wages   3609

« earlier    

"Let Me Tell You About The Very Rich. They Are Different From You And Me.” | Tax Policy Center
For the lowest 20 percent of households (those making $25,500 or less), labor income accounts for about half of all income and government transfers about one third. For nearly every other income group, 60 percent or more comes from wages, salaries, and employment-related benefits. This fraction declines and for the top 1 percent (those making $783,000 or more), their income is about equally split between capital and labor income. At the very top (the top 0.1 percent or those making $3.4 million or more), more than half of income comes from interest, dividends, and capital gains, while only one-quarter comes from wages and benefits.
Incomeinequality  wages  workrequirements 
3 days ago by brycecovert
Obama expanded overtime pay to 4 million workers. Now Trump is scaling that back.
With few exceptions, only workers who earn less than $23,000 a year can currently earn overtime pay under federal law. Overtime wages are defined as 50 percent extra hourly pay for employees who work more than 40 hours in a week.

In 2014, the Obama administration tried to double the threshold to include workers earning up to $47,000, tying future changes to the cost of living. The idea was that a dramatic expansion was needed because the government hasn’t raised the salary limit to keep up with inflation. For example, the $8,060 salary limit set in 1975 was the equivalent of about $50,440 in 2014 — far above the current $23,000 threshold. That means that over the years, more and more Americans have been working extra hours without getting paid for them, which is exactly what federal labor laws meant to prevent.

But Obama’s decision to double the limit created quite an uproar. In brief, here’s what followed: Powerful businesses groups freaked out. Then they joined 21 Republican-controlled states to sue the administration before the rule went into effect in 2016. The rule was put on hold during the legal dispute. A federal judge in Texas invalidated it in 2017, arguing that the Labor Department didn’t have the authority to make such a drastic change.

Companies were relieved, and workers were furious.

And instead of appealing the Texas court’s ruling, Trump’s labor secretary, Alexander Acosta, said he would create a watered-down version of Obama’s rule. Now the agency is only lifting the salary limit from $23,000 to $35,000 and scrapping the cost-of-living increases; that means about 2.8 million of the 4 million workers who expected to get overtime benefits won’t get them.

Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO labor federation, called the new rule “disgraceful.”

“[This] is part of a growing list of policies from the Trump administration aimed at undermining the economic stability of America’s working people,” he tweeted on Friday.

The public can comment on the rule proposal for 60 days before the Department of Labor sends a final version to the White House for review. If the White House approves the new rule, which is likely, it will be the Trump administration’s latest victory in its quest to undo Obama-era regulations meant to benefit workers.
barackobama  DonaldTrump  regulation  government  overtime  employment  legal  usa  salary  wages  economics  business  from instapaper
11 days ago by jtyost2
Die 8 ist keine 3 - Makroskop
Für den öffentlichen Dienst auf Länderebene hat ver.di, die deutsche Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft, nach langen Verhandlungen am Wochenende einen Abschluss über 8 Prozent Lohn- und Gehaltzuwachs verkündet. Der Pferdefuß ist, wie fast immer in den letzten Jahren, die sehr lange Laufzeit. Sage und schreibe für 33 Monate
Germany  wages  economics 
13 days ago by yorksranter
Analysis | The very good news buried in an otherwise mediocre jobs report
On its surface, the Department of Labor’s report on February employment may seem troubling. The country added only 20,000 jobs last month, well below what had been added in earlier months. Thanks in part to the devastation the recession wrought on employment a decade ago, we’ve taken to looking at jobs numbers as a barometer of the economy, meaning that a 20,000-job gain can look worrisome.

There is a point, though, at which the country will theoretically approach full employment — everyone who wants a job can get one. Our economy is based on supply and demand, as you likely learned in middle school, but that works for jobs, too. Because so many people are employed, the supply of workers is low, and employers are having trouble filling jobs. So employers will theoretically increase demand for the jobs they want to fill: by raising wages.
statistics  economics  economy  usa  inflation  wages  employment  2019  from instapaper
15 days ago by jtyost2
When Time Binds: Substitutes for Household Production, Returns to Working Long Hours, and the Skilled Gender Wage Gap | Journal of Labor Economics: Vol 37, No 2
"We provide evidence that constraints that prevent highly skilled women from working long hours hinder gender pay equality. We show that relaxing one such constraint by increasing the supply of substitutes for household production—proxied by intercity variation in predicted low-skilled immigration—increases the relative earnings of women in occupations that disproportionately reward overwork. Low-skilled immigration inflows induce young women to enter occupations with higher returns to overwork and shift women toward higher quantiles of the male wage distribution. The share of women in the top decile remains unaffected, suggesting that other barriers prevent women from reaching the very top."
JOLE  gender-gap  wages  human-capital  jessica.pan  patricia.cortes 
15 days ago by MarcK
UK employers run down clock on gender pay deadline  | Financial Times
Fewer than one in seven of the 10,000 eligible UK employers have submitted gender pay gap data to the government only a month before the deadline for reporting the figures.

Just 1,463 employers had reported by midday on Friday. Overall, their median pay gap stood at 11.1 per cent, slightly below last year’s figure of 11.8 per cent.
Among this group the average pay gap fell by just 0.1 percentage point but it is unclear if the drop can be attributed to the new disclosure rules.

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/f8cd5bf6-3c0b-11e9-b72b-2c7f526ca5d0

Despite the small decrease, 72 per cent of employers still paid men more than they paid women. Just over half narrowed their gap, while 37 per cent posted larger discrepancies than last year.
wages  gendergap 
19 days ago by brycecovert

« earlier    

related tags

$4/hour  2019  a  a:carla-herreria  a:peter-c-baker  activism  administration  after  ai  amazon  aoc  appeal  are  audio  austerity  automation  barackobama  benefits  bls  boycotts  brexit  buffalo  business  but  buybacks  capitalism  career  centralamerica  ceo  children  cities  civil_rights  clippings  compensation  competition  conditions  congress116  contractors  corbynjeremy  corporations  corruption  creativity  crowdfunding  culture  d:2018.04.13  d:2019.01.30  dc:creator=masonpaul  dc:creator=phillipsonbridget  dctagged  debt  demand  democrats  demographics  deportation  disability  discrimination  dividends  donaldtrump  drive-in  driving  dwyl  earnings  economics-automation  economics  economy  education  eeoc  election2016  employer  employers  employment  england  eu  executive  executives  exploitation  fastfood  fed  finance  financial  for  foreignaffairs  france  freedomofmovement  freetime  frugality  ft  gap  gender-gap  gender  gendergap  germany  getrichslowly  globalization  google  government  greed  growth  h&s  health  healthcare  hes  hours  housing  human-capital  human_capital  identity  illinois  immigration  in  income  incomeinequality  inequality  inflation  informationtechnology  institutions  interestrates  internationalism  into  ireland  is  isn't  iwgb  jacobs  jessica.pan  job  jobs  jole  keynes  krugman  labor+rights  labor  labor_economics  labour  labourparty  lagging  language  law  laws  leave  lebron-james  legal  libertiesrights  living  losangeles  lost  macroeconomics  manufacturing  martintim  marx  maytheresa  media  mexico  migrants  migration  millennials  minimum_wage  minimumwage  money  monopoly  monopsony  motherhood  mustread  nation-state  naturaldisasters  negotiation  new  new_jersey  new_world  news  no.fucking.shit  north-east  nostalgia  not  npr  nyc  nz  occupations  ohio  organize  overtime  overwork  p:huffpost★  p:the-guardian★★  paper  passion  patreon  patricia.cortes  patronage  pay  paychecks  phoenix  platforms  politics  post-capitalism  post-scarcity  post-work  postcapitalism  poverty  precarity  president  productivity  profits  propaganda  protectionism  protests  public.policy  publicsector  quit  race  racism  recession09  reduced  referendum  reform  regulation  religion  report  reportedly  republicans  revenue  rifkinjeremy  rights  rising  roaring  robotics  safety  saftey  salaries  salary  salarynegotiation  salarysecrecy  sanctions  scarcity  shareholders  shift  shows  shutdown  skills  slowing  socialmedia  sonic  sovereignty  spending  sports  staff  startup  statistics  steady  stocks  strike  strikes  students  subsidies  sunderland  supermarket  supply  supply_and_demand  tariff  tax  taxes  teachers  tech  technology  that  the  to  toryparty  trade  tradeunions  truck  trump  trust  u.s.  uber  uk  union  unionization  unions  unite  united_states  university  urbanism  us  usa  utilities  value  venezuela  vision  w:500  w:6000  wage  wage_growth  welfare  were  wetherspoons  work  workers.rights  workers  working.poor  workingclass  workrequirements  xenophobia   

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: