petej + filterbubble   34

How social media took us from Tahrir Square to Donald Trump - MIT Technology Review
Rather, the problem is that when we encounter opposing views in the age and context of social media, it’s not like reading them in a newspaper while sitting alone. It’s like hearing them from the opposing team while sitting with our fellow fans in a football stadium. Online, we’re connected with our communities, and we seek approval from our like-minded peers. We bond with our team by yelling at the fans of the other one. In sociology terms, we strengthen our feeling of “in-group” belonging by increasing our distance from and tension with the “out-group”—us versus them. Our cognitive universe isn’t an echo chamber, but our social one is. This is why the various projects for fact-checking claims in the news, while valuable, don’t convince people. Belonging is stronger than facts.
socialMedia  politics  activism  communication  ArabSpring  Egypt  TahrirSquare  Tunisia  Syria  Iran  Twitter  MubarakHosni  authoritarianism  power  control  ObamaBarack  targeting  technoUtopianism  bigData  misinformation  polarisation  NSA  security  Facebook  Google  monopolies  YouTube  algorithms  attention  insults  TrumpDonald  USA  Russia  trolling  interference  corruption  accountability  filterBubble  surveillance  platforms  personalData  inequality  precarity  insecurity  dctagged  dc:creator=TufekciZeynep  recommendations 
august 2018 by petej
John Lanchester reviews ‘The Attention Merchants’ by Tim Wu, ‘Chaos Monkeys’ by Antonio García Martínez and ‘Move Fast and Break Things’ by Jonathan Taplin · LRB 17 August 2017
"What this means is that even more than it is in the advertising business, Facebook is in the surveillance business. Facebook, in fact, is the biggest surveillance-based enterprise in the history of mankind. It knows far, far more about you than the most intrusive government has ever known about its citizens. It’s amazing that people haven’t really understood this about the company. I’ve spent time thinking about Facebook, and the thing I keep coming back to is that its users don’t realise what it is the company does. What Facebook does is watch you, and then use what it knows about you and your behaviour to sell ads. I’m not sure there has ever been a more complete disconnect between what a company says it does – ‘connect’, ‘build communities’ – and the commercial reality. Note that the company’s knowledge about its users isn’t used merely to target ads but to shape the flow of news to them. Since there is so much content posted on the site, the algorithms used to filter and direct that content are the thing that determines what you see: people think their news feed is largely to do with their friends and interests, and it sort of is, with the crucial proviso that it is their friends and interests as mediated by the commercial interests of Facebook. Your eyes are directed towards the place where they are most valuable for Facebook."

"Here in the rich world, the focus is more on monetisation, and it’s in this area that I have to admit something which is probably already apparent. I am scared of Facebook. The company’s ambition, its ruthlessness, and its lack of a moral compass scare me. It goes back to that moment of its creation, Zuckerberg at his keyboard after a few drinks creating a website to compare people’s appearance, not for any real reason other than that he was able to do it. That’s the crucial thing about Facebook, the main thing which isn’t understood about its motivation: it does things because it can. Zuckerberg knows how to do something, and other people don’t, so he does it. Motivation of that type doesn’t work in the Hollywood version of life, so Aaron Sorkin had to give Zuck a motive to do with social aspiration and rejection. But that’s wrong, completely wrong. He isn’t motivated by that kind of garden-variety psychology. He does this because he can, and justifications about ‘connection’ and ‘community’ are ex post facto rationalisations. The drive is simpler and more basic. That’s why the impulse to growth has been so fundamental to the company, which is in many respects more like a virus than it is like a business. Grow and multiply and monetise. Why? There is no why. Because.

Automation and artificial intelligence are going to have a big impact in all kinds of worlds. These technologies are new and real and they are coming soon. Facebook is deeply interested in these trends. We don’t know where this is going, we don’t know what the social costs and consequences will be, we don’t know what will be the next area of life to be hollowed out, the next business model to be destroyed, the next company to go the way of Polaroid or the next business to go the way of journalism or the next set of tools and techniques to become available to the people who used Facebook to manipulate the elections of 2016. We just don’t know what’s next, but we know it’s likely to be consequential, and that a big part will be played by the world’s biggest social network. On the evidence of Facebook’s actions so far, it’s impossible to face this prospect without unease."
Facebook  socialMedia  ZuckerbergMark  attention  business  psychology  ThielPeter  mimeticDesire  GiraudRene  filterBubble  identity  fakeNews  misinformation  Russia  TrumpDonald  advertising  surveillance  surveillanceCapitalism  businessModels  targeting  personalData  monetisation  tracking  Experian  creditCards  algorithms  auctions  Google  monopoly  duopoly  manipulation  emotion  happiness  mentalHealth  dctagged  dc:creator=LanchesterJohn  LRB 
august 2017 by petej
Platform Capitalism and the Government of the Social. Facebook’s ‘Global Community’ | TRU
To sum it up, for me this letter makes it even more clear how Silicon Valley is formulating what Foucault would describe as a new ‘political rationality’ which takes on the legacy of liberalism and neoliberalism in identifying as the main problem the government of populations (billions of users), the maximisation of their social, political and cultural life, and the protection from ‘’risks’, ‘harms’ and ‘errors’ inherent in the circulation of information (false news, sensationalism, polarization, divisiveness, terrorism, climate change and pandemics). This is accomplished within a market economy that never questions ownership or accumulation. Together with the smart city movement, platform capitalism intensifies its vocation to become a new form of social government.
ZuckerbergMark  Facebook  socialMedia  platformCapitalism  filterBubble  misinformation  fakeNews  TrumpDonald  globalisation  politics  government  platforms 
february 2017 by petej
The truth about Brexit didn’t stand a chance in the online bubble | Media | The Guardian
Modern truth is not just outpaced by fiction, it can be bypassed altogether as part of a sound political strategy or as a central requirement of a media business plan. In an illuminating exchange with the Guardian last week, Arron Banks, the wealthy donor partly responsible for the Brexit campaign, explained leave’s media strategy thus: “The remain campaign featured fact, fact, fact, fact, fact. It just doesn’t work. You have got to connect with people emotionally. It’s the Trump success.”
UK  EU  referendum  Brexit  communication  socialMedia  Facebook  misinformation  filterBubble  filtering  ranking  truth 
july 2016 by petej

related tags

accountability  activism  advertising  agriculture  AI  algorithms  API  apps  ArabSpring  artificialIntelligence  attention  auctions  authoritarianism  BanksArron  bigData  Bing  Blekko  Blippex  blogging  bots  Brexit  bugs  bullying  business  businessModels  CambridgeAnalytica  censorship  centralisation  ClintonHillary  communication  confirmationBias  connectedness  conspiracyTheory  control  CorbynJeremy  corruption  creditCards  data  dc:creator=HirstTony  dc:creator=KissJemima  dc:creator=LanchesterJohn  dc:creator=PariserEli  dc:creator=TufekciZeynep  dc:creator=ZuckermanEthan  dctagged  democracy  diversity  DuckDuckGo  DuckSuckGo  duopoly  echoChamber  Egypt  election  emotion  ethics  EU  exclusion  Experian  Facebook  FacebookGraphAPI  facialRecognition  fakeNews  feeds  filterBubble  filtering  food  GiraudRene  globalisation  Google  GoogleGlass  government  graphs  GraphSearch  happiness  harassment  health  Hillsborough  hype  identity  inequality  informationTechnology  insecurity  insults  interference  Internet  Iran  journalism  KoganAleksandr  LabourParty  letter  linking  LRB  manipulation  marketing  media  mentalHealth  mimeticDesire  misinformation  misuse  mobilePhones  models  monetisation  monitoring  monopolies  monopoly  MubarakHosni  newness  news  NSA  ObamaBarack  obfuscation  PariserEli  personalData  personalisation  Pipl  platformCapitalism  platforms  polarisation  politics  popularity  power  precarity  presentation  prison  privacy  profiling  promotion  psychology  publishing  ranking  recommendations  referendum  regulation  research  RSS  Russia  search  security  selection  semanticSearch  SiliconValley  smartPhones  socialGraph  socialMedia  socialSearch  socialWeb  standards  Startpage  surveillance  surveillanceCapitalism  Syria  TahrirSquare  targeting  technology  technoUtopianism  TEDTalk  ThielPeter  tracking  transparency  trolling  TrumpDonald  trust  truth  Tunisia  Twitter  UK  USA  video  virtualAssistant  visibility  walledGarden  wearables  Web  Yandex  YouTube  ZuckerbergMark 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: