nhaliday + borjas   26

Who Emigrates From Denmark? – LaborEcon
Ilpo Kauppinen, Panu Poutvaara, and I have just finished a paper that examines the selection characterizing emigrants from Denmark, one of the richest and most redistributive European welfare states.

The paper makes a neat theoretical contribution. It derives the conditions that determine whether the skill distribution of the emigrants stochastically dominates (or is stochastically dominated by) the skill distribution of the stayers. Because the rewards to skills in Denmark are low (relative to practically all possible destinations), the model predicts that the emigrants will be positively selected, and that the skill distribution of the movers will stochastically dominate that of the stayers.

Our analysis of administrative data for the entire Danish population between 1995 and 2010 strongly confirms the implications of the model. Denmark is indeed seeing an outflow of its most skilled workers. And that is one of the consequences that a very generous welfare state must learn to live with.

The paper is forthcoming in the Economic Journal.
econotariat  borjas  economics  macro  labor  redistribution  welfare-state  europe  nordic  migration  human-capital  compensation  inequality  egalitarianism-hierarchy  anglosphere  correlation  selection  study  summary  🎩  stylized-facts  wonkish  policy  unintended-consequences  comparison  polisci  political-econ  nationalism-globalism  dysgenics 
september 2017 by nhaliday
Trump crafting plan to slash legal immigration - POLITICO
news  org:mag  politics  policy  government  trump  nascent-state  migration  current-events  canada  anglo  nationalism-globalism  multi  right-wing  org:lite  media  track-record  video  announcement  lol  journos-pundits  borjas  econotariat  rhetoric  human-capital  gnon  isteveish  albion  org:rec  douthatish  paleocon  gnxp  scitariat  commentary  wonkish  usa  chart  law  culture-war  🎩  sulla 
july 2017 by nhaliday
The New Narrative: Less Immigration Is Bad – LaborEcon
There is no upper bound to the hypocrisy of experts. It might be a lot of fun to keep track of this over the next few years, watching the dominos fall and all those “immigration-does-not-affect-wages” experts fall all over themselves as they switch to proving the economic awfulness of Trump’s actions because fewer immigrants mean higher labor costs, higher prices, more inflation.

But don’t hold your breath for any admission that they were wrong in the past. They will instantly switch to the former party line the minute the Trump immigration restrictions fade into history.
econotariat  borjas  economics  labor  realness  homo-hetero  crooked  wonkish  commentary  media  propaganda  cost-benefit  compensation  latin-america  critique  vampire-squid  hypocrisy  clown-world 
june 2017 by nhaliday
U.S.-Born Economists Also Compete With Immigrants | Moody's Analytics Economy.com
Economists tend to be pretty optimistic about the positive effects of globalization, including being generally pro immigration and pro free trade. This sometimes leads to accusations of selfishness: Of course economists are pro trade and immigration; they don’t have to compete with foreign workers like low-skilled natives do. This always seemed a little strange to me since I work at a company with offices all over the world. A quick look at the data confirms my suspicion. Economists being sheltered from globalization couldn’t be farther from the truth.
econotariat  rhetoric  economics  labor  migration  competition  realness  paying-rent  nationalism-globalism  borjas  populism  hypocrisy  regularizer 
march 2017 by nhaliday
Give Us Your High Achievers | The American Conservative
That’s just not the way it happened. In 1965—just a year after banning employment discrimination —Congress ended discrimination in immigration law as well. Race, religion, and national origin were no longer to be considered. Apparently the bill’s supporters genuinely didn’t expect this to change America’s ethnic makeup, but of course it did.

By 1990, lawmakers were so unconcerned about changing America’s makeup that they did it on purpose, setting up a “diversity” program that to this day hands out up to 50,000 visas every year—by random lottery—to people from countries that don’t send us many immigrants through the normal channels.

did not know that lol
news  org:mag  right-wing  douthatish  policy  migration  putnam-like  trends  asia  latin-america  diversity  rhetoric  race  education  borjas  labor  crime  human-capital  american-nations  clown-world  current-events  patho-altruism  criminology  assimilation  chart  zeitgeist  identity-politics 
march 2017 by nhaliday
The Cost of Welfare Use By Immigrant and Native Households | Center for Immigration Studies
- Jason Richwine

More recently, the Heritage Foundation's complete fiscal analysis (to which the author of this study contributed) estimated that the average legal immigrant household paid $4,344 less in taxes than it received in services in 2010, compared to a deficit of just $310 for the average native household.

...

For example, consider the reaction to the Heritage Foundation's estimate that illegal immigration and amnesty would generate a direct lifetime cost of $6.3 trillion. Supporters of amnesty quickly settled on a rebuttal point: Although illegal immigrants who receive amnesty may pay as a group $6.3 trillion less in taxes than they receive in benefits over their lifetimes, their labor boosts economic productivity so much that natives probably still end up in the black.12 That claim is, first of all, a tremendous exaggeration. Most of the gains from immigration go to immigrants themselves, not to natives.13 In a paper for CIS back in 2013, economist George Borjas estimated that illegal immigrants increased GDP by $395 billion to $472 billion. Of that amount, however, only about $9 billion went to natives.14 After extending that $9 billion annually over an adult lifetime of 50 years, productivity gains would add back just 7 percent of the $6.3 trillion fiscal cost.

Welfare Use by Immigrant and Native Households: An Analysis of Medicaid, Cash, Food, and Housing Programs: http://cis.org/sites/cis.org/files/camarota-welfare-final.pdf
- welfare = Medicaid/cash/food/housing
- 51% of all immigrant-headed households (legal or illegal) vs. 30% of native-headed
- >70% among Central-American-headed households
- higher for families w/ children

However, among the most educated households, those headed by a person with a bachelor’s degree or more, immigrant households are still much more likely to use all forms of welfare than native households. Therefore, other factors such as culture and the exchange of information provided by immigrant social networks also likely play a significant role in explaining immigrant “success” in accessing welfare programs.4
org:ngo  data  analysis  contrarianism  rhetoric  right-wing  migration  redistribution  money  debt  culture-war  westminster  borjas  latin-america  education  demographics  cost-benefit  government  policy  monetary-fiscal  clown-world  free-riding  putnam-like  current-events  temperance  patho-altruism  assimilation  chart  vampire-squid  welfare-state  multi  pdf  usa  white-paper  attaq  spearhead  wonkish 
march 2017 by nhaliday
A Family-Friendly Policy That’s Friendliest to Male Professors - The New York Times
Evidence of a Toxic Environment for Women in Economics: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/18/upshot/evidence-of-a-toxic-environment-for-women-in-economics.html
lmao, Borjas:
Some economists say they find the discourse on econjobrumors.com to be a breath of fresh air. George Borjas, an economics professor at Harvard, wrote on his blog last summer that he found the forum “refreshing.”

Professor Borjas said: “There’s still hope for mankind when many of the posts written by a bunch of over-educated young social scientists illustrate a throwing off of the shackles of political correctness and reflect mundane concerns that more normal human beings share: prestige, sex, money, landing a job, sex, professional misconduct, sex … ” In an email sent on Wednesday, after he received a copy of Ms. Wu’s paper, Professor Borjas said his views have not changed.
https://gborjas.org/2017/08/22/the-nyt-corrects-the-wolfers-post/
academia  career  gender  study  economics  labor  news  higher-ed  data  summary  org:rec  multi  borjas  econotariat  lmao  sex  identity-politics  westminster  forum  community  chan  internet  commentary  media  propaganda 
june 2016 by nhaliday

bundles : econpeeps

related tags

2016-election  academia  aging  albion  american-nations  analysis  anglo  anglosphere  announcement  article  asia  assimilation  attaq  being-right  blog  books  borjas  c:**  canada  career  chan  chart  clarity  class  cliometrics  clown-world  cold-war  commentary  communism  community  comparison  compensation  competition  contrarianism  correlation  cost-benefit  cracker-econ  crime  criminology  critique  crooked  culture-war  current-events  data  debate  debt  demographics  discussion  diversity  douthatish  dysgenics  econ-productivity  econometrics  economics  econotariat  education  egalitarianism-hierarchy  essay  ethics  europe  explanation  externalities  fertility  forum  free-riding  gender  giants  gnon  gnxp  government  grad-school  higher-ed  history  hmm  homepage  homo-hetero  hsu  human-capital  hypocrisy  identity-politics  incentives  inequality  info-dynamics  innovation  institutions  interdisciplinary  internet  intervention  intricacy  isteveish  journos-pundits  labor  latin-america  law  left-wing  links  list  lmao  lol  macro  madisonian  malaise  management  managerial-state  marginal-rev  math  mathtariat  media  meta:math  meta:science  migration  monetary-fiscal  money  mostly-modern  multi  nascent-state  nationalism-globalism  natural-experiment  neocons  news  nibble  nl-and-so-can-you  noahpinion  nordic  null-result  org:biz  org:bleg  org:bv  org:data  org:foreign  org:lite  org:mag  org:ngo  org:rec  organizing  paleocon  patho-altruism  paying-rent  pdf  poast  policy  polisci  political-econ  politics  population  populism  prof  profile  propaganda  publishing  putnam-like  race  ranking  rant  realness  redistribution  regularizer  review  rhetoric  right-wing  russia  science  scitariat  selection  sex  social  society  spearhead  stories  stream  study  stylized-facts  success  sulla  summary  temperance  the-bones  thurston  track-record  tradeoffs  trends  trump  twitter  unaffiliated  uncertainty  unintended-consequences  usa  vampire-squid  video  visualization  welfare-state  westminster  white-paper  winner-take-all  wonkish  zeitgeist  🎓  🎩 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: