jm + rkt   3

Docker is the dangerous gamble which we will regret : devops
The article this Reddit thread links to is garbage clickbait, but the responses are insightful and much better
reddit  ops  containerization  docker  contrarians  rkt 
may 2018 by jm
Anatomy of a Modern Production Stack
Interesting post, but I think it falls into a common trap for the xoogler or ex-Amazonian -- assuming that all the BigCo mod cons are required to operate, when some are luxuries than can be skipped for a few years to get some real products built
architecture  ops  stack  docker  containerization  deployment  containers  rkt  coreos  prod  monitoring  xooglers 
september 2015 by jm
Red Hat on rkt vs Docker
This is like watching a train-wreck in slow motion on Groundhog Day. We, in the broader Linux and open source community, have been down this path multiple times over the past fifteen years, specifically with package formats. While there needs to be room for experimentation, having two incompatible specs driven by two startups trying to differentiate and in direct competition is *not* a good thing. It would be better for the community and for everyone who depends on our collective efforts if CoreOS and Docker collaborated on a standardized common spec, image format, and distribution protocol. To this end, we at Red Hat will continue to contribute to both initiatives with the goal of driving convergence.
rkt  docker  appc  coreos  red-hat  dpkg  rpm  linux  packaging  collaboration  open-source 
may 2015 by jm

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: