totalitarianism   553

« earlier    

Aeon Essays -- [Terror, Love and Brainwashing: Attachment in Cults and Totalitarian Systems] by Alexandra Stein
'...For a totalist system to wield complete control, the leader must tap fear – this is the fourth element of totalism. The process of brainwashing that totalist systems engage in is one of psychological, coercive manipulation where the leader or group alternates terror with ‘love’. Bowlby said that when we are frightened, we don’t simply run away from the fear, but run to a safe haven, ‘to someone…’ – and that someone is usually a person to whom we feel attached. But when the supposed safe haven is also the source of the fear, then running to that person is a failing strategy, causing the frightened person to freeze, trapped between approach and avoidance. -- Mary Main, the renowned attachment researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, called this type of fear-based relationship ‘disorganised attachment’. This has a two-fold result: a confused emotional bonding to the source of fear in a failed attempt to seek comfort, and a cognitive dissociation, that is, the inability to think about one’s feelings. Fear or stress without escape – ‘fright without solution’, as attachment researchers refer to it – is a traumatic state that derails a person’s ability to think logically and clearly about the situation and therefore to take action to resolve it. Further, never achieving safety from the threat, they will keep returning to the relationship trying to gain that safety. Having disabled logical thinking about the traumatic relationship, the leader can then introduce even more of the fictitious ideology to explain away and redirect the follower’s terror. -- It’s a positive feedback loop with a biochemical element: physiologically, the victim is engaged in an effort to manage their cortisol or anxiety levels by seeking proximity to a safe haven, but never succeeding in attaining adequate comfort. It is for this reason that we can predict that cultic systems will attempt to interfere with and control any alternative attachment relationships a person might have. To fail to do so would allow the follower to find a safe haven elsewhere and potentially escape the emotional and cognitive control of the group. This is the same thing we see in controlling relationships such as in cases of domestic violence, of the Stockholm Syndrome or, frequently, with pimps and prostitutes, as well as in human trafficking. -- ... Every day in the media we can see the destructive power of this coercive psychological control put in place by pathological leaders. Whether it is parents who neglect or abuse children under a leader’s command, or terrorist fighters who blow themselves up for a fictional liberation, or parishioners impoverished by so-called ‘prosperity’ preachers, getting people to this point requires the conditions and processes I have outlined here. Once this fear-based control is in place, it is quite difficult to break: the follower’s dissociation and disorganised emotional attachment to the leader or group makes it extremely difficult to look clearly at what is happening. In fact, any attempt to do so only creates more fear, causing further disorganised bonding to the group to attempt to ease the stress.' -- It's hard to get enough of something that almost works. ~ Vincent Felitti
psychology  attachment  cults  totalitarianism  brainwashing  doublebind  stockholmsyndrome  addiction 
4 days ago by adamcrowe
Thinking and Friendship in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt for Now | On Being
[via: https://www.instagram.com/p/BUht-yij3OyVQraCWufQICDNRQbRNmhMZd0s_M0/

"Still thinking about the recent @onbeing podcast with historian Lyndsey Stonebridge talking about the new/old/new wisdom of Hannah Arendt. Cannot recommend highly enough: the "organized loneliness" of totalitarianism, the limits of empathy as commonly defined, on refugees and belonging, on the theater of politics and neighborly love. Gonna have to re-listen with a notebook in hand."]

"MS. TIPPETT: I think, just for me, rereading The Origins of Totalitarianism, dipping back into her after quite a few years, that she wasn’t just — this is not historical. It’s not history-telling. It’s really delving into the human essence of what we experience and analyze as political historical events.

But something that struck me so much that I’d forgotten is this idea about the isolation of — that she wrote, “What prepares men for a totalitarian domination” — and here, again, is what happens in the human heart and psyche and society that makes these things possible — “is the fact that loneliness, once a borderline experience, usually suffered in certain marginal social conditions like old age, has become an everyday experience of the ever-growing masses of our century.”

And if I think about the Brexit experience in the UK, and I think about this last presidential election in the US, so much of the dynamic were human beings who had felt unseen and feel disconnected. It’s that language, she says, “atomized, isolated individuals.”

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Yeah. And she makes a further distinction in the last chapter of Origins of Totalitarianism, which she wrote later, between uprootedness, which is what people — since the Industrial Revolution, this has happened, but obviously, it’s got worse — and in periods of economic crisis, it gets far worse — is not feeling recognized, not feeling at home. So it’s a kind of malaise about rootedness. And then she contrasts and compares with superfluousness, which is not being not being treated like you’re in the world at all.

And that was the camps, and that is the refugee camps. So there’s this awful relationship between the uprooted of the world, in Europe, in the States, and the new superfluous of the world, which she understood very well because she was one of the superfluous of the world in the 1940s. So I think she was very interested in that relationship. And I think you’re absolutely right; the loneliness is absolutely crucial, but it’s the question of how we imagine a response to that. I think it’s very interesting — I discovered recently that Hannah Arendt taught George Orwell’s 1984 to Berkeley undergraduates in 1955. [laughs]

MS. TIPPETT: [laughs] Another new bestseller.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Exactly. Another new — and what would one give to have been in that classroom?

MS. TIPPETT: [laughs] Right.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Maybe your listeners were in Berkeley in 1955 being taught 1984 by Hannah Arendt. [laughs] I would love to hear. And she had — I think she read the novel earlier because she started rewriting the last chapter of Origins of Totalitarianism. So she’s getting that kind of analysis off Orwell. She’s in dialogue with Orwell, who’s, of course, dead by then. And he’s saying, “Actually, this is what happens.” The visional title of 1984 was The Last Man in Europe. I mean, if you can hear the Brexit resonance. [laughs]

MS. TIPPETT: Yeah.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: The Last Man in Europe. And the loneliness. And the reason why Winston Smith is so drawn to Big Brother in the end is he cannot bear being alone. And I think you’re absolutely right. Listening to that cri de cœur, that cry of the heart around not having a place to go. But I, on the other hand — she would have been, I think, very cautious of having too ready answers to what you do with that dilemma.

I mean, she’d been very, very suspicious of throwing up another worldview or ideology to end the loneliness or very — I think she’d be very impatient with the way that those of us who are trying to react to our current scenarios, both in the UK and the US, are either turning on each other, or blaming the liberal elite, or blaming high capitalism, or blaming whatever. Making people un-lonely is a good project, but how that’s going to happen, what politics you need for that to happen is going to be a very, very hard question.

MS. TIPPETT: Right. Or even if politics is the place where that would start, if it would be a political project, which is a different kind of question to raise in the 21st century than it was in the 20th century…

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Absolutely.

MS. TIPPETT: And that is something I wanted to ask you also because she had this insistence that people should be more political, which meant one thing for her, and maybe this is a way in which the foundation on which that idea was based in her century is so different. I mean, because politics itself is called into question in a different way as part of our crisis.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Yeah. I was very interested about your question about imagination because I think we talk a lot today about empathy and suffering. And I’m like Arendt. I’m always a bit wary. It sounds like a terrible thing to say. I’m really a bit wary about empathy. [laughs] I really don’t know about this.

MS. TIPPETT: I wanted to ask you about that because when we talk — talking about loneliness, as we’re discussing it in the context of her work, it’s clearly the human condition, and it can be a personal experience. But it’s not talking about loneliness as something that, if we can be compassionate towards each other’s loneliness, things will get better.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Well, I think for her — I mean, she was critical of pity, and she wrote very famously in her On Revolution book that what she didn’t like about pity is it kept the power relationship. Other people’s suffering for the one who’s doing the pitying or the empathizing keeps the power.

And also, she didn’t like it because once you have suffering as your ground zero, you can allow for anything in the name to end that suffering. And that was the tragedy for her of the French Revolution. We have to be piteous in order to save the suffering people. And she’s thinking about what it’s like to imagine not being in the place you’re in, to be imagine to be in the place of another.

And that’s slightly different from pity, and it’s a slightly different take from empathy, because it involves something a bit harder, actually. [laughs] So when she’s teaching to Berkeley students in 1955, she says, “Imagine what it was like to have the political experience of a European, which is an experience totally unlike yours.” And then she puts in brackets, “A bit like mine, but totally unlike yours.” [laughs]

MS. TIPPETT: [laughs] Right.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Which I thought was very sweet given what she’d just been through. And I think it’s that kind of — what she says to do is not just to empathize, but which is to actually build blueprints, or worlds, or frames for understanding experience that is not ours, that cannot be incorporated into ours. So why I think it’s different from empathy or pity is, when you are imagining — because you’re imagining to be empathetic or to share suffering — you’re immediately incorporating that experience into a view of yourself and your own worldview.

What Arendt wanted was actually something a bit more radical than that, is to imagine something that’s not your world, that makes you feel uncomfortable. And that’s where the work has to start. And that’s why she was also very committed to thinking. [laughs]

MS. TIPPETT: Right.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: To the activity of thinking.

MS. TIPPETT: Yes. And…

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Which is how you do that.

MS. TIPPETT: Which is how you do that. Right. And honestly, Americans have a very conflicted kind of relationship, historically and philosophically, with thought and ideas. It’s a different thing than it was, for example, in the Germany that Hannah Arendt was raised in. The power of ideas. But it feels to me like there might be a receptivity now precisely because we see that it’s not getting us anywhere to be meeting my emotion with your emotion. Her — as you say, you can only have moral imagination if you also think, if you are thinking.

You talked in this podcast I heard you in that brought me to you, In Our Time, about how she always talked about the dialogue we have in our heads, that we are constantly working out what it means to be human, to be a person, whether we realize it or not."



"MS. TIPPETT: So one of her famous phrases is the “banality of evil,” which was an observation she made about Eichmann, and that was controversial. But you said something about the bureaucratization, which was part of that banality, a refuge for — instead of thinking, you are part of the system, and you follow the rules, and you enact the rules.

And again, not to — I really would not compare Eichmann to anyone alive right now in full, but the revulsion and the sense of alienation people all over the place have from bureaucracy, which in our age is globalized, right? The way the phrase “the government” will be received in many places in the US, the way the phrase “the EU” is received in England, there are echoes of something that goes wrong — something that goes wrong in human societies that were still with us or we’re feeling again. I don’t know.

MS. STONEBRIDGE: Yeah, I think it’s — one of the first things Arendt did when she finally got to New York, one of her first jobs was to help edit Kafka’s diaries. You remember the story of The Castle near the stranger is kind of a — it’s certainly a migrant story. You know, stranger arrives in a new place, he comes for work, and then he can’t work out what’s going on, and he can’t settle, and he’s blocked by this … [more]
hannahjarendt  via:ablerism  kristatippett  2017  lyndseystonebridge  totalitarianism  empathy  refugees  belonging  politics  neighborliness  love  organizedloneliness  thinking  howwethink  acitivism  activists  isonomia  liberty  freedom 
4 weeks ago by robertogreco
Anonymous Conservative -- Venezuelan - So We Are In A Dictatorship Now
'...Meanwhile as the opposition masses, Maduro is arming militias: "As Venezuela’s center-right opposition prepares to stage “the mother of all marches” Wednesday to protest President Nicolas Maduro’s efforts to consolidate power, the besieged leader has called for a countermarch and declared plans to expand the country’s civilian militias. -- Maduro, speaking to thousands to uniformed militia members assembled Monday at the presidential palace in Caracas, said they must determine whether they are “with the homeland or with the betrayal of the homeland.” -- The president announced a goal to ramp up their ranks to half a million, from the current 100,000, and to arm each with a gun." -- There is only one thing to do at that point, and that is to join the militia, get your gun, and wait for the batsign to revolt. -- Once you reach this point with a leftist, there is no reasoning with them. They are operating fully on amygdala, and they will do anything to hold onto power. Only a greater threat to their well being would make them change tack. -- At this point, Venezuela will either violently revolt, enjoy a military coup, or they will descend into a perpetual morass of failure under a delusional leftist who has no idea how to produce success. Worse, they will come to understand the murderous insecurity which will prevent him from ever honestly acknowledging his shortcomings, no matter how many people he has to kill to maintain the charade. -- Never say it could not happen here. The tide of K is rising all over the world. What you see over there will eventually arrive over here – it is the way of nations. The advantages we will have are two-fold. Americans have an aggression you don’t see elsewhere, and it is likely that by the time that overt move by the establishment happens, the economic Apocalypse will be upon us. And a government without money cannot exert control against an armed populace. Stop the money and you stop the government – if you have the guns.'
rkselectiontheory  socialism  authoritarianism  totalitarianism  venezuela 
9 weeks ago by adamcrowe
Fake social media posts aim to distract | Harvard Magazine
More surprising, the purpose of these fabricated posts is not to argue with other social-media users, but to distract them. To perform the study, King and his two coauthors—Jennifer Pan, Ph.D. ’15, and Margaret Roberts, Ph.D. ’14—analyzed a trove of leaked emails sent between local government offices and the propaganda department in one county in southeastern China. “A big giant mess of a dataset,” King recalls, from which the researchers harvested nearly 44,000 fabricated social-media posts from 2013 and 2014. Across all of China, they calculated, that suggests about 450 million posts per year. In those King and his team read, 50-cent party members “are not arguing with anybody at all,” he says. They don’t jump into fights when other users complain about the regime’s repressions or corruption among local officials. 
socialmedia  politics  dissent  totalitarianism  China  research  review  HarvardMagazine  2017 
9 weeks ago by inspiral
YouTube -- Freedomain Radio: Left-Wing Death Camps | Mike Cernovich and Stefan Molyneux
'The history of left-wing violence, forced labor camps and mass murder is often obscured by traditional media and modern academia. The body-count left in the wake of Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin and Mao Zedong illustrated the dangers of communism, socialism and totalitarian leftist ideology overall. Mike Cernovich joins Stefan Molyneux to discuss Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago and the important historical lessons which much be learned to prevent the spread of violence in modern times.'
history  illiberalism  statism  socialism  communism  totalitarianism  joycamp  StefanMolyneux 
march 2017 by adamcrowe
Why Arendt Matters: Revisiting “The Origins of Totalitarianism” - Los Angeles Review of Books
"[T]otalitarian movements succeed when they offer rootless people what they most crave: an ideologically consistent world aiming at grand narratives that give meaning to their lives. By consistently repeating a few key ideas, a manipulative leader provides a sense of rootedness grounded upon a coherent fiction that is “consistent, comprehensible, and predictable.” (Arendt)"
totalitarianism  reality  ideology  politics  power 
march 2017 by jbushnell
YouTube -- HoneyBadgerRadio: Honey Badger Classic 3: Do men Have Empathy?
Alison: "What we have with feminism is a narrative by which the government can regard half of its population as an enemy to the other half. And not just that, it can regard any of the half that it doesn't consider the enemy – [but who don't consider themselves complicit] – as fraternizing with the enemy."
threatnarrative  feminism  statism  totalitarianism  joycamp 
march 2017 by adamcrowe

« earlier    

related tags

1984  1st-amendment  2015  2016-03  2016-11  2016-12  2016  2017  20th_century  21st_century  abuse  acitivism  activism  activists  addiction  albania  algorithms  antifa  arendt  armenia  arrendt  art  ashgabat  assange  assassination  attachment  audio  audreywatters  author--hannah.arendt  author:adamgopnik  author:virgilgriffith  authoritarianism  autocracy  azerbaijan  baumanzygmunt  bbc  belarus  belonging  bigdata  book  books  brainwashing  branding  c19  caliphate  capitalism  censorship  change  china  chris_hedges  christianity  command  communism  conflict  conquest  conservatism  conspiracytheory  control  corporatism  crimestop  critique  croatia  cults  culture  data  dc:creator=butlerjames  dc:creator=ecoumberto  dctagged  democracy  dictatorship  discrimination  dissent  documentary  donald-trump  donald_trump  donaldtrump  donnaharaway  doublebind  dystopia  economics  economist  edtech  education  election  elections  elitism  emotions  empathy  encryption  environment  eritrea  estonia  ethics  europe  extremism  facebook  fascism  fear  feminism  forecast  france  franco  free  freedom  freedomhouse  freespeech  fundamentalism  future  gamertheory  games  gamification  gaslighting  genocide  gentrification  georgia  germany  goebbels  goodthink  google  guardian  hannah-arendt  hannah.arendt  hannah  hannaharendt  hannahjarendt  harvardmagazine  hedges  higher_education  historians  history  hitler  hong-kong  howwethink  human  hungary  identity  ideology  illiberalism  independent  inequality  internationalrelations  internetofthings  iraq  isis  islamicstate  islamism  isonomia  italy  jamesbaldwin  jews  journalism  joycamp  julianassange  kazakhstan  kimjongil  korea  kristatippett  kurzweil  kyrgyzstan  la-review-of-books  la_review  labour  laclauernesto  language  lareviewofbooks  latvia  law  leadershipcults  leftism  liberal_arts  liberalism  libertarianism  liberty  lithuania  livejournal  localism  longreads  love  lyndseystonebridge  macedonia  machismo  magnitogorsk  management  mariosavio  marxism  medium  meta:tagged  middleclass  migrants  mikhaillesin  mind  miniluv  minitrue  miscellany  moldova  montenegro  mosul  murder  mussolini  narcissism  nationalism  nazi  nazis  nazism  neighborliness  neoliberalism  neweconomy  newrepublic  newyorker  northkorea  novara  oliverstone  olympics  online  organizedloneliness  pariahs  pathologicalaltruism  pc  philosophy  picasso  podemos  pokemon  pokemongo  poland  policy  political_science  politicalcorrectness  politicaltheory  politics  pollution  populism  power  ppwer  precarity  presidenttrump  privacy  propaganda  protest  psychohistory  psychology  public_sphere  putin  quantifiedself  racism  ranking  reality  refugee  refugees  religion  research  resistance  review  revolution  rights  rkselectiontheory  romania  russia  scapegoating  school  security  seoul  serbia  sesamecredit  share  simcity  slavespeak  slovakia  slovenia  social-media  social_movements  socialism  socialmedia  southkorea  soviet_union  spain  speech  sport  stalin  stalinism  statism  stefanmolyneux  stockholmsyndrome  stone  subversive  surveillance  tajikistan  technocracy  technology  terrorism  theatlantic  theleft  theocracy  thinking  thoughtcrime  thoughtpolice  threatnarrative  time  toinstapaper  tor  tradition  treachery  trump  turkey  turkmenistan  tyranny_versus_liberty  ukraine  uncertainty  united-states  urbandevelopment  us  us_politics  usa  usefulidiot  uzbekistan  varlamov  venezuela  video  vk  vkontacte  vladimirputin  war  welfare  work  world_history  writing  xenophobia  youth 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: