traditional   1553

« earlier    

You can’t beat a bright red geranium
traditional  from twitter_favs
july 2018 by datz53
Science / Fiction — Carol Black
"‘Evidence-based’ education, scientific racism, & how learning styles became a myth."

"1. The Debunkers
2. The Map and the Territory
3. The Evidence
4. The Territory Beyond the Map
5. Here Be Dragons"

"A disturbing feature of this discourse in education is the frequency with which it takes the form of male researchers and pundits telling female educators that their views on learning are cognitively childish and irrational and should therefore be disregarded. Cognitive psychologist Daniel Willingham, a prominent debunker, has shared some rather patronizing speculations as to why the vast majority of (mostly female) teachers persist in thinking their students have different learning styles ("I think learning styles theory is widely accepted because the idea is so appealing. It would be so nice if it were true.") His paternal tone is especially disturbing since he makes his case by failing to mention the existence of legitimate competing views from respected scientists and education researchers."

"But despite the debunkers' undeniable passion on the topic, the fact is that there are extremely reputable scientists on both sides of this debate. In other words, as Grundmann and Stehr put it, "the basic rift in these debates is not between lay people and experts but between two alliances that advocate different courses of action based on divergent basic values and knowledge claims... we see representatives of science and the lay public on both sides."

So what are the two alliances in the case of learning styles? And what are their divergent basic values?

Luckily, you don't have to dig very deep to find out. If you review the writings of the most vocal learning styles 'debunkers,' you quickly find that they are almost always simply advocates for traditional, teacher-controlled direct instruction. They tend to favor a traditional "core knowledge" curriculum, traditional forms of discipline, and they adhere to a traditional IQ-based view of intelligence. In other words, they’re just educational conservatives. (In the UK they openly call themselves "trads" as opposed to "progs.") They trumpet any research that supports their preferences and ignore or attempt to discredit any research that leans the other way. They don't like progressive or self-directed or culturally relevant approaches to education. They don't tend to concern themselves overmuch with less tangible aspects of children's well-being like, say, "happiness" or "creativity" or "mental health." They define "what works" in education in terms of test scores.

But the reality is that you can’t say ‘what works” in education until you answer the question: works for what? As Yong Zhao explains in “What Works May Hurt: Side Effects in Education,” it’s reasonable to assume, in education as in medicine, that any given intervention may have negative as well as positive effects; if we want to claim to be evidence-based, we need to look at both. What raises test scores may lower creativity or intrinsic motivation, and vice versa; this study, for example, found that direct instruction hastened young children's mastery of a specific task, but lowered exploratory behavior. So “what the research supports” depends on what you value, what you care most about, what kind of life you want for your children."

"The first thing to understand about learning styles is that there is no agreed-on definition of the term. Multiple frameworks have been proposed, from the popular Visual-Auditory-Kinesthetic framework, to the Concrete-Abstract framework, to the Holistic-Analytical, Impulsive-Reflective, Convergent-Divergent, Field-Dependent-Field-Independent, Cognitive-Affective-Physiological –– one literature review identified 71 different models. As Kirschner and van Merriënboer grouse, if we consider each learning style as dichotomous (e.g. visual vs. verbal) that means there are 2 to the power of 71 possible combinations of learning styles – more than the number of people alive on earth.

They say that like it’s a bad thing. But as astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson remarked recently, “In science, when human behavior enters the equation, things go nonlinear. That's why physics is easy and sociology is hard.”

Zhang and her frequent collaborators Robert Sternberg and Stephen Rayner, co-editors of The Handbook of Intellectual Styles, are not fans of the 'debunkers.' They use the term intellectual style as an "umbrella term for all style constructs," (including learning styles, cognitive styles, perceptual styles, and thinking styles) which relate to "people's preferred ways of processing information and dealing with tasks." (Notice the word "preferred" here, since that will come up later.) As these authors see it, intellectual style differences are complex, involving cognitive, affective, physiological, psychological, and sociological dimensions. Researchers Maria Kozhevnikov, Carol Evans, and Stephen Kosslyn use the term cognitive style (which includes learning style constructs), to describe "patterns of adaptation to the external world that develop through interaction with the surrounding environment on the basis of innate predispositions, the interactions among which are shaped by changing environmental demands."

The most promising style constructs, in Kozhevnikov's view, are not the narrow visual-auditory-kinesthetic (V-A-K) perceptual categories, but the richer constructs of "context-dependency vs. independency, rule-based vs. intuitive processing, internal vs. external locus of control, and integration vs. compartmentalization." These cognitive tendencies are neither set in stone nor completely malleable; they intersect with cognition at multiple levels, from perception to concept formation to higher-order cognitive processing to meta-cognitive processing.

So it's complicated. And yet despite what researchers Elena Grigorenko and Samuel Mandelman call "the very fine texture" of the "intertwined threads of intelligence and personality" that make learning styles so devilishly hard to define, in practice these differences are not at all difficult to see.

Which is probably why somewhere between 75 and 90% of teachers believe they exist.

In self-directed learning situations where children are able to follow their curiosity in their own ways, differences that might be muted or masked in a controlled instruction setting become very clearly visible. Sensory preferences intersect with social, emotional, and cognitive differences in complex and individual ways that profoundly shape how each child enters and explores and takes hold of the world. One child will spend quiet hours poring over illustrated books about science or history; another child is quickly bored by those, but gets deeply engaged in active social projects like building or filmmaking or citizen science. One child listens in on adult conversations and remembers everything she hears, absorbing knowledge like a sponge; another child creates and constructs knowledge in her own hands-on ways, writing her first book before she reads one. One child is observant and cautious, always making sure of things before venturing into unfamiliar terrain; another child is bold and intuitive, diving in head first and filling in the gaps later in a "fake it till you make it" spirit. The river moves steadily toward the sea, but it follows many divergent pathways, and the shortest distance between two points may not be a straight line.

In other words, human learning differences are complex, multi-dimensional, and difficult to definitively pin down, but this much is clear: the kids have different styles of learning. So how does something so intuitively obvious and readily observed cease to exist in the eyes of the debunkers?"

"The debunkers admit that people have fairly stable learning preferences. They also admit that people have variable abilities in visual v. auditory memory, etc. When you combine preference with ability –– e.g. "I have a good visual memory, and I prefer information presented visually" –– that’s probably what many speakers of the English language understand by the term “learning style.”

So that thing? That exists.

But here’s where the crucial elision occurs, and the claim shifts to the matching hypothesis. In a literature review of learning styles research, Pashler et al. state it this way: the theory of learning styles is only confirmed if we can successfully sort individuals into groups “for which genuine group-by-treatment interactions can be demonstrated.”

What are “group-by-treatment” interactions? Well, in this scenario the teacher diagnoses and sorts the learners into groups, applies a randomized instructional “treatment” to each group, and then administers a test to determine which “treatment” worked better –– like a drug trial.

It's important to note that the debunkers' claim is thus based almost entirely on studies of teacher-controlled direct instruction; they don't involve scenarios where learners have agency. But the problem with studying learning in teacher-controlled settings is that it may be unclear whether you're measuring something about the learning or something about the teaching. In other words, you have to be sure that "Treatment A" isn't just a better or more interesting lesson than "Treatment B."

How can you solve that problem? Simple. By excluding from the list of methodologically acceptable studies anything that involves the kind of creative activities that good teachers might come up with to address the needs of diverse learners.

From the standpoint of strict scientific method, this is, of course, correct; your experimental protocol should control every variable except the one you're testing. How can you achieve this? By further simplification, of course: by creating a lesson so lacking in complexity that it can’t possibly be interesting to anyone. Like memorizing a random list of words.

Here’s where you run … [more]
carolblack  learningstyles  evidence  2018  paulkirschner  jeroenvanmerriënboer  li-fangzhang  mariakozhevnikov  carolevans  elenagrigorenko  stephenkosslyn  robertsternberg  learning  education  data  danielwillingham  daviddidau  joanneyatvin  power  yongzhao  research  unschooling  deschooling  directinstruction  children  happiness  creativity  well-being  iq  intelligence  traditional  testing  intrinsicmotivation  mastery  behavior  howwelearn  self-directed  self-directedlearning  ignorance  franksmith  race  racism  oppression  intersectionality  coreknowledge  schooling  schooliness  homeschool  multiliteracies  differences  hierarchy  participation  participatory  democracy  leannebetasamosakesimpson  andrealandry  pedagogy  teaching  howweteach  colonization  leisterman  ibramkendi  standardizedtesting  standardization  onesizefitsall  cornelpewewardy  cedarriener  yanaweinstein 
june 2018 by robertogreco
Chinese Converter - Learn Chinese Tools
Learn Chinese tools: simplified to traditional Chinese converter, traditional to simplified and Chinese to pinyin and Chinese to image converter.
chinese  traditional  simplified 
june 2018 by doahn
Bottom Marketing Is It The Like Post Marketing | WordPress Promotion Tools
This method of marketing will enable you to make significant affiliate commissions, in addition to getting opt-in newsletter sign ups and creating loan from the sales of your very own products, supplied that you follow the process correctly.
article  marketing  short  social  media  list  building  internet  business  online  bottom  advertising  traffic  software  traditional 
april 2018 by global.dwellers

« earlier    

related tags

(ssg)  -  13  17.04  2012  2016  2017  2018  20th  23  26th  3/4  3  5  _______catholic  a  about  account  adds  advantage  advertising  after  ag  agriculture  allows  also  amazi...  amazing  amazon  andrealandry  announcements  announcementscloud  another  antique  app  apps  april  armoire  arrest  art  artcraft  article  articles  articlescloud  artist  artwork  aws-tuned  aws  azure-based  azure.  azure  bake  bakery  bamboo  banana  bare  bars  bath  be  bed  been  behavior  bench  benefit  best  between  beyond  big  bookcase  bookies  bookmarks  bookmarks_bar  bookmarks_menu  boost  bottom  box  bread  brexit  bridges  bring  broken_pottery  brunei  build  building  business  cambodia  canonical’s  capabilities  carolblack  carolevans  carpentry  catholic  cedarriener  celebration  celtic  center  century  certified  cheatsheet  children  chimney  china  chinese  christmas  clay  clients)  closely  clothes  cloud  cloudfabric  cloudflare  cloud…  collapsing  colonization  color  combination  comeback  commented  comparing  components  consistent  container  containers  content  continue  continues  contraceptive  converter  cooking  cooperation  coreknowledge  cornell  cornelpewewardy  country  coworking  craftmade  crafts  create  creative  creativity  css  cuisine  curse  customerexperience  damiana  danielwillingham  data-centric  data  databases  daviddidau  dbas  dec  deco  decoration  democracy  demonstration  deployed.  deschooling  design  diez  differences  digital  directinstruction  directvent  diy  docker  documentation  door  doorbell  download  drawing  dress  drum  dustin  earlier  earthen  ebook  education  efficiencies.  efficiency  elenagrigorenko  embroidery  encrypt  engaging  etsy  ever  evidence  expansion  experience  extends  fabrication  fake  fans  faster  fieldrecording  financing  finland  fireplace  fish  fishing  fishs  floating  flour  flower  flue  font  food  for  forests  franksmith  friend  from  from:  fuel  further  game  geothermal  get  gets  gi  giftid  girl  grid  guide  guys  haindpainted  hanzi  happiness  have  having  hd  health  herbal  hierarchy  historic  home  homeschool  house  how-to  how  howto  howwelearn  howweteach  https  huawei  hub  hvac  ibramkendi  ideas  ifttt  igbo  ignorance  illustration  ilomantsi  images  importance  imported  improve  in  in:  indonesia  information  instructions  integrate  integration  intelligence  interested  interesting  internet  intersectionality  intrinsicmotivation  investment  iq  ira  iran  irish  is  islands  it  its  japan  japanese  jeroenvanmerriënboer  jm  joanneyatvin  join  joining  joins  journey  juju  karelia  kernel  khmer  kintsugi  kirkland  kit  knitware  know  kubernetes  kölsch  lake  laptop  latergram  laying  lead  leannebetasamosakesimpson  learning  learningstyles  lease  led  leisterman  let's  li-fangzhang  lighting  like  linux  lisboa  list  lxd  machine  make  malay  management  manga  march  mariakozhevnikov  marketers  marketing  massive  mastery  matrix  may  media  metal  microsoft  microsoft’s  mill  mobile  modeling  modernize  modernizing  momentum.”  mondaymarketingtips  money  most…  mount  moz  mta  multiliteracies  music-instruments  music-label  music  musictheory  nachmany  natural  navigation  need  net  network  newegg  news  newscanonical  nigeria  nouveau  nuclearpower  of  office  of…  oil  old  omg!!  onesizefitsall  online  onlineshopping  openstack  oppression  organization  other  outdoors  oven  ovh  page  painting  palm  paper  participation  participatory  partner  partners  paulkirschner  pb3037-ap  pdf  pedagogy  persia  peru  pewter  photography  pictures  pinterest  places  platforms.  please  plex  police  popular  portugal  portuguese  posted  posture  power  pretty  price:notfree  priest  private  process  programme  programmecloudenterpriselinuxmicrosoftpartnerpress  programming  promise  public  qc  quietcool  rabindrajayanti  race  racism  radio  range  ranks  recipe  recipes  reinterprets  relations  released  releasessql  renovations  repair  research  restaurants  retirement  risk  robertsternberg  role  roth  safeguard  samurai  saving  scalability:  school  schooliness  schooling  self-directed  self-directedlearning  seo  sep  serious  serverappscharm  serverubuntuubuntu  service  services  services:  sex  shapir  shopping  shops  short  simplified  site  sleeping  snaps.  so  social  socialmedia  society  software  solution  solutions  space  special  speed  standardization  standardizedtesting  started  stefan...  stephenkosslyn  streaming  stufftobuy  style  styles  styling  summer-kitchen  supplies  supporting  supports  surface  surprisingly  sword  systems  teaching  techcrunch  technical  technology  testing  text  than  the  their  they  titicaca  to...  to  today  together  trade  traditionalart  traditionalartist  traffic  transformational  trend  trq  turnera  tutorial  tv  type  typography  udi  ukiyo-e  university  unschooling  uros  uses  vendor  venting  vi  video  village  virtual  visit  vps  vs.  vs  web  webdesign  website  weddings  well-being  well  what  whole  widest  windmill  wine  with  without  women  wood-fired  woodworking  wordpress  working  world.  world  world’s  wto  yanaweinstein  year  yongzhao  youtube  |      “microsoft 

Copy this bookmark: