petej + hardbrexit   233

‘We're reactivating the people’s army’: inside the battle for a hard Brexit | World news | The Guardian
Now it’s time for strategy, as Farage tells supporters how to confront MPs. “I don’t want you writing letters to them. Go and visit them at their surgeries, queue around the block, meet them face to face, make them feel the heat, make them understand that being part of a customs union, being a vassal state with laws made somewhere else, is unacceptable. And that if they do this, you will never give them your vote again. Make. Them. Feel. The. Heat. We in Leave Means Leave are reactivating the people’s army.”

The language is tough and militaristic, and Farage’s delivery chilling. He warns that if he is forced to fight a second referendum we’ll see a very different Farage: “This time, no more Mr Nice Guy.” I can’t help thinking back to his victory speech after the referendum, delivered at 4am on 24 June 2016. Farage boasted that Brexit had been achieved “without a single bullet being fired”. It was only eight days after the strongly pro-EU Labour MP Jo Cox had been murdered on her way to a constituency surgery. Her killer, Thomas Mair, shouted “Keep Britain independent”and “Britain first” as he shot and stabbed her. But Farage appeared to have forgotten that.
UK  Brexit  politics  Leave  hardBrexit  LeaveMeansLeave  FarageNigel  populism  Bolton  UKIP  middleClass  Birmingham  Bournemouth  referendum  activism 
january 2019 by petej
The Brexiteers’ idea of how WTO rules would work is pure fantasy | Kojo Koram | Opinion | The Guardian
To understand why parts of the Tory party are happy for Britain to walk in the opposite direction to the rest of the world regarding WTO terms, we must understand their attraction to the myth of how in centuries past, Britain became rich through “global free trade”. With influential economists David Ricardo and Adam Smith serving as intellectual forefathers, Britain’s rise to prominence is seen as intertwined with the rise of the doctrine of free trade, with the removal of legal restrictions on trade producing a system where natural British industriousness and innovation could thrive.

Celebrating and exaggerating Britain’s free-trade policies of the late 19th century, this narrative ignores the prologue to the story, in which the British empire first accumulated wealth through gunboat diplomacy and enforced markets over the 18th and early 19th centuries. Britain only embraced unilateral zero tariffs once its geopolitical power had been built up, and it would quickly depart from free trade and move towards protectionism at the start of the 20th century through the policy of imperial preference, encouraging trade within the empire.

However, the myth persists that anything that promotes free trade promotes British interests. Brexiteers promote a fantasy ideal of the WTO being the answer to all Britain’s problems despite the libraries of research that argue that its rules lead to the impoverishment of countries that have to rely on them. Because Brexiteers misunderstand Britain’s past, they believe that Britain has a “special relationship” to world trade. They cannot fathom the damage that relying on WTO terms to govern trade with our largest trading partner will do to the economy, even if it is obvious to rest of the world.
UK  EU  Brexit  noDeal  WTO  trade  freeTrade  history  delusion  hardBrexit  politics 
december 2018 by petej
How Brexit Broke Up Britain | by Fintan O’Toole | NYR Daily | The New York Review of Books
Another word for “control” is “regulation.” The fundamental appeal of Brexit is that the British have had too much regulation imposed from Brussels and desire in the future to regulate themselves. Thus the British will control their own environmental safeguards, their own food safety, their own labor standards, their own laws on competition and monopolies. The EU does indeed do many of these things and there is a perfectly coherent argument to be made that the British state should do them instead. It is a safe bet that this is what most people who voted for Brexit want and expect.

But that’s not actually what Brexit is about. The real agenda of the Hard Brexiteers is not, in this sense, about taking back control; it is about letting go of control. For people like Dominic Raab, the Brexit secretary, the dream is not of a change in which regulation happens, but of a completion of the deregulating neoliberal project set in motion by Margaret Thatcher in 1979. The Brexit fantasy is of an “open” and “global” Britain, unshackled from EU regulation, that can lower its environmental, health, and labor standards and unleash a new golden age of buccaneering hyper-capitalism. Again, this is a perfectly coherent (if repellent) agenda. But it is not what most of those who voted for Brexit think it is supposed to be. And this gap makes it impossible to say what “the British” want—they want contradictory things.

The second question is who is supposed to be taking control: Who, in other words, are “the people” to whom power is supposedly being returned? Here we find the other thing that dare not speak its name: English nationalism. Brexit is in part a response to a development that has been underway since the turn of the century. In reaction to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 that created a new political space in Northern Ireland and the establishment of the Scottish Parliament in 1999 that did the same for another part of the UK, there has been a rapid change in the way English people see their national identity. Increasingly, they are not British, but English. This resurgent identity has not been explicitly articulated by any mainstream party and surveys have shown a growing sense of English alienation from the center of London government in Westminster and Whitehall. Brexit, which is overwhelming an English phenomenon, is in part an expression of this frustration. In Anthony Barnett’s blunt and pithy phrase from his 2017 book The Lure of Greatness: England’s Brexit and America’s Trump, “Unable to exit Britain, the English did the next-best thing and told the EU to fuck off.”

There is stark and overwhelming evidence that the English people who voted for Brexit do not, on the whole, care about the United Kingdom and in particular do not care about that part of it called Northern Ireland. When asked in the recent “Future of England” survey whether “the unravelling of the peace process in Northern Ireland” is a “price worth paying” for Brexit that allows them to “take back control,” fully 83 percent of Leave voters and 73 percent of Conservative voters in England agree that it is. This is not, surely, mere mindless cruelty; it expresses a deep belief that Northern Ireland is not “us,” that what happens “over there” is not “our” responsibility. Equally, in the Channel 4 survey, asked how they would feel if “Brexit leads to Northern Ireland leaving the United Kingdom and joining the Republic of Ireland,” 61 percent of Leave voters said they would be “not very concerned” or “not at all concerned.”
UK  EU  Brexit  withdrawalAgreement  customsUnion  MayTheresa  ToryParty  CorbynJeremy  LabourParty  opposition  ThornberryEmily  StarmerKeir  referendum  regulation  deregulation  control  neoliberalism  hardBrexit  England  nationalism  NorthernIreland  dctagged  dc:creator=O'TooleFintan 
november 2018 by petej
Can the government avoid crashing out of the European Union without a deal?
Ultimately the only way that the government can avoid a massive row over the final relationship with the European Union in this parliament, which cannot agree on the final relationship, is to simply avoid discussing the final relationship in any detail this side of the 2022 election by having a cursory bit of language in the Withdrawal Agreement of the “there will be a trade deal between the United Kingdom and the European Union” variety and for transition to roll over until such a time as one of the major political parties wins a big enough parliamentary majority to overcome its own internal divisions or the conditions of coalition partners to decisively resolve the matter of the UK-EU relationship.
UK  EU  Brexit  negotiations  noDeal  HuntJeremy  generalElection  referendum  hardBrexit  transition  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=BushStephen 
august 2018 by petej
The Brexit walls are closing in on Theresa May from two sides | Rafael Behr | Opinion | The Guardian
May’s legacy as prime minister will be recorded as the collision of those two dramatic electoral events: the one that put her in charge of Brexit and the one that robbed her of the means to do it her way. The Eurosceptic ultras brandish the 2016 result – the single word “leave” – as licence to demand whatever they want. But parliament, elected a year later, has the authority to define Brexit in other, more moderate ways. In popular cultural terms, the referendum was the bigger deal. In constitutional terms, parliament is paramount. The contest between them is nearing its endgame and May looks more like a bystander than a player.
UK  EU  Brexit  politics  ToryParty  MayTheresa  hardBrexit  customsUnion  divergence  borders  Ireland  NorthernIreland  ERG  DUP  Parliament  democracy  dctagged  dc:creator=BehrRafael 
february 2018 by petej
« earlier      
per page:    204080120160

related tags

1922Committee  academia  activism  ageing  agency  aggression  air  Airbus  alt-right  amendments  anger  anti-fascism  anti-Semitism  anxiety  arrogance  Article50  audio  austerity  authoritarianism  aviation  backstop  BakerSteve  BALPA  BankOfEngland  banks  BanksArron  BannonStephen  BarnierMichel  BattenGerard  Belfast  BestForBritain  betrayal  Birmingham  BlairTony  BlueLabour  BMA  BofE  BolesNick  Bolton  borders  Bournemouth  BradyGraham  Brexit  BrownGordon  budget  budget2017  bullying  Bundesbank  business  byelection  Cabinet  CameronDavid  campaigning  Canada  care  CarneyMark  cars  CBI  change  ChangeBritain  charity  CharityCommission  Chequers  citizensAssembly  CityOfLondon  CivilService  ClarkeKenneth  class  CleggNick  commonRulebook  compensation  compromise  conference  conservatism  control  CooperYvette  Copeland  CorbynJeremy  culture  currency  customs  customsPartnership  customsUnion  cynicism  CzechRepublic  DacrePaul  DailyExpress  DailyMail  DavisDavid  dc:contributor=BastaniAaron  dc:contributor=GalsworthyMike  dc:contributor=MasonPaul  dc:contributor=PestonRobert  dc:contributor=ShanlyMax  dc:contributor=StarmerKeir  dc:contributor=WalkerMichael  dc:contributor=Zarb-CousinMatt  dc:creator=BehrRafael  dc:creator=BushStephen  dc:creator=ChakraborttyAditya  dc:creator=CohenNick  dc:creator=CoppolaFrances  dc:creator=D'AnconaMatthew  dc:creator=Evans-PritchardAmbrose  dc:creator=FreedlandJonathan  dc:creator=GrantCharles  dc:creator=HannanDan  dc:creator=HarrisJohn  dc:creator=HerbertNick  dc:creator=HernAlex  dc:creator=HuttonWill  dc:creator=JenkinsSimon  dc:creator=JonesOwen  dc:creator=KettleMartin  dc:creator=MandelsonPeter  dc:creator=MasonPaul  dc:creator=MonbiotGeorge  dc:creator=O'TooleFintan  dc:creator=PestonRobert  dc:creator=PettiforAnn  dc:creator=RawnsleyAndrew  dc:creator=RuncimanDavid  dc:creator=StarmerKeir  dc:creator=StrossCharles  dc:creator=ToynbeePolly  dc:creator=WilliamsZoe  dctagged  defeat  deficit  delay  delusion  democracy  democratisation  deregulation  devolution  diplomacy  disclosure  discussion  disorder  divergence  division  doctors  DoughtyStephen  DUP  EC  ECJ  economics  economy  editorial  EEA  EFTA  election  emotion  England  ERG  EU  EU27  Europe  EuropeanCouncil  EuropeanParliament  Euroscepticism  exchangeRates  exclusion  experts  exports  extension  extremism  failure  FarageNigel  farRight  fascism  fear  finance  FLA  flowchart  food  forecasts  FoxLiam  France  FrancoisMark  Frankfurt  freedomOfMovement  freedomOfSpeech  freeTrade  freeTradeAgreement  FTA  funding  FurediFrank  GCG  GDP  ge2017  generalElection  Germany  GhosnCarlos  globalisation  GNU  GoldsmithZac  GoodFridayAgreement  GoveMichael  government  GrandWizards  GrantCharles  GreatRepealBill  Greece  GreeningJustine  GreenParty  GrieveDominic  growth  Guardian  HammondPhilip  HammondStephen  hardBrexit  healthcare  HeseltineMichael  HillFiona  HindsDamian  history  HomeOffice  HongKong  HouseOfCommons  hubris  humiliation  hunger  HuntJeremy  identityPolitics  IEA  ignorance  immigration  imports  independence  industry  inequality  inflation  inflexibility  influence  InstituteOfIdeas  insults  interdependency  interestRates  interview  intolerance  intransigence  investment  Ipsos-MORI  Ireland  Islamophobia  JaguarLandRover  Japan  JenkinBernard  JLR  jobs  JohnsonBoris  journalism  JunckerJean-Claude  KennyEnda  KochCharles  KochDavid  KochIndustries  KuenssbergLaura  LabourParty  LancasterHouse  language  LawsonNigel  LawtherColin  LBC  leadership  leaks  Leave  Leave.EU  LeaveMeansLeave  LePenMarine  LeslieChris  letter  LewisClive  LiberalDemocratParty  LidingtonDavid  LilleyPeter  Liverpool  LivingMarxism  localGovernment  LRB  machismo  MajorJohn  mandate  manipulation  manufacturing  markets  MartinTim  masculinity  MayTheresa  McDonnellJohn  meaningfulVote  media  medicine  MerkelAngela  middleClass  migration  MilibandEd  MillerGina  MilosevicSlobodan  MinfordPatrick  misconduct  morality  MorganNicky  MPs  MurdochRupert  NationalInsurance  nationalism  negotiations  neoliberalism  newspapers  Nissan  NixonRichard  noConfidence  noDeal  NorthernIreland  Norway  nostalgia  Novara  NuttallPaul  O'DonnellGus  O'GradyFrances  O'NeillBrendan  OECD  OneNation  OpenBritain  opposition  OrbanViktor  OsborneGeorge  Parliament  passporting  PatersonOwen  pensions  PeoplesVote  polarisation  politeness  politicalDeclaration  politics  populism  poverty  power  prejudice  prices  privatisation  productivity  property  prosperity  publicSector  RaabDominic  racism  RCP  recession  redLines  RedwoodJohn  Rees-MoggJacob  referendum  regulation  regulatoryAlignment  relocation  Remain  resignation  retirement  rhetoric  RichmondPark  rights  RobinsonTommy  RogersIvan  RuddAmber  RutteMark  SalviniMatteo  scarcity  SchaeubleWolfgang  Scotland  secrecy  Serbia  services  settlement  shortage  Singapore  singleMarket  Sleaford  SmithJulian  SNP  SoamesNicholas  socialCare  softBrexit  SorosGeorge  SoubryAnna  sovereignty  speech  Spiked  split  StarmerKeir  Stoke-on-trent  SturgeonNicola  subsidies  Sunderland  survey  tabloids  tacticalVoting  tactics  tariffs  tax  taxation  Thatcherism  TheLeft  TheRight  TheTroubles  ThornberryEmily  threats  TimothyNick  ToryParty  Toyota  trade  transition  transparency  travel  Treasury  Trotsky  TrumpDonald  TUC  TuskDonald  Uk  UK  UKIP  UmunnaChuka  uncertainty  unemployment  unrest  USA  VAT  visas  volatility  VoteLeave  Wetherspoons  whip  whiteSupremacism  WigmoreAndy  withdrawal  withdrawalAgreement  Witney  WTO  xenophobia  YouGov  youth 

Copy this bookmark: