jm + paul-vixie   1

Paul Vixie's answer to "was DNS intentionally designed to be insecure?"

no. nor ip itself, or ncp which preceded it, or tcp, or udp, or icmp, or smtp,
ot http. it was insecure because it evolved in a safe, germ free academic
bubble. absolutely none of it was designed with billions of people in mind, or
the full cross section of humanity which would include criminals and national
intelligence services. the world of the internet in 2019 would have been seen
as a total freak show by the community who deployed dns in the 1980's.

nothing that can be abused won't be. you may or may not believe this; it's
considered controversial, and there are arguments being had about it today.

but noone considered that now-controversial near-truism at all when the core
internet protocols were first designed and implemented. the idea of abuse was
considered novel in the 1990's when commercialization and privatization
brought abuse into the internet world and burst the academic bubble. a lot of
old timers blamed AOL and MSN and even Usenet for the problems, but in
actuality, it's what humans _always_ do at scale. putting the full spectrum of
human culture atop a technology platform designed for academic and
professional culture should have been understood to be a recipe for disaster.
ietf  computers  abuse  internet  security  dns  paul-vixie  history  scale  culture 
5 weeks ago by jm

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: