totalitarianism   537

« earlier    

YouTube -- Freedomain Radio: Left-Wing Death Camps | Mike Cernovich and Stefan Molyneux
'The history of left-wing violence, forced labor camps and mass murder is often obscured by traditional media and modern academia. The body-count left in the wake of Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin and Mao Zedong illustrated the dangers of communism, socialism and totalitarian leftist ideology overall. Mike Cernovich joins Stefan Molyneux to discuss Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago and the important historical lessons which much be learned to prevent the spread of violence in modern times.'
history  illiberalism  statism  socialism  communism  totalitarianism  joycamp  StefanMolyneux 
18 hours ago by adamcrowe
Why Arendt Matters: Revisiting “The Origins of Totalitarianism” - Los Angeles Review of Books
"[T]otalitarian movements succeed when they offer rootless people what they most crave: an ideologically consistent world aiming at grand narratives that give meaning to their lives. By consistently repeating a few key ideas, a manipulative leader provides a sense of rootedness grounded upon a coherent fiction that is “consistent, comprehensible, and predictable.” (Arendt)"
totalitarianism  reality  ideology  politics  power 
yesterday by jbushnell
Why Arendt Matters: Revisiting “The Origins of Totalitarianism” - Los Angeles Review of Books
Arendt’s understanding of the origins of totalitarianism begins with her insight that mass movements are founded upon “atomized, isolated individuals.” The lonely people whom Arendt sees as the adherents of movements are not necessarily the poor or the lower classes. They are the “neutral, politically indifferent people who never join a party and hardly ever go to the polls.” They are not unintelligent and are rarely motivated by self-interest. Arendt writes that Heinrich Himmler understood these isolated individuals when he “said they were not interested in ‘everyday problems’ but only ‘in ideological questions of importance for decades and centuries, so that the man […] knows he is working for a great task which occurs but once in 2,000 years.’” The adherents of movements are not motivated by material interests; they “are obsessed by a desire to escape from reality because in their essential homelessness they can no longer bear its accidental, incomprehensible aspects.”
totalitarianism  trump  fascism 
5 days ago by craniac
YouTube -- HoneyBadgerRadio: Honey Badger Classic 3: Do men Have Empathy?
Alison: "What we have with feminism is a narrative by which the government can regard half of its population as an enemy to the other half. And not just that, it can regard any of the half that it doesn't consider the enemy – [but who don't consider themselves complicit] – as fraternizing with the enemy."
threatnarrative  feminism  statism  totalitarianism  joycamp 
7 days ago by adamcrowe
BBC Radio 4 - In Our Time, Hannah Arendt
"Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the political philosophy of Hannah Arendt. She developed many of her ideas in response to the rise of totalitarianism in the C20th, partly informed by her own experience as a Jew in Nazi Germany before her escape to France and then America. She wanted to understand how politics had taken such a disastrous turn and, drawing on ideas of Greek philosophers as well as her peers, what might be done to create a better political life. Often unsettling, she wrote of 'the banality of evil' when covering the trial of Eichmann, one of the organisers of the Holocaust."
totalitarianism  fascism  audio 
4 weeks ago by jamesshelley
Chris Hedges: The Elites Won’t Save Us - Chris Hedges - Truthdig
Thomas Mann wrote in his diary two months after the Nazis came to power that he had witnessed a revolution “without underlying ideas, against ideas, against everything nobler, better, decent, against freedom, truth and justice.” He lamented that the “common scum” had taken power “accompanied by vast rejoicing on the part of the masses.”
nazism  fascism  totalitarianism 
5 weeks ago by rdpse
YouTube -- Freedomain Radio: The Architecture of Belief | Jordan Peterson and Stefan Molyneux
'What is the reason behind the drift of western culture into empty nihilistic materialistic hedonism? Dr. Jordan Peterson joins Stefan Molyneux to discuss the complicated nature of cultural division, the reduction of personal responsibility, the danger of not "having meaning" in your life, the nature of ideology, developing a sense of efficacy in the world, suffering as an intrinsic component to human nature, the argument for free will and much more! -- Dr. Jordan Peterson is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto, a clinical psychologist and the author of “Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief.”' -- "There's nothing more vicious than a mother [socialist] who thinks that her infants [welfare-dependents] are being threatened."
ideology  illiberalism  socialism  welfare  totalitarianism  joycamp  StefanMolyneux 
5 weeks ago by adamcrowe
Anonymous Conservative -- Democrats Embrace Muslim Nazis
'...The Romans invited barbarians to hold high office, and now in our decline, our Democrats are doing the same with the Muslims. These r-selected liberals are recreating what they are designed for – existing under an oppressive leadership in a foreign land, which they migrated to in order to find r-selected free resource availability. -- Jewish Democrats who support the Muslims are clearly not acting logically. You cannot begin to imply any aspect of these political actions are based in logic. If the Muslims grow in number, as they will, the radicals will take over. The moderate Muslims will gladly let the radicals take over so all non-Muslims will be oppressed and they can enjoy an easy advantage. -- From there, it is a small leap to Holocaust 2.0, only the Muslims will likely not fail to complete the job this time around. -- All of politics is r/K Selection Theory. Logic has nothing to do with it.'
rkselectiontheory  pathologicalaltruism  treachery  conquest  theocracy  totalitarianism  joycamp 
5 weeks ago by adamcrowe
Spiked -- ‘My thinking was infected’ by Barbara Hewson
'A Canadian judge has been forced to capitulate to feminist groupthink. -- ...In an ominous move, which challenges the independence of the judiciary, Camp was disciplined because of his interpretation of the law: the ‘rape shield’ law which governs what evidence may be adduced of a complainant’s sexual activity with others. Ms A was alleged to have been flirtatious with another person at the party. He was also accused of ‘belittling’ sexual assault, simply because he showed a willingness to question the complainant’s version of events. -- Even more alarmingly, the judge faced attacks from a horde of activists who were granted intervener status in the inquiry: the Avalon Sexual Assault Centre; the Ending Violence Association of British Columbia; the Institute for the Advancement of Aboriginal Women; the Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence against Women and Children; the West Coast Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund; the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund Inc (LEAF); Women Against Violence Against Women; and the Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic. -- The CJC’s inquiry has now recommended that Camp be stripped of judicial office. It remains to be seen whether this recommendation will be submitted to the justice minister, and if so, whether Camp will challenge this in court. Only two Canadian judges have been relieved of their office since 1971. -- The 112-page report on Camp is interesting for its abject deference to feminist ideology. It found Camp guilty of unconscious bias and thoughtcrime, in essence, because he: ‘Made comments or asked questions evidencing an antipathy towards laws designed to protect vulnerable witnesses, promote equality, and bring integrity to sexual-assault trials. We also find that the judge relied on discredited myths and stereotypes about women and victim-blaming during the trial and in his Reasons for Judgement.’ -- It complains that he asked questions of the complainant ‘rooted in stereotypical, biased reasoning’. The report claims that he damaged public confidence by evincing ‘a profound failure to act with impartiality and to respect equality before the law, in a context laden with significant and widespread concern about the presence of bias and prejudice’. These are astonishing and contemptuous findings to make about a judge. -- Disturbingly, Camp was forced to grovel during this process, admitting that some of his comments were ‘insensitive’ and ‘inappropriate’. In an abject display of capitulation to feminist groupthink, he also confessed: ‘My thinking was infected.’'
feminism  threatnarrative  totalitarianism  miniluv  thoughtpolice  1984 
6 weeks ago by adamcrowe
Ed-Tech in a Time of Trump
"The thing is, I’d still be giving the much the same talk, just with a different title. “A Time of Trump” could be “A Time of Neoliberalism” or “A Time of Libertarianism” or “A Time of Algorithmic Discrimination” or “A Time of Economic Precarity.” All of this is – from President Trump to the so-called “new economy” – has been fueled to some extent by digital technologies; and that fuel, despite what I think many who work in and around education technology have long believed – have long hoped – is not necessarily (heck, even remotely) progressive."



"As Donna Haraway argues in her famous “Cyborg Manifesto,” “Feminist cyborg stories have the task of recoding communication and intelligence to subvert command and control.” I want those of us working in and with education technologies to ask if that is the task we’ve actually undertaken. Are our technologies or our stories about technologies feminist? If so, when? If so, how? Do our technologies or our stories work in the interest of justice and equity? Or, rather, have we adopted technologies for teaching and learning that are much more aligned with that military mission of command and control? The mission of the military. The mission of the church. The mission of the university.

I do think that some might hear Haraway’s framing – a call to “recode communication and intelligence” – and insist that that’s exactly what education technologies do and they do so in a progressive reshaping of traditional education institutions and practices. Education technologies facilitate communication, expanding learning networks beyond the classroom. And they boost intelligence – namely, how knowledge is created and shared.
Perhaps they do.

But do our ed-tech practices ever actually recode or subvert command and control? Do (or how do) our digital communication practices differ from those designed by the military? And most importantly, I’d say, does (or how does) our notion of intelligence?"



"This is a punch card, a paper-based method of proto-programming, one of the earliest ways in which machines could be automated. It’s a relic, a piece of “old tech,” if you will, but it’s also a political symbol. Think draft cards. Think the slogan “Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.” Think Mario Savio on the steps of Sproul Hall at UC Berkeley in 1964, insisting angrily that students not be viewed as raw materials in the university machine."



"We need to identify and we need to confront the ideas and the practices that are the lingering legacies of Nazism and fascism. We need to identify and we need to confront them in our technologies. Yes, in our education technologies. Remember: our technologies are ideas; they are practices. Now is the time for an ed-tech antifa, and I cannot believe I have to say that out loud to you.

And so you hear a lot of folks in recent months say “read Hannah Arendt.” And I don’t disagree. Read Arendt. Read The Origins of Totalitarianism. Read her reporting from the Nuremberg Trials.
But also read James Baldwin. Also realize that this politics and practice of surveillance and genocide isn’t just something we can pin on Nazi Germany. It’s actually deeply embedded in the American experience. It is part of this country as a technology."



"Who are the “undesirables” of ed-tech software and education institutions? Those students who are identified as “cheats,” perhaps. When we turn the cameras on, for example with proctoring software, those students whose faces and gestures are viewed – visually, biometrically, algorithmically – as “suspicious.” Those students who are identified as “out of place.” Not in the right major. Not in the right class. Not in the right school. Not in the right country. Those students who are identified – through surveillance and through algorithms – as “at risk.” At risk of failure. At risk of dropping out. At risk of not repaying their student loans. At risk of becoming “radicalized.” At risk of radicalizing others. What about those educators at risk of radicalizing others. Let’s be honest with ourselves, ed-tech in a time of Trump will undermine educators as well as students; it will undermine academic freedom. It’s already happening. Trump’s tweets this morning about Berkeley.

What do schools do with the capabilities of ed-tech as surveillance technology now in the time of a Trump? The proctoring software and learning analytics software and “student success” platforms all market themselves to schools claiming that they can truly “see” what students are up to, that they can predict what students will become. (“How will this student affect our averages?”) These technologies claim they can identify a “problem” student, and the implication, I think, is that then someone at the institution “fixes” her or him. Helps the student graduate. Convinces the student to leave.

But these technologies do not see students. And sadly, we do not see students. This is cultural. This is institutional. We do not see who is struggling. And let’s ask why we think, as the New York Times argued today, we need big data to make sure students graduate. Universities have not developed or maintained practices of compassion. Practices are technologies; technologies are practices. We’ve chosen computers instead of care. (When I say “we” here I mean institutions not individuals within institutions. But I mean some individuals too.) Education has chosen “command, control, intelligence.” Education gathers data about students. It quantifies students. It has adopted a racialized and gendered surveillance system – one that committed to disciplining minds and bodies – through our education technologies, through our education practices.

All along the way, or perhaps somewhere along the way, we have confused surveillance for care.

And that’s my takeaway for folks here today: when you work for a company or an institution that collects or trades data, you’re making it easy to surveil people and the stakes are high. They’re always high for the most vulnerable. By collecting so much data, you’re making it easy to discipline people. You’re making it easy to control people. You’re putting people at risk. You’re putting students at risk.

You can delete the data. You can limit its collection. You can restrict who sees it. You can inform students. You can encourage students to resist. Students have always resisted school surveillance.

But I hope that you also think about the culture of school. What sort of institutions will we have in a time of Trump? Ones that value open inquiry and academic freedom? I swear to you this: more data will not protect you. Not in this world of “alternate facts,” to be sure. Our relationships to one another, however, just might. We must rebuild institutions that value humans’ minds and lives and integrity and safety. And that means, in its current incarnation at least, in this current climate, ed-tech has very very little to offer us."
education  technology  audreywatters  edtech  2017  donaldtrump  neoliberalism  libertarianism  algorithms  neweconomy  economics  precarity  inequality  discrimination  donnaharaway  control  command  ppwer  mariosavio  nazism  fascism  antifa  jamesbaldwin  racism  hannaharendt  totalitarianism  politics 
6 weeks ago by robertogreco
Chris Hedges: American Psychosis - Chris Hedges - Truthdig
The lies create a climate in which everyone is assumed to be lying. The truth becomes suspect and obscured. Narratives begin to be believed not because they are true, or even sound true, but because they are emotionally appealing. The aim of systematic lying, as Arendt wrote, is the “transformation of human nature itself.” The lies eventually foster somnambulism among a population that surrenders to the magical thinking and ceases to care. It checks out. It becomes cynical. It only asks to be entertained and given a vent for its frustration and rage. Demagogues produce enemies the way a magician pulls rabbits out of a hat. They wage constant battles against nonexistent dangers, rapidly replacing one after the other to keep the rhetoric at a fever pitch.

“Practically speaking, the totalitarian ruler proceeds like a man who persistently insults another man until everybody knows that the latter is his enemy, so that he can, with some plausibility, go out and kill him in self-defense,” Arendt wrote. “This certainly is a little crude, but it works—as everybody will know who has ever watched how certain successful careerists eliminate competitors.”
politics  Trump  chris_hedges  totalitarianism 
7 weeks ago by jstenner
Loretta Napoleoni -- Sara Khan: The Battle within Islam BBC4
['On Start the Week Tom Sutcliffe discusses what Islam means in the modern world. Graeme Wood has spent his career getting to know Islamist fundamentalists to try to understand the apocalyptic ideology and theology at the heart of the so-called Islamic State. Sara Khan campaigns to reclaim her faith from extremism, while Ziauddin Sardar argues that Islam demands reason and critical inquiry from its believers. Loretta Napoleoni 'follows the money' to uncover the millions made by those exploiting the destabilisation of Syria and Iraq and the rise of ISIS.' http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b088b855]
ideology  conquest  religion  theocracy  fundamentalism  totalitarianism 
8 weeks ago by adamcrowe
Populism and Totalitarianism
Roger Berkowitz compares Hannah Arendts comments about populism and totalitarianism to Trumps rhetoric.
populism  totalitarianism  trump  arendt  politics 
8 weeks ago by pascalglatz

« earlier    

related tags

1960  1984  1st-amendment  2014  2015  2016-03  2016-11  2016-12  2016  2017  20th_century  21st_century  abuse  activism  albania  algorithms  antifa  arendt  armenia  arrendt  art  ashgabat  assange  assassination  audio  audreywatters  author:adamgopnik  author:virgilgriffith  authoritarianism  autocracy  awrinkleintime  azerbaijan  baiku  baumanzygmunt  belarus  benfritz  bigdata  billbrowder  book  books-non-fiction  branding  c19  camazotz  capitalism  catherinehand  censorship  change  charlottejonesvoiklis  china  chris_hedges  christianity  command  communism  conflict  conquest  conservatism  conspiracytheory  control  convert  corporatism  corruption  coup  crimestop  critique  croatia  culture  data  dc:creator=ecoumberto  dctagged  democracy  dictatorship  discrimination  disruption  documentary  donald-trump  donald_trump  donaldtrump  donnaharaway  economics  economist  edtech  education  election  elections  elitism  emotions  empathy  encryption  environment  eritrea  estonia  ethics  europe  europeangames  extremism  facebook  farrarstrauss  fascism  fear  feminism  fidelcastro  financialtimes  forecast  foreignpolicy  france  franco  free  freedom  freedomhouse  freespeech  fundamentalism  future  gambia  gamertheory  games  gamification  gaslighting  genocide  gentrification  georgia  germany  goebbels  goodthink  google  guardian  hannah.arendt  hannah  hannaharendt  hedges  higher_education  historians  history  hitler  hong-kong  human  humanrights  hungary  identity  ideology  illiberalism  impact  independent  inequality  internationalrelations  internetofthings  isis  italy  jamesbaldwin  japan  jenniferlee  jews  johnfarrar  journalism  joycamp  julianassange  karendawisha  kazakhstan  khrushchev  korea  kurzweil  kyrgyzstan  la-review-of-books  la_review  labour  language  latvia  law  leadershipcults  learninganalytics  leftism  liberal_arts  liberalism  libertarianism  liberty  literature  lithuania  livejournal  localism  macedonia  machismo  madeleinel'engle  magnitogorsk  maotsetung  mariosavio  marxism  medium  memo  miao  middleclass  migrants  mikhaillesin  miniluv  minitrue  miscellany  moldova  montenegro  murder  mussolini  naomiwood  narcissism  nationalism  nazi  nazis  nazism  neoliberalism  neweconomy  newrepublic  newyorker  oliverstone  olympics  online  oppression  panopticon  pariahs  pathologicalaltruism  pearson  peterpomerantsev  philosophy  picasso  pokemon  pokemongo  poland  police  policy  political_science  politicalcorrectness  politicaltheory  politics  pollution  populism  poverty  power  ppwer  precarity  presidenttrump  privacy  propaganda  protest  psychohistory  psychology  public_sphere  putin  quantifiedself  queue  racism  ranking  reality  rebeccastead  refugee  refugees  religion  resistance  review  revolution  rights  rkselectiontheory  romania  russia  sacrifice  scapegoating  school  secrecy  security  seoul  serbia  sesamecredit  simcity  slavespeak  slovakia  slovenia  smartphones  social-media  social_movements  socialism  socialmedia  southkorea  soviet_union  sovietunion  spain  speech  sport  stalin  stalinism  statism  stefanmolyneux  stone  subversive  surveillance  suzannebray  tajikistan  technology  techpinions  terrorism  theatlantic  theocracy  thoughtcrime  thoughtpolice  threatnarrative  time  toinstapaper  tor  torture  tradition  treachery  trump  tudors  turkey  turkmenistan  ukraine  uncertainty  united-states  urbandevelopment  us  us_politics  usa  usefulidiot  uzbekistan  varlamov  vk  vkontacte  vladimirputin  war  washingtonpost  welfare  work  world_history  writing  xenophobia  zeit 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: