petej + ecj   68

Not much remains of Theresa May's red lines after the Brexit deal | Dan Roberts | Politics | The Guardian
It states clearly: “In the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the internal market and the customs union.” In other words, the UK may not be a member of the single market, or have any direct ability to shape its rules in future, but it could yet have to play by them in perpetuity.
UK  EU  Brexit  negotiations  MayTheresa  LancasterHouse  alignment  singleMarket  customsUnion  ECJ  transition  finance  settlement  obligations  liabilities  politics  redLines 
december 2017 by petej
Brexit means leaving the single market and the customs union. Here’s why | Barry Gardiner | Opinion | The Guardian
Most trade agreements arise from a desire to liberalise trade – making it easier to sell goods and services into one another’s markets. Brexit will not. Brexit arose from key political, rather than trade, objectives: to have control over our borders, to have sovereignty over our laws, not to submit to the European court of justice (ECJ), and not to pay money into the European budget. When negotiations start it will be the first time countries seek a trade agreement with the clear understanding that they are increasing barriers between them.
UK  EU  Brexit  LabourParty  sovereignty  freedomOfMovement  ECJ  singleMarket  customsUnion  trade  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=GardinerBarry 
july 2017 by petej
European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Speech by Michel Barnier at the European Economic and Social Committee
I have heard some people in the UK argue that one can leave the single market and keep all of its benefits – that is not possible.
I have heard some people in the UK argue that one can leave the single market and build a customs union to achieve "frictionless trade" – that is not possible.
UK  EU  Brexit  singleMarket  customsUnion  freedomOfMovement  sovereignty  ECJ  BarnierMichel  negotiations  politics 
july 2017 by petej
The Death of the British Dream | Vanity Fair
Somehow, May faces no opposition whatsoever and no prospect of it. The simple answer is that M.P.s were stunned by the shock of the referendum result last year and remain intimidated by both the pro-Brexit tabloids and the strength of feeling in the country against immigrants, a feeling that will be familiar to Americans. And yet there is no clear majority for all of this within the U.K. population. A mere 27 percent of the country voted for Brexit and those people were misled by Leavers, including Johnson, who said that Britain would retain access to the single market after leaving the E.U., otherwise known as “soft Brexit.” What May proposes, of course, is a much more dangerous “hard Brexit,” with a giddy aspiration of turning Britain into the Singapore of Northern Europe. Unfortunately, an analysis conducted by JPMorgan suggests that sort of geo-economic strategy could only work if firms have access to markets in their neighborhood—and there is absolutely no guarantee of that.

An economy like Britain, which is increasingly knowledge-based, can survive a great amount of chaos, but it seems certain that the fall of sterling and inflationary pressures will impoverish Britons; that many jobs will be lost; and that a likely dropping off in tax revenues means there will be less money to spend on services, particularly the National Health Service. These are things the the Labor Party, the main opposition, cares deeply about. But, as I have explained before, the party has been paralyzed by a fear of its own supporters, who tend to be nationalistic and fear competition for jobs, homes, and services from European migrants. The grim reality is that the possibility of losing these people to the right-wing UKIP party, or the Conservatives, concerns Labor more than the promised hardships of Brexit, which it anyway calculates may play well for it in the future. And that may be why May can get away with an extreme policy that was never explicitly part of the Leave campaign, and for which there is only minority support.

Until Labor confronts its own supporters, or a new center group materializes to oppose Brexit, Parliament will be powerless in the face of a ruthless conservative coup. I don’t see either happening anytime soon.
MayTheresa  speech  LancasterHouse  UK  EU  Brexit  hardBrexit  politics  Parliament  democracy  Article50  singleMarket  ECJ  freedomOfMovement  customsUnion  trade  immigration  tabloids  opposition  LabourParty 
january 2017 by petej

related tags

algorithms  alignment  Article50  Article112  backstop  BarnierMichel  BolesNick  borders  Brexit  business  Canada  censorship  ChapmanJames  Chequers  citizenship  CJEU  cloudComputing  communication  control  cooperation  CooperYvette  CorbynJeremy  CouncilOfTheEuropeanUnion  counter-terrorism  court  courts  Coventry  crime  crisis  customs  customsUnion  data  dataProtection  DavisDavid  dc:contributor=PestonRobert  dc:contributor=StarmerKeir  dc:creator=AlexanderHeidi  dc:creator=BernalPaul  dc:creator=BushStephen  dc:creator=Evans-PritchardAmbrose  dc:creator=GardinerBarry  dc:creator=KettleMartin  dc:creator=KuenssbergLaura  dc:creator=PennyLaurie  dc:creator=PestonRobert  dc:creator=SeymourRichard  dc:creator=WatsonTom  dctagged  decisions  deletion  democracy  DExEU  digitalIdentity  DRIP  DRIPA  DuncanSmithIain  DUP  EC  ECHR  ECJ  economics  EEA  EFTA  EHIC  email  ERG  EU  EU27  Euratom  Europe  EuropeanCommission  EuropeanCourtOfJustice  EuropeanParliament  Europol  experiment  Facebook  filtering  finance  forgetting  freedomOfMovement  freedomOfSpeech  freeTrade  GardinerBarry  ge2017  generalElection  Google  GoveMichael  government  GrieveDominic  HammondPhilip  hardBrexit  healthcare  HuntJeremy  ICO  identity  immigration  informationTechnology  intelligence  Internet  interview  InvestigatoryPowersAct  InvestigatoryPowersBill  Ireland  Jisc  JohnsonBoris  judiciary  JunckerJean-Claude  jurisdiction  justice  LabourParty  LancasterHouse  LawsonNigel  Leave  legal  liabilities  LRB  manipulation  MansionHouse  MayTheresa  memory  migration  monopolies  nationalisation  negotiations  noDeal  NorthernIreland  Norway  NorwayPlus  NSA  obligations  opposition  OrdeHugh  ownership  Parliament  passporting  PatersonOwen  payments  PeoplesVote  personalData  policing  politics  power  privacy  private  privatisation  property  public  rail  ratification  redLines  RedwoodJohn  Rees-MoggJacob  referendum  regulation  regulatoryAlignment  regulatoryFramework  Remain  reputation  research  residence  residency  retention  revocation  rights  RIPA  safeHarbour  Salzburg  SchulzMartin  search  secrecy  security  settlement  shaming  singleMarket  snoopersCharter  socialMedia  sovereignty  speech  stateAid  storage  surveillance  tabloids  tariffs  telephone  terrorism  threats  TimothyNick  ToryParty  trade  transition  transitions  transport  TTIP  TuskDonald  Uber  UK  USA  VaradkarLeo  VerhofstadtGuy  WalesJimmy  WatsonTom  WeyandSabine  wikipedia  wikipediaPage  withdrawal  withdrawalAgreement  WTO 

Copy this bookmark: