values   4523

« earlier    

can art help heal?
about museums in "red states" reaching out to audiences
institutions  community  outreach  engagement  values  principles  ideology 
8 days ago by droitcour
“When You Get That Wealthy, You Start to Buy Your Own Bullshit”: The Miseducation of Sheryl Sandberg | Vanity Fair
"Harvard Business School invented the “leadership” industry—and produced a generation of corporate monsters. No wonder Sandberg, one of the school’s most prominent graduates, lacks a functioning moral compass."

"The truth is, Harvard Business School, like much of the M.B.A. universe in which Sandberg was reared, has always cared less about moral leadership than career advancement and financial performance. The roots of the problem can be found in the School’s vaunted “Case Method,” a discussion-based pedagogy that asks students to put themselves in the role of corporate Übermensch. At the start of each class, one unlucky soul is put in the hot seat, presented with a “what would you do” scenario, and then subjected to the ruthless interrogation of their peers. Graded on a curve, the intramural competition can be intense—M.B.A.s are super-competitive, after all.

Let’s be clear about this: in business, as in life, there isn’t always one correct answer. So the teaching of a decision-making philosophy that is deliberate and systematic, but still open-minded, is hardly controversial on its face. But to help students overcome the fear of sounding stupid and being remorselessly critiqued, they are reminded, in case after case—and with emphasis—that there are no right answers. And that has had the unfortunate effect of opening up a chasm of moral equivalence in too many of their graduates.

And yet, there are obviously many situations where some answers are more right than others. Especially when it comes to moral issues like privacy, around which both Sandberg and Facebook have a history of demonstrating poor judgment. While H.B.S. is correct in its assertion that it produces people who can make decisions, the fact of the matter is that they have never emphasized how to make the right ones.

Consider investment banker Bowen McCoy’s “The Parable of the Sadhu,” published in Harvard Business Review in 1977, and again 20 years later. It addressed what seemed, at least to the H.B.S. crowd, to be an ethical dilemma. McCoy was on a trip to the Himalayas when his expedition encountered a sadhu, or holy man, near death from hypothermia and exposure. Their compassion extended only to clothing the man and leaving him in the sun, before continuing on to the summit. One of McCoy’s group saw a “breakdown between the individual ethic and the group ethic,” and was gripped by guilt that the climbers had not made absolutely sure that the sadhu made it down the mountain alive. McCoy’s response: “Here we are . . . at the apex of one of the most powerful experiences of our lives. . . . What right does an almost naked pilgrim who chooses the wrong trail have to disrupt our lives?”

McCoy later felt guilt over the incident, but his parable nevertheless illustrated the extent to which aspiring managers might justify putting personal accomplishment ahead of collateral damage—including the life of a dying man. The fact that H.B.S. enthusiastically incorporated said parable into its curriculum says far more about the fundamental mindset of the school than almost anything else that has come out of it. The “dilemma” was perfectly in line with the thinking at H.B.S. that an inability to clearly delineate the right choice in business isn’t the fault of the chooser but rather a fundamental characteristic of business, itself.

Here’s a slightly more recent example: remember Jeff Skilling? Like Sandberg, he graduated from H.B.S. and went to work at McKinsey. And like Sandberg, he left McKinsey for a C-suite gig—in his case, Enron—that took him to the stratosphere. Again like Sandberg, he basked in adulation over his ability to deliver shareholder returns. Skilling had done so, of course, by turning Enron into one of the greatest frauds the world has ever seen.

One of Skilling’s H.B.S. classmates, John LeBoutillier, who went on to be a U.S. congressman, later recalled a case discussion in which the students were debating what the C.E.O. should do if he discovered that his company was producing a product that could be potentially fatal to consumers. “I’d keep making and selling the product,” he recalled Skilling saying. “My job as a businessman is to be a profit center and to maximize return to the shareholders. It’s the government’s job to step in if a product is dangerous.” Several students nodded in agreement, recalled LeBoutillier. “Neither Jeff nor the others seemed to care about the potential effects of their cavalier attitude. . . . At H.B.S. . . . you were then, and still are, considered soft or a wuss if you dwell on morality or scruples.”

Why do so many M.B.A.s struggle to make the ethical decisions that seem so clear to the rest of us? Is it right to employ a scummy P.R. firm to deflect attention from our failures? Is it O.K. if we bury questions about user privacy and consent under a mountain of legalese? Can we get away with repeatedly choosing profits over principles and then promising that we will do better in the future?

If you think this kind of thing isn’t still going on at Harvard Business School—or wasn’t going on when Sandberg graduated in 1995—I refer you to Michel Anteby, who joined the faculty 10 years later, in 2005. At first enthusiastic, Anteby was soon flummoxed by the complete absence of normative viewpoints in classroom discussion. “I grew up in France where there were very articulated norms,” he told the BBC in 2015. “Higher norms and lower norms. Basically, you have convictions of what was right or wrong, and when I tried to articulate this in the classroom, I encountered . . . silence on the part of students. Because they weren’t used to these value judgments in the classroom.”

Eight years after his arrival, Anteby published Manufacturing Morals: The Values of Silence in Business School Education. The book was not published by Harvard but the University of Chicago Press. Calling the case system an “unscripted journey” for students, it was one of the first times an insider had joined the chorus of outsiders who have long criticized the case method as one that glamorizes the C.E.O.-as-hero, as well as the overuse of martial terminology in business curricula. (The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Mark Zuckerberg currently considers Facebook “at war.”)

“H.B.S. studies everybody under the sun,” Anteby told me in early 2015. “There is no reason we should be off limits.” Alas, they were. Not long after his book was published, Anteby came to believe that H.B.S. would not grant him tenure, and left the school soon after. “He is an unbelievably productive and smart guy,” one of his supporters, the University of Michigan’s Jerry Davis, told me later that year. “And they fired him. Probably because H.B.S. wasn’t the right place to have a conversation about itself. It would be like being at Versailles in 1789, offering up leadership secrets of Louis XIV. The really unfortunate part is that he wasn’t as harsh as he should have been, because he was up for tenure.”

The absence of voices like Anteby’s are evident to this day, and an ongoing indictment of the culture that turned Facebook from a Harvard sophomore’s dorm-room project into what passes for a Harvard Business School success story. Return one last time to the H.B.R. Web site, and you will find a case study that was published just a few months ago entitled “Facebook—Can Ethics Scale in the Digital Age?” Set aside the abuse of the English language in the question—M.B.A.s specialize in that kind of thing. The mere fact that it’s being asked serves as resounding proof that the moral equivalence problem is still with us today. The question is not whether or not a company of Facebook’s size and reach can stay ethical. The question is whether it will even try."
harvard  harvardbusinessschool  ethics  sherylsandberg  facebook  2018  business  careerism  morality  hbs  via:nicoleslaw  leadership  billclinton  mba  mbas  harvardbusinessrevie  hbr  duffmcdonald  competition  competitiveness  winning  decisionmaking  billgeorge  larrysummers  abrahamzaleznik  johnleboutillier  jeffskilling  bowenmccoy  michelanteby  norms  values  capitalism  neoliberalism 
19 days ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

$5.6  $9  -the  2  2009  2012  2018  5star  a  abrahamzaleznik  achievement_gap  activism  ad  adhoc  advertising  alignment  america  anaction  and  annepasternak  anthropology  archipelago  archives  are  array  art  article  assessment  aston  at  attitudes  audience  australia  authentic  babylon  basketball  be  beliefs  benefits  bias  billclinton  billgeorge  billion  bond's  book  boundaries  bowenmccoy  boxes  brand  brexit  britishness  britishvalues  budget  business  c++  can  canada  canon  capitalism  capitalism:  car  career  careerism  centrists  change  character  childcare  china  choices  christianity  citizenship  civil-liberty  code  colonialism  comma  commas  commonground  comms  communications  community  company  competition  competitiveness  conference  congruence  conservatism  conservatives  consultant  consulting  content  conversion  conviction  coolstuff  core  corporate  cruelty  cspace  csv  culture  customer  cv  cycles  data  database  death  decisionmaking  decisions  deepdive  dei  democrats  denmark  departations  descending  design  development  dictionary  discipline  discrimination  disney  diversity  doug_saunders  duffmcdonald  economics  education  embracing  empathy  employment  emptiness  endowment  engagement  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  enterprise  entertainment  entrepreneurialism  epistemology  ethics  eu  europe  evil  example  facebook  faces  facilitation  faith  fast  favorite  feminist  finance  firebreaks  for  frames  france  from  fun  games  gaming  gap  gds  genre  get  getichslowly  getrichslowly  gitlab  goals  google  government  guide  habits  harvard  harvardbusinessrevie  harvardbusinessschool  hash  hbr  hbs  help  hiring  hoc  homo-hetero  horizons  hostage-taking  hostages  hostileenvironment  how  howto  hp  hr  huawei  huffpo  hulu  humanism  humanistic  humanrights  identity  ideo  ideology  immersion  immigration  in  index  influence  infontology  innovation  insightful  inspiration  institutions  insurance  interestrates  interview  interviewing  investing  investment  ipo  is  it  items  james  javidsajid  jeffskilling  jim_rohn  job  johnleboutillier  jq  karaswisher  karlschroeder  karsalfrink  knutepunkt  labor  ladyofmazes  language  larp  larrysummers  lead  leadership  legal  level  liability  liberal  libertarians  life  list  literacy  lizziestark  machinelearning  macronemmanuel  management  managment  manifesto  marketing  martin  maslow  maytheresa  mba  mbas  mc  meaning  measurement  meritocracy  metapphor  michaelbloomberg  michelanteby  middleground  millennials  miskfoundation  misogyny  ml  morale  morality  more  movementstrategy  multiculturalism  museum  nationalism  neoliberalism  new  news  newsletter  newsvalues  newyork  nihil  nike  noble-lie  nodejsinteractive  norms  now  number  numbers  numpy  oct18  of  omnicom  onlineonly  open-hiring  opportunity  optimism  order  org:mag  organization  outreach  parent  parenting  patriotism  perception  personaldevelopment  personality  pessimism  pete  philosophy  pirc  planning  platforms  podemo  polarization  policy  polisci  political_parties  politics  pov  power  prevent  pricing  principle  principles  profit  programming  property  protest  pscyhology  public  purpose  putnam-like  python  python2.7  qualities  quick  reagan  realestate  realness  reason  recreation  recruiting  recruitment  reference  religion  remembrance  remote  research  reverse  riotgames  rules  rust  sample  saudiarabi  schools  science  science_mag  sean-rose  selfactualization  sexism  shared  sherylsandberg  siliconvalley  skills  slice  socialist  socialmedia  software-development  software  sort  space  sri  stackoverflow  startup  startups  statistics  stats  still  strategy  stripe  sustainability  swap  switzerland  taxes  tayarijones  team  tech  technology  testing  than  the  theos  time  to  toryparty  touch  trends2018  trends2019  trump  two  tx  u.s.  uk  uniqueness  unity  up-to-us  utopia-dystopia  value  variable  viewpoints  webfirst  westminster  whitemaleprivilege  whiteness  winning  wittgenstein  women  work  working  workshop  you  your  ★★★★☆ 

Copy this bookmark: