The Thriving World, the Wilting World, and You – Anand Giridharadas – Medium
Our deliberations about what to do about this extreme winning and losing are sponsored by the extreme winners. This community was formed by stalwarts of American capitalism; today we sit in spaces named after Pepsi (as in the beverage) and Koch (as in the brothers); our discussion of Martin Luther King and Omelas is sponsored by folks like Accenture, David Rubenstein and someone named Pom; we are deeply enmeshed and invested in the establishment and systems we are supposed to question. And yet we are a community of leaders that claims to seek justice. These identities are tricky to reconcile.
10 hours ago
Gospels of Giving for the New Gilded Age | The New Yorker
Anand Giridharadas is a journalist who, in 2011, was named a Henry Crown Fellow of the Aspen Institute. The institute is financed by, among other groups, the Carnegie Corporation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Gates Foundation. The fellowship, according to its Web site, aims to “develop the next generation of community-spirited leaders” by engaging them “in a thought-provoking journey of personal exploration.”

Giridharadas at first found the fellowship to be a pretty sweet deal; it offered free trips to the Rockies and led to invitations from the sorts of people who own Western-themed mansions and fly private jets. After a while, though, he started to feel that something was rotten in the state of Colorado. In 2015, when he was asked to deliver a speech to his fellow-fellows, he used it to condemn what he called “the Aspen Consensus.”

“The Aspen Consensus, in a nutshell, is this,” he said. “The winners of our age must be challenged to do more good. But never, ever tell them to do less harm.” The speech made the Times; people began asking for copies of it; and Giridharadas decided to expand on it. The result is “Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World.” “I hadn’t planned to write a book on this topic, but the topic chose me,” he writes.
10 hours ago
Look at Me! - Columbia Journalism Review
As a rule of thumb (and with some notable exceptions), the profit margins you could achieve selling a good or service were directly correlated to the total idiocy and/or moral bankruptcy of the demand you drummed up for it.
media  criticism 
How to add site to IPFS and IPNS – Coinmonks – Medium
IPFS allows to place p2p content inside web applications and simple web pages. Also you can hosting whole static site in peer to peer(p2p) IPFS network. So other people, who owns IPFS nodes can share your site and be a peer of your content and distribute HTML, CSS, JS and Images from their nodes. After that — if you node stops, the site will live, while someone with an IPFS node will keep a site on his node.
13 days ago
The Price of Privacy: What’s Wrong with the New Shadow Giving System | HistPhil
How much dark philanthropic money are we talking about? It’s hard to say, exactly, given the laxity of disclosure rules and donors who keep finding new ways to operate with less transparency.

Yet the biggest story here is the stunning rise of donor-advised funds. DAFs must reveal where their grants go, but they don’t have to say which of their clients provided those gifts and few DAFs reveal such information voluntarily. Just 10 years ago, DAFs moved a total of around $7 billion in grants. In 2016, they moved more than twice that amount. Of the top 10 grantmakers in the U.S. today, more than half are DAFs—all moving money in ways that don’t reveal their donors. Earlier this year, even close observers of the DAF world were surprised to learn that a DAF managed by Goldman Sachs had quietly become among the largest such entities in the U.S., thanks to big infusions of wealth by billionaires that include Steve Ballmer and Laurene Powell Jobs. All this represents a dramatic shift from an earlier era of philanthropy in which top donors created private foundations that operated with relative transparency.
14 days ago
Noam Chomsky on Fascism, Showmanship and Democrats' Hypocrisy in the Trump Era
Some ideas are not even rejected; they are unthinkable. Like the idea that US aggression is aggression; it can only be “a mistake,” “a tragic error,” “a strategic blunder.”
consensus  politics  nuclear 
8 weeks ago
BBC - Future - How an abandoned lab could show us the future
The Amani Hill Research Station in Tanzania was once one of East Africa’s leading laboratories – now it is a shadow of its past glory. Rachel Nuwer visited to find out what happened, and discovered lessons about the fragility of scientific progress that the whole world should consider.
responsible_innovation  development 
12 weeks ago
Design Thinking Is a Boondoggle - The Chronicle of Higher Education
Do you know what design thinking is? 

Your answer to that question will depend largely on where you sit. Design thinking is often centrally associated with the fabled design and consulting firm IDEO, most famous for crafting Apple’s first mouse and the look of the Palm V personal digital assistant. But in recent years, it is Stanford University’s design school (or "d.school" — their asinine punctuation, not mine) that has become most associated with design thinking. IDEO will charge you $399 for a self-paced, video-based design-thinking course, "Insights for Innovation." Stanford will charge you $12,600 for a four-day "Design Thinking Bootcamp" called, likewise, "From Insights to Innovation." Clearly, there’s money to be made from design thinking.

If you’re confused, you’re not alone. Confusion is a common reaction to a "movement" that’s little more than floating balloons of jargon. If design thinking (for short, let’s call it the DTs) merely involved bilking some deluded would-be entrepreneurs, well — no harm no foul. The problem is that faddists and cult-followers are pushing the DTs as a reform for all of higher education. In th
design_thinking  consulting 
12 weeks ago
GrantCraft Roles at Work
Grantmakers manage a lot of expectations about their work. We've talked with hundreds of grantmakers about what their foundations and grantees expect of them to get their work done - and what they expect of themselves.  Our card deck, a tool we've named Roles@work, collects the 29 roles grantmakers mentioned most often.
12 weeks ago
swisspeace: About us
swisspeace is a practice-oriented peace research institute. It analyses violent conflicts and develops strategies for their peaceful transformation. swisspeace aims to contribute to the improvement of conflict prevention and conflict transformation by producing innovative research, shaping discourses on international peace policy, developing and applying new peacebuilding tools and methodologies, supporting and advising other peace actors, as well as by providing and facilitating spaces for analysis, discussion, critical reflection and learning.
12 weeks ago
EFF and Coalition Partners Push Tech Companies To Be More Transparent and Accountable About Censoring User Content | Electronic Frontier Foundation
Groups Release Specific Guidelines Addressing Shoddy, Opaque Private Censorship

(as opposed to high qualify, transparent censorship")
removals  exclusions  takedowns  archives  censorship 
may 2018
After 5 years and $3M, here's everything we've learned from building Ghost
There are seemingly no good nonprofit funding options for journalism/tech
One big surprise in the last 5 years has been discovering that there are really no good funding options for journalism/tech. We've bootstrapped from day 1 and always planned to be totally self-sufficient. But initially we did think that there might be grant funding or support that we might be able to benefit from. It turns out: No. Absolutely none.

I thought between the Knight Foundation and the Mozilla Foundation and the Ford Foundation and the Google News Initiatives — there might be a path to getting a lil' help. However, they all seem to be limited to helping only projects in their own countries (mostly the US) and selecting who is awarded grants appears to be often more about who you know, than what you do.

I'm still curious about this. Are we missing something?
philanthropy  tech 
may 2018
A Grant Maker’s View: Money Doesn’t Make Us More Powerful — or Smarter - The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Among our bad habits, we:

Trash talk other foundations and bad-mouth nonprofits.
Give advice without understanding context and don’t seek advice from nonprofits.
Don’t trust nonprofits to spend the money where they see it’s most needed.
Fail to make clear what we do or don’t fund and rarely fund for more than one year at a time.
Operate on longer decision cycles than it takes to conceive and give birth to a baby.
Ask for extensive individualized information and evaluation for small amounts of money.
Allow personal interests to drive foundation strategies and set grant priorities without getting feedback from nonprofits and the people they serve.
Punish nonprofits for accumulating too much money in their reserves.
Act like we are superior to nonprofits.
Exclude nonprofits from foundation gatherings because we don’t want them to pitch us.
Everyone in foundations does these things, and most of the time we don’t even realize we are doing them. So why do we act this way when we’re aiming for the same change as the nonprofits we support? One of the biggest reasons is money, and particularly the perceived ownership of money.
may 2018
Fidelity’s donor-advised fund is shaking up charitable giving.
Fidelity makes money by encouraging people to donate money to Fidelity Charitable. And the data suggest that DAFs are not aiming to mimic established foundations, either in longevity or cost structure. DAFs, in fact, generally give that money away pretty quickly: 38 percent of the original dollars donated are gone within a year, and 74 percent is doled out within five years.
may 2018
Global Philanthropy Environment Index: Global Philanthropy Indices: Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
The 2018 Global Philanthropy Environment Index is the world’s largest and most comprehensive effort to document the state of global philanthropy and the factors that enhance or inhibit its success. The index was previously the product of the renowned Hudson Institute, under the title The Index of Philanthropic Freedom.
may 2018
::.Václav Havel.::
this world of truth, however uncomfortable to live in, offers at the same time definite advantages: finding himself outside the universe of real power and traditional practical politics, that is, outside the matrix of utility, tactics, success, compromise, and the inevitable manipulations of half truths and deceptions, the dissident can be himself and can even make fun of himself without danger of becoming ridiculous to everyone.
peace  havel  politics  propaganda 
april 2018
Against metrics: how measuring performance by numbers backfires | Aeon Ideas
to what extent the culture of metrics – with its costs in employee time, morale and initiative, and its promotion of short-termism – has itself contributed to economic stagnation?
april 2018
The Key to Everything | by Freeman Dyson | The New York Review of Books
The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies.
complexity  books 
april 2018
An Apology for the Internet — From the People Who Built It
Even those who designed our digital world are aghast at what they created. A breakdown of what went wrong — from the architects who built it.
april 2018
Alliance for Financial Inclusion - Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Purpose: to support The Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI) scale their activities and create a sustainable, member-owned institution which supports smart financial inclusion policy solutions
Amount: $28,325,947
april 2018
To Bartolomeo Romano | Georgetown University Library
Occupy yourself in beholding and bewailing your own imperfections rather than contemplating the imperfections of others.
april 2018
Private Philanthropy for Development - en - OECD

The total volume of philanthropic funding for development was USD 24 billion in 2013-2015. 
Globally, philanthropy is the 3rd provider of health funding in developing countries.
Health, by far, is the sector that benefits the most from philanthropy. 
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation alone accounts for half of all philanthropic giving to developing countries. 
Most philanthrophic funds come from the United States. 
Africa is the region that benefits most from philanthropy.
Foundations working for development ’’play it safe”: 86% of foundations’ grants are for no longer than five years.
philanthropy  development 
april 2018
Private philanthropy funding for development modest compared to public aid, but its potential impact is high, says OECD - OECD
Though philanthropic flows are relatively modest compared to official development assistance (ODA), their contribution is substantial in certain sectors, according to a new OECD report. For the first time, Private Philanthropy for Development uses global, comparable data to analyse how private foundations are supporting development.

The report is based on a survey conducted by the OECD, in collaboration with the Global Network of Foundations Working for Development (netFWD) and applies OECD-DAC statistical reporting standards. The data is thus fully comparable to ODA flows.
philanthropy  development 
april 2018
Liminal Leadership – Kosmos Journal
I was sent an entry for a contest to win a prize of several million dollars awarded to the person that provided the winning project for developing social collaboration. The irony was too much. Competing for ideas on collaboration is a perfect illustration of why so much change-making today is riddled with toxic fumes of the last century’s hero-envy. The rush-for-the-gold and step-over-the-next-guy approach is the thinking that got us into this mess. Surely, it won’t get us out. This sort of contest will divide people who could be working together. They will need to keep secrets about their work, lest their ideas be stolen; they will claim credit instead of giving it. The hunger for the keynote gig, the best seller, the viral meme about how to save the world is better suited for Wall Street than for change-makers. Watch out. The future lies in the capacity to understand and respond to interdependency. When you see collaboration with a promise of fame or awards, you are seeing lingering ideologies of capitalism.
philanthropy  competitions  prizes  challenges  networks 
april 2018
OECD Centre on Philanthropy - Data and analysis on global philanthropy for development
The OECD Centre on Philanthropy will contribute to the global demand for more and better data and analysis on global philanthropy for development. It will seek to bring together relevant efforts from existing research centres and projects, expand the OECD database, and provide research and analysis on global trends and impact of philanthropy for development in the context of the 2030 Agenda.
philanthropy  development 
april 2018
Stewardship in the "Age of Algorithms" | Lynch | First Monday
This paper explores pragmatic approaches that might be employed to document the behavior of large, complex socio-technical systems (often today shorthanded as “algorithms”) that centrally involve some mixture of personalization, opaque rules, and machine learning components. Thinking rooted in traditional archival methodology — focusing on the preservation of physical and digital objects, and perhaps the accompanying preservation of their environments to permit subsequent interpretation or performance of the objects — has been a total failure for many reasons, and we must address this problem. The approaches presented here are clearly imperfect, unproven, labor-intensive, and sensitive to the often hidden factors that the target systems use for decision-making (including personalization of results, where relevant); but they are a place to begin, and their limitations are at least outlined. Numerous research questions must be explored before we can fully understand the strengths and limitations of what is proposed here. But it represents a way forward. This is essentially the first paper I am aware of which tries to effectively make progress on the stewardship challenges facing our society in the so-called “Age of Algorithms;” the paper concludes with some discussion of the failure to address these challenges t
archives  AI 
april 2018
'The Oligarchs Valley' by Yasha Levine and the parallels in India
What made the saga intriguing was the insistence of the World Bank and its interference to ensure that Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) got selected as the consultant to the project. Thousands of pages made available as a result of RTI (Right to Information) queries filed by activists, it emerged that despite PwC failing to make the cut in the technical and financial rounds, the World Bank insisted on changes to the evaluation criteria, that the marks were given by one particular member of the evaluation committee be excluded from the final evaluation so as to favour PwC, and so on.

What most people were unwilling to put on record was that PwC had on its payrolls the son of a powerful person in the government of India and who had long-standing ties to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
april 2018
Bernard Lietaer
Biography | Currency Solutions for a Wiser World
money  economics 
march 2018
About - P2P Foundation
The P2P Foundation was conceived to help people, organizations and governments transition towards commons-based approaches to society through co-creating an open knowledge commons and a resilient, sustainable human network.

Between the paradigms of the network and the organization, the P2P Foundation exists as an ‘organized network’ which can facilitate the creation of networks, yet without directing them. Our primary aim is to be an incubator and catalyst for the emerging ecosystem, focusing on the ‘missing pieces’, and the interconnectedness that can lead to a wider movement.
p2p  commons 
march 2018
Requiem for a dream…of an online impact investing platform
As the impact investing community processes the shuttering of ImpactUS, it’s time to acknowledge a painful reality: when it comes to building the definitive impact investment platform, we’ve dug too many graves.
platforms  markets  exchanges 
march 2018
Global Solvers Co-Lab: 489 UN-limited
the Global Solvers Co-Lab: 489 UN-limited will take place from 22 – 27 September 2018 in Aubervilliers, France.
march 2018
Why Diversity Programs Fail
It shouldn’t be surprising that most diversity programs aren’t increasing diversity. Despite a few new bells and whistles, courtesy of big data, companies are basically doubling down on the same approaches they’ve used since the 1960s—which often make things worse, not better. Firms have long relied on diversity training to reduce bias on the job, hiring tests and performance ratings to limit it in recruitment and promotions, and grievance systems to give employees a way to challenge managers. Those tools are designed to preempt lawsuits by policing managers’ thoughts and actions.
march 2018
The What Went Wrong? Foundation : Peter DiCampo
Examples of failed development projects, mostly foundations in sub-Saharan Africa.
failure  development 
march 2018
Feedbin (1,000+)
What Went Wrong? is a citizen journalism project started in sub-Saharan Africa to document all the unsustainable aid projects started by Westerners who fail to follow through after their PR blitz. Journalist Peter DeCampo spoke with BRIGHT magazine about the project, where Africans can text reports on local fiascoes and boondoggles:
march 2018
Design Freedom
Stafford Beer's Massey Lectures.
stafford_beer  complexity  systems  futures 
march 2018
Hired: Six Months Undercover in Low-Wage Britain – review | Books | The Guardian
Silicon Valley’s success in prompting us to talk of “the gig economy” instead suggests that exploited men and women are the equivalent of rock stars, nipping into a club for a surprise session one night and heading off to Glastonbury the next. Far from being beaten down by lives of grinding insecurity, workers are freewheeling bohemians liberated from the routines that tied down their boring parents.
march 2018
Design Thinking Study: Parts Without A Whole? | This is Design Thinking!
In October 2015 we published our report “Parts Without a Whole? – The Current State of Design Thinking Practice in Organizations”, which inspired us to develop this website. The exploratory study looked at the many forms of design thinking adoption in organizations. You can download it below.
design_thinking  futures 
march 2018
Making Knowledge Available | Public Seminar
A few weeks ago, shortly after reading that Elsevier, the world’s largest academic publisher, had made over €1 billion in profit in 2017, I received notice of a new journal issue on decolonization and media.* “Decolonization” denotes the dismantling of imperialism, the overturning of systems of domination, and the founding of new political orders. Recalling Achille Mbembe’s exhortation that we seek to decolonize our knowledge production practices and institutions, I looked forward to exploring this new collection of liberated learning online – amidst that borderless ethereal terrain where information just wants to be free. (…Not really.)

Instead, I encountered a gate whose keeper sought to extract a hefty toll: $42 to rent a single article for the day, or $153 to borrow it for the month. The keeper of that particular gate, mega-publisher Taylor & Francis, like the keepers of many other epistemic gates, has found toll-collecting to be quite a profitable business. Some of the largest academic publishers have, in recent years, achieved profit margins of nearly 40%, higher than those of Apple and Google.
march 2018
Stafford Beer Collection | Liverpool John Moores University
The Stafford Beer Collection consists of the personal library of Professor Stafford Beer, the founder of Management Cybernetics, who was appointed Honorary Professor of Organisational Transformation at LJMU in 1989.
PersonalArchiving  Stafford_Beer  complexity 
march 2018
Culpabliss Error.PDF
Some forty years ago, the management of the largest departmental store in London's Oxford Street had a tremendous idea. If we divide the profit of each department by the floor area, we can determine the optimal use of floor space, they said. All we need to do is to copy the practice of the department that generates the most profit per square foot. So they did the exercise; and the most profitable area per square foot turned out to be the suite of rest rooms, with its coin-in- the-slot cubicles. For some reason, however, Selfridges was not turned into a gigantic public convenience.

I published that story in my second book, Decision and Control (Beer, 1966), exactly thirty years ago (describing it even then as “well known”) - and the book has remained in print ever since. Alas, the lesson of that story, and dozens of others like it, has not been learned to this day. Perhaps people file it away as a funny story. But it is actually an archetype of the reductive technique in action. This is the approach that expects to understand wholes, which are integral systems, by breaking them down into smaller and smaller parts. We need to remember that the basic technique of Western thinking, and of the whole body of science itself, is reductive - or to use a term more readily understood to be pejorative, it is reductionist.

I need a pejorative word; because the technique of thinking we use, despite its spectacular successes, is also responsible for the appalling mess in which we find ourselves on every side. The technique is not systemic. Indeed, it is anti-systemic. The world however is very much systemic....
futures  systems  stafford_beer  evaluation  assessment  complexity 
march 2018
Impact of Social Sciences – It’s the Neoliberalism, Stupid: Why instrumentalist arguments for Open Access, Open Data, and Open Science are not enough.
Metrics, even better Alt-metrics, won’t make researchers or research more creative and innovative. The crux of the problem centers A Hunger Games-style “winner take all” dynamic that pervades commerce and in the Academy. A rapidly shrinking minority has any hope of gaining job security or the time and resources needed for autonomous research. In an employment environment where one slip means complete ejection from the academy, risk-taking becomes quasi-suicidal. With employment increasingly precarious, professional pressures balloon in ways that make risk taking and going outside of established norms unthinkable. Adding more or better metrics without addressing the underlying job security issues just adds to the ways people will be ejected from the research community.
metrics  open_data  open_access  risk 
march 2018
It's simple. If we can't change our economic system, our number's up | George Monbiot | Opinion | The Guardian
The trajectory of compound growth shows that the scouring of the planet has only just begun. As the volume of the global economy expands, everywhere that contains something concentrated, unusual, precious, will be sought out and exploited, its resources extracted and dispersed, the world's diverse and differentiated marvels reduced to the same grey stubble.

Some people try to solve the impossible equation with the myth of dematerialisation: the claim that as processes become more efficient and gadgets are miniaturised, we use, in aggregate, fewer materials. There is no sign that this is happening. Iron ore production has risen 180% in 10 years. The trade body Forest Industries tells us that "global paper consumption is at a record high level and it will continue to grow". If, in the digital age, we won't reduce even our consumption of paper, what hope is there for other commodities?
sustainability  futures 
march 2018
Left and Right Agree that Russiagate is Hogwash, So Why Does It Live On? – Tablet Magazine
Buy into a storyline that turns FBI and CIA bureaucrats and their hand-puppets in the press into heroes while legitimizing the use of a vast surveillance apparatus for partisan purposes, and you’re in. Dissent, and you’re out, or worse—you’re defending Trump.
march 2018
When Nerds Collide – Meredith L. Patterson – Medium
Treat censorship as damage and route around it. That’s censorship in the colloquial usage, so leave the “but we’re not the government” rhetoric at the door, please. National governments are one threat model; workplace governance is a different threat model; hackers are interested in self-government. Hackers’ gut response to any kind of speech policing — amplify the speech, as loudly and in as many places as possible — is, in its best-known form, what gives rise to the Streisand Effect, and is also why we react so stridently when ordered to constrain our speech habits Or Else. This sort of amplification is attractive to power-seekers, and the amplification of opposing ideas is anathema to them. Fortunately for power-seekers, the Internet offers up a pool of potential pitchfork mob participants just as readily as it delivers the gullible to 419 scammers. This alarms us, and if you’ve ever had to keep your own controversial beliefs quiet for fear of being dogpiled, you should understand why.
culture  FoE 
march 2018
The CIA Democrats
One quarter of all the Democratic challengers in competitive House districts have military-intelligence, State Department or NSC backgrounds. This is by far the largest subcategory of Democratic candidates. National security operatives (56) outnumber state and local government officials (45), lawyers (34), corporate executives, businessmen and wealthy individuals (30) and other professionals (18) among the candidates for Democratic congressional nominations.
power  politics 
march 2018
Six Ways the 'Resistance' Gave Trump a Dictator’s Toolkit
Just to sum up, the Democrats have helped, voted for, and often argued in favor of all of the following:

Giving Trump unlimited war powers.
Giving Trump unlimited trade negotiation powers.
Giving Trump unlimited surveillance powers.
Giving Trump the power to lock someone up indefinitely without a trial or charges under the National Defense Authorization Act.
Giving Trump the power to assassinate American citizens without a trial or charges.
Giving Trump’s administration full control of our election system infrastructure.
blowback  politics  power 
march 2018
Censorship, with EU procedures
Any interference by intermediaries with the free and open flow of information
and ideas, be it by automated means or not, should be based on clear and
transparent policies and must be limited to specific legitimate purposes, such as
to restrict access to illegal content, as determined either by law or by a judicial
authority or other independent administrative authority whose decisions are
subject to judicial review, or in accordance with their own content restriction
policies or codes of ethics, which may include flagging mechanisms.
censorship  FoE  illegalcontent 
march 2018
The Giving Journey
Interested analysis of steps in becoming a donor.
march 2018
NSA Used Porn to “Break Down Detainees” in Iraq — and Other Revelations From 297 Snowden Documents
in 2008, Skype “began its own secret program, Project Chess, to explore the legal and technical issues in making Skype calls readily available to intelligence agencies and law enforcement officials.”
march 2018
America doesn’t need Russia to ruin democracy. It can do it itself. - The Washington Post
Still, let’s be honest: The elimination of Russian influence from U.S. cyberspace would not prevent another Pizzagate. A shutdown of Russian bots will still leave swarms of American bots free to deceive American voters. By its very nature, social media makes disinformation campaigns possible on a larger scale than ever before: Its algorithms encourage deep polarization, and its promise of anonymity opens the door to fraud. By its very nature, American society seems to be susceptible to these campaigns, too. Mueller’s indictment shouldn’t end our investigation into this problem. We should consider it just the beginning.
february 2018
An Insider’s Take on Assessment: It May Be Worse Than You Thought - The Chronicle of Higher Education
"The whole assessment process would fall apart if we had to test for reliability and validity and carefully model interactions before making conclusions about cause and effect."

Because it’s fairly obvious that assessment has not caused (and probably will not cause) positive changes in student learning, and because it’s clear that this has been an open secret for a while, one wonders why academic administrators have been so acquiescent about assessment for so long.

Here’s why: It’s no accident that the rise of learning-outcomes assessment has coincided with a significant expansion in the use of adjunct faculty, the growth of dual enrollment, and the spread of online education. Each of these allows administrators to deliver educational product to their customers with little or no involvement from the traditional faculty. If they are challenged on the quality of these programs, they can always point out that assessment results indicate that the customers are learning just as much as the students in traditional courses.
evaluation  assessment  education  learning 
february 2018
« earlier      
100 100c 100change 3d abuse academia accounting advice affective_computing africa aging agnotology ai anthropocene anthropology antibiotics anticipatory_governance architecture archive archives art arts assessment atemporality autonomy badges basic_income behavior_change berkeley bestof bigbets bigdata biohacking birds bitcoin blowback books brexit bureaucracy burning_man c&a campaign_finance capitalism cars catalogs censorship challenges changing_minds chicago cities citizen_science climate cognitive_diversity commons competitions complexity conflict consensus conservation consulting content contrarians copyright corruption creativity cri crime criticism crowdfunding crowdsourcing cryptography csr culture currencies cve cybernetics cybersecurity darknets dashboards data death decentralization declassification dei democracy demographics depleted_uranium design design_thinking development digital_humanities digitization discovery dml documentaries donation_pages doris_lessing drones drought drugs dystopia ecd economics education elections elections_administration enhancement environment ethics ethnography eu eutopia evaluation events evidence_action exchanges exclusions extinction extremism fabs facebook facial_recognition failure family_offices fear fellows film filter_bubble finance financial_inclusion firstperson flu foe food forecast fow fraud freedom fuller funding future futures games gardens gender genetics genomics geoengineering ghosttowns global_observatories gmo goodnews google governance government graeber grand_challenges grantees grantmaking grants graphs green greenwald hackathons halal_internet harvard havel health heresy housing hr humanrights hype ice_clowns ideas illegalcontent imf impact_investing implementation income_inequality india infants infrastructure innovation intelligent_systems interdisciplinary intergenerational_equity internet internships investing_in_people iot ip iran irb islam iyi jarg jargon journalism justice k km kosovo labor labs law lead learning libraries life lifelogging lists macarthur machine_learning maintainers malefactors management maps marketplaces markets mass_incarceration maternal_health media medical_devices medicine memory metaphor metrics micronutrients migration millenium_development_goals mindfulness mobile money muni_broadband museums nda net_policy networks new_ideas news nuclear oa obesity oceans oer open open_access open_data opsec optimism organizations p2p pakistan paleofuture pandemics panels panic partnerships pbs pda peace peer_review peerreview personal_data personalarchiving persons phi philanthropy plain_english platforms police policy politics power ppp pr predictions preservation press priorities prisons privacy privatization prizes prop propaganda psychology ptsd public-private publishing radiation_monitoring rants readlater recording reflections regional_economic_development religion remorse removals replication reproducibility reproductive_health resp responsible_innovation responsible_investing retractions retrotech risk risks robotlaw robots russia sachs scaling scenarios sci-hub science scientism sdg secrecy security self-regulation sensors serbia shariasource sib sins skepticism slavery snark snowden so social_science stafford_beer startups stats storytelling strange_bedfellows strategies surveillance sustainability syria systems takedown takedowns talent tbi teams tech technology&society ted television_archiving terrorism things_to_come think_tanks tools torture transparency truck_art university urban_farms utopia vaccines values via:jubois video visualization voting vr war water wealth whistleblowing wikileaks wikipedia wireless wmd work workflow worldgame youth

Copy this bookmark: