least."
scholarlyCommunication  openAccess  research  publishers  publishing  journals  impact  APC  goldOA  funding  advocacy  HEFCE  mandates  repositories  greenOA 
march 2016 by petej
Why Metrics Cannot Measure Research Quality: A Response to the HEFCE Consultation | The Disorder Of Things
"Overall, the academic community as a whole should resist the adoption of citation metrics as a means by which to make conclusions about either research impact or research quality. They are not logically connected to either issue, contain systematic biases against different researchers and are all too easily manipulated, particularly by corporate rankings providers. They should certainly not become institutionalised in national, international or institutional practices."
research  metrics  impact  citation  quality  HEFCE 
june 2014 by petej
Blue Lines Revisited - It feels as if we’re all trying to be a cheeky...
"But the effect of this on Twitter is to create a house style which is more or less identical to the “watching TV” style - perpetual zingers, whether about news, what you’re reading, your entire life… it’s all done DVD commentary style. I don’t think outside the media people are thinking “please notice me Buzzfeed!”, I just think people adapt to the language and rhythms of the culture they’re in, and at the moment that’s what Twitter is (and wants to be)."
Twitter  television  media  socialMedia  attention  impact  reputation 
january 2014 by petej
« earlier      
per page:    204080120160

related tags

academia  academics  advertising  advice  advocacy  agriculture  AHRC  AIM25  altmetrics  analysis  analytics  anxiety  APC  ApolloGroup  archaeology  archivalDescription  archives  ArendtHannah  assessment  attainment  attention  audience  audit  aviation  backstop  badges  BakerSteve  BankOfEngland  BCC  beef  BennHilary  BercowJohn  bibliography  BigBen  BIS  blog  blogging  books  borders  BPP  branding  Breitbart  Brexit  Browne  BurtAlistair  business  Butterworths  Canada  capitalism  care  CarneyMark  cars  change  citation  citations  CivilService  clickfarms  collaboration  commerce  commercialisation  commodification  commoditisation  CommonTravelArea  communication  community  competition  conservatism  contempt  contentManagement  control  copyright  CorbynJeremy  core  corporatisation  CoveneySimon  crash  crowdsourcing  CTA  culture  CummingsDominic  customs  customsUnion  CVCP  data  DavisDavid  dc:creator=BehrRafael  dc:creator=BuranyiStephen  dc:creator=CannAlan  dc:creator=CarrNicholas  dc:creator=ColliniStefan  dc:creator=DayMichael  dc:creator=DempseyLorcan  dc:creator=ElliottLarry  dc:creator=EveMartin  dc:creator=GreenDavidAllen  dc:creator=HinsliffGaby  dc:creator=HirstTony  dc:creator=KellyBrian  dc:creator=KernohanDavid  dc:creator=KnightSam  dc:creator=MorozovEvgeny  dc:creator=PearsIain  dc:creator=TaylorMike  dc:creator=WellerMartin  dc:creator=Wren-LewisSimon  dctagged  delay  demand  deregulation  DExEU  digitalIdentity  disclosure  discourse  dishonesty  disruption  distanceEducation  Dover  drivingLicence  DuckDuckGo  DUP  economics  economy  editing  editorial  education  EEA  EFTA  election  Elsevier  emergency  emotion  EmpireAvenue  employers  employment  England  ERG  ethics  EU  evasion  exploitation  exports  Facebook  FacebookLike  fakeNews  farming  fees  finance  FOI  food  forecasts  freedomOfMovement  freeTradeAgreement  fruit  fuel  funding  games  GaukeDavid  GDP  genres  goldOA  GoodFridayAgreement  government  greenOA  GrieveDominic  growth  Guardian  HammondPhilip  HarringtonRichard  health  healthcare  HEFCE  higherEducation  HorrocksPeter  HouseOfCommons  HouseOfLords  housing  ideas  identity  imagination  immigration  impact  impactFactor  imports  industry  influence  information  insurance  intellectualism  intimacy  investment  Ireland  Jarratt  JavidSajid  JISC  jobs  JohnsonBoris  journalism  journals  just-in-time  KerslakeBob  KhanSadiq  Klout  KPMG  labour  LabourParty  language  leagueTables  leaks  learning  Leave  LeePhillip  legal  libraries  like  linkedData  Liverpool  locah  loneliness  LRB  LSE  MAC  MakeUK  MalthouseKit  management  managerialism  mandates  manufacturing  margin  marketing  marketisation  MaxwellRobert  MayTheresa  media  medicine  memes  metadata  metrics  migrants  migration  misinformation  mobilePhones  monitoring  monopolies  morality  NAO  nationalism  NCH  negotiations  neoliberalism  networks  news  NHS  NIESR  noDeal  North-East  NorthernIreland  Norway  NorwayPlus  OECD  openAccess  opendata  openness  OpenUniversity  OperationYellowhammer  Parliament  parody  participation  passports  pay  peerReview  PeoplesVote  perception  performance  Pergamon  personality  planning  polarisation  policy  politicalDeclaration  politics  popularity  precarity  presentation  pressure  prestige  prices  privacy  privatisation  propaganda  property  publicIntellectuals  publicServices  publicSpending  publishers  publishing  quality  radio  RAE  RAND  ranking  recession  recruitment  redaction  Rees-MoggJacob  REF  referendum  regions  regulation  regulatoryAlignment  relationships  relocation  report  reports  repositories  reputation  research  retention  review  RichardIII  riot  scholarlyCommunication  Sci-Hub  science  scientists  search  secrecy  security  SedwillMark  selectCommittee  sharing  shortage  singleMarket  skills  slides  slideshare  SMMT  socialHousing  socialMedia  socialNetworking  socialSciences  socialWeb  sociology  SoubryAnna  spam  spammers  specialisation  speculation  Springer  staffing  standards  StarmerKeir  statistics  status  Stern  stockMarket  students  Sunderland  supply  tariffs  teaching  technology  TED  television  THE  TheLancet  TimesHigherEducation  ToryParty  tracking  trade  transition  transparency  transport  travel  Treasury  TrumpDonald  tuitionFees  Twitter  UK  UKOLN  ukriots  uncertainty  unemployment  universities  UniversityOfHuddersfield  UniversityOfLeicester  unpaidLabour  unpaidWork  unwagedLabour  Upworthy  URI  USA  usage  VaradkarLeo  video  Vimeo  virality  VoteLeave  WAB  wages  Wales  WallStreetJournal  Web  web2.0  weblog  wikipedia  Wired  withdrawalAgreement  work  WorldWarII  writing  WSJ  WTO  xenophobia  youth 

Copy this bookmark: