toxicmasculinity   142

« earlier    

Why Susan Fowler blew the whistle on sexism at Uber - The Verge
The book that pushed her into the blog post was Viktor Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning, about surviving Nazi concentration camps. “I’m reading this, and I’m thinking, Would I actually be a good person if I was in that situation?” she says. “When we’re in these difficult situations, it’s our character that shows. I had just gone through this, and how dare I walk away and wash my hands of that whole situation.”

She sat down to compose and was very careful not to betray any emotion; she was a woman, after all, and her emotions could be used to discredit her. No names, only formal titles. And not a single sentence could be written without evidence. Its publication was months before the #MeToo movement when powerful men were accused of sexual misconduct, and Fowler’s work is different. Most #MeToo stories involved multiple women whose accounts were similar enough for a reporter to establish a pattern. And nearly all #MeToo stories focused closely on specific men, not the entirety of the system that protected them.

Fowler, on the other hand, presented Uber. Not one sexist manager. Not two. But all of them — and the HR system that shielded them. When Fowler wrote it, she didn’t imagine she would change much. She thought, maybe, someone else would be able to use it in a lawsuit. “I still have no idea what happened,” she says.
uber  susanfowler  sexualharassment  equity  toxicmasculinity  techculture  latecapitalism  ethics  womenintech 
3 days ago by dirtystylus
The hold has on some guys is really something. It’s like a prison not allowing them to experience…
toxicmasculinity  from twitter
5 days ago by colinaut
Gabrielle Blair on Twitter: "When I hear men worshipping guns and talking about how there’s nothing that will stop them from defending their family, my mind goes to Naaman in the Bible. Do you remember Naaman? He was a great military leader, and he also
When I hear men worshipping guns and talking about how there’s nothing that will stop them from defending their family, my mind goes to Naaman in the Bible. Do you remember Naaman? He was a great military leader, and he also had leprosy.
The prophet told him to bathe in the Jordan River 7 times to be cured. He refused. In fact he was pissed off the cure was so simple. So his servants said: If he’d asked you to do some great thing, you would have done it, but you’re not willing to go bathe in the water?
That’s like men bragging about how they’re ready and willing to protect their family. They're picturing doing *some great thing*, but protecting your family is almost always much more mundane.

A few conversations with God to illustrate:
Conversation #1:

Man: Hey God, I just want you to know I am committed to protecting my family at all costs.

God: Gosh, that’s great to hear.

One of the main things I need you to do to protect your family is laundry. Tons of laundry. You know kids...
— they’re so susceptible to infections and viruses. Pinworms, athlete’s foot, lice, strep throat, colds and flues. Pneumonia and diarrhea are *serious killers* of children under five. The list is endless. So you’re going to need to do laundry pretty much daily.
Launder their socks & underwear, their sheets. Put their sneakers through the wash. I can’t emphasize this enough: protecting your family involves a lot of laundry.

Man: Oh. Um.

I was thinking more along the lines of a masked intruder with a gun at 2 AM raping my family.
God: First of all, stop fantasizing about your family being raped.

Second, do you know the stats on break-ins? The vast majority happen when no one is home, and only a small percentage are armed. Home alarms and dogs reduce the risk even more.
Even if you do end up being the rare house with an armed-break-in-while-home, you want to shoot someone for over your TV? Isn't that a ridiculous overreaction?

You’re not in the mob. I assure you there’s a slim-to-none chance you’ll need to defend your family at gun point.
If you really want to protect your family, laundry is where I need you to focus.

Man: But. But.

I bought all these guns. And ammunition. And I’m telling you, if anyone threatens my family, I’ll be ready.
God: Is there anything you’re willing to do to protect your family that’s not the plot of an action/thriller?




God: Sigh.

Conversation #2:

God: I’d like you to protect your family.

Man: You bet. I’m ready. If anyone touches my kids, they are dead meat.

God. Okay. Well, to protect your family, the thing I need you to do is teach thorough hand-washing.

Basically, you’ll need to carefully wash your kids’ hands several times a day until they’re old enough to do it themselves. At that point you’ll need to supervise the hand-washing for several years until you know they’ve mastered it.

And from then on, you just need to spend another ten years asking them to wash their hands multiple times a day — before school, after school, before meals, after potty breaks, etc.. Cool?

Man: Well. Um.

Is there an assignment that’s more related to guns?

God: Nope. The main thing is hand-washing.

Having guns in the house actually puts your kids in harm’s way. Surely, as a protective parent, you’ve read about the dangers of keeping and storing guns at home?


God: Let me guess. If I need someone to dig a hole on an asteroid, plant a bomb in the hole to blow up the asteroid, in order to save the Earth, you’ll be first in line.




God: Helpful.

Conversation #3:

Man: I’m ready to defend my family!! My guns and ammunition are stocked.

God: So glad to hear you’re ready to defend your family. Here’s the key thing I need you to do: Never drink alcohol again.

Man: Wait. What?

God: Well I’m sure you know motor vehicle accidents and gun accidents are top killers of children. And mixing alcohol with driving or guns makes them far riskier. If you’ve been drinking, there’s a higher likelihood you’ll drive drunk, lose your temper and hurt the kids...

... or just be irresponsible with your gun. So if you want to protect your family, I would recommend giving up alcohol as a good way to start.



Man: Can’t I just shoot some bad guys?

God: So then, NOT actually interested in protecting your family.

Conversation #4:

God: Are you ready and willing to protect your family?

Man: YES. Come at me. My house is fully armed and I keep a handgun under the passenger seat. I am READY.

God: Oh. Well. The thing I need you to do is feed your kids plenty of healthy food.

Do the grocery shopping. Plans the meals. Stock the fridge. Cook dinner. And of course, do the dishes and keep the kitchen clean because you don’t want harmful bacteria taking over.

Man: But. I mean. I don’t even know how to cook.

God: How did you learn about your weapons?

Man: Youtube.

God: Are there cooking videos on Youtube?


[End of conversations]

I'm often told that men have instincts to protect their family and how Protector is their natural role.

I think the case can be more easily made that men have zero natural instincts to protect their family.





If such an instinct had evolved, why wouldn't men check back with any woman they’d had sex with, to see if they'd caused a pregnancy?

How can we say men have an instinct to protect their family when there are children the world over with fathers who have no idea they exist?

It’s much easier to argue that mothers have a strong instinct to protect their families. Mothers still do the bulk (by far the bulk) of the parenting. Which means mothers do the real things that actually protect their kids every day all day long.

Men demanding guns for their role as protector-of-the-family are full of it. They are only willing to protect in make-believe instances that are never likely to happen. When asked to *actually* protect their family, by doing something like laundry, they can’t be bothered.




guns  religion  toxicmasculinity  genderroles  twitterthread  by:gabrielleblair 
10 days ago by dirtystylus
“Cat Person”
Short story about a Bad Date & depressingly familiar ego-driven masculine fragility
story  toxicmasculinity 
november 2019 by elq
Fire the bro gun – Appear Works
Protecting marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort is a guideline that can be used to think about who is being centered in a given situation and how the path is being cleared for inclusivity. A conference that creates a comfortable environment for people from under-represented backgrounds extends this guideline to protecting not just the safety, but also the experience marginalized people have at the conference.
inclusivity  diversity  conferences  safety  toxicmasculinity 
august 2019 by beep
Fascinating conversation today with Henry Rollins about and his recent review of TH…
ToxicMasculinity  from twitter_favs
june 2019 by _zakris

« earlier    

related tags

#metoo  1013  3013  ad  advice  america  amok  atlanta  atlanticmonthly  australia  autoindustry  backlash  biology  blackmen  blag  books  branding  brooklyn99  bullshit  by:gabrielleblair  by:michaelianblack  by:miri  by:tylerhuckabee  canpoli  cartoons  children  cinema  climatechange  comic  comics  communalism  communication  conferences  conservatives  cooking  cousins  creepy  criticism  crypto  dadspective  danharmon  death  denial  dgni  discrimination  diversity  documentary  donaldtrump  education  emotion  emotional  emotionalabuse  emotionalvampire  emotionalvampires  emotions  energy  environment  equity  ethics  evil  exvangelical  fallacies  families  family  fandom  feminism  films  fm4auflaut  from:brutereason  fuckboy  fuckboys  gay  geek  geekcommunity  gender  genderessentialism  genderroles  genocide  geo:unitedstates  gillette  grief  group  groups  grouptherapy  guncontrol  guns  harassment  health  heteronormativity  highschool  hiking  hollywood  identity  ijeomaoluo  impostorsyndrome  incels  inclusivity  indigenous  intervention  isolation  jordanpeterson  latecapitalism  laurie_penny  lauriepenny  lebanon  lie  loneliness  maleprivilege  mansplaining  marriage  martinheavyhead  marvel  masculinity  medium  meme  men  mentalhealth  metoo  mikehuckabee  misogyny  nativeamericans  ncp  ncpin  nct  nerds  newyorker  nyt  opinion  parenting  patriarchy  podcast  politics  popculture  programming  psychology  putin  queereye  race  racism  rape  rapeculture  reddit  rejection  religion  revengeofthenerds  rickandmorty  rightwingers  roadsafety  rossdouthat  russia  safety  science  sciencefiction  scifi  sexdifferences  sexism  sexualassault  sexualharassment  sf  siblings  socialdominanceorientation  socialmovements  society  sociology  southernbaptist  spoilers  starwars  story  subcultures  suicide  susanfowler  suvs  syria  techculture  television  terrorism  terrycrews  theguardian  thelastjedi  thenib  therapy  toread  toxic  tradition  tv  tweetthread  twitterthread  uber  unitedstates  vampire  vampires  videogames  violence  wafflehouse  webcomic  wehuntedthemammoth  whitenationalism  whitesupremacy  whitewash  womenintech  womenonly  work  workersrights 

Copy this bookmark: