nhaliday + focus   28

Trust, Trolleys and Social Dilemmas: A Replication Study
Overall, the present studies clearly confirmed the main finding of Everett et al., that deontologists are more trusted than consequentialists in social dilemma games. Study 1 replicates Everett et al.’s effect in the context of trust games. Study 2 generalizes the effect to public goods games, thus demonstrating that it is not specific to the type of social dilemma game used in Everett et al. Finally, both studies build on these results by demonstrating that the increased trust in deontologists may sometimes, but not always, be warranted: deontologists displayed increased cooperation rates but only in the public goods game and not in trust games.

The Adaptive Utility of Deontology: Deontological Moral Decision-Making Fosters Perceptions of Trust and Likeability: https://sci-hub.tw/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-016-0080-6
Consistent with previous research, participants liked and trusted targets whose decisions were consistent with deontological motives more than targets whose decisions were more consistent with utilitarian motives; this effect was stronger for perceptions of trust. Additionally, women reported greater dislike for targets whose decisions were consistent with utilitarianism than men. Results suggest that deontological moral reasoning evolved, in part, to facilitate positive relations among conspecifics and aid group living and that women may be particularly sensitive to the implications of the various motives underlying moral decision-making.

Inference of Trustworthiness From Intuitive Moral Judgments: https://sci-hub.tw/10.1037/xge0000165

Exposure to moral relativism compromises moral behavior: https://sci-hub.tw/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113001339

Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?: http://cushmanlab.fas.harvard.edu/docs/Hannikainanetal_2017.pdf

Disgust and Deontology: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550617732609
Trait Sensitivity to Contamination Promotes a Preference for Order, Hierarchy, and Rule-Based Moral Judgment

We suggest that a synthesis of these two literatures points to one specific emotion (disgust) that reliably predicts one specific type of moral judgment (deontological). In all three studies, we found that trait disgust sensitivity predicted more extreme deontological judgment.

The Influence of (Dis)belief in Free Will on Immoral Behavior: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00020/full

Beyond Sacrificial Harm: A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology.: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-57422-001
Recent research has relied on trolley-type sacrificial moral dilemmas to study utilitarian versus nonutilitarian modes of moral decision-making. This research has generated important insights into people’s attitudes toward instrumental harm—that is, the sacrifice of an individual to save a greater number. But this approach also has serious limitations. Most notably, it ignores the positive, altruistic core of utilitarianism, which is characterized by impartial concern for the well-being of everyone, whether near or far. Here, we develop, refine, and validate a new scale—the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale—to dissociate individual differences in the ‘negative’ (permissive attitude toward instrumental harm) and ‘positive’ (impartial concern for the greater good) dimensions of utilitarian thinking as manifested in the general population. We show that these are two independent dimensions of proto-utilitarian tendencies in the lay population, each exhibiting a distinct psychological profile. Empathic concern, identification with the whole of humanity, and concern for future generations were positively associated with impartial beneficence but negatively associated with instrumental harm; and although instrumental harm was associated with subclinical psychopathy, impartial beneficence was associated with higher religiosity. Importantly, although these two dimensions were independent in the lay population, they were closely associated in a sample of moral philosophers. Acknowledging this dissociation between the instrumental harm and impartial beneficence components of utilitarian thinking in ordinary people can clarify existing debates about the nature of moral psychology and its relation to moral philosophy as well as generate fruitful avenues for further research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)

A breakthrough in moral psychology: https://nintil.com/2017/12/28/a-breakthrough-in-moral-psychology/

Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas: A Process Dissociation Analysis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25840987
The principle of deontology states that the morality of an action depends on its consistency with moral norms; the principle of utilitarianism implies that the morality of an action depends on its consequences. Previous research suggests that deontological judgments are shaped by affective processes, whereas utilitarian judgments are guided by cognitive processes. The current research used process dissociation (PD) to independently assess deontological and utilitarian inclinations in women and men. A meta-analytic re-analysis of 40 studies with 6,100 participants indicated that men showed a stronger preference for utilitarian over deontological judgments than women when the two principles implied conflicting decisions (d = 0.52). PD further revealed that women exhibited stronger deontological inclinations than men (d = 0.57), while men exhibited only slightly stronger utilitarian inclinations than women (d = 0.10). The findings suggest that gender differences in moral dilemma judgments are due to differences in affective responses to harm rather than cognitive evaluations of outcomes.
study  psychology  social-psych  morality  ethics  things  trust  GT-101  coordination  hmm  adversarial  cohesion  replication  cooperate-defect  formal-values  public-goodish  multi  evopsych  gender  gender-diff  philosophy  values  decision-making  absolute-relative  universalism-particularism  intervention  pdf  piracy  deep-materialism  new-religion  stylized-facts  🌞  🎩  honor  trends  phalanges  age-generation  religion  theos  sanctity-degradation  correlation  order-disorder  egalitarianism-hierarchy  volo-avolo  organizing  impro  dimensionality  patho-altruism  altruism  exploratory  matrix-factorization  ratty  unaffiliated  commentary  summary  haidt  scitariat  reason  emotion  randy-ayndy  liner-notes  latent-variables  nature  autism  👽  focus  systematic-ad-hoc  analytical-holistic  expert-experience  economics  markets  civil-liberty  capitalism  personality  psych-architecture  cog-psych  psychometrics  tradition  left-wing  right-wing  ideology  politics  environment  big-peeps  old-anglo  good-evil  ends-means  nietzschean  effe 
march 2017 by nhaliday
“A state of flow can be achieved by deep work” | Hacker News
When I start my morning, I refused to pick up my phone and check out social media (usually I would take a 45 minute dump just catching up on stuff posted last night). Sure my morning chores became a bit boring, but I also became more efficient (I started getting to work sooner).

Basically, by the time I get to my desk, I am so bored that the most interesting thing I can do is work. And my work (programming) is a very interesting task, it used to keep me engaged for hours and hours, it's just that Social Media defeated it.

hn  commentary  techtariat  tech  working-stiff  attention  the-monster  focus  productivity  discipline  self-control  inhibition  multi  twitter  social  barons  emotion 
february 2017 by nhaliday
Neurodiversity | West Hunter
Having an accurate evaluation of a syndrome as a generally bad thing isn’t equivalent to attacking those with that syndrome. Being a leper is a bad thing, not just another wonderful flavor of humanity [insert hot tub joke] , but that doesn’t mean that we have to spend our spare time playing practical jokes on lepers, tempting though that is.. Leper hockey. We can cure leprosy, and we are right to do so. Preventing deafness through rubella vaccination was the right thing too – deafness sucks. And so on. As we get better at treating and preventing, humans are going to get more uniform – and that’s a good thing. Back to normalcy!

focus: https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/neurodiversity/#comment-88691
interesting discussion of mutational load: https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/neurodiversity/#comment-88793

I was thinking again about the consequences of having more small-effect deleterious mutations than average. I don’t think that they would push hard in a particular direction in phenotype space – I don’t believe they would make you look weird, but by definition they would be bad for you, reduce fitness. I remembered a passage in a book by Steve Stirling, in which our heroine felt as if her brain ‘was moving like a mechanism of jewels and steel precisely formed.’ It strikes me that a person with an extra dollop of this kind of genetic load wouldn’t feel like that. And of course that heroine did have low genetic load, being the product of millennia of selective breeding, not to mention an extra boost from the Invisible Crown.

Well, what does the distribution of fitness burden by frequency look like for deleterious mutations of a given fitness penalty?
It’s proportional to the mutation rate for that class. There is reason to believe that there are more ways to moderately or slightly screw up a protein than to really ruin it, which indicates that mild mutations make up most load in protein-coding sequences. More of the genome is made up of conserved regulatory sequences, but mutations there probably have even milder effects, since few mutations in non-coding sequences cause a serious Mendelian disease.

I have wondered if there was some sort of evolutionary tradeoff between muscles and brains over the past hundred thousand years through dystrophin’s dual role. There is some evidence of recent positive selection among proteins that interact with dystrophin, such as DTNBP1 and DTNA.

Any novel environment where higher intelligence can accrue more caloric energy than brute strength alone (see: the invention of the bow) should relax the selection pressure for muscularity. The Neanderthals didn’t fare so well with the brute strength strategy.
Sure: that’s what you might call an inevitable tradeoff, a consequence of the laws of physics. Just as big guys need more food. But because of the way our biochemistry is wired, there can be tradeoffs that exist but are not inevitable consequences of the laws of physics – particularly likely when a gene has two fairly different functions, as they often do.
west-hunter  discussion  morality  philosophy  evolution  sapiens  psychology  psychiatry  disease  neuro  scitariat  ideology  rhetoric  diversity  prudence  genetic-load  autism  focus  👽  multi  poast  mutation  equilibrium  scifi-fantasy  rant  🌞  paternal-age  perturbation  nibble  ideas  iq  quotes  aphorism  enhancement  signal-noise  blowhards  dysgenics  data  distribution  objektbuch  tradeoffs  embodied  speculation  metabolic  volo-avolo  degrees-of-freedom  race  africa  genetics  genomics  bio  QTL  population-genetics  stylized-facts  britain  history  early-modern  pre-ww2  galton  old-anglo  giants  industrial-revolution  neuro-nitgrit  recent-selection  selection  medicine  darwinian  strategy  egalitarianism-hierarchy  CRISPR  biotech  definition  reflection  poetry  deep-materialism  EGT  discrimination  conceptual-vocab 
february 2017 by nhaliday
Overcoming Bias : Chip Away At Hard Problems
One of the most common ways that wannabe academics fail is by failing to sufficiently focus on a few topics of interest to academia. Many of them become amateur intellectuals, people who think and write more as a hobby, and less to gain professional rewards via institutions like academia, media, and business. Such amateurs are often just as smart and hard-working as professionals, and they can more directly address the topics that interest them. Professionals, in contrast, must specialize more, have less freedom to pick topics, and must try harder to impress others, which encourages the use of more difficult robust/rigorous methods.

You might think their added freedom would result in amateurs contributing more to intellectual progress, but in fact they contribute less. Yes, amateurs can and do make more initial progress when new topics arise suddenly far from topics where established expert institutions have specialized. But then over time amateurs blow their lead by focusing less and relying on easier more direct methods. They rely more on informal conversation as analysis method, they prefer personal connections over open competitions in choosing people, and they rely more on a perceived consensus among a smaller group of fellow enthusiasts. As a result, their contributions just don’t appeal as widely or as long.
ratty  postrat  culture  academia  science  epistemic  hanson  frontier  contrarianism  thick-thin  long-term  regularizer  strategy  impact  essay  subculture  meta:rhetoric  aversion  discipline  curiosity  rigor  rationality  rat-pack  🤖  success  2016  farmers-and-foragers  exploration-exploitation  low-hanging  clarity  vague  🦉  optimate  systematic-ad-hoc  metameta  s:***  discovery  focus  info-dynamics  hari-seldon 
december 2016 by nhaliday
Genetic Relations Among Procrastination, Impulsivity, and Goal-Management Ability: Implications for the Evolutionary Origin of Procrastination : slatestarcodex
First, both procrastination and impulsivity were moderately heritable (46% and 49%, respectively). Second, although the two traits were separable at the phenotypic level (r=.65), they were not separable at the genetic level (rg=1.0). Finally, variation in goal-management ability accounted for much of this shared genetic variation. These results suggest that procrastination and impulsivity are linked primarily through genetic influences on the ability to use their high-priority goals effectively to regulate their action.

An Investigation of Genetic and Environmental Influences Across The Distribution of Self-Control: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316292004_An_Investigation_of_Genetic_and_Environmental_Influences_Across_The_Distribution_of_Self-Control
Subsequent biometric quantile regression models revealed that genetic influences on self-control were maximized in the 50th and 60th percentiles and minimized in the tails of the distribution. Shared environmental influences were nonsignificant at all examined quantiles of self-control with only one exception.

The Heritability of Self-Control: a Meta-Analysis: https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.012
The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative overview of the heritability of self-control. A systematic search resulted in 31 included studies, 17 reporting on individual samples, based on a sample size of >30,000 twins, published between 1997 and 2018. Our results revealed an overall monozygotic twin correlation of .58, and an overall dizygotic twin correlation of .28, resulting in a heritability estimate of 60%. The heritability of self-control did not vary across gender or age. The heritability did differ across informants, with stronger heritability estimates based on parent report versus self-report or observations.


The MZ correlation was twice as large as the DZ correlation, indicating little to no evidence for shared environmental effects. Rather, these results suggest that environmental effects on self-control, that explain 40% of the variance, are unique to individuals. This is in line with the standardized variance estimates reported by the studies, where76% of the studies reported no or very little influence of the shared environment on the variance in self-control.
reddit  commentary  akrasia  genetics  cog-psych  psychology  gwern  discipline  ssc  ratty  variance-components  twin-study  genetic-correlation  study  correlation  aversion  decision-making  the-monster  biodet  🌞  self-control  focus  inhibition  procrastination  behavioral-gen  multi  environmental-effects  curvature  null-result  convexity-curvature  piracy  pdf  meta-analysis 
august 2016 by nhaliday
Getting (Unremarkable) Things Done: The Problem With David Allen’s Universalism - Study Hacks - Cal Newport
As a graduate student, I didn’t need better lists of next actions. I needed instead to be training my ability to focus hard on meaningful things for long periods of time — even after it becomes uncomfortable.

It’s here that Allen apologists might try to force these two worlds together. They might suggest, for example, that you could simply have a next action labeled: “spend many hours obsessively doing deep work on problem X.” But such efforts soon reveal their inadequacy.

Deep work is fundamentally different than the shallow (though still important) work of keeping on top of the little things required to function personally and professionally.

At least, this is the compromise I’ve adopted. I embrace GTD for organizing shallow work. It is, as many will attest, devastatingly effective for this purpose. But I think of deep work as something different altogether. A philosophy of life that requires its own strategies.
advice  productivity  workflow  critique  hmm  gtd  aversion  attention  time-use  focus 
june 2016 by nhaliday

bundles : disciplinegrowthng

related tags

80000-hours  :/  absolute-relative  academia  acmtariat  adversarial  advice  africa  age-generation  agriculture  ai  ai-control  akrasia  albion  alignment  allodium  altruism  amazon  analogy  analytical-holistic  anglosphere  antidemos  aphorism  apollonian-dionysian  apple  aristos  art  asia  atmosphere  attention  authoritarianism  autism  aversion  bangbang  barons  beeminder  behavioral-econ  behavioral-gen  being-becoming  benevolence  best-practices  biases  big-peeps  bio  biodet  bioinformatics  biotech  blowhards  bootstraps  brain-scan  brands  britain  business  business-models  california  cancer  canon  capital  capitalism  career  cartoons  cheatsheet  checklists  china  christianity  civil-liberty  clarity  class  clever-rats  climate-change  coarse-fine  cog-psych  cohesion  cold-war  collaboration  commentary  comparison  compensation  competition  complement-substitute  composition-decomposition  computation  computer-vision  conceptual-vocab  concrete  conquest-empire  contrarianism  convexity-curvature  cooperate-defect  coordination  correlation  courage  course  creative  crime  CRISPR  critique  crooked  cs  cultural-dynamics  culture  curiosity  current-events  curvature  cycles  cynicism-idealism  dark-arts  darwinian  data  death  debt  decision-making  deep-materialism  definite-planning  definition  degrees-of-freedom  democracy  detail-architecture  dimensionality  dirty-hands  discipline  discovery  discrimination  discussion  disease  distribution  diversity  drugs  duplication  dysgenics  early-modern  econ-productivity  economics  education  effect-size  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  EGT  einstein  elite  embodied  embodied-pack  emotion  empirical  ems  ends-means  energy-resources  engineering  enhancement  entrepreneurialism  environment  environmental-effects  envy  epistemic  equilibrium  essay  essence-existence  estimate  ethics  ethnocentrism  europe  evidence-based  evolution  evopsych  examples  exocortex  expert-experience  explanans  exploration-exploitation  exploratory  externalities  extra-introversion  facebook  faq  farmers-and-foragers  fashun  FDA  feudal  fiction  finance  flexibility  focus  formal-values  frontier  futurism  gallic  galton  games  gender  gender-diff  genetic-correlation  genetic-load  genetics  genomics  geoengineering  geography  germanic  giants  gnosis-logos  god-man-beast-victim  good-evil  google  government  growth  growth-econ  GT-101  gtd  guide  GWAS  gwern  habit  haidt  hanson  hard-tech  hari-seldon  harvard  heterodox  hidden-motives  high-variance  higher-ed  history  hmm  hn  homo-hetero  honor  human-ml  hypocrisy  ideas  ideology  impact  impetus  impro  individualism-collectivism  industrial-revolution  inequality  info-dynamics  inhibition  innovation  insight  institutions  intel  intelligence  interdisciplinary  interests  internet  intervention  intricacy  investing  ios  iq  iteration-recursion  janus  japan  justice  knowledge  labor  latent-variables  latin-america  law  leadership  lecture-notes  left-wing  len:short  lens  lesswrong  leviathan  lifehack  limits  liner-notes  links  list  literature  local-global  long-term  longevity  love-hate  low-hanging  machine-learning  macro  magnitude  malthus  management  marginal  market-power  markets  math  math.CA  matrix-factorization  meaningness  measurement  media  medicine  meta-analysis  meta:rhetoric  metabolic  metabuch  metameta  microsoft  mindful  mobile  models  moments  monetary-fiscal  money-for-time  morality  mostly-modern  multi  multiplicative  music  musk  mutation  myth  n-factor  narrative  nationalism-globalism  nature  near-far  network-structure  neuro  neuro-nitgrit  neurons  new-religion  news  nibble  nietzschean  nitty-gritty  noble-lie  nordic  northeast  notetaking  nuclear  null-result  nutrition  nyc  objektbuch  occident  old-anglo  open-closed  optimate  optimism  order-disorder  org:anglo  org:edu  org:mag  org:nat  organizing  orient  outcome-risk  outliers  p:whenever  paradox  parallax  paternal-age  patho-altruism  patience  pdf  peace-violence  people  personality  perturbation  pessimism  phalanges  pharma  phd  philosophy  physics  piracy  plots  poast  poetry  polanyi-marx  polarization  polisci  politics  poll  pop-diff  popsci  population-genetics  postrat  power  power-law  pragmatic  pre-2013  pre-ww2  preprint  primitivism  princeton  prioritizing  pro-rata  probability  procrastination  productivity  properties  prudence  psych-architecture  psychiatry  psychology  psychometrics  public-goodish  q-n-a  qra  QTL  quantum  questions  quotes  race  random  randy-ayndy  ranking  rant  rat-pack  rationality  ratty  realness  reason  recent-selection  recruiting  reddit  redistribution  reference  reflection  regularizer  regulation  religion  rent-seeking  replication  revolution  rhetoric  rhythm  right-wing  rigidity  rigor  risk  ritual  robotics  roots  s:*  s:***  sanctity-degradation  sapiens  scale  scholar  science  scifi-fantasy  scitariat  search  securities  selection  self-control  serene  shakespeare  shift  signal-noise  signaling  sinosphere  skeleton  skunkworks  social  social-choice  social-norms  social-psych  sociology  socs-and-mops  software  solid-study  space  speculation  speed  speedometer  ssc  stagnation  stamina  stanford  startups  statesmen  stats  status  stereotypes  stochastic-processes  stock-flow  stoic  stories  strategy  stream  stress  structure  study  stylized-facts  subculture  success  summary  sv  synchrony  systematic-ad-hoc  tactics  tails  tech  technology  techtariat  telos-atelos  the-classics  the-devil  the-founding  the-great-west-whale  the-monster  the-watchers  the-west  theory-of-mind  theos  thick-thin  thiel  things  thinking  time  time-preference  time-use  track-record  trade  tradeoffs  tradition  transportation  trends  tribalism  trust  truth  tutorial  twin-study  twitter  unaffiliated  uncertainty  unintended-consequences  universalism-particularism  urban-rural  us-them  usa  vague  values  variance-components  venture  vgr  virtu  visual-understanding  visualization  vitality  volo-avolo  war  wealth  welfare-state  west-hunter  wiki  winner-take-all  wire-guided  wisdom  within-without  wkfly  workflow  working-stiff  world  world-war  writing  X-not-about-Y  yvain  zero-positive-sum  zooming  🌞  🎓  🎩  👽  🖥  🤖  🦉 

Copy this bookmark: