nhaliday + murray + life-history   4

The Dream Hoarders: How America's Top 20 Percent Perpetuates Inequality | Boston Review
this is ominous
Has the Democratic Party Gotten Too Rich for Its Own Good: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/opinion/democratic-party-rich-thomas-edsall.html
Saving the American Dream: https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/saving-american-dream/
It’s not just about the people at the top
- Amy Wax

ow can we arrange things so that more people with different levels of affluence can prosper and live meaningful lives? How can we make the advantages that the rich now “hoard” more widely available, thus reducing their incentive to separate themselves? Although these goals are elusive and difficult for any society to attain, ours can probably do better. But the changes required would be far bolder than the tepid ones Reeves proposes, which do little to disrupt current “structures of privilege.” And more dramatic reforms might also advance the causes he holds dear, including enhancing mobility and reducing inequality.
So here goes my laundry list.

Let’s start with Reeves’s proposal to ban legacy admissions. Not only would this increase fairness, but it would discourage private contributions. This would, in turn, promote the worthy goal of defunding the Ivies and other selective universities, which have become counterproductive sites of snobbery, dogma, and progressive indoctrination. Save for the kind of scientific research that benefits everyone, they don’t need any more money and could do with much less.

But we shouldn’t stop there. As suggested by the late Justice Antonin Scalia during oral argument in the Grutter affirmative-action case, selective admissions should simply be abolished and students admitted by lottery, except for math and hard sciences, for which a simple test can determine entrance. The steep pyramid of colleges, in which the affluent crowd monopolizes prestigious institutions, will be immediately flattened, and the need for affirmative action would disappear. In this respect, our system would simply mimic those in northern European countries like Holland and Germany, where enrolling in the university nearest to home is the usual practice and there is no clear elite pecking order. And since fewer than a fifth of colleges take less than half their applicants, with only a tiny group much more competitive, this change would have no effect on most institutions of higher learning.

While we’re at it, we should give up on the fetish of college for all by significantly reducing the number of students attending four-year academic programs to no more than 10 to 15 percent of high-school graduates. The government should dial back on student loans and grants to universities, except for scientific research.

That step, which would reduce the burden of educational debt, is not as drastic as it appears, since many students who start college end up dropping out and only 25 percent of high-school graduates manage to obtain a four-year degree. At the same time, we should step up the effort to recruit highly qualified low-income students to the most selective colleges across the country—something that Caroline Hoxby’s research tells us is not currently taking place. Finally, we should copy some of Western Europe’s most successful economies by tracking more students into job-related nonacademic programs, and by redirecting the private and public money that now goes to universities to creating and maintaining such programs.

More broadly, the amounts freed up by defunding elite colleges and private schools should be used to help average Americans. The Gates Foundation and other rich private philanthropies should stop chasing after educational schemes of dubious value and devote their billions to improving community colleges, supporting the people who attend them, and dramatically expanding vocational programs.

Although Reeves does mention vocational education, he does so only in passing. That option should receive renewed emphasis. And private donors should provide grants to thousands of students of modest means, including stipends for rent and living expenses, to enable them to do the summer internships that Reeves claims are now so important to getting ahead.
news  org:mag  letters  rhetoric  left-wing  books  usa  politics  class  inequality  economics  higher-ed  race  multi  twitter  social  commentary  org:lite  journos-pundits  coalitions  org:rec  trends  elections  data  compensation  strategy  gnon  unaffiliated  backup  envy  coming-apart  murray  mobility  class-warfare  parenting  housing  s-factor  assortative-mating  biodet  egalitarianism-hierarchy  legacy  education  dignity  life-history  demographics  age-generation  intervention  attaq  contrarianism  spearhead  elite  nyc  reflection  order-disorder  duty  civic  discrimination  proposal  alt-inst  labor  noblesse-oblige  pennsylvania  nascent-state  counter-revolution  academia  money  monetary-fiscal 
june 2017 by nhaliday
Rolling Stones – spottedtoad
I’m not 100% convinced that dads make a huge difference to their kid’s individual development; there are of course reasonable arguments on either side. But I’ve become convinced that the end of married fatherhood is a hugely politically and socially destabilizing force, and that the particular form of the married family was deeply important to both the rise of capitalism and the gradual expansion of liberty where and when it occurred. There are multiple reasons to doubt Deirdre McCloskey’s sanguine conclusion that The Great Enrichment of capitalist wealth and political equality will expand to every corner of the globe, but this seems like one of the important ones.

THERE ARE TWO AMERICAS…: https://spottedtoad.wordpress.com/2017/10/18/there-are-two-americas/
…with almost wholly separate life histories:

Age Women Have Children by Marital Status: First Births 2016

Now for some good news (of a sort). Changes in family structure for kids have largely ground to a halt.
ratty  unaffiliated  data  trends  society  murray  visualization  wonkish  sociology  gender  current-events  social-capital  social-norms  capitalism  malaise  chart  coming-apart  dignity  life-history  social-structure  zeitgeist  rot  mokyr-allen-mccloskey  microfoundations  multi  distribution  age-generation  pop-structure  demographics  civilization  douthatish  time-series  optimism  twitter  social  commentary  backup  pro-rata  general-survey  sex 
december 2016 by nhaliday

bundles : guvnorpatternspeepssoft

related tags

academia  age-generation  ai  alt-inst  anarcho-tyranny  anglosphere  anthropology  asia  assortative-mating  attaq  automation  backup  behavioral-econ  big-peeps  biodet  books  business  c:*  capital  capitalism  career  chart  china  civic  civilization  class  class-warfare  coalitions  coming-apart  commentary  compensation  contrarianism  counter-revolution  crime  criminology  current-events  data  debate  demographics  developing-world  dignity  discipline  discrimination  discussion  distribution  divergence  douthatish  duty  econ-productivity  economics  econotariat  education  EEA  egalitarianism-hierarchy  elections  elite  envy  ethnography  farmers-and-foragers  finance  futurism  gender  gender-diff  general-survey  gnon  government  growth-econ  hanson  hari-seldon  heuristic  higher-ed  housing  human-capital  hypocrisy  inequality  innovation  insight  instinct  intel  internet  intervention  japan  journos-pundits  labor  latin-america  law  left-wing  legacy  len:short  letters  life-history  lived-experience  long-term  low-hanging  malaise  male-variability  management  managerial-state  marginal-rev  matching  microfoundations  migration  mobility  models  modernity  mokyr-allen-mccloskey  monetary-fiscal  money  multi  murray  nascent-state  nationalism-globalism  news  nl-and-so-can-you  noblesse-oblige  nyc  optimism  order-disorder  org:lite  org:mag  org:rec  parenting  pennsylvania  personality  phalanges  planning  politics  pop-structure  prediction  privacy  pro-rata  property-rights  proposal  quotes  race  ranking  ratty  redistribution  reflection  regulation  rent-seeking  review  revolution  rhetoric  ritual  rot  s-factor  science  sex  sinosphere  social  social-capital  social-norms  social-science  social-structure  society  sociology  spearhead  speculation  ssc  stagnation  strategy  straussian  success  summary  sv  taxes  teaching  tech  technocracy  temperance  texas  the-bones  the-world-is-just-atoms  things  thinking  time-series  trade  tradition  trends  tutoring  twitter  unaffiliated  urban  urban-rural  usa  values  vampire-squid  visualization  welfare-state  winner-take-all  wonkish  world  zeitgeist  🎩  🐝 

Copy this bookmark: