unit.testing   80

« earlier    

To Kill a Mockingtest | REA Group Tech Blog
The real battle for clean tests, and code for that matter, is about controlling side-effects. Mocks and stubs attempt to provide some level of testing in the face of entangled effects in output or input, respectively. However, in practice, almost every usage can be obviated by simply writing better code; the entanglement is the problem, and mocks only allow the developer to ignore it.
testing  mocks  mock  stubs  unit.testing 
june 2016 by tonious

« earlier    

related tags

agile.software.development  agile  amazon  asp.net  blogs  book  boost  c#  c++  c  command.line  comparison  core.location  cs  cunit  database  db.unit.testing  development  events  extreme.programming  frameworks  functional.testing  jasmine  java  javascript  jquery  js  junit  library  linuxtag2007  methods  mock  mocking  mocks  model.view.controller  model.view.presenter  mvc  mvp  ndbunit  netbeans  node.js  nodejs  nodeunit  nunit  objective.c  opensource  osx  patterns  pex  php  proctor  programming.tools  programming  python  quality  qunit  refactoring  resharper  rhino.mocks  schemas  schematron  scons  selenium  servlet  shell  software.engineering  spring  stack.overflow  static  stubs  tdd  teamcity  templates  test  testing  tool  tools  toorder  toread  totry  unittest  unittesting  utilities  webdeveloper  xml  xmlunit  xunit 

Copy this bookmark: