nhaliday + writing   96

ellipsis - Why is the subject omitted in sentences like "Thought you'd never ask"? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
This is due to a phenomenon that occurs in intimate conversational spoken English called "Conversational Deletion". It was discussed and exemplified quite thoroughly in a 1974 PhD dissertation in linguistics at the University of Michigan that I had the honor of directing.

Thrasher, Randolph H. Jr. 1974. Shouldn't Ignore These Strings: A Study of Conversational Deletion, Ph.D. Dissertation, Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor


"The phenomenon can be viewed as erosion of the beginning of sentences, deleting (some, but not all) articles, dummies, auxiliaries, possessives, conditional if, and [most relevantly for this discussion -jl] subject pronouns. But it only erodes up to a point, and only in some cases.

"Whatever is exposed (in sentence initial position) can be swept away. If erosion of the first element exposes another vulnerable element, this too may be eroded. The process continues until a hard (non-vulnerable) element is encountered." [ibidem p.9]
q-n-a  stackex  anglo  language  writing  speaking  linguistics  thesis 
7 weeks ago by nhaliday
Verbal Edge: Borges & Buckley | Eamonn Fitzgerald: Rainy Day
At one point, Borges said that he found English “a far finer language” than Spanish and Buckley asked “Why?”

Borges: There are many reasons. Firstly, English is both a Germanic and a Latin language, those two registers.


And then there is another reason. And the reason is that I think that of all languages, English is the most physical. You can, for example, say “He loomed over.” You can’t very well say that in Spanish.

Buckley: Asomo?
Borges: No; they’re not exactly the same. And then, in English, you can do almost anything with verbs and prepositions. For example, to “laugh off,” to “dream away.” Those things can’t be said in Spanish.

J.L.B.: "You will say that it's easier for a Dane to study English than for a Spanish-speaking person to learn English or an Englishman Spanish; but I don't think this is true, because English is a Latin language as well as a Germanic one. At least half the English vocabulary is Latin. Remember that in English there are two words for every idea: one Saxon and one Latin. You can say 'Holy Ghost' or 'Holy Spirit,' 'sacred' or 'holy.' There's always a slight difference, but one that's very important for poetry, the difference between 'dark' and 'obscure' for instance, or 'regal' and 'kingly,' or 'fraternal' and 'brotherly.' In the English language almost al words representing abstract ideas come from Latin, and those for concrete ideas from Saxon, but there aren't so many concrete ideas." (P. 71) [2]

In his own words, then, Borges was fascinated by Old English and Old Norse.
interview  history  mostly-modern  language  foreign-lang  anglo  anglosphere  culture  literature  writing  mediterranean  latin-america  germanic  roots  comparison  quotes  flexibility  org:junk  multi  medieval  nordic  lexical  parallax 
8 weeks ago by nhaliday
Language Log » English or Mandarin as the World Language?
- writing system frequently mentioned as barrier
- also imprecision of Chinese might hurt its use for technical writing
- most predicting it won't (but English might be replaced by absence of lingua franca per Nicholas Ostler)
linguistics  language  foreign-lang  china  asia  anglo  world  trends  prediction  speculation  expert-experience  analytical-holistic  writing  network-structure  science  discussion  commentary  flux-stasis  nationalism-globalism 
8 weeks ago by nhaliday
etymology - What does "no love lost" mean and where does it come from? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
Searching Google books, I find that what the phrase originally meant in the 17th and 18th centuries was that "A loves B just as much as B loves A"; the amount of love is balanced, so there is no love lost. In other words, unrequited love was considered to be "lost". This could be used to say they both love each other equally, or they both hate each other equally. The idiom has now come to mean only the second possibility.


If two people love each other, then fall out (because of an argument or other reason), then there was love lost between them. But if two people don't care much for each other, then have a falling out, then there really was no love lost between them.

Interestingly, when it was originated in the 1500s, until about 1800, it could indicate either extreme love or extreme hate.
q-n-a  stackex  anglo  language  aphorism  jargon  emotion  sociality  janus  love-hate  literature  history  early-modern  quotes  roots  intricacy  britain  poetry  writing  europe  the-great-west-whale  paradox  parallax  duty  lexical 
april 2018 by nhaliday
Small penis rule - Wikipedia
The small penis rule is an informal strategy used by authors to evade libel lawsuits. It was described in a New York Times article in 1998:

“ "For a fictional portrait to be actionable, it must be so accurate that a reader of the book would have no problem linking the two," said Mr. Friedman. Thus, he continued, libel lawyers have what is known as "the small penis rule". One way authors can protect themselves from libel suits is to say that a character has a small penis, Mr. Friedman said. "Now no male is going to come forward and say, 'That character with a very small penis, that's me!'"[1] ”
The small penis rule was referenced in a 2006 dispute between Michael Crowley and Michael Crichton. Crowley alleged that after he wrote an unflattering review of Crichton's novel State of Fear, Crichton libeled him by including a character named "Mick Crowley" in the novel Next. The character is a child rapist, described as being a Washington, D.C.-based journalist and Yale graduate with a small penis.[2]
lol  cocktail  literature  writing  wiki  reference  meta:rhetoric  law 
june 2017 by nhaliday
List of Chinese inventions - Wikipedia
China has been the source of many innovations, scientific discoveries and inventions.[1] This includes the Four Great Inventions: papermaking, the compass, gunpowder, and printing (both woodblock and movable type). The list below contains these and other inventions in China attested by archaeology or history.
china  asia  sinosphere  technology  innovation  discovery  list  top-n  wiki  reference  article  history  iron-age  medieval  arms  summary  frontier  agriculture  dirty-hands  civilization  the-trenches  electromag  communication  writing  publishing  archaeology  navigation 
june 2017 by nhaliday
technological development - What could an average modern human achieve in medieval times? - Worldbuilding Stack Exchange
John's best bet is to find a monastery and stay there. The monks have some degree of charity towards wandering halfwits who can barely communicate -- and make no mistake, this is how John will come across at first. Once the monks get to know him, they may value his more unusual skills, especially his ability to read and write.
q-n-a  stackex  gedanken  time  history  medieval  europe  lived-experience  disease  parasites-microbiome  medicine  allodium  stories  early-modern  embodied  technology  low-hanging  prepping  frontier  ideas  writing  feudal 
may 2017 by nhaliday
Annotating Greg Cochran’s interview with James Miller
opinion of Scott and Hanson: https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2017/04/05/interview-2/#comment-90238
Greg's methodist: https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2017/04/05/interview-2/#comment-90256
You have to consider the relative strengths of Japan and the USA. USA was ~10x stronger, industrially, which is what mattered. Technically superior (radar, Manhattan project). Almost entirely self-sufficient in natural resources. Japan was sure to lose, and too crazy to quit, which meant that they would lose after being smashed flat.
There’s a fairly common way of looking at things in which the bad guys are not at fault because they’re bad guys, born that way, and thus can’t help it. Well, we can’t help it either, so the hell with them. I don’t think we had to respect Japan’s innate need to fuck everybody in China to death.

2nd part: https://pinboard.in/u:nhaliday/b:9ab84243b967

some additional things:
- political correctness, the Cathedral and the left (personnel continuity but not ideology/value) at start
- joke: KT impact = asteroid mining, every mass extinction = intelligent life destroying itself
- Alawites: not really Muslim, women liberated because "they don't have souls", ended up running shit in Syria because they were only ones that wanted to help the British during colonial era
- solution to Syria: "put the Alawites in NYC"
- Zimbabwe was OK for a while, if South Africa goes sour, just "put the Boers in NYC" (Miller: left would probably say they are "culturally incompatible", lol)
- story about Lincoln and his great-great-great-grandfather
- skepticism of free speech
- free speech, authoritarianism, and defending against the Mongols
- Scott crazy (not in a terrible way), LW crazy (genetics), ex.: polyamory
- TFP or microbio are better investments than stereotypical EA stuff
- just ban AI worldwide (bully other countries to enforce)
- bit of a back-and-forth about macroeconomics
- not sure climate change will be huge issue. world's been much warmer before and still had a lot of mammals, etc.
- he quite likes Pseudoerasmus
- shits on modern conservatism/Bret Stephens a bit

- mentions Japan having industrial base a tenth the size of the US's and no chance of winning WW2 around 11m mark
- describes himself as "fairly religious" around 20m mark
- 27m30s: Eisenhower was smart, read Carlyle, classical history, etc.

but was Nixon smarter?: https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2019/03/18/open-thread-03-18-2019/
The Scandals of Meritocracy. Virtue vs. competence. Would you rather have a boss who is evil but competent, or good but incompetent? The reality is you have to balance the two. Richard Nixon was probably smarter that Dwight Eisenhower in raw g, but Eisenhower was probably a better person.
org:med  west-hunter  scitariat  summary  links  podcast  audio  big-picture  westminster  politics  culture-war  academia  left-wing  ideology  biodet  error  crooked  bounded-cognition  stories  history  early-modern  africa  developing-world  death  mostly-modern  deterrence  japan  asia  war  meta:war  risk  ai  climate-change  speculation  agriculture  environment  prediction  religion  islam  iraq-syria  gender  dominant-minority  labor  econotariat  cracker-econ  coalitions  infrastructure  parasites-microbiome  medicine  low-hanging  biotech  terrorism  civil-liberty  civic  social-science  randy-ayndy  law  polisci  government  egalitarianism-hierarchy  expression-survival  disease  commentary  authoritarianism  being-right  europe  nordic  cohesion  heuristic  anglosphere  revolution  the-south  usa  thinking  info-dynamics  yvain  ssc  lesswrong  ratty  subculture  values  descriptive  epistemic  cost-disease  effective-altruism  charity  econ-productivity  technology  rhetoric  metameta  ai-control  critique  sociology  arms  paying-rent  parsimony  writing  realness  migration  eco 
april 2017 by nhaliday
soft question - Thinking and Explaining - MathOverflow
- good question from Bill Thurston
- great answers by Terry Tao, fedja, Minhyong Kim, gowers, etc.

Terry Tao:
- symmetry as blurring/vibrating/wobbling, scale invariance
- anthropomorphization, adversarial perspective for estimates/inequalities/quantifiers, spending/economy

fedja walks through his though-process from another answer

Minhyong Kim: anthropology of mathematical philosophizing

Per Vognsen: normality as isotropy
comment: conjugate subgroup gHg^-1 ~ "H but somewhere else in G"

gowers: hidden things in basic mathematics/arithmetic
comment by Ryan Budney: x sin(x) via x -> (x, sin(x)), (x, y) -> xy
I kinda get what he's talking about but needed to use Mathematica to get the initial visualization down.
To remind myself later:
- xy can be easily visualized by juxtaposing the two parabolae x^2 and -x^2 diagonally
- x sin(x) can be visualized along that surface by moving your finger along the line (x, 0) but adding some oscillations in y direction according to sin(x)
q-n-a  soft-question  big-list  intuition  communication  teaching  math  thinking  writing  thurston  lens  overflow  synthesis  hi-order-bits  👳  insight  meta:math  clarity  nibble  giants  cartoons  gowers  mathtariat  better-explained  stories  the-trenches  problem-solving  homogeneity  symmetry  fedja  examples  philosophy  big-picture  vague  isotropy  reflection  spatial  ground-up  visual-understanding  polynomials  dimensionality  math.GR  worrydream  scholar  🎓  neurons  metabuch  yoga  retrofit  mental-math  metameta  wisdom  wordlessness  oscillation  operational  adversarial  quantifiers-sums  exposition  explanation  tricki  concrete  s:***  manifolds  invariance  dynamical  info-dynamics  cool  direction 
january 2017 by nhaliday
Dehaene describes some fascinating and convincing evidence for the first kind of innateness. In one of the most interesting chapters, he argues that the shapes we use to make written letters mirror the shapes that primates use to recognize objects. After all, I could use any arbitrary squiggle to encode the sound at the start of “Tree” instead of a T. But actually the shapes of written symbols are strikingly similar across many languages.

It turns out that T shapes are important to monkeys, too. When a monkey sees a T shape in the world, it is very likely to indicate the edge of an object — something the monkey can grab and maybe even eat. A particular area of its brain pays special attention to those significant shapes. Human brains use the same area to process letters. Dehaene makes a compelling case that these brain areas have been “recycled” for reading. “We did not invent most of our letter shapes,” he writes. “They lay dormant in our brains for millions of years, and were merely rediscovered when our species invented writing and the alphabet.”
ratty  gwern  speculation  language  writing  visuo  eden  dennett  news  org:rec  books  review  summary  roots  deep-materialism 
january 2017 by nhaliday
Fact Posts: How and Why
The most useful thinking skill I've taught myself, which I think should be more widely practiced, is writing what I call "fact posts." I write a bunch of these on my blog. (I write fact posts about pregnancy and childbirth here.)

To write a fact post, you start with an empirical question, or a general topic. Something like "How common are hate crimes?" or "Are epidurals really dangerous?" or "What causes manufacturing job loss?"

It's okay if this is a topic you know very little about. This is an exercise in original seeing and showing your reasoning, not finding the official last word on a topic or doing the best analysis in the world.

Then you open up a Google doc and start taking notes.

You look for quantitative data from conventionally reliable sources. CDC data for incidences of diseases and other health risks in the US; WHO data for global health issues; Bureau of Labor Statistics data for US employment; and so on. Published scientific journal articles, especially from reputable journals and large randomized studies.

You explicitly do not look for opinion, even expert opinion. You avoid news, and you're wary of think-tank white papers. You're looking for raw information. You are taking a sola scriptura approach, for better and for worse.

And then you start letting the data show you things.

You see things that are surprising or odd, and you note that.

You see facts that seem to be inconsistent with each other, and you look into the data sources and methodology until you clear up the mystery.

You orient towards the random, the unfamiliar, the things that are totally unfamiliar to your experience. One of the major exports of Germany is valves? When was the last time I even thought about valves? Why valves, what do you use valves in? OK, show me a list of all the different kinds of machine parts, by percent of total exports.

And so, you dig in a little bit, to this part of the world that you hadn't looked at before. You cultivate the ability to spin up a lightweight sort of fannish obsessive curiosity when something seems like it might be a big deal.

And you take casual notes and impressions (though keeping track of all the numbers and their sources in your notes).

You do a little bit of arithmetic to compare things to familiar reference points. How does this source of risk compare to the risk of smoking or going horseback riding? How does the effect size of this drug compare to the effect size of psychotherapy?

You don't really want to do statistics. You might take percents, means, standard deviations, maybe a Cohen's d here and there, but nothing fancy. You're just trying to figure out what's going on.

It's often a good idea to rank things by raw scale. What is responsible for the bulk of deaths, the bulk of money moved, etc? What is big? Then pay attention more to things, and ask more questions about things, that are big. (Or disproportionately high-impact.)

You may find that this process gives you contrarian beliefs, but often you won't, you'll just have a strongly fact-based assessment of why you believe the usual thing.
ratty  lesswrong  essay  rhetoric  meta:rhetoric  epistemic  thinking  advice  street-fighting  scholar  checklists  🤖  spock  writing  2016  info-foraging  rat-pack  clarity  systematic-ad-hoc  bounded-cognition  info-dynamics  let-me-see  nitty-gritty  core-rats  evidence-based  truth 
december 2016 by nhaliday
soft question - A Book You Would Like to Write - MathOverflow
- The Differential Topology of Loop Spaces
- Knot Theory: Kawaii examples for topological machines
- An Introduction to Forcing (for people who don't care about foundations.)
writing  math  q-n-a  discussion  books  list  synthesis  big-list  overflow  soft-question  techtariat  mathtariat  exposition  topology  open-problems  logic  nibble  fedja  questions 
october 2016 by nhaliday
Michel de Montaigne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The tendency in his essays to digress into anecdotes and personal ruminations was seen as detrimental to proper style rather than as an innovation, and his declaration that, "I am myself the matter of my book", was viewed by his contemporaries as self-indulgent. In time, however, Montaigne would come to be recognized as embodying, perhaps better than any other author of his time, the spirit of freely entertaining doubt which began to emerge at that time.
people  history  europe  philosophy  writing  wiki  gallic  early-modern  big-peeps  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation 
september 2016 by nhaliday
George Orwell: Politics and the English Language
i. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
ii. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
iii. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
iv. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
v. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
vi. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

How I lost my 25-year battle against corporate claptrap: https://www.ft.com/lucycolumn
writing  advice  essay  contrarianism  rhetoric  politics  language  meta:rhetoric  mostly-modern  britain  anglosphere  literature  albion  big-peeps  info-dynamics  anglo  aristos  prudence  old-anglo  pre-ww2  multi  news  org:rec  org:anglo  org:biz  business  realness  jargon 
august 2016 by nhaliday
About | More Crows than Eagles
a quasi-journalist with some really novel thinking (refreshing change) and great writing
people  postrat  writing  media  culture  society 
may 2016 by nhaliday
« earlier      
per page:    204080120160

bundles : cultureframegrowth

related tags

ability-competence  absolute-relative  academia  accretion  accuracy  acemoglu  acm  acmtariat  adversarial  advertising  advice  africa  age-generation  agriculture  ai  ai-control  akrasia  albion  algebra  algorithms  alignment  allodium  alt-inst  analogy  analysis  analytical-holistic  anglo  anglosphere  announcement  anonymity  anthropology  antidemos  antiquity  aphorism  apollonian-dionysian  app  archaeology  aristos  arms  art  article  asia  attaq  attention  audio  authoritarianism  aversion  axioms  backup  behavioral-gen  being-becoming  being-right  best-practices  better-explained  biases  bible  big-list  big-peeps  big-picture  biodet  biophysical-econ  biotech  blog  books  bots  bounded-cognition  bret-victor  britain  broad-econ  brooks  business  calculator  canada  carcinisation  career  cartoons  causation  chan  charity  chart  cheatsheet  checklists  china  christianity  civic  civil-liberty  civilization  clarity  classic  clever-rats  climate-change  coalitions  cocktail  cohesion  collaboration  comedy  commentary  communication  comparison  compensation  concept  concrete  confluence  confusion  conquest-empire  contrarianism  cool  coordination  core-rats  correlation  cost-disease  counter-revolution  course  cracker-econ  creative  criminal-justice  critique  crooked  crosstab  crypto-anarchy  cs  cultural-dynamics  culture  culture-war  cybernetics  cycles  cynicism-idealism  dan-luu  darwinian  data  database  death  debate  debt  decentralized  decision-making  deep-learning  deep-materialism  definition  dennett  descriptive  design  desktop  deterrence  developing-world  dimensionality  direct-indirect  direction  dirty-hands  discipline  discovery  discrimination  discussion  disease  distribution  documentation  dominant-minority  drugs  duty  dynamic  dynamical  early-modern  econ-metrics  econ-productivity  economics  econotariat  ed-yong  eden  education  effective-altruism  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  electromag  embedded-cognition  embeddings  embodied  emotion  empirical  endogenous-exogenous  energy-resources  engineering  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  environment  epidemiology  epistemic  error  essay  estimate  ethanol  ethics  europe  evidence-based  evolution  examples  exegesis-hermeneutics  exit-voice  exocortex  expectancy  expert  expert-experience  explanation  exposition  expression-survival  extrema  farmers-and-foragers  fedja  feudal  fiction  film  flexibility  fluid  flux-stasis  focus  food  foreign-lang  foreign-policy  forms-instances  free  frontier  futurism  gallic  gavisti  gedanken  gender  geometry  georgia  germanic  giants  git  gnon  gnosis-logos  gnxp  god-man-beast-victim  government  gowers  grad-school  gradient-descent  ground-up  group-selection  growth  gtd  guide  guilt-shame  gwern  h2o  habit  hanson  hci  heavy-industry  heuristic  hi-order-bits  hidden-motives  higher-ed  history  hmm  hn  homogeneity  howto  human-capital  humanity  ideas  identity-politics  ideology  illusion  impact  impro  incentives  india  inference  info-dynamics  info-foraging  infrastructure  inhibition  init  innovation  insight  institutions  intelligence  interdisciplinary  internet  interpretation  interview  intricacy  intuition  invariance  iraq-syria  iron-age  islam  isotropy  janus  japan  jargon  jobs  journos-pundits  judaism  jvm  kinship  knowledge  labor  language  latin-america  law  learning  lecture-notes  left-wing  len:short  lens  lesswrong  let-me-see  letters  leviathan  lexical  lifehack  linguistics  links  list  literature  lived-experience  lmao  local-global  logic  lol  long-short-run  long-term  longform  love-hate  low-hanging  machine-learning  macro  madisonian  manifolds  marginal-rev  market-failure  markets  math  math.GR  mathtariat  meaningness  media  medicine  medieval  mediterranean  memes(ew)  MENA  mental-math  meta:math  meta:research  meta:rhetoric  meta:science  meta:war  metabuch  metameta  michael-nielsen  microbiz  migration  monetary-fiscal  money  morality  mostly-modern  multi  murray  music  mutation  mystic  myth  narrative  nationalism-globalism  nature  navigation  neocons  network-structure  neurons  new-religion  news  nibble  nihil  nitty-gritty  nlp  no-go  nordic  notetaking  objektbuch  oceans  old-anglo  oly  open-closed  open-problems  operational  opsec  optimization  order-disorder  org:anglo  org:biz  org:bleg  org:edu  org:junk  org:lite  org:local  org:mag  org:med  org:nat  org:popup  org:rec  org:sci  organization  orient  oscillation  oss  osx  outcome-risk  overflow  p:null  p:whenever  paganism  papers  paradox  parallax  parasites-microbiome  parsimony  paying-rent  pdf  people  personality  pharma  philosophy  piracy  planning  plots  poast  podcast  poetry  polis  polisci  politics  polynomials  postrat  pre-ww2  prediction  preference-falsification  prepping  presentation  privacy  pro-rata  problem-solving  productivity  profile  programming  project  proofs  protestant-catholic  protocol  prudence  pseudoE  psychiatry  psychology  public-goodish  publishing  q-n-a  quantifiers-sums  questions  quixotic  quiz  quotes  random  randy-ayndy  ranking  rant  rat-pack  rationality  ratty  reading  realness  reason  recommendations  reference  reflection  regularizer  regulation  religion  repo  research  responsibility  retention  retrofit  review  revolution  rhetoric  rhythm  right-wing  risk  roots  rot  russia  s:*  s:***  sanctity-degradation  sapiens  satire  scale  scaruffi  scholar  science  scifi-fantasy  scitariat  search  security  selection  shipping  SIGGRAPH  signal-noise  signaling  similarity  sinosphere  skeleton  sleuthin  social  social-science  sociality  society  sociology  soft-question  software  spatial  speaking  speculation  spock  spreading  ssc  stackex  stamina  startups  statesmen  status  stereotypes  stories  strategy  straussian  stream  street-fighting  strings  structure  study  studying  stylized-facts  subculture  subjective-objective  sulla  summary  symmetry  syntax  synthesis  systematic-ad-hoc  tactics  tapes  tcs  tcstariat  teaching  tech  technology  techtariat  telos-atelos  temperature  terrorism  the-classics  the-devil  the-great-west-whale  the-south  the-trenches  the-world-is-just-atoms  theory-of-mind  theos  thesis  thick-thin  thinking  threat-modeling  thurston  time  time-use  tip-of-tongue  tools  top-n  topology  traces  track-record  tradecraft  tradeoffs  tradition  trees  trends  tribalism  tricki  trivia  troll  truth  tutorial  tutoring  tv  twitter  unaffiliated  unit  universalism-particularism  usa  vague  values  vampire-squid  vgr  virtu  visual-understanding  visualization  visuo  volo-avolo  vulgar  war  webapp  weird  west-hunter  westminster  whole-partial-many  wiki  wisdom  wordlessness  workflow  working-stiff  world  world-war  wormholes  worrydream  writing  X-not-about-Y  yak-shaving  yoga  yvain  zeitgeist  🎓  🎩  🐸  👳  👽  🔬  🖥  🤖 

Copy this bookmark: