university_of_california   43

Why the rush on Napolitano? -
It's still unknown how Napolitano's impressive skills fit with the UC job. The Times reported that some UC officials thought Napolitano's Cabinet experience would help her run UC's energy and nuclear laboratories, but those are a small and ancillary part of the university's mission. Also mentioned was that she might be able to aid in the university's federally funded research, though there's no obvious connection between running the Department of Homeland Security and being an expert on research grants.

The selection committee is made up of less than half the Board of Regents; the entire board shouldn't rubber-stamp the committee's choice Thursday. The president of the University of California is a quasi-governmental appointee, and the selection process should be handled in an open way so that taxpayers, students, faculty and other interested parties can learn why Napolitano was chosen from the crowd of 300 candidates and weigh in with their own opinions. There should be no mystery about how the choice was made or why she is right for the job.
Janet_Napolitano  University_of_California  education 
july 2013 by chrisrusak
Editorial: Will Napolitano perpetuate UC's bloated pay? - Editorials - The Sacramento Bee
As the University of California Board of Regents votes Thursday on a new president, Californians should watch the compensation package.This is one area where nominee Janet Napolitano, now secretary of U.S. Homeland Security, can make a big difference.

As an outsider to academia with a long career in public service – beginning with her Truman Scholarship in 1977 – Napolitano understands public service pay.

She earned $95,000 a year as governor of Arizona and earns $199,700 a year as a U.S. Cabinet secretary. She was among five Cabinet secretaries who volunteered to take a 5 percent pay cut this year after across-the-board "sequestration" spending cuts took effect March 1.
Janet_Napolitano  University_of_California  education_reform  executive_salary  editorial 
july 2013 by chrisrusak
Cut from the top to save UC -
The current University of California Office of the President, or UCOP, is a labyrinthine bureaucracy that takes money from the 10 campuses where actual teaching and research happen. Instead of investing more authority in a president whose ambit is already absurdly huge — an annual budget of $24 billion, 230,000 students, 191,000 faculty and staff — the regents should scale back UCOP and empower each campus to make even more of its own decisions.

Many of my UC faculty colleagues suspect the UCOP operation in Oakland has two objectives: to blunt any campus initiatives through bureaucratic overkill, and to impose top-down guidelines that show how out of touch it is with life on campus. What we know is that UCOP charges each campus for "institutional support services," and that the process often involves distributing money back to the campuses. This makes UCOP an expensive and inefficient middleman.
University_of_California  higher_education 
june 2013 by chrisrusak
The Council of UC Faculty Associations
You and your company’s compelling pitch to consumers suggests that the private sector--that is, venture capitalists and not taxpayers--can deliver a more equal world in which income will be based on the skills and knowledge people actually acquire rather than the artificial scarcity of credentials for which they are eligible and can afford to pay. It is natural to hope that in this more equal, and also more productive, world incomes could rise for everyone willing to acquire the necessary academic knowledge and take the tests to prove it. This, in fact, was exactly what was promised by the original California Master Plan for Higher Education using taxpayers’ money when it was adopted in 1960.
education  University_of_California  MOOC  Coursera  venture_capital 
may 2013 by chrisrusak
"Because if it is the right thing to do, then we have every right to do it.” The crowd cheered..."
““Because if it is the right thing to do, then we have every right to do it.” The crowd cheered as the chains on the gates were cut open and hundreds flooded onto the Gill Tract, several acres of University of California (UC) property that have been contested for more than a decade. They brought tools, straw, chickens in portable coops and 15,000 starter plants that had been growing in green houses around Northern California for the past several months before finding their home in this Class I soil in the sleepy bedroom community of Albany, just north of Berkeley.” - Occupy the Farm Dig In, Dug Up — me for Truthout today
Occupy_the_Farm  journalism  politics  Occupy  urban_agriculture  University_of_California  from google
may 2012 by pixplz
The college we now know as University of California at Berkeley...
The college we now know as University of California at Berkeley was founded in Oakland in 1855, helped in large part by the 1860 Morrill Act, which financially supported the establishment of land-grant universities. The Morrill Act “transformed not just California, but the entire United States” according to UC President Mark Yudof.

It did not actually become the UC until 1868, with the passage of the Organic Act of California, which explicitly founded the university as well as a program in “objective practical education in agriculture and landscape gardening.” Four years later, the UC established its first agricultural research station, of 40 acres. The 1887 Hatch Act further funded these research stations at the UC and beyond in the pursuit of creating a more prosperous American agricultural sector and, thus, society.

A few miles away from the young and prospering University, horticulturist Edward Gill — and, after his death, his son John — tended to the 104 acre “Gill Tract” nursery. Following the younger Gill’s death, the University of California either purchased or obtained the land for free in 1928 — it depends on who you talk to. Over the years, they established an agricultural research station while also parceling out and developing the tract piece by piece, building barracks for the military during World War II and housing for the local shipyards that in 1957 became housing for UC Berkeley graduate students with families. 

The development of 90% of the tract faced little if any pushback from the community until 1997, when nearly four dozen community groups and non-profits, as well as several UC Berkeley professors, began a campaign to turn a portion of the remaining Gill Tract into “the world’s first university center on sustainable urban agriculture and food systems.” They toiled for years as the UC entered into more contracts with corporations such as Novartis to share in discoveries made through tract research.

Their efforts, under the umbrella Bay Area Coalition for Urban Agriculture, were ultimately blocked by the university. “The administration has drug its feet and stonewalled this innovative proposal,” the BACUA wrote in 2000. “We feel this behavior represents a distinct bias within UC to favor global industrial agriculture at the expense of the people of California.”

From 2002 to 2006, another group, Urban Roots, attempted to begin the farm conversation again, this time with significant backing from the local teachers association, school district, mayor of Berkeley, and farm-to-table food star Alice Waters. 

Urban Roots sought to make “a green oasis in the midst of our cement-locked lives,” an “eco-park” that would have combined community and education on the tract in several acres of unique urban farm. They called their project “Village Creek.” And again, they failed.

Tonight the renegade Gill Tract farmers who took the tract on April 22 and cultivated two acres of crops will converge again in Albany near that land.
Occupy_the_Farm  University_of_California  from google
may 2012 by pixplz
Next: Bankruptcy for a whole Generation
Wolf Richter

Another student protest, another mass arrest. Monday, thousands of students from all over California snarled traffic during their march on the Capitol in Sacramento. Hundreds of students then flooded the Rotunda of the Capitol, a somewhat raucous affair. Eventually, the California Highway Patrol cleared them out, and 60 were carted off and thrown in the hoosegow for trespassing and resisting arrest.

Their problem: tuition increases. Already, tuition in California's state schools has tripled over the last decade, and state budget cuts will induce universities to jack up tuition again. But the state is out of money. And so it's struggling in a weird and ineffectual way with its red ink. For California’s ongoing debacle, read.... Searching For The Missing Moolah.

The same day the students were arrested, the New York Fed released a report on the consequences of incessant tuition increases across the nation: ballooning student loan balances that are increasingly difficult to bear:

- 27% of the borrowers who had to make payments (not current students) were past due.

- $870 billion in student-loan balances at the end of the 3rd quarter 2011 (higher than credit card debt of $693 billion and auto loans of $730 billion), up 2.1% from the 2nd quarter, while other consumer debt declined or remained flat.

- Average balance: $23,300. That includes the millions of student loans that, after years of payment, have much smaller balances or are nearly paid off. Average balances owed by recent graduates are much higher.

The report lauded President Obama’s executive actions of October last year designed to ease the repayment burden of federal student loans. Laudable as they may be, they only soothe the symptoms for ex-students by shifting more of the costs to the taxpayer. But they don’t deal with the cause: the system itself. It has become dysfunctional.

Universities as businesses, in an environment that is devoid of price competition. For example, when the University of California system demands higher tuition, the whole system falls in line to support those increases, rather than resist them.

Captive customers. Students have to get their education within the higher education system. When tuition goes up, they can’t massively drop out because it would jeopardize their dream (by contrast, if air fares jump, customers react by flying less). They can choose cheaper colleges, but all colleges are jacking up tuition and fees. And the nationwide existence of “out-of-state tuition,” while plausible on a state basis, stifles cross-border competition. So students fight tuition increases the only way they can: by obtaining more funding.

Finance. The student-loan industry profits from processing student loans. Naturally, they encourage students to take on more debt. The amount is a function of the cost of the school, not of the ability to pay back the loan. While risk serves as a natural brake in making loans, in the student-loan industry, risk is transferred to the taxpayer who guarantees the loans.

The ultimate enabler. The government, in constant need of voter support, will fund and guarantee whatever it takes to allow students to get their education regardless of how reckless tuition and fee increases are. Thus, Obama’s executive actions make repayment less onerous, but they don’t do anything to contain tuition increases.

There are no price pressures on universities—except student protests (so, keep at it). Outrageous clockwork-like tuition increases are met not with resistance but with an unquestioning, endless, and ever increasing flow of government-guaranteed student loans. The beneficial forces of market discipline have been wrung out of the system, and governments have not stepped in to exercise alternate controls.

University administrator salaries, bonuses, benefits, golden parachutes, and pensions have shocked the public when they’re exposed in the media. Programs that have little to do with education swallow up more and more money. And sure, everybody loves to have well-equipped labs in fancy buildings. But the system needs to be restructured, either by opening it up to competition or by exposing it to effective checks and balances. Solutions won’t be easy, but there isn’t much room left before it will bankrupt an entire generation.

And just when the information age demands more from education than ever before. In this respect, an insidious and at once funny information-age issue with worldwide implications erupted, of all places, in a tiny village in France. Read.... Can't Even Urinate in his own Yard Anymore.
France  New_York_Fed  President_Obama  University_of_California  from google
march 2012 by takshimada
How to Increase Productivity and Enjoy Life More

Tony Schwartz notes:


Our most fundamental need as human beings is to spend and renew energy.




When I began to crash in the early afternoon following my red-eye flight, I took a 30-minute nap in the room we have set aside for that purpose in our office. The nap didn’t give me nearly enough rest to fully catch up, but it powerfully revived me for the next several hours.


At the other end of the spectrum, exercise … positively influences our cognitive functioning, and our mood.


The truth is that we ought to be exercising nearly every day, ideally for at least 45 minutes, including strength training at least twice a week.




The secret to optimal well-being and effectiveness is to make more rhythmic waves in your life.To build the highest level of fitness, for example, it’s critical to challenge the heart at high intensity for short periods of time, and then to recover deeply.


The bigger the amplitude of your wave — the higher your maximum heart rate, and the more deeply you recover — the more flexibly you can respond to varying demands and the healthier you likely are.


The same rhythmic movement serves us well all day long, but instead we live mostly linear, sedentary lives. We go from email to email, and meeting to meeting, almost never getting much movement, and rarely taking time to recover mentally and emotionally.


Even a little intentional recovery can go a long way. It’s possible, for example, to clear the bloodstream of cortisol just by breathing deeply — in to a count of three, out to a count of six — for as little as a minute. Try it right now. See if it changes the way you feel.


Paradoxically, the most effective way to operate at work is like a sprinter, working with single-minded focus for periods of no longer than 90 minutes, and then taking a break. That way when you’re working, you’re really working, and when you’re recovering, you’re truly refueling the tank.


Making rhythmic waves is the secret to getting more done, in less time, at a higher level of engagement, with a better and more sustainable quality of life.

Schwartz explained last year:


In the renowned 1993 study of young violinists, performance researcher Anders Ericsson found that the best ones all practiced the same way: in the morning, in three increments of no more than 90 minutes each, with a break between each one. Ericcson found the same pattern among other musicians, athletes, chess players and writers.


For the first several books I wrote, I typically sat at my desk for 10 or even 12 hours at a time. I never finished a book in less than a year. For my new book, The Way We’re Working Isn’t Working, I wrote without interruptions for three 90 minute periods, and took a break between each one. I had breakfast after the first session, went for a run after the second, and had lunch after the third. I wrote no more than 4 1/2 hours a day, and finished the book in less than six months. By limiting each writing cycle to 90 minutes and building in periods of renewal, I was able to focus far more intensely and get more done in far less time.


The counterintuitive secret to sustainable great performance is to live like a sprinter. In practice, that means working at your highest intensity in the mornings, for no more than 90 minutes at a time before taking a true break. And getting those who work for you to do the same.


Obviously, it’s not possible for every employee to work in multiple uninterrupted 90-minute sprints, given the range of demands they face. It is possible for you as a leader and managers to make a shift in the way you manage your energy, and to better model this new way of working yourself. Make it a high priority to find at least one time a day–preferably in the morning–to focus single-mindedly on your most challenging and important task for 60 to 90 minutes. Encourage those who work for you to do the same.


In addition, encourage your employees to take true renewal breaks intermittently through the day. It’s possible to get a great deal of renewal in a very short time. Try this technique, for example:


Build a more rhythmic pulse into your workdays and you’ll increase your own effectiveness and your satisfaction. Support this way of working among those you manage and you’ll fuel both loyalty and huge competitive advantage.


Inc. magazine provided details of the benefits of short naps … even at work:


[S]everal recent studies reveal medical explanations for why naps increase productivity, too. In 2010, researchers at the University of California at Berkeley confirmed that napping can improve the brain’s ability to retain information, noting that a middle-of-the-day reprieve “not only rights the wrong of prolonged wakefulness but, at a neurocognitive level, it moves you beyond where you were before.” Two years earlier, at the University of Haifa in Israel, researchers found that naps help “speed up the process of long term memory consolidation,” while the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health in Atlanta concluded in 2007 that a short catnap during the day “may be a useful strategy to improve not only mood but also job satisfaction”.


James Maas, a sleep expert and Cornell social psychologist who coined the term “power nap” 36 years ago, recommends employees nap for 15-minutes when they feel sluggish to restore a sense of vitality to the workday.


“If we operated machinery like we operate the human body, we’d be accused of reckless endangerment. Just like machinery gets oiled, the human body needs to be nurtured and fed,” Maas says.


Maas says there’s a neurological reason power naps work. Though an EEG pattern—which measures the flow of electricity in the head—shows wakefulness while a person is excessively tired, the neurons involved in memory can be turned off, he says. So although a person is technically “awake” in this state of sleepiness, his or her memory neurons can go offline. Simply put, even though you’re awake, your brain isn’t. (A longer 30-minute or 60-minute nap, on the other hand, puts a person in Delta—or deep—sleep, he explains, which leaves the person groggy upon waking up.)


Maas, who also consults on workplace sleeping and productivity at Harvard, IBM, Goldman Sachs, and Blackrock, points out longterm benefits of napping, too. If regular, naps can reduce the risk of cardiovascular problems, including heart attack, stroke, and diabetes. Studies have also shown that chronic drowsiness during the workday can cause slower reaction times, an inability to concentrate, and difficulty remembering information over longer periods of time.


Studies show that exercise boosts productivity and helps us work better with others.  See this, this and this.


Numerous studies show that focusing on your breath or other mediation techniques increase productivity. See this and this. (*)

Some studies seem to indicate that meditation is more effective than napping in increasing productivity. However, it may be a question of preference or situation. For example, there are many times where someone at work can’t close their eyes to nap, but can meditation by focusing on a tree outside their window, for example.

Meditation need not include religious or even spiritual content to be useful. It can be simply a physical or mental practice utilizing sounds, breathing, mental exercises or concentration.

Meditation may also help us:

Get smarter

Be healthier

Reduce damage from radiation

Live longer

*For further evidence of the benefits of meditation on productivity, see D. Orme-Johnson, Pschosomatic Medicine 49 (1987) 493-507; Michael Murphy and Steven Donovan, The Physical and Psychological Effects of Meditation (Institute of Noetic Sciences, 1997); R. Davidson, J. Kabat-Zinn, et al, “Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation,” Psychosomatic Medicine 65 (2003) 564-570; The Boston Globe, November 23, 2005;    H. Benson, M. Wilcher, et al, (2000). “Academic performance among middle school students after exposure to a relaxation response curriculum,” Journal of Research and Development in Education 33 (3) (2000) 156-165; Jones, Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (4) (1988).
Blackrock  Goldman_Sachs  Israel  recovery  University_of_California  from google
november 2011 by takshimada
Researchers Studying How to Increase Fuel Efficiency By Changing Our Behavior
Sure, you can save fuel by making lighter cars and more efficient engines or by adding new batteries, but what if fuel economy could be boosted just by changing the bad habits of drivers? That’s exactly what researchers at the University of California, Riverside’s Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CERT) are working to do. Using a $1.2 million grant from the Department of Energy, the group of scientists is finding ways to change our behavior when we’re in the driver’s seat to maximize our mileage and improve our fuel efficiency by as much as 30 percent. It may seem easy, but we all know that old habits die hard.

Read the rest of Researchers Studying How to Increase Fuel Efficiency By Changing Our Behavior

Permalink |
Add to |

Post tags: Center for Environmental Research and Technology, cert researchers, changing behavior to save fuel, changing driver behavior, department of energy grant, drivers waste fuel, fuel economy, fuel efficiency, fuel efficient drivers, fuel efficient routes, gps system, increasing fuel efficiency, Kanok Boriboonsomsin, real time driving feedback, university of california, university of california riverside
Green_Transportation  News  Center_for_Environmental_Research_and_Technology  cert_researchers  changing_behavior_to_save_fuel  changing_driver_behavior  department_of_energy_grant  drivers_waste_fuel  fuel_economy  fuel_efficiency  fuel_efficient_drivers  fuel_efficient_routes  gps_system  increasing_fuel_efficiency  Kanok_Boriboonsomsin  real_time_driving_feedback  university_of_california  university_of_california_riverside  from google
september 2011 by soupkills
Americans are angry. Why aren’t they protesting? - The Washington Post
There’s something exciting, sometimes terrifying, about people taking to the streets to get what they want. In Cairo’s Tahrir Square, they gathered to demand the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak. In Athens, demonstrators set up a gallows in front of Parliament, threatening the socialist government, which was imposing austerity measures in the face of 15 percent unemployment. Most recently, in London and across England, young people have assembled at night, looting stores and burning cars to demand — well, that’s not clear yet.
news  sociology  protest  university_of_california  irvine  movements  organizations  from delicious
august 2011 by BenjaminLind
Who Could Have Guessed: 3D Hurts Your Eyes
After experimenting on 24 adults, a research team at the University of California, Berkeley has determined that viewing content on a stereo 3D display hurts your eyes and your brain. The scientific term is “vergence-accomodation,” which means that the eye must constantly adjust to both the distance of the physical screen and that of the 3D content. This can supposedly cause visual discomfort, fatigue, and headaches, which I had thought were just a part of life but apparently there’s a scapegoat: 3D technology.

In his Journal of Vision article, The Zone of Comfort: Predicting Visual Discomfort with Stereo Displays, author Martin S. Banks (also professor of optometry and vision science) writes, “When watching stereo 3D displays, the eyes must focus — that is, accommodate — to the distance of the screen because that’s where the light comes from. At the same time, the eyes must converge to the distance of the stereo content, which may be in front of or behind the screen.”

According to the article, 3D content viewed over a short distance (like with desktops and smartphones) is more visually uncomfortable when the stereo content is placed in front of the screen. In a movie theater, it’s the opposite: Stereo content that is placed behind the screen causes more discomfort than scenes that jump out at you.

With the explosion of 3D-capable gadgetry such as televisions and mobile phones, understanding just what this kind of technology is doing to our bodies may help us better use it in the future. The only problem is that technology tends to far outpace research, and until we get a better handle on its effects, we’re more or less walking blindly into a 3D world.
Gadgets  TC  3d  Berkeley  Martin_Banks  The_Zone_of_Comfort:_Predicting_Visual_Discomfort_with_Stereo_Displays  University_of_California  from google
july 2011 by demoi
Help / Discussion lists for R packages « Permutations
Jorge M Rocha stimulated Carter Butts to write a mini-essay on exponential random graph models which I received permission to repost. Dave Hunter also adds some thoughts at the bottom.
social_networks  sociology  statistics  programming  university_of_california  irvine  rstats  from delicious
may 2011 by BenjaminLind
Free Science, One Paper at a Time
Howard Eisen, 1942-1987

On Father’s Day three years ago, biologist Jonathan Eisen decided he’d like to republish all his father’s papers. His father, Howard Eisen, a biologist and a researcher at the National Institutes of Health, had published 40-some-odd papers by the time that he died by suicide at age 45. That had been in Febuary 1987, while Jonathan, a sophomore at college, was on the verge of discovering his own love of biology. At the time, virtually all scientific papers were just on paper. Now, of course, everything happens online, and Jonathan, who in addition to researching and teaching also serves as an editor for the open-access, online-only journal PLoS Biology, knows this well. So three years ago, Jonathan decided to reclaim his father’s papers from print limbo and make them freely available online. He wanted to make them part of the scientific record. He also wanted, he says, “to leave a more positive presence” — to ensure his father had a public legacy first and foremost as a scientist.

I researched and wrote this article last summer and fall (2010) under assignment from a magazine that accepted and paid for it but, in the way these things sometimes work, decided not to run it and gave me its blessing to publish it elsewhere. I’m publishing it here at Neuron Culture and also in an identical post at my website, It is based on extensive reporting. I’d like to thank in particular Jonathan Eisen,, for reasons that the article will make obvious; Cameron Neylon, Peter Murray-Rust, Richard Grant, Michael Nielsen, Martin Fenner, Leslie Carr, and Lord Rees, whose ideas are fundamental to the story and its subject; Mark Patterson and Brian Mossop of PLoS; Victor Henning, Jason Hoyt, Ian Mulvany, William Gunn, and Jan Riechelt, all of Mendeley; and Melody Dye, Kristi Holmes, John Timmer, and Sara Wood, who along with Reichelt participated in a session on open science I organized at ScienceOnline 2011. I also had several conversations off-record; you know who you are — thanks.

How hard could it be? Howard Eisen had been a federal employee, so his work rightly lay in some sense in the public domain. And Jonathan, as an heir, presumably owned copyright anyway, along with his brother Michael (also a biologist, and one of the founders of the Public Library of Science, the innovative journal group that publishes PLoS Biology). Yet to the brothers’ continuing chagrin, Jonathan has found securing and publishing his father’s papers to be far harder than he expected.

For instance, even though Jonathan has access to the enormous University of California library system, which subscribes to a particularly high number of journals, he often can’t even find some his father’s papers. And when he finds a paper in a journal the university doesn’t subscribe to, he is asked to pay as much as $50 to read the paper — even though his father did the work with public funds. He’s not alone; one recent study found that even most university researchers have access to only about half the papers they need to cite for a given bit of research. Just yesterday, in fact, Jonathan asked on Twitter if anyone could send him a copy of one of his father’s paper and confronted a paywall asking for his credit card number. “I ain’t payin’,” he replied.

Meanwhile, Jonathan has found and downloaded the PDFs for about half his father’s papers, but he remains uncertain whether he could safely post them on his website. While some publishers allow such “collegial sharing,” others leave their policies unclear, and he worries about getting sued. His brother urged Jonathan to post them.

“Come on,” Michael wrote in a comment at Jonathan’s blog. “I DARE them to sue us.”

Jonathan has posted the whole list at his blog and uploaded what PDFs he could obtain, and so far he has not been sued or asked to take them down. Yet he remains wary and unsatisfied. He knows that few researchers will find his father’s papers if they reside only on his web page. So for now, his father’s work remains buried in an old structure — a calcified matrix. Though Jonathan bangs away at the surrounding rock, he knows he hasn’t really pried the work loose. This frustrates him on two fronts: It stops him from freeing his father’s work. And it confirms to him science, which should be a fluid medium, has much of its content still trapped in old structures.

“I started this partly to test how hard it would be to try to make science more available in the current system,” he says. “I’m finding that even with my father’s papers, or even with my own, it’s not very easy.”

Jonathan Eisen’s quest has solidified his conviction that science needs to radically rework the way it collects and shares its data, methods, and findings. He has plenty of company. A growing number of prominent scientists want to replace the aging journal system with something faster, cheaper, and richer. The current system, they note, grew out of meeting notes and journals published by societies in Europe over three centuries ago. Back then, quarterly or monthly volumes could accommodate the flow of ideas and data from most disciplines, and the printed journal, though it required a top-heavy, expensive printing and publishing infrastructure, was the most efficient way to share those ideas.

“But now,” says Jonathan Eisen, “there’s this thing called the Internet. It changes not just how things can be done but how they should be done.”

As Stanford biochemist and PLoS co-founder Patrick Brown put it a few years ago, “What seemed an impossible ideal in 1836, when Antonio Panizzi, librarian of the British Museum, wrote, ‘I want a poor student to have the same means of indulging his learned curiosity, … of consulting the same authorities, … as the richest man in the kingdoms,’ is today within reach. With the Internet, we have the means to make humanity’s treasury of knowledge freely available to scientists, teachers, students and the public around the world.”

“The existing system worked well for quite a while,” says Jonathan Eisen. “But it was not designed by theory. It was designed by constraints.” In a world that provides communications conduits far larger and faster, those constraints have now made science’s traditional pipeline a bottleneck.
Neuron_Culture  Science_Blogs  Cameron_Neylon  Elsevier  Gina_Kolata  Google  Jan_Reichelt  Jason_Hoyt  Jonathan_Eisen  KnowledgeBlog  Leslie_Carr_Howard_Eisen  Luca_de_Alfaro  Mark_Patterson  Mendeley  Nature_Publishing_Group  open_science  Peter_Murray-Rust  Phillip_Lord  Public_Library_of_Science  scientific_publishing  Stefan_Glaenzer  University_of_California  Victor_Henning  from google
may 2011 by neuromusic

related tags

2010  3d  academia  academic  afghanistan  african-american  aids_hiv  animal_planet  animals:_pets  animals:general  arabic  architecture  archive  avma  behavior  berkeley  berlin_philharmonic  bill_dudley  biotech  black  blackrock  blogs  business  california  cameron_neylon  cards  career  catalog  cataloging  cats  center_for_environmental_research_and_technology  central_banks  cert_researchers  changing_behavior_to_save_fuel  changing_driver_behavior  charitable_organizations  classical_music  classroom  confluence  consumption  coursera  crude  culture  data  databases  datasets  david_s_greene  davis  defense_and_military_forces  delicious  delong.brad  department_of_energy_grant  design  development  digital_libraries  dogs  drivers_waste_fuel  eastern_europe  ebooks  edie_lau  editorial  education  education_reform  elsevier  enron  ericka_basile  executive_salary  faybee  fellowships  fish  florentine  florida  france  fraternity  free  freespeech  fuel_economy  fuel_efficiency  fuel_efficient_drivers  fuel_efficient_routes  funding  future  gadgets  gina_kolata  goebbels_joseph  goldman_sachs  goldman_sachs_asset_management  google  gps_system  grants  green_transportation  gross_david  gross_domestic_product  hamster  harvard  health  higher_education  history  holocaust_and_the_nazi_era  ifttt  ils  images  increasing_fuel_efficiency  india  inspiration  international  internment  iran  iraq  irvine  islam  israel  jan_reichelt  janet_napolitano  japanese  jason_hoyt  jobs  john_mccain  jonathan_eisen  journalism  kanok_boriboonsomsin  knowledgeblog  kuwait  labor  learning  leslie_carr_howard_eisen  letters  library  lifehacks  longitudinal  los_angeles  luca_de_alfaro  manuscripts  mark_patterson  martin_banks  media_consumption  mediaconsumption  medical  mendeley  mexican-american  middle_east  mit  monetary_policy  money  mooc  moscow  movements  music  napoleon  narratives  national-level  national_archives_and_records_administration  nature  nature_publishing_group  neuron_culture  new_york_fed  news  niall_ferguson  nobelpreisträger  non-profits  nsf  obama  obama_administration  occupy  occupy_the_farm  opec  open_access  open_science  oral_history  organizations  our_decrepit_institutions  persian  pet-lover_life  pet_food  pet_travel  peter_murray-rust  phillip_lord  photos  physik  poetry  poland  police  police_dogs  politics  polls  posters  president_obama  programming  protest  public_library_of_science  puppy_bowl  read  real_time_driving_feedback  reality  recession  recovery  research  response  rock  rstats  russia  salary  saudi_arabia  science  science_blogs  scientific_publishing  security  serials  social_media  social_networks  sociology  state_department  statistics  stefan_glaenzer  study  surveys  synergie  tc  texas  the_honest_kitchen  the_zone_of_comfort:_predicting_visual_discomfort_with_stereo_displays  time_series  top  trade  twitter  u.n.  u.s.  ucsd  unions  university_of_california_riverside  university_of_california_san_diego  universityofcalifornia  universityofcaliforniasandiego  universität  urban_agriculture  utopia  venture_capital  veterinary  victor_henning  videos  vin_news_service  violins  vision  waco  wikipedia  wikis  women  worker-managed_socialism  worth_a_click  wtf 

Copy this bookmark: